Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Fatigue crack detection in welded structural components of steel bridges using artificial neural network

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Under the cyclic traffic loads, welded structural components of steel bridges may encounter fatigue, which can cause a shorter service life and lead to fracture. A precise fatigue life prediction of structural components requires an accurate collection of stress cycles of the respective component. The density of sensors installed for monitoring the component and the distance to the concentrated stress areas are the features, which impact the efficacy of the estimated fatigue life. In this study, a platform is developed for the data-driven fatigue assessment of welded structural components of steel bridges, using artificial neural networks (ANN). The proposed algorithm is implemented for a case study, vertical lift truss bridge, the Memorial Bridge, Portsmouth, NH. A 12-month data collection period is utilized for the algorithm, from the long-term SHM program of the bridge. The stress cycles are used to estimate fatigue responses of an instrumented structural component of the bridge and determine the correlation between the estimated fatigue responses at the instrumentation plan. Additionally, a validated finite element model of the bridge is utilized to investigate fatigue responses in the unhealthy condition of the objective component. Therefore, multiple physical damage cases are simulated to compute the damage-induced stresses and the resulting fatigue life. The healthy and damaged fatigue responses are the ANN inputs, to detect crack-induced variation in the estimated fatigue responses at the instrumented locations. It is demonstrated that the proposed damage detection method can effectively detect possible fatigue cracks using a detailed database of damaged and healthy fatigue damage indices for training ANNs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Farrar CR, Worden K (2012) Structural health monitoring: a machine learning perspective. Wileya, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Sohn H, Farrar CR, Hunter NF, Worden K (2001) Structural health monitoring using statistical pattern recognition techniques. J Dyn Syst Meas Control Spec Issue Identif Mech Syst 123(4):706–711. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1410933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fisher JW, Roy S (2015) Fatigue damage in steel bridges and extending their life. Adv Steel Res (Adv Steel Constr) 11(3):250–268

    Google Scholar 

  4. Leander J (2013) Refining the fatigue assessment procedure of existing steel bridges. Ph.D. Dissertation. Stockholm: KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 2013

  5. Adeli H (2001) Neural networks in civil engineering. Comput Aided Civ Infrastruct Eng 16(2):126–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/0885-9507.00219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Catbas FN, Susoy M, Frangopol DM (2008) Structural health monitoring and reliability estimation: long span truss bridge application with environmental monitoring data. Eng Struct 30(9):2347–2359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ghannadi P, Kourehli SS (2019) Data-driven method of damage detection using sparse sensors installation by SEREP. J Civ Struct Health Monit 9(4):459–475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-019-00345-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Amezquita‐Sanchez JP, Adeli H (2015) Feature extraction and classification techniques for health monitoring of structures. Sci Iran 1931–1940

  9. Gu J, Gul M, Wu X (2017) Damage detection under varying temperature using artificial neural networks. Struct Control Health Monit. 24(11):e1198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. EftekharAzam S, Rageh A, Linzell D (2019) Damage detection in structural systems utilizing artificial neural networks and proper orthogonal decomposition. Struct Control Health Monit 26(2):e2288. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Azimi M, DadrasEslamlou A, Peckan G (2020) Data-driven structural health monitoring and damage detection through deep learning: state-of-the-art review. Sensors 20(10):2778. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20102778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Karimian SF, Moradi R, Cofre-Martel S, Groth KM, Modarres M (2020) Neural network and particle filtering: a hybrid framework for crack propagation prediction. Signal Process 2004

  13. Kang J, Hoi B, Lee K, Kim J, Kim K (2006) Neural network application in fatigue damage analysis under multiaxial random loadings. Int J Fatigue 28(2):132–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fathalla E, Tanaka Y, Maekawa K (2018) Remaining fatigue life assessment of in-service road bridge decks based upon artificial neural networks. Eng Struct 171:602–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.05.122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Durodola JF, Ramachandra S, Gerguri S et al (2018) Artificial neural network for random fatigue loading analysis including the effect of mean stress. Int J Fatigue 111:321–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhan Z, Li H (2021) Machine learning based fatigue life prediction with effects of additive manufacturing process parameters for printed SS 316L. Int J Fatigue 142:105941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rageh A, Azam SE, Linzell DG (2020) Steel railway bridge fatigue damage detection using numerical models and machine learning: mitigating influence of modeling uncertainty. Int J Fatigue 134:105458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.105458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yan F, Chen W, Lin Z (2016) Prediction of fatigue life of welded details in cable-stayed orthotropic steel deck bridges. Eng Struct 127:344–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.08.055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Leander J (2018) Fatigue life prediction of steel bridges using a small scale monitoring system. Stockholm. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-238718.

  20. Xu Y, Bao Y, Chen J, Zuo W, Li H (2019) Surface fatigue crack identification in steel box girder of bridges by a deep fusion convolutional neural network based on consumer-grade camera images. Struct Health Monit 18:653–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang B, Xie L, Song J, Zhao B, Li C, Zhao Z (2021) Curved fatigue crack growth prediction under variable amplitude loading by artificial neural network. Int J Fatigue 142:105886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Downing SD, Socie DF (1982) Simple Rainflow counting algorithms. Int J Fatigue 4(1):31–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Miner MA (1945) Cumulative damage in fatigue. J Appl Mech 12(3):A159–A164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. AASHTO (2017) ASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications, 8th edn. AASHTO, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  25. Paris P, Erdogan F (1963) A critical analysis of crack propagation laws. J Basic Eng 85(4):528–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Guo T, Li A, Wang H (2008) Influence of ambient temperature on the fatigue damage of welded bridge decks. Int J Fatigue 30(6):1092–1102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.08.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Chiewanichakorn M, Aref AJ, Alampali S (2007) Dynamic and fatigue response of a truss bridge with fiber reinforced polymer deck. Int J Fatigue 29:1475–1489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Waszczyszyn Z (1999) Fundamentals of artificial neural networks. In: Waszczyszyn Z (ed) Neural networks in the analysis and design of structures. Springer, Vienna, pp 1–51

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Gope D, Gope PC, Thakur A, Yadav A (2015) Application of artificial neural network for predicting crack growth direction in multiple cracks geometry. Appl Soft Comput 30:514–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Adams T, Mashayekhizadeh M, Santinni-Bell E, Wosnik M, Baldwin K, Fu T (2017) Structural response monitoring of a vertical lift Truss Bridge. In: 96th Annual Meeting. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.

  31. Mashayekhizadeh M, Santini-Bell E, Adams T (2017) Instrumentation and structural health monitoring of a vertical lift bridge. Processings of 27th ASNT Research Symposuim, Jacksonville

  32. Alampalli S, Ettouney MM, Agrawal AK (2005) Structural Health Monitoring for Bridge Maintenance. Bridge Struct 1:345–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Mashayekhi M, Santini-Bell E (2018) Three-dimensional multiscale finite element models for in-service performance assessment of bridges. Comput Aided Civil Infrastruct Eng 34(5):385–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Shahsavari V, Mashayekhi M, Mehrkash M, Santini-Bell E (2019) Diagnostic testing of a vertical lift truss bridge for model verification and decision-making support. Front Built Environ (Front) 5:92. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2019.00092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Mashayekhi M, Santini-Bell E (2020) Fatigue assessment of a complex welded steel bridge connection utilizing a three-dimensional multi-scale finite element model and hotspot stress method. Eng Struct 214:110624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Rageh A, Linzell DG, EftekharAzam S (2018) Automated, strain-based, output-only bridge damage detection. J Civil Struct Health Monit 8:833–846. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-018-0311-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Tchemodanova SP, Mashayekhi M, Sanayei M, Santini Bell E (2021) Multiaxial fatigue assessment of complex steel connections: a case study of a vertical-lift gussetless truss bridge. Eng Struct 235:111996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Agathos K, Chatzi E, Bordas SPA, Talaslidis D (2016) A well-conditioned and optimally convergent XFEM for 3D linear elastic fracture. Int J Numer Methods Eng 105(9):643–677

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  39. Belytschko T, Black T (1999) Elastic crack growth in finite elements with minimal remeshing. Int J Numer Methods Eng 45:601–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Chena D, Lib G, Wangb Y, Xiaoa Q (2019) Research on fatigue crack propagation of a T-joint based on XFEM and TSA. Eng Fract Mech 222:106707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.106707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Barsom, J. 1976. Fatigue crack growth under variable-amplitude loading in various bridge steels. In: Wei R, Stephens R (eds) Fatigue crack growth under spectrum loads, pp 217–232. ASTM International, West Conshohocken. https://doi.org/10.1520/STP33374S

  42. Bucar T, Nagode M, Fajdiga M (2006) A neural network approach to describing the scatter of S-N curves. Int J Fatigue 28:311–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. MathWorks (2017) Create, train, and simulate shallow and deep learning. https://www.mathworks.com/products/neural-network.html

  44. Neves AC, González I, Leander J, Karoumi R (2017) Structural health monitoring of bridges: a model-free ANN-based approach to damage detection. J Civil Struct Health Monit 7:689–702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-017-0252-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Abedin M, Mehrabi AB (2019) Novel approaches for fracture detection in steel girder bridges. Infrastructures 4:42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Weinstein JC, Sanayei M, Brenner BR (2018) Bridge damage identification using artificial neural networks. J Bridge Eng. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Nguyen D, Widrow B (1990) Improving the learning speed of 2-layer neural networks by choosing initial values of the adaptive weights. 1990 IJCNN International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, 1990, pp 21–26, vol 3. https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCNN.1990.137819

Download references

Acknowledgements

This material is based upon work partially supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 1430260, FHWA AID: DEMO Program and funding from the NHDOT Research Advisory Council. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. The research team is also grateful to HNTB Corporation, in particular, Ted Zoli, for sharing design information on the Memorial Bridge.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA

    Maryam Mashayekhi, Erin Santini-Bell & Saeed Eftekhar Azam

Authors
  1. Maryam Mashayekhi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Erin Santini-Bell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Saeed Eftekhar Azam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maryam Mashayekhi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mashayekhi, M., Santini-Bell, E. & Eftekhar Azam, S. Fatigue crack detection in welded structural components of steel bridges using artificial neural network. J Civil Struct Health Monit 11, 931–947 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-021-00488-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-021-00488-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation