Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring

, Volume 7, Issue 5, pp 589–599 | Cite as

Study on dynamic characteristics and seismic response of the extradosed cable-stayed bridge with single pylon and single cable plane

  • Qu Hao
  • Su Jufeng
  • Huang PingmingEmail author
Original Paper


Taking Sifang Bridge in Suijiang County, Yunnan Province as a research object, this paper established a three-dimensional finite-element model of the entire bridge. In the semi-floating structure system, the dynamic characteristics were calculated according to the pile–soil interaction, and the influence of pile–soil interaction on the dynamic characteristics of the structure was analyzed. Based on this, the seismic dynamic time history analysis method was used by considering the cable sag, nonlinearity of the support, rigidity of the structure, boundary condition setting, and the pile–soil interaction. Then, we analyzed the seismic performance of the structure and its responses by providing the seismic wave at different levels. The results showed that the structure can be softened by the pile–soil interaction. The dynamic characteristics of the structure in each direction could be accurately reflected by considering the pile–soil interaction. Due to the weak lateral stiffness of the main pylon, the other structural measures should be added in the design. The support between the pylon and girder was the most unfavorable part in the along bridge segment, while the bottom of the pylon was the most unfavorable part in the across bridge segment. Under the earthquake magnitude E1, the bridge sustained the damage and the structure was in the elastic working range. Under the earthquake magnitude E2, some local repairable damage has been detected in some segment of the bridge. The results of this study can be used as a potential reference for practical engineering problems as well as can provide the parameter basis for the subsequent seismic design of the bridge. At the same time, this study has also provided a theoretical reference and an effective method for the seismic analysis of cable-stayed bridge with single pylon and single cable plane of the same kind.


Single pylon Single cable plane Pile-soil interaction Dynamic characteristics Seismic response 



The authors deeply appreciate the help of Niu Zhihua in discussing and revising. Comments from anonymous reviewers and the editor greatly improved the manuscript and are highly appreciated.


  1. 1.
    Adeli H, Gere JM, Weaver W (1978) Algorithms for nonlinear structural dynamics. J Struct Division 104(2):263–280Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ernest HJ (1965) Themodulas of elasticity of cable taking into account of catenary action. Der Bauing 40(2):52–55Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hu DL, Zhang YW, Chen F et al (2011) Study on seismic performance of single pylon cable-stayed bridge at high intensity seismic region. Adv Mater Res 295–297:197–202Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kim D, Yi JH, Seo HY et al (2008) Earthquake risk assessment of seismically isolated extradosed bridges with lead rubber bearings. Struct Eng Mech 29(6):689–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Krstevska L, Tashkov L (2014) Importance of in situ experimental testing in estimation of seismic stability of structures and implementation in structural health monitoring. J Civil Struct Health Monit 5(2):1–17Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Liao Y, Song Z, Gao G et al (2015) Seismic analysis of ITER poloidal field converter bridge. J Fusion Energy 34(1):70–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liu K, Yang G, Yang K (2014) Research and analysis of ship-bridge collision. Appl Mech Mater 638–640:973–976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Margariti G, Gantes C (2015) Linear and nonlinear buckling response and imperfection sensitivity of cable-stayed masts and pylons. Struct Eng Int 25(1):389–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nishio M, Marin J, Fujino Y (2012) Uncertainty quantification of the finite element model of existing bridges for dynamic analysis. J Civil Struct Health Monit 2(3–4):163–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Paolo F, Alessio L, Fabrizio N et al (2015) Seismic fragility of reinforced concrete girder bridges using Bayesian belief network. Earthquake Eng Struct Dynam 45(1):29–44Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sehnawi RA, Nakajima A, Takeshima R et al (2014) Experimental investigation of amplitude dependency of dynamic characteristics in elastic and inelastic stages of reinforced concrete pier model. J Civil Struct Health Monit 4(4):289–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shen J, Tsai MH, Chang KC et al (2004) Performance of a seismically isolated bridge under near-fault earthquake ground motions. J Struct Eng 130(6):861–868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang FL, Chan THT, Thambiratnam DP et al (2013) Damage diagnosis for complex steel truss bridges using multi-layer genetic algorithm. J Civil Struct Health Monit 3(2):117–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yuan F, Jin X (2015) Optimization of earthquake resistance system for single tower cable-stayed bridge. Highway (in Chinese) 5:56–60Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhang YY, Ding Y, Pang YT (2015) Selection of optimal intensity measures in seismic damage analysis of cable-stayed bridges subjected to far-fault ground motions. J Earthq Tsunami 09(1):1550003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhang W, Liu JX, Zhang Q (2005) Seismic response analysis of long span continuous rigid framed bridge. Earthq Resist Eng Retrofit (in Chinese) 27(6):75–78Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of HighwayChang’ an UniversityXi′anPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations