Skip to main content
Log in

Safety monitoring of underground steel pipeline subjected to soil deformation using wireless inclinometers

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Failures occurring in buried pipelines are usually associated with structural damages externally induced by surface loading or permanent ground deformation. In the framework of structural health monitoring, this paper presents a real-time monitoring technique for safety evaluation of continuously welded underground pipelines subjected to soil deformation using dual axis wireless inclinometers. Based on the multiple inclination measurements, a new algorithm combined with indirect adjustment theory and the general solution of the differential equation of beam model on elastic foundation are developed to reconstruct the rotation equation. The deflection curve is then derived to locate the abnormal surface loading and permanent ground deformation. Stress is also calculated to evaluate the performance of the buried pipeline. Numerical simulations verify that the proposed algorithm is of high precision to reconstruct the rotation equation as well as to calculate the deflection and strain. Based on error analysis, comparative studies between the traditional leveling method and the proposed method are conducted and verify the ascendency of the new technique. Field testing on a 24-m-long buried steel pipe equipped with wireless inclinometers is finally carried out and validates the effectiveness to locate the external interference and evaluate the safety of buried pipeline.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kishawy HA, Gabbar HA (2010) Review of pipeline integrity management practices. Int J Press Vessel Pip 87(7):373–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. European Gas Pipeline Incident Data Group (EGIG) (2007). European gas pipeline incidents: 1970–2007. The 7th report of the European Gas Pipeline Incident Data Group.

  3. Li SZ (2011) Municipal pipeline accidents and cause analysis. Technical report of Lifeline Engineering Division, Tongji University, China

  4. Hyoung-S and Woo-S (1998). Analysis of stresses on buried natural gas pipeline subjected to ground subsidence. International Pipeline Conference. 2, 749–756

  5. Fuchimoto K, Ogawa Y, Oka S, Shimizu K (1992) A stress estimation of pipeline subject to ground settlement. Proc Int Gas Res Conf 1:456–465

    Google Scholar 

  6. Limura S (2004) Simplified mechanical model for evaluating stress in pipeline subjected to settlement. Constr Build Mater 18:469–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Femi T, David H (2009) Distributed fibre optic sensors for pipeline protection. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 1(4–5):134–143

    Google Scholar 

  8. Branko G, Yao Y (2012) Fiber optic method for health assessment of pipelines subjected to earthquake-induced ground movement. Struct Health Monit 11(6):696–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cauchi S, Cherpillod T, Morison D, McClarty E (2007) Fiber-optic sensors for monitoring pipe bending due to ground movement. Proceedings of the Biennial International Pipeline Conference. IPC. 2, 885–893

  10. Daniele I, Branko G (2010) Long-range pipeline monitoring by distributed fiber optic sensing. J Press Vessel Technol 132(011701):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  11. Grivas D, Bhagvati C, Schultz B, Trigg A, Rizkalla M (1998). Applicability of interferometric SAR technology to ground movement and pipeline monitoring. Proceedings of the SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering. 3398, 35–43

  12. Russell K, Howell C, Bobby P, McHugh S, Power D (2008) Rizkalla M. Integration of radarsat-2 dual and quad polarization data into pipeline third party encroachment monitoring. Int Geosci Remote Sens Symp (IGARSS) 4(1):675–678

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zheng JY, Zhang BJ (2012) Failure analysis and safety evaluation of buried pipeline due to deflection of landslide process. Eng Fail Anal 25:156–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Orynyak IV, Bogdan AV (2007) Problem of large displacements of buried pipelines. Part1. Working out a numerical procedure. Strength Mater 39(3):257–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang XL, Shuai J, Zhang JQ (2011) Mechanical response analysis of buried pipeline crossing mining subsidence area. Rock Soil Mech 32(11):3373–3378

    Google Scholar 

  16. Orynyak LV, Lokhman LV (2012) Determination of curve characteristics by its discrete points measured with an error and its application to stress analysis for buried pipeline. Strength Mater 44(3):268–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Long YQ (1981) Calculation methods for elastic foundation beam. People’s Education Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the State Key Laboratory of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering (Project: SLDRCE14-B-19) and the Fok Ying-Tong Education Foundation, China (Grant No. 142004) for the financial support of this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suzhen Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, S., Peng, X. Safety monitoring of underground steel pipeline subjected to soil deformation using wireless inclinometers. J Civil Struct Health Monit 6, 739–749 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-016-0194-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-016-0194-3

Keywords

Navigation