Advertisement

Diabetology International

, Volume 7, Issue 1, pp 25–33 | Cite as

Decreased glucagon levels and decreased insulin secretion after sitagliptin versus mitiglinide administration with similar glycemic levels following an oral glucose load: a randomized crossover pharmaceutical mechanistic study

  • Yoshitaka Akiyama
  • Tomoko Morita-Ohkubo
  • Natsuko Oshitani
  • Yuko Ohno
  • Yoshimasa Aso
  • Toshihiko Inukai
  • Masafumi Kakei
  • Masanobu Kawakami
  • Takuya Awata
  • Shigehiro Katayama
  • Masafumi MatsudaEmail author
Original Article
  • 242 Downloads

Abstract

Aims

Both sitagliptin (SIT) and mitiglinide (MIT) can lower postprandial hyperglycemia. The purpose of this study was to examine differences in insulin and glucagon secretion after SIT or MIT administration when similar levels of plasma glucose (PG) were achieved for both agents following an oral glucose load.

Patients and methods

We directly compared the effects of these two agents in 16 type-2 diabetic patients (M/F = 10/6, age 66 ± 3 years old, HbA1c 6.6 ± 0.5 %). Patients received SIT (50 mg qd for 1 week and 100 mg qd for an additional week) or MIT (10 mg tid for 2 weeks). After 2 weeks, patients crossed over to the other treatment. 75-g oral glucose tolerance tests were conducted before the study and after interventions.

Results

The area under the curve (AUC) up to 180 min for the PG response was similar for both agents. While basal insulin secretion rates (ISR) were similar, incremental AUC of ISR was significantly lower in the SIT treatment (522 ± 108 vs 702 ± 288 pmol/min min, p < 0.01), although the difference between the SIT and MIT treatments in the Matsuda index—which reflects insulin sensitivity—remained nonsignificant. Glucose-stimulated insulin secretion was similarly increased by the MIT and SIT treatments. Suppression of the AUC for glucagon was observed in the SIT treatment, while MIT treatment failed to suppress the glucagon concentration (−432 ± 2322 vs MIT 1116 ± 2520 pg/ml min, p < 0.05). The basal proinsulin/insulin ratio was lower in the SIT treatment (0.23 ± 0.04 vs MIT 0.26 ± 0.36, p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Although either SIT or MIT can be employed to reduce postprandial hyperglycemia, SIT induces changes in hormonal profiles that are more favorable to islet functions than MIT does.

Keywords

Sitagliptin Mitiglinide Proinsulin 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was planned and conducted by the Saitama Incretin Study Group, and was funded via a grant from the Waksman Foundation of Japan, Inc. The authors are members of the Saitama Incretin Study Group, of which Shigehiro Katayama is the president. The number of this clinical trial in the UMIN clinical trial registration system is UMIN000005283. The UMIN Registry has been officially accepted by the ICMJE (International Committee of Medical Journal Editors). Part of the data obtained in this study was presented at the annual meeting of the American Diabetes Association in 2012, and the calculations of insulin secretion rates were presented as an abstract at the annual meeting of the Japan Diabetes Society in 2013.

Conflict of interest

Yoshimasa Aso received lecture fees from Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd., Eli Lilly Japan K.K., and MDS K.K. Shigeharu Katayama received research grants from MSD K.K. and Daiichi Sankyo Pharma Ltd. Yoshitaka Akiyama, Tomoko Morita-Okubo, Natsuko Oshitani, Yuko Ohno, Toshihiko Inukai, Kakei Masafumi, Kawakami Masanobu, Takuya Awata, and Masafumi Matsuda declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human rights statement and informed consent

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and its subsequent revision. Informed consent or a substitute for it was obtained from all patients before they were included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    DECODE Study Group, European Diabetes Epidemiology Group. Glucose tolerance and mortality: comparison of WHO and American Diabetes Association diagnostic criteria. Diabetes Epidemiology: Collaborative analysis Of Diagnostic criteria in Europe. Lancet. 1999;354:617–621.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chiasson JL, Josse RG, Gomis R, Hanefeld M, Karasik A, Laakso M. Acarbose treatment and the risk of cardiovascular disease and hypertension in patients with impaired glucose tolerance: the STOP-NIDDM trial. JAMA. 2003;290:486–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mita T, Watada H, Shimizu T, Tamura Y, Sato F, Watanabe T, et al. Nateglinide reduces carotid intima-media thickening in type 2 diabetic patients under good glycemic control. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2007;27:2456–62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chrysant SG, Chrysant GS. Clinical implications of cardiovascular preventing pleiotropic effects of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors. Am J Cardiol. 2012;109:1681–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Herman GA, Bergman A, Stevens C, Kotey P, Yi B, Zhao P, et al. Effect of single oral doses of sitagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, on incretin and plasma glucose levels after an oral glucose tolerance test in patients with type 2 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91:4612–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Meier JJ, Gallwitz B, Siepmann N, Holst JJ, Deacon CF, Schmidt WE, et al. Gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) dose-dependently stimulates glucagon secretion in healthy human subjects at euglycaemia. Diabetologia. 2003;46:798–801.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kojima Y, Kaga H, Hayashi S, Kitazawa T, Iimura Y, Ohno M, et al. Comparison between sitagliptin and nateglinide on postprandial lipid levels: the STANDARD study. World J Diabetes. 2013;4:8–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kinukawa M, Ohnota H, Ajisawa Y. Effect of a non-sulphonylurea hypoglycaemic agent, KAD-1229 on hormone secretion in the isolated perfused pancreas of the rat. Br J Pharmacol. 1996;117:1702–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hovorka R, Soons PA, Young MA. ISEC: a program to calculate insulin secretion. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 1996;50:253–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, Naylor BA, Treacher DF, Turner RC. Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia. 1985;28:412–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Matsuda M, DeFronzo RA. Insulin sensitivity indices obtained from oral glucose tolerance testing: comparison with the euglycemic insulin clamp. Diabetes Care. 1999;22:1462–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Abdul-Ghani MA, Matsuda M, Jani R, Jenkinson CP, Coletta DK, Kaku K, et al. The relationship between fasting hyperglycemia and insulin secretion in subjects with normal or impaired glucose tolerance. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2008;295:E401–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Duffy NA, Green BD, Irwin N, Gault VA, McKillop AM, O’Harte FP, et al. Effects of antidiabetic drugs on dipeptidyl peptidase IV activity: nateglinide is an inhibitor of DPP IV and augments the antidiabetic activity of glucagon-like peptide-1. Eur J Pharmacol. 2007;568:278–86.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kitahara Y, Miura K, Yasuda R, Kawanabe H, Ogawa S, Eto Y. Nateglinide stimulates glucagon-like peptide-1 release by human intestinal L cells via a K(ATP) channel-independent mechanism. Biol Pharm Bull. 2011;34:671–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tahara A, Matsuyama-Yokono A, Shibasaki M. Effects of antidiabetic drugs in high-fat diet and streptozotocin-nicotinamide-induced type 2 diabetic mice. Eur J Pharmacol. 2011;655:108–16.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jung JA, Kaku K, Kim JH, Kim JR, Ko JW, Lee SY, et al. Additive postprandial glucose-lowering effects of mitiglinide and sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Adv Ther. 2013;30:1018–29.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stephens JW, Bodvarsdottir TB, Wareham K, Prior SL, Bracken RM, Lowe GD, et al. Effects of short-term therapy with glibenclamide and repaglinide on incretin hormones and oxidative damage associated with postprandial hyperglycaemia in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2011;94:199–206.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nauck MA, Heimesaat MM, Behle K, Holst JJ, Nauck MS, Ritzel R, et al. Effects of glucagon-like peptide 1 on counterregulatory hormone responses, cognitive functions, and insulin secretion during hyperinsulinemic, stepped hypoglycemic clamp experiments in healthy volunteers. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87:1239–46.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Malin SK, Solomon TP, Blaszczak A, Finnegan S, Filion J, Kirwan JP. Pancreatic beta-cell function increases in a linear dose-response manner following exercise training in adults with prediabetes. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2013;305:E1248–54.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    McKillop AM, Duffy NA, Lindsay JR, Green BD, Patterson S, O’Harte FP, et al. Insulinotropic actions of nateglinide in type 2 diabetic patients and effects on dipeptidyl peptidase-IV activity and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide degradation. Eur J Endocrinol. 2009;161:877–85.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Holman RR, Haffner SM, McMurray JJ, Bethel MA, Holzhauer B, Hua TA, et al. Effect of nateglinide on the incidence of diabetes and cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1463–76.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    DeFronzo RA, Okerson T, Viswanathan P, Guan X, Holcombe JH, MacConell L. Effects of exenatide versus sitagliptin on postprandial glucose, insulin and glucagon secretion, gastric emptying, and caloric intake: a randomized, cross-over study. Curr Med Res Opin. 2008;24:2943–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japan Diabetes Society 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yoshitaka Akiyama
    • 1
  • Tomoko Morita-Ohkubo
    • 1
  • Natsuko Oshitani
    • 1
  • Yuko Ohno
    • 2
  • Yoshimasa Aso
    • 3
  • Toshihiko Inukai
    • 4
  • Masafumi Kakei
    • 5
  • Masanobu Kawakami
    • 5
  • Takuya Awata
    • 6
  • Shigehiro Katayama
    • 6
  • Masafumi Matsuda
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Saitama Medical CenterSaitama Medical UniversityKawagoe-shiJapan
  2. 2.Central Laboratory, Saitama Medical CenterSaitama Medical UniversityKawagoe-shiJapan
  3. 3.Department of Endocrinology and MetabolismDokkyo Medical UniversityMibu, ShimotugaJapan
  4. 4.Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology and HematologyDokkyo Medical University Koshigaya HospitalKoshigayaJapan
  5. 5.Department of Internal Medicine, Omiya Medical CenterJichi Medical SchoolSaitamaJapan
  6. 6.Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Faculty of MedicineSaitama Medical UniversityIruma-gunJapan

Personalised recommendations