Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Antihypertensive and metabolic effects of hydrochlorothiazide versus amlodipine when added to losartan in patients with type 2 diabetes

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Diabetology International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We performed a prospective, randomized, multicenter, parallel-group, per-protocol study to compare the effects of hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) and amlodipine as add-on to losartan treatment in hypertensive type 2 diabetic patients. A total of 49 Japanese type 2 diabetic patients with inadequate control of blood pressure while receiving losartan 50 mg were randomly allocated to receive a fixed-dose single-pill combination of HCTZ 12.5 mg plus losartan (N = 26) or a free combination of amlodipine 5 mg plus losartan (N = 23). During 8 weeks of follow-up, changes in blood pressure and laboratory data including HbA1c, uric acid, and potassium were compared between the groups using analysis of covariance. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure decreased in both groups, the reductions of which were greater in the amlodipine group. However, the least square mean (95 % CI) differences between groups were not statistically significant [2.3 (−6.8 to 11.4) mmHg, p = 0.618 and 2.7 (−2.4–7.9) mmHg, p = 0.293, respectively]. HbA1c increased in patients receiving HCTZ but not in the amlodipine group. Uric acid also increased in patients receiving HCTZ but decreased in patients receiving amlodipine, yielding a significant between-group difference of 1.0 (0.5–1.5) mg/dl (p < 0.001). No intra- or intergroup change was observed in serum potassium levels. This pilot study suggests that HCTZ and amlodipine result in nonsignificant effects on systolic and diastolic blood pressure reduction when administrated as add-on therapy to losartan in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes; however, addition of HCTZ may be associated with less favorable effects on metabolic profiles than amlodipine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shimamoto K, Ando K, Fujita T, Hasebe N, Higaki J, Horiuchi M, et al. The Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension (JSH 2014). Hypertens Res. 2014;37:253–390.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mancia G, Fagard R, Narkiewicz K, Redón J, Zanchetti A, Böhm M, et al. 2013 ESH/ESC Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). J Hypertens. 2013;31:1281–357.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. James PA, Oparil S, Carter BL, Cushman WC, Dennison-Himmelfarb C, Handler J, et al. 2014 evidence-based guideline for the management of high blood pressure in adults: report from the panel members appointed to the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC 8). JAMA. 2014;311:507–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. American Diabetes Association, Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes. 8. Cardiovascular disease and risk management. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(Suppl. 1):S49–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mahmud A, Feely J. Low-dose quadruple antihypertensive combination: more efficacious than individual agents–a preliminary report. Hypertension. 2007;49:272–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kurnatowska I, Królikowski J, Jesionowska K, Marczak A, Krajewska J, Zbróg Z, et al. Prevalence of arterial hypertension and the number and classes of antihypertensive drugs prescribed for patients late after kidney transplantation. Ann Transplant. 2012;17:50–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Burnier M, Brown RE, Ong SH, Keskinaslan A, Khan ZM. Issues in blood pressure control and the potential role of single-pill combination therapies. Int J Clin Pract. 2009;63:790–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bakris GL, Toto RD, McCullough PA, Rocha R, Purkayastha D, Davis P, et al. Effects of different ACE inhibitor combinations on albuminuria: results of the GUARD study. Kidney Int. 2008;73:1303–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ando K, Nitta K, Rakugi H, Nishizawa Y, Yokoyama H, Nakanishi T, et al. Comparison of the antialbuminuric effects of benidipine and hydrochlorothiazide in renin–angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitor-treated hypertensive patients with albuminuria: the COSMO-CKD (combination strategy on renal function of benidipine or diuretics treatment with ras inhibitors in a chronic kidney disease hypertensive population) study. Int J Med Sci. 2014;11:897–904.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Palmer BF. Metabolic complications associated with use of diuretics. Semin Nephrol. 2011;31:542–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Peterzan MA, Hardy R, Chaturvedi N, Hughes AD. Meta-analysis of dose–response relationships for hydrochlorothiazide, chlorthalidone, and bendroflumethiazide on blood pressure, serum potassium, and urate. Hypertension. 2012;59:1104–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Franse LV, Pahor M, Di Bari M, Shorr RI, Wan JY, Somes GW, et al. Serum uric acid, diuretic treatment and risk of cardiovascular events in the systolic hypertension in the elderly program (SHEP). J Hypertens. 2000;18:1149–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jamerson K, Weber MA, Bakris GL, Dahlöf B, Pitt B, Shi V, et al. Benazepril plus amlodipine or hydrochlorothiazide for hypertension in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2417–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dahlöf B, Sever PS, Poulter NR, Wedel H, Beevers DG, Caulfield M, et al. Prevention of cardiovascular events with an antihypertensive regimen of amlodipine adding perindopril as required versus atenolol adding bendroflumethiazide as required, in the Anglo–Scandinavian cardiac outcomes trial-blood pressure lowering arm (ASCOT-BPLA): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;366:895–906.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, Naylor BA, Treacher DF, Turner RC. Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia. 1985;28:412–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kashiwagi A, Kasuga M, Araki E, Oka Y, Hanafusa T, Ito H, Araki E, et al. International clinical harmonization of glycated hemoglobin in Japan: from Japan Diabetes Society to national glycohemoglobin standardization program values. Diabetol Int. 2012;3:8–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Matsuo S, Imai E, Horio M, Yasuda Y, Tomita K, Nitta K, et al. Revised equations for estimated GFR from serum creatinine in Japan. Am J Kidney Dis. 2009;53:982–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hood SJ, Taylor KP, Ashby MJ, Brown MJ. The spironolactone, amiloride, losartan, and thiazide (SALT) double-blind crossover trial in patients with low-renin hypertension and elevated aldosterone–renin ratio. Circulation. 2007;116:268–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hayashi M, Uchida S, Kawamura T, Kuwahara M, Nangaku M, Iino Y; The PROTECT-CKD Study Group (2015) Prospective randomized study of the tolerability and efficacy of combination therapy for hypertensive chronic kidney disease: results of the PROTECT-CKD study. Clin Exp Nephrol 2015;19:925–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nishiwaki M, Hosoai H, Ikewaki K, Ayaori M, Yamashita T, Shige H, et al. Efficacy and effects on lipid metabolism of combination treatment with losartan + hydrochlorothiazide versus losartan + amlodipine: a 48-week prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label trial. Clin Ther. 2013;35:461–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Messerli FH, Makani H, Benjo A, Romero J, Alviar C, Bangalore S. Antihypertensive efficacy of hydrochlorothiazide as evaluated by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57:590–600.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kato J, Yokota N, Tamaki N, Kariya S, Kita T, Ayabe T, et al. Comparison of combination therapies, including the angiotensin receptor blocker olmesartan and either a calcium channel blocker or a thiazide diuretic, in elderly patients with hypertension. Hypertens Res. 2011;34:331–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Musini VM, Nazer M, Bassett K, Wright JM. Blood pressure-lowering efficacy of monotherapy with thiazide diuretics for primary hypertension. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;5:CD003824.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ruilope LM, Simpson RL, Toh J, Arcuri KE, Goldberg AI, Sweet CS. Controlled trial of losartan given concomitantly with different doses of hydrochlorothiazide in hypertensive patients. Blood Press. 1996;5:32–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Runyan JW Jr. Influence of thiazide diuretics on carbohydrate metabolism in patients with mild diabetes. N Engl J Med. 1962;267:541–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group. Major cardiovascular events in hypertensive patients randomized to doxazosin vs chlorthalidone: the antihypertensive and lipid-lowering treatment to prevent heart attack trial (ALLHAT). JAMA. 2000;283:1967–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Elliott WJ, Meyer PM. Incident diabetes in clinical trials of antihypertensive drugs: a network meta-analysis. Incident diabetes in clinical trials of antihypertensive drugs: a network meta-analysis. Lancet. 2007;369:201–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hirst JA, Farmer AJ, Feakins BG, Aronson JK, Stevens RJ. Quantifying the effects of diuretics and β-adrenoceptor blockers on glycaemic control in diabetes mellitus—a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2015;79:733–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Harper R, Ennis CN, Heaney AP, Sheridan B, Gormley M, Atkinson AB, et al. A comparison of the effects of low- and conventional-dose thiazide diuretic on insulin action in hypertensive patients with NIDDM. Diabetologia. 1995;38:853–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ernst ME, Moser M. Use of diuretics in patients with hypertension. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:2153–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Zillich AJ, Garg J, Basu S, Bakris GL, Carter BL. Thiazide diuretics, potassium, and the development of diabetes: a quantitative review. Hypertension. 2006;48:219–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. McLaughlin DM, Atkinson AB, Ennis CN, Browne J, Hunter SJ, Sheridan B, et al. Comparison of effects of combined ACE inhibitor and low-dose thiazide diuretic with ACE inhibitor alone on insulin action in patients with hypertension and Type 2 diabetes: a double-blind crossover study. Diabet Med. 2008;25:631–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. McKenney JM, Goodman RP, Wright JT Jr, Rifai N, Aycock DG, King ME. The effect of low-dose hydrochlorothiazide on blood pressure, serum potassium, and lipoproteins. Pharmacotherapy. 1986;6:179–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Jounela AJ, Lilja M, Lumme J, Mörlin C, Hoyem A, Wessel-Aas T, et al. Relation between low dose of hydrochlorothiazide, antihypertensive effect and adverse effects. Blood Press. 1994;3:231–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sennesael JJ, Lamote JG, Violet I, Tasse S, Verbeelen DL. Divergent effects of calcium channel and angiotensin converting enzyme blockade on glomerulotubular function in cyclosporine-treated renal allograft recipients. Am J Kidney Dis. 1996;27:701–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Japan Kidney Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tetsuya Babazono.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

T. B. has received lecture fees from MSD, Pfizer, and Sumitomo Dainippon and research funding from MSD. O. T. has received lecture fees from MSD and Sumitomo Dainippon. Y. U has received lecture fees from MSD and research funding from MSD, Pfizer, and Sumitomo Dainippon. N. T., M. T., and Y. S. declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human rights statement and informed consent

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and later versions. Informed consent or a substitute for it was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tanaka, N., Babazono, T., Tanaka, M. et al. Antihypertensive and metabolic effects of hydrochlorothiazide versus amlodipine when added to losartan in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetol Int 7, 266–273 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13340-015-0243-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13340-015-0243-x

Keywords

Navigation