Collectanea Mathematica

, Volume 68, Issue 1, pp 69–85 | Cite as

Some extensions of Hilbert–Kunz multiplicity

Article
  • 108 Downloads

Abstract

Let R be an excellent Noetherian ring of prime characteristic. Consider an arbitrary nested pair of ideals (or more generally, a nested pair of submodules of a fixed finite module). We do not assume that their quotient has finite length. In this paper, we develop various sufficient numerical criteria for when the tight closures of these ideals (or submodules) match. For some of the criteria we only prove sufficiency, while some are shown to be equivalent to the tight closures matching. We compare the various numerical measures (in some cases demonstrating that the different measures give truly different numerical results) and explore special cases where equivalence with matching tight closure can be shown. All of our measures derive ultimately from Hilbert–Kunz multiplicity.

Keywords

Hilbert–Kunz multiplicity Tight closure 

Mathematics Subject Classification

Primary 13A35 Secondary 13D40 

References

  1. 1.
    Aberbach, I.M.: The existence of the F-signature for rings with large \(\mathbb{Q}\)-Gorenstein locus. J. Algebra 319(7), 2994–3005 (2008)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Achilles, R., Manaresi, M.: Multiplicity for ideals of maximal analytic spread and intersection theory. J. Math. Kyoto Univ. 33(4), 1029–1046 (1993)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Achilles, R., Manaresi, M.: Multiplicities of a bigraded ring and intersection theory. Math. Ann. 309(4), 573–591 (1997)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brenner, H.: Irrational Hilbert-Kunz multiplicities. arXiv:1305.5873 (2013)
  5. 5.
    Brenner, H., Monsky, P.: Tight closure does not commute with localization. Ann. of Math. (2) 171(1), 571–588 (2010)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Buchsbaum, D.A., Eisenbud, D.: What makes a complex exact? J. Algebra 25, 259–268 (1973)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dao, H., Smirnov, I.: On generalized Hilbert–Kunz function and multiplicity. arXiv:1305.1833 (2013)
  8. 8.
    Dao, H., Watanabe, K.: Some computations of generalized Hilbert–Kunz function and multiplicity. arXiv:1503.00894 (2015)
  9. 9.
    Epstein, N.: Phantom depth and stable phantom exactness. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 359(10), 4829–4864 (2007)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Epstein, N., Yao, Y.: Criteria for flatness and injectivity. Math. Z. 271(3–4), 1193–1210 (2012)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Epstein, N., Yao, Y.: A computation concerning relative Hilbert–Kunz multiplicities. arXiv:1605.01807 (2016)
  12. 12.
    Flenner, H., Manaresi, M.: A numerical characterization of reduction ideals. Math. Z. 238(1), 205–214 (2001)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hochster, M., Huneke, C.: Tight closure, invariant theory, and the Briançon-Skoda theorem. J. Am. Math. Soc. 3(1), 31–116 (1990)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hochster, M., Huneke, C.: \(F\)-regularity, test elements, and smooth base change. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 346(1), 1–62 (1994)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hochster, M., Huneke, C.: Localization and test exponents for tight closure. Michigan Math. J. 48, 305–329 (2000)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Huneke, C.: Tight Closure and its Applications. In: CBMS Reg. Conf. Ser. in Math., vol. 88, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence (1996)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Huneke, C., Leuschke, G.J.: Two theorems about maximal Cohen–Macaulay modules. Math. Ann. 324(2), 391–404 (2002)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Katzman, M., Sharp, R.Y.: Uniform behaviour of the Frobenius closures of ideals generated by regular sequences. J. Algebra 295(1), 231–246 (2006)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kurano, K.: The singular Riemann–Roch theorem and Hilbert–Kunz functions. J. Algebra 304(1), 487–499 (2006)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lam, T.Y.: A First Course in Noncommutative Rings. Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer, New York (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lyubeznik, G.: \(F\)-modules: applications to local cohomology and \(D\)-modules in characteristic \(p>0\). J. Reine Angew. Math. 491, 65–130 (1997)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Monsky, P.: The Hilbert–Kunz function. Math. Ann. 263(1), 43–49 (1983)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Peskine, C., Szpiro, L.: Dimension projective finie et cohomologie locale. applications à la démonstration de conjectures de M. Auslander, H. Bass et A. Grothendieck, Inst. Hautes Études Sci. Publ. Math. 42, 47–119 (1973)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Polstra, T.: Uniform bounds in F-finite rings and lower semi-continuity of the F-signature. arXiv:1506.01073, (2015)
  25. 25.
    Seibert, G.: Complexes with homology of finite length and Frobenius functors. J. Algebra 125(2), 278–287 (1989)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sharp, R.Y.: Graded annihilators of modules over the Frobenius skew polynomial ring, and tight closure. Trans. Am. Math. Soc 359(9), 4237–4258 (2007) (electronic)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sharp, R.Y.: On the Hartshorne-Speiser-Lyubeznik theorem about Artinian modules with a Frobenius action. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 135(3), 665–670 (2007) (electronic)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sharp, R.Y., Nossem, N.: Ideals in a perfect closure, linear growth of primary decompositions, and tight closure. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 356(9), 3687–3720 (2004)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Shibuta, T.: One-dimensional rings of finite \(F\)-representation type. J. Algebra 332(1), 434–441 (2011)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Smith, K.E., van der Bergh, M.: Simplicity of rings of differential operators in prime characteristic. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 75(1), 32–62 (1997)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ulrich, B., Validashti, J.: Numerical criteria for integral dependence. Math. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 151(1), 95–102 (2011)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Vraciu, A.: An observation on generalized Hilbert-Kunz functions. arXiv:1510.00668, (2015)
  33. 33.
    Yao, Y.: Modules with finite \(F\)-representation type. J. Lond. Math. Soc. 2(72), 53–72 (2005)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Yoshino, Y.: Skew-polynomial rings of Frobenius type and the theory of tight closure. Comm. Algebra 22(7), 2473–2502 (1994)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Universitat de Barcelona 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mathematical SciencesGeorge Mason UniversityFairfaxUSA
  2. 2.Department of Math and StatisticsGeorgia State UniversityAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations