Advertisement

Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring

, Volume 8, Issue 4, pp 607–615 | Cite as

Composite panel structural health monitoring and failure analysis under compression using acoustic emission

  • L. Michalcová
  • P. Bělský
  • L. Petrusová
Original Paper

Abstract

This paper documents an application of the acoustic emission (AE) method for structural health monitoring (SHM) of an integrally stiffened composite panel. The panel consists of a skin and two T-stringers and represents a typical part of the wing or fuselage structure. Similar design is used in civil structure parts. Quasi-static loading under compression was carried out to determine the initiation of the buckling modes. Two pieces of integral panels were tested up to failure. Both panels were monitored using 9 AE sensors in the same configuration throughout the test. The final stage of the test was recorded with a high-speed camera to obtain a detailed view of failure development. The velocity of the propagated AE elastic waves was determined experimentally before the test based on the best match of the computed and real positions of the Hsu–Nielsen sources. The determined velocity was subsequently used for AE source localization during the compression test. Different failure mechanisms were directly linked to different sources of AE using cluster analysis. Visualization of the AE location clusters was performed via the Kernel density estimation. High-speed camera images confirmed that the location of failure corresponds with the localization of a specific cluster of AE events. The AE method demonstrated the detection capability of the critical spot at 87% of the panel strength in compression. In conclusion, AE is suitable as an SHM method for damage monitoring of aerospace composite structures as well as for applications in civil structures.

Keywords

Acoustic emission Compression test Cluster analysis Failure mechanisms Source localization 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author gratefully thanks all his colleagues.

Funding

This work was funded by the Ministry of Industry and Trade of the Czech Republic in the framework of institutional support of research organisations.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Military Handbook-MIL-HDBK-17-3F: Composite Materials Handbook, Volume 3-polymer matrix composites materials usage, design, and analysisGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rose JL (2014) Ultrasonic guided waves in solid media. Cambridge University Press, New York. ISBN 11-070-4895-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Giurgiutiu V (2016) Structural health monitoring of aerospace composites. Elsevier, London. ISBN 978-0-12-409605-9Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ruzek R, Kudrna P, Kadlec M, Karachalios V, Tserpes KI (2014) Strain and damage monitoring in CFRP fuselage panels using fiber Bragg grating sensors. Part II: mechanical testing and validation. Compos Struct 107:737–744.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.09.056. ISSN 02638223
  5. 5.
    Miskiewicz M, Pyrzowski L, Chroscielewski J, Wilde K (2016) Structural health monitoring of composite shell footbridge for its design validation. 2016 Baltic Geodetic Congress.  https://doi.org/10.1109/bgc.geomatics.2016.48 Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Crivelli D, Guagliano M, Eaton M, Pearson M, Al-Jumaili S, Holford K, Pullin R (2015) Localisation and identification of fatigue matrix cracking and delamination in a carbon fibre panel by acoustic emission. Compos Part B Eng 74:1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.12.032. ISSN 13598368
  7. 7.
    Mccrory JP, Al-Jumaili S, Crivelli D et al (2015) Damage classification in carbon fibre composites using acoustic emission: a comparison of three techniques. Compos Part B Eng 68:424–430.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.08.046. ISSN 13598368
  8. 8.
    Eaton M (2008) Acoustic emission (AE) monitoring of buckling and failure in carbon fibre composite structures. Ph. D. thesis. Cardiff university, Cardiff. https://orca.cf.ac.uk/54625/1/U585014.pdf. Assessed 09 May 2017
  9. 9.
    Bohse J. Acoustic emission examination of polymer-matrix composites. BAM, Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing Unter den Eichen 87, D-12200 Berlin, Germany. http://www.ndt.net/article/jae/papers/22-208.pdf. Assessed 09 May 2017
  10. 10.
    Holford K, Pullin R, Evans S, Eaton M, Hensman J, Worden K (2009) Acoustic emission for monitoring aircraft structures. In: Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering 223(5):525–532.  https://doi.org/10.1243/09544100jaero404. ISSN 0954-4100
  11. 11.
    Perelli A, de Marchi L, Marzani A, Speciale N (2012) Acoustic emission localization in plates with dispersion and reverberations using sparse PZT sensors in passive mode. Smart Materials and Structures 21(2):025010.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/21/2/025010. ISSN 0964-1726
  12. 12.
    Sause MGR (2016) In situ monitoring of fiber-reinforced composites. Springer, Switzerland. ISBN 978-331-9309-538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schumacher T, Straub D, Higgins CH, Pearson M, Al-Jumaili S, Holford K, Pullin R (2012) Toward a probabilistic acoustic emission source location algorithm: a Bayesian approach. J Sound Vib 331(19):4233–4245.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2012.04.028. ISSN 0022460x
  14. 14.
    Prevorovsky Z (2015) Novel acoustic emission source location. Physics Procedia 70.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2015.08.035. ISSN 18753892
  15. 15.
    Eaton M, Pullin R, Holford K (2012) Acoustic emission source location in composite materials using Delta T Mapping. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 43(6):856–863.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.01.023. ISSN 1359835x
  16. 16.
    Goutianos S (2003) Compressive behaviour of carbon-fibre polymer composite materials, PH. D. Thesis, London, University of London. https://www.sems.qmul.ac.uk/research/honours/doc.php?id=199. Assessed 04 May 2017]
  17. 17.
    Liebig WV, Viets CH, Schulte K, Fiedler B (2015) Influence of voids on the compressive failure behaviour of fibre-reinforced composites. Compos Sci Technol 117:225–233.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.06.020. ISSN 02663538
  18. 18.
    Nimdum P, Renard J (2012) Use of acoustic emission to discriminate damage modes in carbon fibre reinforced epoxy laminate during tensile and buckling loading. ECCM 15-15th European Conference on Composite Materials, Venice, Italy, p 8Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Srinivasa V, Shivakumar V, Nayaka V, Jagadeeshaiaih S, Seethram M, Shenoy R, Nafidi A (2010) Fracture morphology of carbon fiber reinforced plastic composite laminates. Mater Res 13(3):417–424.  https://doi.org/10.1590/s1516-14392010000300022. ISSN 1516-1439
  20. 20.
    Avery DP, Samborsky DD, Mandell JF, Cairns DS (2004) Compression strength of carbon fiber laminates containing flaws with fiber waviness. 42nd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, pp 54–63Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    FlexTest_40 control system manual, DS2.42684 311 Dynamic High Force System, MTS System Corporation, June 23, 2011Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Strength of Structures DepartmentVZLU–Czech Aerospace Research CentrePragueCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations