Philosophy & Technology

, Volume 29, Issue 3, pp 211–222 | Cite as

Should Extinction Be Forever?

  • Karim JebariEmail author
Research Article


This article will explore a problem which is related to our moral obligations towards species. Although the re-creation of extinct animals has been discussed to some degree both in lay deliberations as well as by scientists, advocates tend to emphasize the technological and scientific value of such an endeavour, and the “coolness” factor (Sherkow and Greely Science, 340(6128), 32–33, 2013). This article will provide an argument in favour of re-creation based on normative considerations. The environmentalist community generally accepts that it is wrong to exterminate species, for reasons beyond any instrumental value these species may have. It is often also claimed that humanity has a collective responsibility to either preserve or at least to not exterminate species. These two beliefs are here assumed to be correct. The argument presented here departs from and places these two ideas in a deontological framework, from which it is argued that when humanity causes the extinction of a species, this is a moral transgression, entailing a residual obligation. Such an obligation implies a positive duty to mitigate any harm caused by our moral failure. In light of recent scientific progress in the field of genetic engineering, it will be argued that humanity has a prima facie obligation to re-create species whose extinction mankind may have caused, also known as de-extinction.


Extinction De-extinction Species Bioethics Environmental ethics Restoration 


  1. Attfield, R. (2005). In defense of environmental ethics. Environmental Ethics, 27(3), 335–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Benirschke, K. (1984). The frozen zoo concept. Zoo Biology, 3(4), 325–328. doi: 10.1002/zoo.1430030405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bradley, B. (2001). The value of endangered species. The Journal of Value Inquiry, 35(1), 43–58. doi: 10.1023/A:1010383322591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Díaz, S., Fargione, J., Stuart Chapin, F., III, & Tilman, D. (2006). Biodiversity loss threatens human well-being. PLoS Biology, 4(8), e277. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Elliot, R. (1982). Faking nature. Inquiry, 25(1), 81–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Elliot, R. (1994). Extinction, restoration, naturalness. Environmental Ethics: An Interdisciplinary Journal Dedicated to the Philosophical Aspects of Environmental Problems, 16, 135–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ereshefsky, M. (2014). Species. Accessed 4 Feb.
  8. Folch, J., Cocero, M. J., Chesné, P., Alabart, J. L., Domínguez, V., Cognié, Y., Roche, A., et al. (2009). First birth of an animal from an extinct subspecies (Capra Pyrenaica Pyrenaica) by Cloning. Theriogenology, 71(6), 1026–1034. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.11.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fuller, E. (2001). Extinct birds (1st ed.). Ithaca: Comstock Pub. Assoc/Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Ghiselin, M. T. (1974). A radical solution to the species problem. Systematic Zoology, 23, 536–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gunn, A. S. (1991). The restoration of species and natural environments. Environmental Ethics, 13(4), 291–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hansson, S. O., & Peterson, M. (2001). Rights, risks, and residual obligations. Risk, Decision and Policy, 6(03), 157–166.Google Scholar
  13. Honig, F. (1954). The reparations agreement between Israel and the Federal Republic of Germany. The American Journal of International Law, 48(4), 564. doi: 10.2307/2195023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Katz, E. (1996). The problem of ecological restoration. Environmental Ethics, 18(2), 222–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kumar, S. (2012). Extinction need not be forever. Nature, 492(7427), 9. doi: 10.1038/492009a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lanza, R. P., Cibelli, J. B., Diaz, F., Moraes, C. T., Farin, P. W., Farin, C. E., Hammer, C. J., West, M. D., & Damiani, P. (2000). Cloning of an endangered species (Bos Gaurus) using interspecies nuclear transfer. Cloning, 2(2), 79–90. doi: 10.1089/152045500436104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Larsen, P. A., Marchán-Rivadeneira, M. R., & Baker, R. J. (2010). Natural hybridization generates mammalian lineage with species characteristics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(25), 11447–11452. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1000133107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Loi, P., Ptak, G., Barboni, B., Fulka, J., Cappai, P., & Clinton, M. (2001). Genetic rescue of an endangered mammal by cross-species nuclear transfer using post-mortem somatic cells. Nature Biotechnology, 19(10), 962–964. doi: 10.1038/nbt1001-962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Loi, P., Wakayama, T., Saragustry, J., Fulka, J., Jr., & Ptak, G. (2011). Review biological time machines: a realistic approach for cloning an extinct mammal. Endangered Species Research, 14(3), 227–233. doi: 10.3354/esr00366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Miller, W., Drautz, D. I., Ratan, A., Pusey, B., Qi, J., Lesk, A. M., Tomsho, L. P., et al. (2008). Sequencing the nuclear genome of the extinct woolly mammoth. Nature, 456(7220), 387–390. doi: 10.1038/nature07446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Norton, B. G. (1984). Environmental ethics and weak anthropocentrism. Environmental Ethics, 6(2), 131–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Norton, B. G. (1986). Conservation and preservation. Environmental Ethics, 8(3), 195–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Parfit, D. (1986). Reasons and persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pask, A. J., Behringer, R. R., & Renfree, M. B. (2008). Resurrection of DNA function in vivo from an extinct genome. PLoS ONE, 3(5), e2240. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Piña-Aguilar, R. E., Lopez-Saucedo, J., Sheffield, R., Ruiz-Galaz, L. I., de Barroso-Padilla, J. J., & Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez, A. (2009). Revival of extinct species using nuclear transfer: hope for the mammoth, true for the Pyrenean Ibex, but is it time for ‘Conservation cloning’? Cloning and Stem Cells, 11(3), 341–346. doi: 10.1089/clo.2009.0026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ramathal, C., Durruthy-Durruthy, J., Sukhwani, M., Arakaki, J. E., Turek, P. J., Orwig, K. E., & Reijo Pera, R. A. (2014). Fate of iPSCs derived from azoospermic and fertile men following xenotransplantation to murine seminiferous tubules. Cell Reports, 7(4), 1284–1297. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.03.067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Stuart Chapin, F., Lambin, E. F., Lenton, T. M., et al. (2009). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461(7263), 472–475. doi: 10.1038/461472a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rolston, H. (1985). Duties to endangered species. BioScience, 35(11), 718–726. doi: 10.2307/1310053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sandel, M. J. (2009). Justice: What’s the right thing to do?. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
  30. Sandler, R. (2010). The value of species and the ethical foundations of assisted colonization. Conservation Biology, 24(2), 424–431. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01351.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sandler, R. (2014). The ethics of reviving long extinct species. Conservation Biology, 28(2), 354–360. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sherkow, J. S., & Greely, H. T. (2013). What if extinction is not forever?”. Science, 340(6128), 32–33. doi: 10.1126/science.1236965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sterelny, K., & Griffiths, P.E. (1999). Sex and death: An introduction to philosophy of biology. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  34. Taylor, P. W. (1981). The ethics of respect for nature. Environmental Ethics, 3(3), 197–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wong, K. (2013). Can a mammoth carcass really preserve flowing blood and possibly live cells? Nature. doi: 10.1038/nature.2013.13103.Google Scholar
  36. Zettler, E. R., Mincer, T. J., & Amaral-Zettler, L. A. (2013). Life in the ‘Plastisphere’: microbial communities on plastic marine debris. Environmental Science & Technology, 47(13), 7137–7146. doi: 10.1021/es401288x.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Futures StudiesStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations