Advertisement

Diabetology International

, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 111–118 | Cite as

The relationship between patient perception of healthcare provision by professionals and the self-care activity of patients with diabetes: Japanese subgroup analysis of the second Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes, and Needs (DAWN2) study

  • Yasuaki HayashinoEmail author
  • Hitoshi Ishii
Original Article

Abstract

Data for a subgroup of Japanese diabetes patients from the second Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes, and Needs (DAWN2) study were analyzed to investigate possible relationships between patient-perceived healthcare provision by healthcare professionals, patient self-care, and glycemic control, by focusing on the patient’s perception. Patients answered a questionnaire that was originally developed and validated for the DAWN2 study. Questions on their perception of healthcare provision, duration of self-care activity during the past 7 days, and their last HbA1c level were analyzed. Self-care activity for more than 5 days was regarded as good adherence. This analysis included 508 patients (81 type 1 and 427 type 2). Of the self-care activity, “taking physical activity” for both types of diabetes and “checking feet” for type 2 patients were implemented for longer among patients with the perception of equivalent care provision than among those without. Patients with perception of “examining feet” as healthcare provision also reported longer implementation of “following healthy diet”, “taking physical activity”, “testing blood sugar”, and “taking diabetes medications exactly” than those who did not; however, this trend was not observed for “testing blood sugar” among type 1 patients. HbA1c level was significantly lower among type 2 patients with good adherence to “following healthy diet” and “taking physical activity”. Association may exist between patients’ perceptions of diabetes care and improvement in self-care activity, and between more engagement in self-care activity and better HbA1c achievement as a treatment outcome. For better management, it is essential for healthcare professionals to provide care that patients can perceive.

Keywords

Adherence Diabetes mellitus Healthcare professionals Patient perception Self-care 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Novo Nordisk A/S funded the DAWN2 study. Statistical and editorial support was provided by Clinical Study Support, Inc.

Conflict of interest

Yasuaki Hayashino has received funding for travel and accommodation to attend DAWN2 summit and EASD meetings but has not received any fee for this work from Novo Nordisk. Hitoshi Ishii has received honoraria for lectures from MSD, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Eli Lilly, and AstraZeneca and scholarship grants from Mitsubishi Tanabe.

Human rights

This study was conducted in accordance with relevant ethical requirements, following regional and/or national and/or local guidelines relating to the conduct of non-interventional studies. Informed consent was obtained from all patients before inclusion in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The absence of a glycemic threshold for the development of long-term complications: the perspective of the diabetes control and complications trial. Diabetes. 1996;45:1289–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stratton IM, Adler AI, Neil HAW, Matthews DR, Manley SE, Cull CA, Hadden D, Turner RC, Holman RR. Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study. BMJ. 2000;321:405–12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ali MK, Bullard KM, Saaddine JB, Cowie CC, Imperatore G, Gregg EW. Achievement of goals in US diabetes care, 1999–2010. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:1613–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Harris MI. Healthcare and health status and outcomes for patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2000;23:754–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cramer JA. A systematic review of adherence with medications for diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:1218–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Glasgow RE, Hampson SE, Strycker LA, Ruggiero L. Personal-model beliefs and social-environmental barriers related to diabetes self-management. Diabetes Care. 1997;20:556–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hunt LM, Pugh J, Valenzuela M. How patients adapt diabetes self-care recommendations in everyday life. J Fam Pract. 1998;46:207–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    McNabb WL. Adherence in diabetes: can we define it and can we measure it? Diabetes Care. 1997;20:215–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yoshioka N, Ishii H, Tajima N, Iwamoto Y, DAWN Japan Group. Differences in physician and patient perceptions about insulin therapy for management of type 2 diabetes: the DAWN Japan study. Curr Med Res Opin. 2014;30:177–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Peyrot M, Burns KK, Davies M, Forbes A, Hermanns N, Holt R, Kalra S, Nicolucci A, Pouwer F, Wens J, Willaing I, Skovlund SE. Diabetes Attitudes Wishes and Needs 2 (DAWN2): a multinational, multi-stakeholder study of psychosocial issues in diabetes and person-centred diabetes care. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2013;99:174–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nicolucci A, Burns KK, Holt RIG, Comaschi M, Hermanns N, Ishii H, Kokoszka A, Pouwer F, Skovlund SE, Stuckey H, Tarkun I, Vallis M, Wens J, Peyrot M, DAWN2 Study Group. Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes and Needs second study (DAWN2™): cross-national benchmarking of diabetes-related psychosocial outcomes for people with diabetes. Diabet Med. 2013;30:767–77.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Holt RIG, Nicolucci A, Burns KK, Escalante M, Forbes A, Hermanns N, Kalra S, Massi-Benedetti M, Mayorov A, Menéndez-Torre E, Munro N, Skovlund SE, Tarkun I, Wens J, Peyrot M, DAWN2 Study Group. Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes and Needs second study (DAWN2™): cross-national comparisons on barriers and resources for optimal care—healthcare professional perspective. Diabet Med. 2013;30:789–98.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Burns KK, Nicolucci A, Holt RIG, Willaing I, Hermanns N, Kalra S, Wens J, Pouwer F, Skovlund SE, Peyrot M, DAWN2 Study Group. Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes and Needs second study (DAWN2™): cross-national benchmarking indicators for family members living with people with diabetes. Diabet Med. 2013;30:778–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Toobert DJ, Hampson SE, Glasgow RE. The summary of diabetes self-care activities measure: results from 7 studies and a revised scale. Diabetes Care. 2000;23:943–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Funnell MM, Anderson RM. Empowerment and self-management of diabetes. Clinical Diabetes. 2004;22:123–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Heisler M, Bouknight RR, Hayward RA, Smith DM, Kerr EA. The relative importance of physician communication, participatory decision making, and patient understanding in diabetes self-management. J Gen Intern Med. 2002;17:243–52.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Del Canale S, Louis DZ, Maio V, Wang X, Rossi G, Hojat M, Gonnella JS. The relationship between physician empathy and disease complications: an empirical study of primary care physicians and their diabetic patients in Parma, Italy. Acad Med. 2012;87:1243–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hojat M, Louis DZ, Markham FW, Wender R, Rabinowitz C, Gonnella JS. Physicians empathy and clinical outcomes for diabetic patients. Acad Med. 2011;86:359–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Levinson W, Gorawara-Bhat R, Lamb J. A study of patient clues and physician responses in primary care and surgical settings. JAMA. 2000;284:1021–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wilson A, Childs S. The relationship between consultation length, process and outcomes in general practice: a systematic review. Br J Gen Pract. 2002;52:1012–20.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bruce M. The physical exam. In: Bruce M, editor. Clinical medicine in optometric practice. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby Elsevier; 2007. p. 9–25.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Donnelly LA, Morris AD, Evans JM. Adherence to insulin and its association with glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. QJM. 2007;100:345–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Morowatisharifabad M, Mazloomy Mahmoodabad S, Baghianimoghadam M, Tonekaboni NR. Relationships between locus of control and adherence to diabetes regimen. J Res Health Sci. 2009;9:37–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japan Diabetes Society 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EndocrinologyTenri hospitalTenriJapan
  2. 2.Department of DiabetologyNara Medical UniversityKashiharaJapan

Personalised recommendations