Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling and simulation of a novel autonomous underwater vehicle with glider and flapping-foil propulsion capabilities

  • Published:
China Ocean Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

HAISHEN is a long-ranged and highly maneuverable AUV which has two operating modes: glider mode and flapping-foil propulsion mode. As part of the vehicle development, a three-dimensional mathematical model of the conceptual vehicle was developed on the assumption that HAISHEN has a rigid body with two independently controlled oscillating hydrofoils. A flapping-foil model was developed based on the work done by Georgiades et al. (2009). Effect of controllable hydrofoils on the vehicle stable motion performance was studied theoretically. Finally, a dynamics simulation of the vehicle in both operating modes is created in this paper. The simulation demonstrates that: (1) in the glider mode, owing to the independent control of the pitch angle of each hydrofoil, HAISHEN travels faster and more efficiently and has a smaller turning radius than conventional fix-winged gliders; (2) in the flapping-foil propulsion mode, HAISHEN has a high maneuverability with a turning radius smaller than 15 m and a forward motion velocity about 1.8 m/s; (3) the vehicle is stable under all expected operating conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arima, M., Ichihashi, N. and Miwa, Y., 2009. Modeling and motion simulation of an underwater glider with independently controllable main wings, Proc. IEEE OCEANS 2009, 1–6.

  • Apneseth, C. C., Day, A. H. and Clelland, D., 2010. Hydrodynamics of an oscillating articulated eel-like structure, Ocean Eng., 37(13): 1221–1232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, R. E., Eriksen, C. C. and Jones, C. P., 2003. Autonomous buoyancy-driven underwater gliders, The Technology and Applications of Autonomous Underwater Vehicles, 37–58.

  • Eriksen, C. C., Osse, T. J., Light, R. D., Wen, T., Lehman, T. W., Sabin, P. L., Ballard, J. W. and Chiodi, A. W., 2001. Seaglider, a long range autonomous underwater vehicle for oceanographic research, IEEE J. Oceanic Eng., 26(4): 424–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fossen, T. I., 1994. Guidance and Control of Ocean Vehicles, New York, Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgiades, C., Nahon, M. and Buehler, M., 2009. Simulation of an underwater hexapod robot, Ocean Eng., 36(1): 39–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graver, J. G., 2005. Underwater Gliders: Dynamics, Control and Design, Ph. D. Thesis, Princeton University.

  • Harper, K. A., Berkemerier, M. D. and Grace, S., 1998. Modeling the dynamics of spring-driven oscillating foil propulsion, IEEE J. Oceanic Eng., 23(3): 285–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healey, A. J., Rock, S. M., Cody, S., Miles, D. and Brown, J. P., 1994. Toward an improved understanding of thruster dynamics for underwater vehicles, IEEE J. Oceanic Eng., 20(4): 354–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hussain, N. A. A., Arshad, M. R. and Mokhtar, R. M., 2011. Underwater glider modelling and analysis for net buoyancy, depth and pitch angle control, Ocean Eng., 38(16): 1782–1791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isa, K. and Arshad, M. R., 2011. Motion Simulation for propeller-driven USM underwater glider with controllable wings and rudder, Proc. 2nd International Conference on Instrumentation, Control and Automation, Indonesia, 316–321.

  • Kelly, S. D. and Murray, R. M., 2000. Modeling efficient pisciform swimming for control, International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 10(4): 217–241.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Laurence, K. L. and Kenneth, G. C., 1951. Aerodynamic characteristics of a number of modified NACA four-digit-series airfoil sections, National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics Collection.

  • Leonard, N. E. and Graver, J. G., 2001. Model based feedback control of autonomous underwater gliders, IEEE J. Oceanic Eng., 26(4): 633–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., Lu, C. J. and Huang, X., 2010. Calculation of added mass of a vehicle running with cavity, Journal of Hydrodynamics, Ser. B, 22(3): 312–318.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Li, T. S., 2007. Torpedo Manoeuvrability, Revision. Beijing, National Defense Industry Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Licht, S., Hover, F. and Triantafyllou, M. S., 2004a. Design of a flapping foil underwater vehicle, Proceedings of International Symposium on Underwater Technology, 311–316.

  • Licht, S., Polidoro, V., Flores, M., Hover, F. and Triantafyllou, M. S., 2004b. Design and projected performance of a flapping foil AUV, IEEE J. Oceanic Eng., 29(3): 786–794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lighthill, M. J., 1970. Aquatic animal propulsion of high hydromechanical efficiency, J. Fluid Mech., 44, 265–301.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, X. Y., Yin, X. Z., Yang, J. M. and Tong, B. G., 2010. Studies of hydrodynamics in fishlike swimming propulsion, Journal of Hydrodynamics, Ser. B, 22(5): 17–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mantia, M. L. and Dabnichki, P., 2009. Unsteady panel method for flapping foil, Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, 33(4): 572–580.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, B. W., 1995. Aerodynamics, Aeronautics, and Flight Mechanics, New York, Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medjroubi, W., Stoevesandt, B., Carmo, B. and Peinke, J., 2011. High-order numerical simulations of the flow around a heaving airfoil, Computers and Fluids, 51(1): 68–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrault, D. E., 2002. Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUV) Sensitivity of Motion Response to Geometric and Hydrodynamic Parameters and AUV Behaviors with Control Plane Faults, Ph. D. Thesis, Memorial University of Newfoundland.

  • Sherman, J., Davis, R. E., Owens, W. B. and Valdes J., 2001. The autonomous underwater glider “Spray”, IEEE J. Oceanic Eng., 26(4): 437–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stommel, H., 1989. The Slocum mission, Oceanography, 2(1): 22–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triantafyllou, M. S., Techet, A. H. and Hover, F. S., 2004. Review of experimental work in biomimetric foils, IEEE J. Oceanic Eng., 29(3): 585–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Triantafyllou, M. S. and Triantafyllou, G. S., 1995. An efficient swimming machine, Scientific American, 272(3): 64–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S. X., Sun, X. J., Wang, Y. H., Wu, J. G. and Wang, X. M., 2011. Dynamic modeling and motion simulation for a winged hybrid-driven underwater glider, China Ocean Eng., 25(1): 97–112.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. H. and Wang, S. X., 2009. Dynamic modeling and three-dimensional motion analysis of underwater gliders, China Ocean Eng., 23(3): 489–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z. D., Lao, Y. J., Li, L. J. and Cong, W. C., 2010. Experiment on the characteristic of 3-D vortex ring behind a flexible oscillating caudal fin, Journal of Hydrodynamics, Ser. B, 22(3): 393–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, D. C., Simonetti, P. J. and Jones, C. P., 2001. Slocum: an underwater glider propelled by environmental energy, IEEE J. Oceanic Eng., 26(4): 447–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wen-long Tian  (田文龙).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tian, Wl., Song, Bw., Du, Xx. et al. Modeling and simulation of a novel autonomous underwater vehicle with glider and flapping-foil propulsion capabilities. China Ocean Eng 26, 603–622 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13344-012-0046-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13344-012-0046-9

Key words

Navigation