Advertisement

Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring

, Volume 8, Issue 4, pp 635–648 | Cite as

Damage assessment due to pounding between adjacent structures with equal and unequal heights

  • Rajaram Chenna
  • Pradeep Kumar Ramancharla
Original Paper
  • 56 Downloads

Abstract

Structural pounding may occur between two structures or at different parts of the same building during ground motions. Among all the structural damages, structural pounding has been commonly observed during several earthquakes in the past, which have lead to minor damage till complete collapse of the structure. The main focus of this paper is to study pounding responses and impact effects on structures subjected to ground motions. It is observed from the study that the response of stiff structure is more than flexible structure at dominant period of ground motion, irrespective of equal and unequal heights. If the structures vibrate at a non-dominant period of ground motion, then the response of flexible structure is observed more than the stiff structure.

Keywords

Pounding Pounding response Damage Ground motion 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Jankowski R (2009) Non-linear FEM analysis of earthquake induced pounding between the main building and the stair way tower of the Olive View Hospital. Eng Struct 31:1851–1864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aguilar J, Jurez H, Ortega R, Iglesias J (1989) The Mexico earthquake of September 19, 1985. Statistics of damage and retrofitting techniques in reinforced concrete buildings affected by the 1985 earthquake. Earthq Spectra 5(1):145–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kasai K, Maison BF (1997) Building pounding damage during the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake. Eng Struct 19(3):195–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chuang LL, Jean WY, Yeh YK, Hwang SJ, Tsai KC (2007) Seismic upgrading of compulsory school buildings in Taiwan. In: Proceedings on 2nd international conference on urban disaster reductionGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jain SK, Murty CVR, Dayal U, Jaswant NA, Sailender KC (2001) A field report on structural and geotechnical damages sustained during the 26 January 2001 M7.9 Bhuj Earthquake in Western India, Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kaushik HB, Dasgupta K, Sahoo DR, Kharel G (2006) Performance of structures during the Sikkim earthquake of 14 February 2006. Curr Sci 91(4):449–455Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rajaram C, Pradeep RK (2012) Pounding between adjacent buildings: comparison of codal provisions. Indian Concr J 86(8):49–59Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    EERI Report (2012) The Mw 6.9 Sikkim–Nepal border earthquake of September 18, 2011. EERI special earthquake report, pp 1–14Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Anagnostopoulos SA (1988) Pounding of buildings in series during earthquakes. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 16:443–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Anagnostopoulos SA, Spiliopoulos KV (1992) An investigation of earthquake induced pounding between adjacent buildings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 21:289–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Athanassiadou CJ, Penelis GG, Kappos AJ (1994) Seismic response of adjacent buildings with similar or different dynamic characteristics. Earthq Spectra 10(2):293–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Papadrakakis M, Mouzakis HP (1995) Earthquake simulator testing of pounding between adjacent buildings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 24:811–834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Raheem A (2006) Seismic pounding between adjacent building structures. Electron J Struct Eng 6:66–74Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rajaram C (2011) A study of pounding between adjacent structures. MS by research thesis, Computer Aided Structural Engineering, International Institute of Information Technology, Hyderabad, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Goltabar AM, Shamstabar KR, Ebadi A (2008) Study of impact between adjacent structures during of earthquake and their effective parameters. Am J Eng Appl Sci 1(3):210–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rajaram C, Pradeep RK (2014) Three dimensional analysis of pounding between adjacent buildings. J Struct Eng (SERC) 41(2):161–171Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Abdeddaim M, Ounis A, Djedoui N, Shrimali MK (2016) Pounding hazard mitigation between adjacent planar buildings using coupling strategy. J Civ Struct Health Monit 6(3):603–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tubaldi E, Freddi F, Barbato M (2016) Probabilistic seismic demand model for pounding risk assessment. J Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 45(11):1743–1758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ghandil M, Aldaikh H (2017) Damage based seismic planar pounding analysis of adjacent symmetric buildings considering inelastic structure–soil–structure interaction. J Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 46(7):1141–1159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Goldsmith W (1960) Impact: the theory and physical behaviour of colliding solids. Edward Arnold, LondonzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lankarani HM, Nikravesh PE (1990) A contact force model with hysteresis damping for impact analysis of multi-body systems. J Mech 112:369–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jankowski R (2004) Pounding force response spectrum under earthquake excitation. Eng Struct 28:1149–1161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ye K, Li L, Zhu H (2009) A modified Kelvin impact model for pounding simulation of base-isolated building with adjacent structures. Earthq Eng Eng Vib 8(3):433–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chau KT, Wei XX, Guo X, Shen CY (2003) Experimental and theoretical simulations of seismic poundings between two adjacent structures. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 32:537–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chau KT, Wei XX (2001) Pounding of structures modelled as nonlinear impacts of two oscillators. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 30:633–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Davis RO (1992) Pounding of buildings modelled by an impact oscillator. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 21:253–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jing HS, Young M (1991) Impact interaction between two vibration systems under random excitation. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 20:667–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Muthukumar S, DesRoches R (2006) A Hertz contact model with non-linear damping for pounding simulation. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 35(7):811–828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Indian standard plain and reinforced concrete—code of practice (fourth revision), IS 456:2000. Bureau of Indian standards, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hatem TD (1998) A new efficient method for nonlinear, large deformation and collapse analysis of structures. Ph.D. thesis, Civil Engineering. Department, University of Tokyo, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Maekawa K, Okamura H (1983) The deformational behavior and constitutive equation of concrete using the elasto-plastic and fracture model. J Fac Eng Univ Tokyo Ser B 37(2):253–328Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ristic D (1988) Nonlinear behavior and stress–strain based modeling of reinforced concrete structures under earthquake induced bending and varying axial loads. Ph.D. Dissertation, School of Civil Engineering, Kyoto University, Kyoto, JapanGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Applied Science International, ASI (2006) Extreme loading for structures technical manual. Raleigh. https://www.extremeloading.com/. Accessed 20 Feb 2018
  34. 34.
    Meguro K, Hatem TD (2001) Applied element simulation of RC structures under cyclic loading. J Struct Eng (ASCE) 127(11):1295–1305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Chopra AK (2001) Dynamics of structures. Pearson Education Inc, LondonGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kunnath SK, Reinhorn AM, Park YJ (1990) Analytical modeling of inelastic seismic response of RC structures. J Struct Eng (ASCE) 116(4):996–1017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Park YJ, Ang AH (1985) Mechanistic seismic damage model for reinforced concrete. J Struct Eng (ASCE) 111(4):722–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Pradeep KR (1997) Damage based life of structures in seismic environment. M.Tech thesis, Civil Engineering. Department, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kramer SL (1996) Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Pearson Publishers, LondonGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Moustafa A, Mahmoud S (2014) Damage assessment of adjacent buildings under earthquake loads. Eng Struct 61:153–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Tagel-Din H, Meguro K (1999) Applied element simulation for collapse analysis of structures. Bull Earthquake Resistant Struct (32):113–123Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Civil Engineering, Earthquake Engineering Research CentreInternational Institute of Information TechnologyHyderabadIndia

Personalised recommendations