Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Action Schemes: Questions and Suggestions

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Philosophy & Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In “Artefacts Without Agency,” Christian Illies and Anthonie Meijers articulate the basic framework of a notion identified as “Action Schemes.” We identify an internal inconsistency in their account and offer concrete suggestions on how to avoid it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Reference

  • Illies, C., & Meijers, A. (2009). Artefacts without agency. The Monist, 92(3), 420–440.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, USA

    Evan Selinger & Jesús Aguilar

  2. Department of Philosophy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA

    Kyle Powys Whyte

Authors
  1. Evan Selinger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jesús Aguilar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kyle Powys Whyte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Evan Selinger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Selinger, E., Aguilar, J. & Whyte, K.P. Action Schemes: Questions and Suggestions. Philos. Technol. 24, 83–88 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-010-0007-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-010-0007-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation