Should Extinction Be Forever?
- 1.1k Downloads
This article will explore a problem which is related to our moral obligations towards species. Although the re-creation of extinct animals has been discussed to some degree both in lay deliberations as well as by scientists, advocates tend to emphasize the technological and scientific value of such an endeavour, and the “coolness” factor (Sherkow and Greely Science, 340(6128), 32–33, 2013). This article will provide an argument in favour of re-creation based on normative considerations. The environmentalist community generally accepts that it is wrong to exterminate species, for reasons beyond any instrumental value these species may have. It is often also claimed that humanity has a collective responsibility to either preserve or at least to not exterminate species. These two beliefs are here assumed to be correct. The argument presented here departs from and places these two ideas in a deontological framework, from which it is argued that when humanity causes the extinction of a species, this is a moral transgression, entailing a residual obligation. Such an obligation implies a positive duty to mitigate any harm caused by our moral failure. In light of recent scientific progress in the field of genetic engineering, it will be argued that humanity has a prima facie obligation to re-create species whose extinction mankind may have caused, also known as de-extinction.
KeywordsExtinction De-extinction Species Bioethics Environmental ethics Restoration
- Ereshefsky, M. (2014). Species. Accessed 4 Feb. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2010/entries/species/.
- Fuller, E. (2001). Extinct birds (1st ed.). Ithaca: Comstock Pub. Assoc/Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
- Hansson, S. O., & Peterson, M. (2001). Rights, risks, and residual obligations. Risk, Decision and Policy, 6(03), 157–166.Google Scholar
- Larsen, P. A., Marchán-Rivadeneira, M. R., & Baker, R. J. (2010). Natural hybridization generates mammalian lineage with species characteristics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(25), 11447–11452. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1000133107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Piña-Aguilar, R. E., Lopez-Saucedo, J., Sheffield, R., Ruiz-Galaz, L. I., de Barroso-Padilla, J. J., & Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez, A. (2009). Revival of extinct species using nuclear transfer: hope for the mammoth, true for the Pyrenean Ibex, but is it time for ‘Conservation cloning’? Cloning and Stem Cells, 11(3), 341–346. doi: 10.1089/clo.2009.0026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ramathal, C., Durruthy-Durruthy, J., Sukhwani, M., Arakaki, J. E., Turek, P. J., Orwig, K. E., & Reijo Pera, R. A. (2014). Fate of iPSCs derived from azoospermic and fertile men following xenotransplantation to murine seminiferous tubules. Cell Reports, 7(4), 1284–1297. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.03.067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sandel, M. J. (2009). Justice: What’s the right thing to do?. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
- Sterelny, K., & Griffiths, P.E. (1999). Sex and death: An introduction to philosophy of biology. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar