Advertisement

Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring

, Volume 8, Issue 4, pp 585–595 | Cite as

Experimental and numerical dynamic structural analysis of footbridges when subjected to pedestrians walking loads

  • Irwing Aguiar Ribeiro da Silva
  • José Guilherme Santos da Silva
Original Paper
  • 110 Downloads

Abstract

This research work aims to investigate the dynamic structural behaviour and assess the human comfort of footbridges, when subjected to pedestrian walking, based on experimental tests and tuning of finite element model. This way, the test structure is related to a real pedestrian footbridge, located at the Osvaldo Aranha Street, route of great importance and so very heavy traffic of vehicles along the day, next to the new Maracanã Stadium, in the city of Rio de Janeiro/RJ, Brazil. The investigated footbridge presents two spans with length equal to 29.5 and 24 m, respectively, and a total length of 53.5 m. Initially, to identify and assess the global dynamic structural behaviour of the structural model an operational modal analysis (OMA) was performed on the investigated footbridge. After that, several forced vibration tests were performed on the footbridge, considering the pedestrians walking with different step frequencies. In sequence, a finite element model was developed based on the ANSYS computational program. This model was used for the calibration of results, obtained based on the footbridge experimental monitoring. Finally, a human comfort assessment was performed, based on the comparisons between the results (peak accelerations), of the dynamic experimental monitoring and the recommendations provided by design guides HIVOSS and SÉTRA.

Keywords

Pedestrian footbridges Experimental monitoring Vibration analysis Human comfort 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support for this work provided by the Brazilian Science Foundation’s CAPES, CNPq and FAPERJ.

References

  1. 1.
    Silva IAR. “Experimental monitoring and numerical modelling to evaluate the pedestrian-structure dynamic interaction effect on the dynamic response of pedestrian foot-bridges” (In development). PhD Thesis. Civil Engineering Post-graduate Programme, PGECIV. State University of Rio de Janeiro, UERJ. Rio de Janeiro/RJ, Brazil, 2017Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Silva IAR, Debona GL, Silva JG (2016) Design evaluation of the serviceability limit states of footbridges when subjected to the dynamic action of pedestrians walking. XXXVII Iberian Latin-American Congress on Computational Methods in Engineering (CILAMCE 2016), Brazil, pp 182–201Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Santos da Silva JG, Burgos RB, Duarte IFB, Debona GL (2016) Vibration Analysis and Human Comfort Evaluation of Steel-Concrete Composite Footbridges Based on the Modelling of the Pedestrian-Structure Dynamic Interaction Effect”. Int J Eng Res Appl 6(11):38–45Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Van Nimmen K, Lombaert G, De Roeck G, Van den Broeck P (2017) The impact of vertical human-structure interaction on the response of footbridges to pedestrian excitation. J Sound Vib 402:104–121.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2017.05.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Venuti F, Racic V, Corbetta A (2016) Modelling framework for dynamic interaction between multiple pedestrians and vertical vibrations of footbridges. J Sound Vib 379:245–263.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2016.05.047 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jiménez-Alonso JF, Sáez A, Caetano E, Magalhães F (2016) Vertical crowd-structure interaction model to analyse the change of the modal properties of a footbridge. J Bridge Eng 21(8):C4015004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Živanović S, Pavic A, Reynolds P (2006) Modal testing and FE model tuning of a lively footbridge structure. Eng Struct 28(6):857–868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brencich A, Sabia D (2008) Experimental identification of a multi-span masonry bridge: the Tanaro Bridge. Constr Build Mater 22(10):2087–2099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bayraktar A, Altuniik AC, Birinci F, Sevim B, Turker T (2010) Finite-element analysis and vibration testing of a two-span masonry arch bridge. J Perform Constr Fac 24(1):46–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pieraccini M, Betti M, Forcellini D, Devis D, Papi F, Bartoli G, Facchini L, Corazzi R, Kovacevic CV (2017) Radar detection of pedestrian-induced vibrations of Michelangelo’s David. PLoS One 12(4):e0174480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bedon C, Dilena M, Morassi A (2016) Ambient vibration testing and structural identification of a cable-stayed bridge. Meccanica 51:2777–2796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    ANSYS Swanson Analysis Systems (2007) P. O. Box 65, Johnson Road, Houston, PA, 15342-0065. Release 11.0, SP1 UP20070830, ANSYS, Inc. is a UL registered ISO 9001:2000 Company. Products ANSYS Academic ResearchGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    HIVOSS (2008) Human induced vibration of steel structures. Design of footbridges guideline. Research fund for coal and steelGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    SÉTRA Footbridge (2006) Assessment of vibrational behaviour of footbridge under pedestrian loading, technical guide. Service d’Etudes Techniques des Routes et Autoroutes, ParisGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Civil Engineering Post-graduate Programme (PGECIV/UERJ)Rio de JaneiroBrazil
  2. 2.Structural Engineering Department (ESTR)State University of Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)Rio de JaneiroBrazil

Personalised recommendations