Advertisement

Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring

, Volume 7, Issue 5, pp 645–656 | Cite as

Toward transportation asset management: what is the role of geotechnical monitoring?

  • P. MazzantiEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

Geotechnical assets are vital for the efficiency of transportation corridors. Geotechnical monitoring can be a powerful tool for an effective maintenance of transportation assets and for safety purposes. Thanks to the technological evolution that has occurred during recent years, several monitoring technologies are now available to perform geotechnical monitoring. Ranging from remote satellite systems to contact instrumentation, it is now possible to perform a multi-scale approach in space and time, thus effectively supporting management and decision making actions. In this paper, three main categories of geotechnical monitoring are considered on the basis of the “monitoring purpose”: knowledge monitoring, control monitoring and emergency monitoring. STN (space–time-need) diagrams are proposed as a simple and useful graphic tool for the design of an effective monitoring plan that accounts for both the technical capabilities of the available monitoring technologies and the specific monitoring needs. Effective monitoring programs, suitable tools for data collection, management and processing combined with efficient models to support decision making leads to “Smart Geotechnical Asset Management” (SGAM). SGAM is a program that takes advantage of sensors collecting data in order to make risk assessment continuously updated over time.

Keywords

Geotechnical assets Observational method Geotechnical monitoring Remote sensing Transportation corridors Landslides 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I would like to acknowledge Susan Taylor and the organizing committee of the 6th Workshop in Civil Structural Health Monitoring for inviting me to prepare this contribution on Geotechnical Monitoring. This paper would have never seen the light without the inspiring contribution of several friends and leading geotechnical engineers met in the past few years. Among them a special thanks is devoted to John Dunnicliff for his fruitful comments and revision of the paper.

References

  1. 1.
    Abellan A, Jaboyedoff M, Oppikofer T, Vilaplana JM (2009) Detection of millimetric deformation using a terrestrial laser scanner: experiment and application to a rockfall event. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 9:365–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ahmed N, Zheng YR, Pommerenke D (2016) Low power magneto-inductive communication system for structural health monitoring. In: Proceedings of the OCEANS 2016, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). Shanghai, China, pp 1–4. doi: 10.1109/OCEANSAP.2016.7485708
  3. 3.
    Anderegg P, Brönnimann R, Meier U (2014) Reliability of long-term monitoring data. J Civil Struct Health Monitor 4(1):69–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Anderson SA, Schaefer VR, Nichols SC (2016) Taxonomy for geotechnical assets, elements, and features. Compendium of Papers, TRB Annual Meeting. Transportation Research Board, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Austrian Society of Geomechanics (ASG) (2014) Geotechnical monitoring in conventional tunnelling. Austrian society of geomechanics, handbook. ÖGG, SalzburgGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bennett V, Abdoun T, Shantz T, Jang D, Thevanayagam S (2009) Design and characterization of a compact array of MEMS accelerometers for geotechnical instrumentation. Smart Struct Syst 5(6):663–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Benoit L, Briole P, Martin O, Thom C, Malet JP, Ulrich P (2015) Monitoring landslide displacements with the Geocube wireless network of low-cost GPS. Eng Geol 195:111–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bergamo P, Dashwood B, Uhlemann S, Swift R, Chambers JE, Gunn DA, Donohue S (2016) Time-lapse monitoring of climate effects on earthworks using surface waves. Geophysics 81(2):1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bigarre P, Verdel T, Klein E, Gueniffey Y (2013) Cloud monitoring: an innovative approach for the prevention of landslide risks. Landslide science and practice. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 665–670Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Blikra LH (2008) The Åknes rockslide: Monitoring, threshold values and early-warning. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Landslides and Engineered Slopes, Xian, China, 30 June–4 July 2008, p 1089–1094Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bouali E, Oommen T, Escobar-Wolf R (2016) Interferometric stacking toward geohazard identification and geotechnical asset monitoring. J Infrastruct Syst. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000281 Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bozzano F, Cipriani I, Mazzanti P, Prestininzi A (2011) Displacement patterns of a landslide affected by human activities: insights from ground-based InSAR monitoring. Nat Hazards. doi: 10.1007/s11069-011-9840-6 Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bozzano F, Esposito C, Fantini A, Fiorucci M, Martino S, Mazzanti P, Prestininzi A, Rivellino S, Rocca A Scarascia Mugnozza G (2017) Multisensor landslide monitoring as a challenge for early warning: from process based to statistic based approaches. In: Proceeding 4th World Landslide Forum Ljubljana, Slovenia, May 29—June 2 (in press)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bozzano F, Cipriani I, Mazzanti P, Prestininzi A (2014) A field experiment for calibrating landslide time-of-failure prediction functions. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 67:69–77Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bruckno B, Vaccari A, Hoppe E, Niemann W, Campbell E (2013) Validation of Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar as a Tool for Identification of Geohazards and at-Risk Transportation Infrastructure. In Highway Geology Symposium (HGS), DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska, LincolnGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Brunetti A, Mazzanti P (2015) Monitoring an unstable road embankment for public safety purposes by terrestrial SAR interferometry. In: Proceedings of the 9th international symposyum on field measurements in geomechanics (Sydney 9–11 September 2015) p 769–780Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    BSI (2004) Eurocode 7: geotechnical design—part 1: general rules. BS EN 1997–1:2004. British Standards Institution, LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    British Tunnelling Society (BSI) (2011) Monitoring underground construction. A best practice guide. ICE Publishing, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Burland JB, Jamiolkowski MB, Viggiani C (2009) Leaning tower of pisa: behaviour after stabilization operations. Int J Geoeng Case Hist 1(3):156–169Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cardellini S, Osimani P (2008) Living with landslides: the Ancona case history and early warning system. Landslide Monitor Technol Early Warn Syst 82(1):1–10Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Carrión FJ, Quintana JA, Crespo SE (2017) Techno-economical and practical considerations for SHM systems. J Civ Struct Health Monitor 7(2):207–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chambers JE, Gunn DA, Wilkinson PB, Meldrum PI, Haslam E, Holyoake S, Kirkham M, Kuras O, Merritt A, Wragg J et al (2014) 4D electrical resistivity tomography monitoring of soil moisture dynamics in an operational railway embankment. Near Surf Geophys 12(1):61–72Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cook D (2010) Fundamentals of instrumentation geotechnical database management—things to consider. Geotech News 25–28Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Di Biagio E, Høeg K (1989) Where has all the judgment come from? In: Cording EL et al (ed), Proc. Conf. The art and science of geotechnical engineering at the dawn of the twenty-first century. 1st Edn, Reprinted by permission of Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, p 248–268Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ding LY, Zhou C (2013) Development of web-based system for safety risk early warning in urban metro construction. Automat Constr 34:45–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dunnicliff J (1988) Geotechnical instrumentation for monitoring field performance. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dunnicliff J (1993) Geotechnical instrumentation for monitoring field performance. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dunnicliff J (2012) ICE manual of geotechnical engineering. Institution of Civil Engineers, London, pp 1379–1403 (Chapter 95) Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Dunnicliff J, Deere DU (1991) Judgment in Geotechnical Engineering. The Professional Legacy of Ralph B. Peck. Wiley, BiTech Publishers (1984), New York (Vancouver, BC)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Dunnicliff J, Marr WA, Standing J (2012) ICE manual of geotechnical engineering. Institution of civil engineers, London, pp 1363–1377 (Chapter 94) Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Federico A, Popescu M, Elia G, Fidelibus C, Interno G, Murianni A (2012) Prediction of time to slope failure: a general framework. Environ Earth Sci 66:245–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Fernandez-Steeger TM, Hu H, Li C, Azzam R (2015) Wireless sensor networks and sensor fusion for early warning in engineering geology. In: Lollino G et al (eds) Engineering geology for society and territory vol. 2. Springer, Berlin, pp 1421–1424Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Field Measurements in GeoMechanics (FMGM) (1984) In: Kovári K. Kovári, (ed) Proceedings of the international symposium, Zurich (1983). A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, p 5–8Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Glisic B, Inaudi D (2008) Fibre optic methods for structural health monitoring. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Gunn DA, Chambers JE, Uhlemann S, Wilkinson PB, Meldrum PI, Dijkstra TA, Haslam E, Kirkham M, Wragg J, Holyoake S, Hughes PN, Hen-Jones R, Glendinning S (2015) Moisture monitoring in clay embankments using electrical resistivity tomography. Constr Build Mater 92:82–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Habel WR (2013) SHM systems supporting extension of the structures’ service life. J Civ Struct Health Monitor 3(4):225–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hanna TH (1985) Field instrumentation in geotechnical engineering. Trans Tech, Clausthal-ZellerfeldGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hanssen RF (2001) Radar interferometry: data interpretation and error analysis, 2nd edn. Springer, HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    ISRM (1981) Suggested methods for monitoring rock movements using inclinometers and tiltmeters. Rock characterization testing and monitoring, ISRM Suggested Methods. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 187–199Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    ISRM (1981) Suggested methods for monitoring rock movements using borehole extensometers. Rock Characterization testing and monitoring, ISRM suggested methods. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 173–183Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    ISRM (1981) Suggested methods for pressure monitoring using hydraulic cells. Rock characterization testing and monitoring, ISRM suggested methods. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 201–211Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Jamiolkowski M (2014) Soil mechanics and the observational method: challenges at the Zelazny Most copper tailings disposal facility. Geotechnique 64(8):590–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Kampes BM (2006) Radar interferometry: persistent scatterer technique. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kavvadas MJ (2005) Monitoring ground deformation in tunnelling: current practice in transportation tunnels. Eng Geol 79:93–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kovari K, Lunardi P (2000) On the observational method in tunnelling. In: Proceedings international conference on geotechnical and geological engineering. Melbourne, p 19–24Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Lovisolo M, Ghirotto S, Scardia G, Battaglio M (2003) The use of differential monitoring stability (DMS) for remote monitoring of excavation and landslide movements. In: Myrvol A (ed) Proceedings of the sixth international symposium on field measurements in geomechanics. Balkema, Oslo p 519–524Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Lunardi P (2008) Design and construction of tunnels: analysis of controlled deformation in rocks and soils (ADECO-RS). Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Maddison S, Smith B (2014) New advances for wireless remote condition monitoring in tunnel deformation and track tilt. In: Railway condition monitoring (RCM 2014), 6th IET Conference on IET p 1–5Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Mazzanti P (2012) Remote monitoring of deformation. An overview of the seven methods described in previous GINs. Geotech News 30(4):24Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Mazzanti P, Bozzano F, Cipriani I, Prestininzi A (2015) New insights into the temporal prediction of landslides by a terrestrial SAR interferometry monitoring case study. Landslides 12(1):55–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Mazzanti P, Thompson PD, Beckstrand DL, Stanley DA (2016) Geotechnical asset management for Italian transport agencies implementation principles and concepts. International Congress on Transport Infrastructure and Systems, Rome, pp 10–12 (Submitted) Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Michoud C, Bazin S, Blikra LH, Derron MH, Jaboyedoff M (2013) Experiences from site-specific landslide early warning systems. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 13:2659–2673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Monserrat O, Crosetto M, Luzi G (2014) A review of ground-based SAR interferometry for deformation measurement. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 93:40–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    New Zealand Asset Management Support (NAMS) (2006) International infrastructure management manual, 3rd edn. NAMS, ThamesGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Nicholson D, Tse C, Penny C (1999) The observational method in ground engineering—principles and applications. Report 185, CIRIA, LondonGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Peck RB (1970) Observation and instrumentation: some elementary considerations. In: Lecture notes for seminar on Field Observations in Foundation Design and Construction. Metropolitan Section, American Society of Civil Engineers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Peck RB (1969) Advantages and limitations of the observational method in applied soil mechanics. Géotechnique 19(2):171–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Perry JG, Pedley M, Brady K (2003) Infrastructure embankments—condition appraisal and remedial treatment. Construction Industry Research and Information Association, London, p C592Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Perry JG, Pedley M, Brady K (2003) Infrastructure cuttings: condition appraisal and remedial treatment. Construction Industry Research and Information Association, London, p C591Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Power C, Mian J, Spink T, Abbott S, Edwards M (2016) Development of an evidence-based geotechnical asset management policy for network rail, Great Britain. Proced Eng 143:726–733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Rackwitz F, Savidis SA, Rickriem J (2013) Web-based data and monitoring platform for complex geotechnical engineering projects. Geotech Geol Eng 31(3):927–939CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Ramesh MV (2014) Design, development, and deployment of a wireless sensor network for detection of landslides. Ad Hoc Netw 13:2–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Sellers JB, Taylor R (2008) MEMS basics. Geotech News 26:32–33Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Spencer BF Jr, Jo H, Mechitov KA, Li J, Sim SH, Kim RE, Cho S, Linderman LE, Moinzadeh P, Giles RK, Agha G (2016) Recent advances in wireless smart sensors for multi-scale monitoring and control of civil infrastructure. J Civ Struct Health Monit 6(1):17–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Terzaghi K (1937) Settlement of structures in Europe and methods of observations. Am Soc Civ Eng Proc 63:1358–1374Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Thiebes B, Bell R, Glade T, Jäger S, Mayer J, Anderson M, Holcombe L (2014) Integration of a limit-equilibrium model into a landslide early warning system. Landslides 11(5):859–875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Thompson PD (2016) Geotechnical asset management plan: technical report. Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities, JuneauGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Thorarinsson A (2007) Methods for automatic storage, visualization, and reporting in datalogging applications. In: FMGM (ed) Field measurements in geomechanics. ASCE, Reston, pp 1–14Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    US Department of Transportation (2013) Geotechnical asset management: implementation concepts and strategies. Publication no. FHWA-CFL/TD-13-003Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Voight B (1989) A relation to describe rate-dependent material failure. Science 243:200–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Zeni L, Picarelli L, Avolio B, Coscetta A, Papa R, Zeni G, Di Maio C, Vassallo R, Minardo A (2015) Brillouin optical time-domain analysis for geotechnical monitoring. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 7(4):458–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Zhang L, Wu X, Chen Q, Skibniewski MJ, Zhong J (2015) Developing a cloud model based risk assessment methodology for tunnel-induced damage to existing pipelines. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 29(2):513–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Zou Y, Kiviniemi A, Jones SW (2016) A review of risk management through BIM and BIM-related technologies. Safe Sci. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.12.027 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.NHAZCA S.r.l, Spinoff “Sapienza” University of RomeRomeItaly
  2. 2.Department of Earth Sciences“Sapienza” University of RomeRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations