Philosophy & Technology

, 24:339 | Cite as

Martial Bliss: War and Peace in Popular Science Robotics

  • Robert M. Geraci
Special Issue


In considering how to best deploy robotic systems in public and private sectors, we must consider what individuals will expect from the robots with which they interact. Public awareness of robotics—as both military machines and domestic helpers—emerges out of a braided stream composed of science fiction and popular science. These two genres influence news media, government and corporate spending, and public expectations. In the Euro-American West, both science fiction and popular science are ambivalent about the military applications for robotics, and thus we can expect their readers to fear the dangers posed by advanced robotics while still eagerly anticipating the benefits to be accrued through them. The chief pop science authors in robotics and artificial intelligence have a decidedly apocalyptic bent and have thus been described as leaders in a social movement called "Apocalyptic AI." In one form or another, such authors look forward to a transcendent future in which machine life succeeds human life, thanks to the march of evolutionary progress. The apocalyptic promises of popular robotics presume that presently exponential growth in computing will continue indefinitely, producing a "Singularity." During the Singularity, technological progress will be so rapid that undreamt of changes will take place on earth, the most important of which will be the evolutionary succession of human beings by massively intelligent robots and the "uploading" of human consciousness into computer bodies. This supposedly inevitable transition into post-biological life looms across the entire scope of pop robotics and artificial intelligence (AI), and it is from beneath that shadow that all popular books engage the military and the ethics of warfare. Creating a just future will require that we transcend the apocalyptic discourse of pop science and establish an ethical approach to researching and deploying robots, one that emphasizes human rather than robot welfare; doing so will require the collaboration of social scientists, humanists, and scientists.


Apocalyptic AI Artificial intelligence Ethics Hans Moravec Military Morality Popular science Ray Kurzweil Robotics Science fiction War 


  1. Arkin, R. (2009). Governing lethal behavior in autonomous robots. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asimov, I. [1953] 1991. Caves of steel. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  3. Asimov, I. [1956] 1957. The $$. Garden City: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  4. Asimov, I. [1983] 1991. The robots of dawn. New York: Del Rey.Google Scholar
  5. Atwood, T. (2009). Future bytes: Raytheon’s agile exoskeleton. Robot, 18, 90.Google Scholar
  6. Atwood, T. (2011). Future bytes: Warfighter robot upgrade. Robot, 26, 90.Google Scholar
  7. Atwood, T., & Klein, J. (2007). VECNA’s battlefield extraction-assist robot. Robot, 7, 24–28.Google Scholar
  8. Bailey, L. W. (2005). The enchantments of technology. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  9. Berry, K. (2006). Team robotics: DARPA grand challenge. Robot, 2, 76–79.Google Scholar
  10. Berry, K. (2008). DARPA urban challenge. Robot, 10, 24–28.Google Scholar
  11. Berry, K. (2010). Uncle Sam wants robots! Robot, 21, 48–49.Google Scholar
  12. Brand, S. (1987). The media lab: Inventing the future at MIT. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  13. Čapek, K. [1923] 2001. R.U.R. Mineola: Dover.Google Scholar
  14. Crevier, D. (1993). AI: The tumultuous history of the search for artificial intelligence. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  15. De Garis, H. (2005). The artilect war: Cosmists vs. Terrans. A bitter controversy concerning whether humanity should build godlike massively intelligent machines. Palm Springs: ETC Publications.Google Scholar
  16. Dreyfus, H., & Dreyfus, S. (1986). Mind over machine: The power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  17. Friedman, R. (2010). 10 questions for Ray Kurzweil. Time (December 6). Retrieved 20 December 2010 from,9171,2033076,00.html.
  18. Geraci, R. M. (2008). Apocalyptic AI: Religion and the promise of artificial intelligence. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 76(1), 138–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Geraci, R. M. (2010). Apocalyptic AI: Visions of heaven in robotics, artificial intelligence, and virtual reality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Govers, F. X. (2008). The MULE: Anatomy of a U.S. Army warrior bot. Robot, 12, 30–31.Google Scholar
  21. Govers, F. X. (2010). U.S. Army holds ‘robot rodeo’ at Ford Hood. Robot, 20, 24–27.Google Scholar
  22. Gutkind, L. (2006). Almost human: Making robots think. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  23. Haraway, D. (1997). Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium.Female_Man©_Meets_Oncomouse™. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Hornyak, T. N. (2006). Loving the machine: The art and science of Japanese robots. New York: Kodansha International.Google Scholar
  25. Joy, B. (2000). Why the future doesn’t need us. Wired 8.04 (April). Retrieved June 2007 from
  26. Kurzweil, R. (1999). The age of spiritual machines: When computers exceed human intelligence. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  27. Kurzweil, R. (2005). The Singularity is near: When humans transcend biology. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  28. Lang, F. (1927). Metropolis. Berlin: Universum Film AG.Google Scholar
  29. Lanier, J. (2010). You are not a gadget: A manifesto. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  30. Latour, B. (1983). Give me a laboratory and I will raise the world. In K. Knorr-Cetina & M. Mulkay (Eds.), Science observed: Perspectives on the social study of science (pp. 141–170). Beverley Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  31. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Levy, D. (2006). Robots unlimited: Life in a virtual age. Wellesley: A.K. Peters.Google Scholar
  34. Levy, L. (2007). Love and sex with Robots: The evolution of human–robot relationships. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  35. Liebowitz, S. J., & Margolis, S. E. (1995). Path dependence, lock-in, and history. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 11(1), 205–226.Google Scholar
  36. Marsh, T. (2009). Robobusiness 2009 highlights: Military and healthcare. Robot, 18, 52–55.Google Scholar
  37. Marsh, T. (2010a). 2009 AUVSI Conference Coverage: Latest-Generation Unmanned Systems for Military and Commercial Applications. Robot, 20, 74–77.Google Scholar
  38. Marsh, T. (2010b). Snapshot: Guess who’s coming to dinner? Robot, 21, 50.Google Scholar
  39. Massimov, K.K. (2011). Posting on (May 22). Retrieved 24 May 2011 from!/KarimMassimov_E.
  40. Minsky, M. (1994). Will robots inherit the earth? Scientific American (October). Retrieved 14 June 2007 from
  41. Mitsuoka, G. (2011). AUVSI North America 2010: Unmanned systems land in Denver. Robot, 26, 42–45.Google Scholar
  42. Moravec, H. (1978). Today’s computers, intelligent machines and our future. Analog 99, 2 (February), 59–84. Retrieved 5 August 2007 from
  43. Moravec, H. (1988). Mind children: The future of robot and human intelligence. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Moravec, H. (1992). Letter from Moravec to Penrose. Electronic-mail correspondence published in Thinking Robots. In R. B. Miller & M. T. Wolf (Eds.), An aware Internet, and cyberpunk librarians: The 1992 LITA President’s Program (pp. 51–58). Chicago: Library and Information Technology Association.Google Scholar
  45. Moravec, H. (1999). Robot: Mere machine to transcendent mind. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Moshkina, L. & Arkin R. (2007). Lethality and autonomous systems: Survey design and results. Technical Report GIT-GVU-07-16, Georgia Institute of Technology.
  47. Pinch, T. J., & Bijsterveld, K. (2003). ‘Should one applaud?’: Breaches and boundaries in the reception of new technology in music. Technology and Culture, 44(3), 536–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schodt, F. L. (1988). Inside the robot kingdom: Japan, mechatronics, and the coming robotopia. New York: Kodansha International.Google Scholar
  49. Singer, P. W. (2009). Wired for war: The robotics revolution and conflict in the 21st century. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  50. Sparrow, R. (2009). Building a better warbot: Ethical issues in the design of unmanned systems for military applications. Science and Engineering Ethics, 15(2), 169–187.Google Scholar
  51. Spinetta, L. (2009). Predator UAV: The ultimate teleoperated robot. Robot, 16, 20–23.Google Scholar
  52. Staff, R. M. (2008). Snapshot: Global hawk unmanned aerial vehicle. Robot, 12, 32.Google Scholar
  53. Staff, R. M., Lastrapes, T., Newhouse, S., & Krasny, D. (2009). Battelle multi-use robotic system: Robots to clean tanks of mighty B-52 Stratofortress. Robot, 15, 32–35.Google Scholar
  54. Stross, C. (2005). Accelerando. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  55. Telotte, J. P. (1995). Replications: A robotic history of the science fiction film. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  56. Tierney, J. (2008). The future is now? Pretty soon, at least. New York Times (June 3).
  57. Vinge, V. [1993] 2003. Technological Singularity (revised edition). Retrieved 29 August 2009 from
  58. Wallach, W., & Angle, C. (2009). Moral machines: Teaching robots right from wrong. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Warwick, K. [1997] 2004. March of the machines: The breakthrough in artificial intelligence. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  60. Weinberg, S. (1992). Dreams of a final theory: The scientist’s search for the ultimate laws of nature. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  61. Wilson, D. (2005). How to survive a robot uprising: Tips on defending yourself against the coming rebellion. New York: Bloomsbury USA.Google Scholar
  62. Young, J. R. (2009). Founder of Singularity University talks about his unusual new university. Chronicle of Higher Education (Feb 3).

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Religious StudiesManhattan CollegeRiverdaleUSA

Personalised recommendations