Abstract
In a recent publication in this journal, Asle Kiran and Peter-Paul Verbeek (hereafter K&V) argue that extension theory and the notion of trust it implies are flawed. In this commentary, I defend extension theory against their critique. I first briefly introduce extension theory, then reconstruct K&V’s five arguments against extension theory and demonstrate that four of their five arguments are misplaced.
Notes
An anonymous reviewer pointed this out.
References
Brey, P. (2000). Technology as extension of human faculties. In C. Mitcham (Ed.), Metaphysics, epistemology and technology. Research in philosophy and technology, vol. 19. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Clark, A. (2003). Natural-born cyborgs: Minds, technologies, and the future of human intelligence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Clark, A. (2007). Reinventing ourselves: The plasticity of embodiment, sensing, and mind. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 32(3), 263–282.
Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58, 10–23.
De Preester, H. (2010). Technology and the body: The (im)possibilities of re-embodiment. Foundations of Science, 16(2–3), 119–137.
Donald, M. (1991). Origins of the modern mind: Three stages in the evolution of culture and cognition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Feibleman, J. K. (1967). The philosophy of tools. Social Forces, 45(3), 329–337.
Gehlen, A. (2003). A philosophical–anthropological perspective on technology. In R. C. Scharff & V. Dusek (Eds.), Philosophy of technology. The technological condition: An anthology (pp. 213–220). Oxford: Blackwell.
Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Ihde, D. (1990). Technology and the lifeworld: From garden to earth. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Kiran, A. H., & Verbeek, P.-P. (2010). Trusting our selves to technology. Knowledge, Technology & Policy, 23, 409–427.
McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Sutton, J. (2010). Exograms and interdisciplinarity: History, the extended mind, and the civilizing process. In R. Menary (Ed.), The extended mind (pp. 189–225). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Sutton, J., Harris, C. B., Keil, P. G., & Barnier, A. J. (2010). The psychology of memory, extended cognition, and socially distributed remembering. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 9(4), 521–560.
Acknowledgements
I would like to express my gratitude to Asle Kiran, John Sutton, Sadjad Soltanzadeh, as well as two anonymous reviewers for commenting on an earlier draft.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Heersmink, R. Defending Extension Theory: A Response to Kiran and Verbeek. Philos. Technol. 25, 121–128 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-011-0035-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-011-0035-6