Data Availability
Not applicable.
References
Douglas. T (2024). Criteria for assessing the performance of AI-based sentencing algorithms: a reply to Ryberg. Philosophy & Technology 37 (forthcoming).
Ryberg, J. (2004). The ethics of proportionate punishment. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Ryberg, J. (2020). Proportionality and the seriousness of crimes. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Of one-eyed and toothless miscreants (pp. 51–75). Oxford University Press.
Ryberg, J. (2024). Criminal justice and artificial intelligence: How should we assess the performance of sentencing algorithms? Philosophy & Technology 37 (forthcoming).
Funding
The author declares that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Not applicable.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics and Approval to Participate
This is a philosophical study that does not involve human or animals subjects, or any sort of data management.
Consent for Participate and Publish
Not applicable.
Competing Interests
The author has no competing interests to declare that have relevance to the content of this article.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ryberg, J. Artificial Intelligence and the Assessment of Sentencing Algorithms: a Reply to Douglas. Philos. Technol. 37, 31 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-024-00726-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-024-00726-y