Skip to main content
Log in

Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Diabetes Quality-Of-Life questionnaire for Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Diabetology International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Quality of life (QOL) is recognized as an important medical outcome. The aim of this study was to test the validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the Diabetes Quality-Of-Life (J-DQOL) questionnaire originally developed by the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial.

Patients and methods

The standard procedure for cross-culture adaptation was followed to develop the Japanese version of the J-DQOL. After linguistic validation, reliability was assessed by evaluating the test–retest reliability and internal consistency. Validity was also assessed by examining the floor and ceiling effects, factor structure, and construct validity.

Results

The responses of 298 of 319 patients with type 2 diabetes who volunteered to answer the questionnaire were analyzed. The J-DQOL and its four scales had high degrees of internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha, 0.73–0.91) and test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients, 0.66–0.86). Floor effects were found in the categories of worry about social/vocational issues and diabetes. Also, factor analysis indicated that the J-DQOL structure was not completely consistent with that of the original DQOL. Construct validity was confirmed by relative correlation between J-DQOL scores only and certain components of the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire, the Well-being Questionnaire, and the Beck Depression Inventory measures.

Conclusions

This study confirmed the reliability of the J- DQOL questionnaire and indicates that DQOL for Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus is not valid for assessing QOL, especially with regard to worry domains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BDI:

Beck Depression Inventory

DCCT:

Diabetes Control and Complications Trial

DQOL:

Diabetes Quality Of Life

DTSQ:

Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire

HR-QOL:

Health-related quality of life

ICC:

Intraclass correlation coefficient

NGSP:

National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program

OHA:

Oral hypoglycemic agents

QOL:

Quality of life

SF-36:

Short-form Health Survey with only 36 questions

W-BQ:

Well-being Questionnaire

References

  1. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:977–86.

  2. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Lancet. 1998;352:837–53.

  3. Rubin RR, Peyrot M. Quality of life and diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 1999;15:205–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Redekop WK, Koopmanschap MA, Stolk RP, Rutten GE, Wolffenbuttel BH, Niessen LW. Health-related quality of life and treatment satisfaction in Dutch patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2002;25:458–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Influence of intensive diabetes treatment on quality-of-life outcomes in the diabetes control and complications trial. Diabetes Care. 1996;19:195–203.

  6. Riazi A, Bradley C, Barendse S, Ishii H. Development of the Well-being questionnaire short-form in Japanese: the W-BQ12. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006;4:40.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kojima M, Furukawa TA, Takahashi H, Kawai M, Nagaya T, Tokudome S. Cross-cultural validation of the Beck depression inventory-II in Japan. Psychiatry Res. 2002;110:291–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Reliability and validity of a diabetes quality-of-life measure for the diabetes control and complications trial (DCCT). The DCCT Research Group. Diabetes Care. 1988;11:725–32.

  9. Jacobson AM, de Groot M, Samson JA. The evaluation of two measure of quality of life in patient with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1994;17:267–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cheng AY, Tsui EY, Hanley AJ, Zinman B. Developing a quality of life measure for Chinese patients with diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1999;46:259–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Huang IC, Liu JH, Wu AW, Wu MY, Leite W, Hwang CC. Evaluating the reliability, validity and minimally important difference of the Taiwanese version of the diabetes quality of life (DQOL) measurement. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2008;6:87.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Reviriego J, Millan MD, Millan M. Evaluation of the diabetes quality-of-life questionnaire in a Spanish population. An experience of translation and reliability. Pharmacoeconomics. 1996;10:614–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yildirim A, Akinci F, Gozu H, Sargin H, Orbay E, Sargin M. Translation, cultural adaptation, cross-validation of the Turkish diabetes quality-of-life (DQOL) measure. Qual Life Res. 2007;16:873–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jacobson AM, Barofsky I, Cleary P, Rand LI. Reliability and validity of a diabetes quality-of-life measure for the diabetes control and complications trial (DCCT). The DCCT Research Group. Diabetes Care. 1988;11:725–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jacobson AM. The diabetes quality of life measure. Handbook of psychology and diabetes: a guide to psychological measurement in diabetes research and practice 1994:65–87.

  16. Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46:1417–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bradley C. Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ). Handbook of psychology and diabetes 1994:111–32.

  18. Ishii H, Bradley C, Riazi A, Barendse S, Yamamoto T. The Japanese version of the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ): translation and clinical evaluation. Igaku no Ayumi. 2000;192:809–14.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bradley C. Diabetes treatment satisfaction questionnaire (DTSQ). Handbook of psychology and diabetes: a guide to psychological measurement in Diabetes Research and Practice pp. 111–32.

  20. Pouwer F, van der Ploeg HM, Ader HJ, Heine RJ, Snoek FJ. The 12-item well-being questionnaire. An evaluation of its validity and reliability in Dutch people with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1999;22:2004–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, Mock J, Erbaugh J. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1961;4:561–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK. Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory-II. San Antonio: Psychol Corp; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Seino Y, Nanjo K, Tajima N, Kadowaki T, Kashiwagi A, Araki E, et al. Report of the Committee on the classification and Diagnostic Criteria of Diabetes Mellitus. J Diabetes Investig. 2010;1:212–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Asao K, Matsushima M, Sano H, Agata T, Shimizu H, Tajima N. Measurement of quality of life in patients with type 2 diabetes (1): development and evaluation of a questionnaire using the diabetes quality of life (DQOL) scale in Japanese. J Japan Diab Soc. 2000;43:1085–91.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Nathan DM, Fogel H, Norman D, Russell PS, Tolkoff-Rubin N, Delmonico FL, et al. Long-term metabolic and quality of life results with pancreatic/renal transplantation in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Transplantation. 1991;52:85–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tsui E, Barnie A, Ross S, Parkes R, Zinman B. Intensive insulin therapy with insulin lispro: a randomized trial of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily insulin injection. Diabetes Care. 2001;24:1722–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Shehadeh N, Battelino T, Galatzer A, Naveh T, Hadash A, de Vries L, et al. Insulin pump therapy for 1–6-year-old children with type 1 diabetes. Isr Med Assoc J. 2004;6:284–86.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Speight J, Reaney MD, Barnard KD. Not all roads lead to Rome-a review of quality of life measurement in adults with diabetes. Diabet Med. 2009;26:315–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Witthaus E, Stewart J, Bradley C. Treatment satisfaction and psychological well-being with insulin glargine compared with NPH in patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2001;18:619–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wexler DJ, Grant RW, Wittenberg E, Bosch JL, Cagliero E, Delahanty L, et al. Correlates of health-related quality of life in type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2006;49:1489–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Paschalides C, Wearden AJ, Dunkerley R, Bundy C, Davies R, Dickens CM. The associations of anxiety, depression and personal illness representations with glycemic control and health-related quality of life in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Psychosom Res. 2004;57:557–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Anderson RM, Fitzgerald JT, Wisdom K, Davis WK, Hiss RG. A comparison of global versus disease-specific quality-of-life measures in patients with NIDDM. Diabetes Care. 1997;20:299–305.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lustman PJ, Clouse RE, Carney RM. Depression and the reporting of diabetes symptoms. Int J Psychiatry Med. 1988;18:295–303.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Miho Nakahara and Yuko Tachibana for the excellent technical assistance. T. Hirose was supported by funds from the Ministry of Education, Sports and Culture of Japan.

Conflict of interest

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomoya Mita.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 65 kb)

About this article

Cite this article

Sato, F., Mita, T., Yamamoto, R. et al. Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Diabetes Quality-Of-Life questionnaire for Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetol Int 5, 21–29 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13340-013-0125-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13340-013-0125-z

Keywords

Navigation