Advertisement

Diabetology International

, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 188–198 | Cite as

Predictors for achieving target glycemic control in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes after initiation of basal supported oral therapy using insulin glargine: sub-analysis of the ALOHA2 study, drug use surveillance in Japan

  • Yukio Ikeda
  • Shoko TsukubeEmail author
  • Takashi Kadowaki
  • Masato Odawara
Original Article

Abstract

Objectives

We aimed to identify diabetes-related factors associated with achieving HbA1c <7.0 % after the initiation of basal supported oral therapy (BOT) in insulin-naïve type 2 diabetes patients with an HbA1c value of ≥6.5 % during the previous 4 weeks, using data from Add-on Lantus® to Oral Hypoglycemic Agents 2 (ALOHA2) study, a 24-week observational study on Japanese type 2 diabetes patients.

Methods

Patients were categorized into two groups: HbA1c <7.0 % at the final evaluation point (at 24 weeks or the last visit) as HbA1c-target-achieved; HbA1c ≥7.0 % as target-not-achieved. Associations between baseline factors and HbA1c <7.0 % achievement were explored using logistic regression.

Results

Of the 1520 patients in the study, 400 patients (26.3 %) achieved HbA1c <7.0 %. Patients with diabetes duration of <1 year and between ≥1 and <2 years [odds ratio (OR): 5.27, 95 % confidence interval (CI): 1.13–24.51; OR: 3.77, 95 % CI 1.19–11.93, respectively], those on one pre-study orally administered antidiabetic agent (OAD) (OR: 2.42, 95 % CI 1.12–5.22), and those with absence of diabetic neuropathy (OR: 2.54, 95 % CI 1.12–5.76) were more likely to achieve HbA1c <7.0 % than those with duration of ≤15 years, ≥4 pre-study OADs, and neuropathy, respectively. Achievement of HbA1c <7.0 % among patients increased by approximately 20 % for each 1 % decrease in HbA1c level at baseline.

Conclusions

Shorter diabetes duration, pre-study regimen of one OAD, absence of neuropathy, and lower HbA1c level at baseline were associated with achievement of HbA1c <7.0 %, suggesting that earlier initiation of BOT leads to good HbA1c control in insulin-naïve Japanese type 2 diabetes patients, consistent with our early ALOHA study.

Keywords

Type 2 diabetes Basal supported oral therapy Insulin glargine Real-life observational study 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to all physicians at the hospitals and clinics participating in the ALOHA2 study. Statistical analysis was performed by EPS Corp., and editorial support was provided by Clinical Study Support, Inc., both under contract with Sanofi K.K. This study was conducted and sponsored by Sanofi K.K.

Sanofi K.K. had responsibility for the study design, statistical analysis plan, and drafting and approval of the manuscript. YI and ST drafted the manuscript. TK and MO made significant suggestions regarding analysis and interpretation of the data, and reviewed and revised the draft manuscript. All authors have reviewed and approved the final version of this manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

This study was conducted as a special drug use surveillance and complied with the Pharmaceutical Affairs Law enacted by the Japanese Health Authority and the ministerial ordinance, “Good Post-Marketing Study Practice (GPSP)”, and was conducted after a contract was signed with each medical institution participating in the survey.

Conflict of interest

YI and ST are employees of Sanofi K.K., Tokyo, Japan. Insulin glargine is marketed by Sanofi K.K. under the name Lantus®. TK has served on advisory panels for Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi-Sankyo, Novo Nordisk, Taisho, Takeda and Tanabe-Mitsubishi, and has served as a consultant for Boehringer Ingelheim and MSD (Merck), and has received research support from AstraZeneca, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, MSD, Ono, Sanofi, Takeda and Tanabe-Mitsubishi, and has served on speakers’ bureaus for Astellas, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi-Sankyo, Dainippon Sumitomo, Eli Lilly, Kowa, Kyowahakko Kirin, MSD, Novartis, Ono, Sanofi, Sanwa, Taisho, Takeda and Tanabe-Mitsubishi. MO has served on advisory panels for AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi and Taisho, has received research support from Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi-Sankyo, Dainippon Sumitomo, Eli Lilly, Kowa, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, MSD, Novartis, Ono, Sanofi, Taisho, Takeda and Tanabe-Mitsubishi, and has served on speakers’ bureaus for Astellas, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi-Sankyo, Dainippon Sumitomo, Eli Lilly, Kowa, Kyowahakko Kirin, MSD, Novartis, Ono, Sanofi, Taisho, Takeda and Tanabe-Mitsubishi.

Informed consent

Informed consent or substituted consent was obtained from all patients included in the ALOHA2 study.

Supplementary material

13340_2015_236_MOESM1_ESM.doc (98 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 98 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Stratton IM, Adler AI, Neil HA, et al. Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study. BMJ. 2000;321:405–12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nathan DM, Buse JB, Davidson MB, et al. Medical management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: a consensus algorithm for the initiation and adjustment of therapy: a consensus statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the study of diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009;27:4–16.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Canadian Diabetes Association Clinical Practice Guidelines Expert Committee. Canadian Diabetes Association 2008 Clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and management of diabetes in Canada. Can J Diabetes. 2008;32:S1–201.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Japan Diabetes Society. Treatment guide for diabetes 2014–2015. Tokyo: Bunkodo Co., Ltd.; 2014.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vouri SM, Shaw RF, Waterbury NV, et al. Prevalence of achievement of A1c, blood pressure, and cholesterol (ABC) goal in veterans with diabetes. J Manag Care Pharm. 2011;17:304–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stark Casagrande S, Fradkin JE, Saydah SH, et al. The prevalence of meeting A1C, blood pressure, and LDL goals among people with diabetes, 1988–2010. Diabetes Care. 2013;36:2271–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chan JC, Gagliardino JJ, Baik SH, et al. Multifaceted determinants for achieving glycemic control: the International Diabetes Management Practice Study (IDMPS). Diabetes Care. 2009;32:227–33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kawamori R, Node K, Hanafusa T, et al. Baseline and 1 year interim follow-up assessment of Japanese patients initiating insulin therapy who were enrolled in the cardiovascular risk evaluation in people with type 2 diabetes on insulin therapy study: an international, multicenter, observational study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2013;12:131.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Riddle MC, Rosenstock J, Gerich J, et al. The treat-to-target trial: randomized addition of glargine or human NPH insulin to oral therapy of type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:3080–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Inzucchi SE, Bergenstal RM, Buse JB, et al. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes, 2015: a patient-centered approach: update to a position statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the study of diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2015;38:140–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ohtani T, Ito T. Safety and effectiveness of BOT (Basal supported Oral Therapy) using insulin glargine in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes—results from post-marketing surveillance of insulin glargine (ALOHA study). Shinyaku Rinsho (J New Rem Clin). 2011;60:458–75.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kadowaki T, Ohtani T, Odawara M. Potential formula for the calculation of starting and incremental insulin glargine doses: ALOHA subanalysis. PLoS One. 2012;7:e41358.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kadowaki T, Ohtani T, Odawara M. Baseline predictive factors for glycemic control in Japanese type 2 diabetes patients treated with insulin glargine plus oral antidiabetic drugs: ALOHA study subanalysis. Diabetol Int. 2012;4:16–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Odawara M, Ohtani T, Kadowaki T. Dosing of insulin glargine to achieve the treatment target in Japanese type 2 diabetes on a basal supported oral therapy regimen in real life: ALOHA study subanalysis. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2012;14:635–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Odawara M, Kadowaki T, Naito Y. Incidence and predictors of hypoglycemia in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes treated by insulin glargine and oral antidiabetic drugs in real-life: ALOHA post-marketing surveillance study sub-analysis. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2014;6:20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Seufert J, Pegelow K, Bramlage P. Efficacy and safety of insulin glargine added to a fixed-dose combination of metformin and a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor: results of the GOLD observational study. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2013;9:711–7.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vilsbøll T, Rosenstock J, Yki-Järvinen H, et al. Efficacy and safety of sitagliptin when added to insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2010;12:167–77.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kobayashi M, Tsukube S, Ikeda Y, Shuto Y. Safety and efficacy of combination therapy with insulin glargine and oral hypoglycaemic agents including DPP-4 inhibitors in Japanese T2DM patients: ALOHA 2 study, a post-marketing surveillance for Lantus®. J Diabetes Mellit. 2014;4:273–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kashiwagi A, Kasuga M, Araki E, et al. Related laboratory testing of Japan Diabetes Society. International clinical harmonization of glycated hemoglobin in Japan: from Japan diabetes society to National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program values. J Diabetes Investig. 2012;3:39–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Origin Trial Investigators, Gerstein HC, Bosch J, et al. Basal insulin and cardiovascular and other outcomes in dysglycemia. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:319–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Polonsky WH, Fisher L, Guzman S, et al. Psychological insulin resistance in patients with type 2 diabetes: the scope of the problem. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:2543–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Peyrot M, Rubin RR, Lauritzen T, et al. Resistance to insulin therapy among patients and providers: results of the cross-national Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes, and Needs (DAWN) study. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:2673–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Odawara M, Kadowaki T, Naito Y. Effectiveness and safety of basal supported oral therapy with insulin glargine, in Japanese insulin-naive, type 2 diabetes patients, with or without microvascular complications: subanalysis of the observational, non-interventional, 24-week follow-up Add-on Lantus® to Oral Hypoglycemic Agents (ALOHA) study. J Diabetes Complicat. 2015;29:127–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japan Diabetes Society 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yukio Ikeda
    • 1
  • Shoko Tsukube
    • 1
    Email author
  • Takashi Kadowaki
    • 2
  • Masato Odawara
    • 3
  1. 1.Sanofi K.K.TokyoJapan
  2. 2.Department of Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases, Graduate School of MedicineUniversity of TokyoTokyoJapan
  3. 3.Department of Diabetology, Metabolism, and EndocrinologyTokyo Medical UniversityTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations