IB is one of the most economically significant diseases of the intensive poultry industry in the world. Vaccination programmes rely mainly on the use of the Massachusetts strain, which is the most commonly used IBV vaccine strain in India; however, presence of the disease in vaccinated chickens is commonly observed, causing a major economic impact all over the world [12]. There is no detailed information available on the genetic makeup of any of the IBV strains used in the commercial vaccines. Since the IBV vaccines or the vaccine strains used in Indian poultry population are usually imported from abroad, it is always advisable to use an indigenous IBV vaccine strain as the immuno-prophylactic agent against prevailing field strains.
Isolation of IBV by passaging the tissue samples in embryonated SPF eggs is a simple method. Dwarfing and curling signs were suggestive of presence of IBV [3, 16]. RT-PCR technique is increasingly being used to identify the spike glycoprotein genotype of IBV field strains and found to be very specific and sensitive for the detection of IBV [9, 11, 15, 16].
The sequencing of five field samples (Anand isolates) revealed that all the five sequences were 99.09–100 % similar among themselves. Sequences of five samples compared with the vaccine sample, indicated 99.10–100 % similarity. The sequence alignment of Ma5, H120 and Mass41 reference strains with Anand isolates exhibited 97.75–99.55 % identity. The sequence alignment of Anand isolates with two references (Ma5 and H120) vaccine strains revealed 99.32–99.55 % identity and with Mass41 strain, lower identity of 97.75–97.96 % (Table 2).
Table 2 Percentage nucleotide and amino acid identity amongst the IBV isolates/strains under comparison
The deduced amino acid sequences of Anand isolates and vaccine virus were also aligned using the ClustalW programme. The amino acid sequences of the Anand isolates and vaccine virus showed no variation. Multiple amino acid sequence alignment revealed that all the strains under comparison had similar amino acid sequences except the reference vaccine virus strain Mass41, which showed I (isoleucine) and S (serine) at position 246 and 379, while all the other strains including Anand isolates showed T (threonine) and L (leucine) at the same positions. This again substantiates the earlier observation that our isolates were more similar to the reference vaccine strains Ma5 and H120 than Mass41 strain. The nucleotide/aminoacid differences between IBV Anand isolates and other reported sequences were based on the Clustal Alignment of the Nucleotide sequences of S1 subunit fragment of Anand isolates, vaccine strain and reference strains as mentioned in Table 3. The three reference vaccine strains i.e. Ma 5, H120 and Mass41 showed SNVs at positions 708, 1143 and 1146 with ‘C’, ‘T’ and ‘A’ respectively, while the Anand isolates including the vaccine strain showed ‘T’, ‘C’ and ‘G’ at the same positions. Mass41 (AY851295) showed additional seven SNVs at positions 737, 846, 861, 1017, 1104, 1119 and 1136 with T, T, T, C, T, T, and C nucleotide respectively, while all other strains showed C, A, C, T, C, C and T at the respective positions. Thus, Mass41 strain showed maximum variation of ten nucleotides at different positions, which also showed the least percent nucleotide identity with our isolates. This indicates that our isolates were more similar at S1 subunit nucleotide level with the reference Ma5 and H120 vaccine strains than the reference Mass41 strain (Table 3).
Table 3 Nucleotide and amino acid changes in spike glycoprotein of S1 subunit of Anand isolates, vaccine sample and reference strains of IBV
Phylogenetic analysis revealed that the Anand isolates and the reference M41 (Massachusetts type) strain grouped into the same cluster I and thus showed higher genetic similarity. However, the Anand isolates were of genetic distance with the Arkansas and Connecticut reference strains, which grouped into cluster IV. Nephropathogenic reference isolates also formed well defined separate clusters II and III with nucleotide identity of 63.27–69.59 and 77.59–87.05 % respectively with Anand isolates. Grouping of Anand isolates in a separate cluster I at a genetic distance with the nephropathogenic strains further indicate the fast emergence of variants in IBV. The Anand isolates showed similarities in the range of 77.59–78.08 % with earlier reported isolate of Gujarat and 78.64–79.19 % with the Tamil Nadu (India/NMK/72/IVRI/10) isolate. The sequence of Gujarat IBV isolate was reported in the year 2009 and the lower similarity as observed in the current study indicates further genetic changes in the circulating IBV in Gujarat, which may partially explain the increasing incidences of IB in the country in spite of the vaccination programme.
Unifying the overall findings, the present study has given an insight into the ever-changing genetic makeup of IBV, and probably addresses the IBV vaccine failures in field conditions. The results of present study revealed that different strain variants of IBV may be circulating among chicken populations in India and recent outbreaks of nephropathogenic IB were due to this reason. The finding of IBV strains in field samples and its crucial genetic distance with other reported IBV isolates demands a continuous scientific effort in the country to monitor and characterize the circulating IBV so as to get rid off this important disease menace faced by poultry population.