Video file formats are used to record, play and store videos according to heterogeneous platforms; devices and online streaming on networks vary by speed. Video formats are different codecs and resolution from each other and also vary in display quality and storage size which also differentiate the quality of experience (QoE) of users. This paper presents the subjective QoE of end user’s for different video file format varied according to resolution quality and bitrate. Videos of most popular formats which are used for online streaming was downloaded from YouTube and stored on the local system for play for subjects to perceive the video quality. Subjective QoE experiments were conducted by questionnaires given to subjects to perceive video quality and assign ratings. Results show high ratings for FLV 240P and WebM 360P for low resolution videos where high ratings for the MP4 video for 720P and 2160P high resolutions.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Networking Index, C.V., (2016). Forecast and methodology, 2016-2021, white paper. San Jose, CA, USA, 1.
Laghari, A. A., He, H., Zardari, S., & Shafiq, M. (2017). Systematic analysis of quality of experience (QoE) frameworks for multimedia services. IJCSNS, 17(5), 121.
Xiao, Y., Kalyanaraman, R. S. & Yla-Jaaski, A. (2008). Energy consumption of mobile youtube: Quantitative measurement and analysis. In The second international conference on next generation mobile applications, services and technologies, 2008. NGMAST’08 (pp. 61–69).
Mustafa, M. A., Elahi, M. M., Hossain, M. A. & Islam, M. M. (2010). Comparative performance analysis of MPEG4, FLV and 3GP multimedia file formats using wireless network parameters. In 2010 13th international conference on computer and information technology (ICCIT), (pp. 306-311).
Gloe, T., Fischer, A., & Kirchner, M. (2014). Forensic analysis of video file formats. Digital Investigation, 11, S68–S76.
Amon, P., Rathgen, T., & Singer, D. (2007). File format for scalable video coding. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 17(9), 1174–1185.
Varsa, V. & Curcio, I. (2003). Transparent end-to-end packet switched streaming service (pss); rtp usage model (release 5). 3GPP TR 26.937 V1. 4.0.
McNamee, R., Evans, G. & Frederick, M. R., ROGER B & Ann K Mcnamee Trust U/t/a/d. (2017). Systems and methods for communicating events to users. U.S. Patent 9,788,035.
Tian, L., Wang, H., Zhou, Y., & Peng, C. (2018). Video big data in smart city: Background construction and optimization for surveillance video processing. Future Generation Computer Systems, 86, 1371–1382.
Kalampogia, A., & Koutsakis, P. (2018). H. 264 and H. 265 video bandwidth prediction. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 20(1), 171–182.
Zaidi, S., Bitam, S., & Mellouk, A. (2018). Hybrid error recovery protocol for video streaming in vehicle ad hoc networks. Vehicular Communications, 12, 110–126.
Rajan, R., Sekhon, N. K., Kaur, J., & Tiwari, M. (2017). Mobile computing and android support: A review. World Journal of Technology, Engineering and Research, 1(1), 104–126.
https://www.webmproject.org/about/ Accessed on 4/28/2018.
Kromer, R. (2017). Matroska and FFV1: One file format for film and video archiving? Journal of Film Preservation, 96, 41.
Lopes Goncalves Magalhaes, F. (2017). Intelligent Security System connected to IoT.
Laghari, A. A., He, H., Halepoto, I. A., Memon, M. S., & Parveen, S. (2017). Analysis of quality of experience frameworks for cloud computing. IJCSNS, 17(12), 228.
Laghari, A. A., Laghari, K. U. R., Channa, M. I. & Falk, T. H. (2012). QON: Quality of experience (QoE) framework for network services. In Proceedings of the 4th international conference on software technology and engineering (ICSTE’12).
Le Callet, P., Möller, S. & Perkis, A. (2013). Qualinet White Paper on Definitions of Quality of Experience (2012). European Network on Quality of Experience in Multimedia Systems and Services (COST Action IC 1003). Version 1.2. Mar-2013.
Laghari, A. A., Sadhayo, I. H., & Channa, M. I. (2015). Enhanced autonomic networking management architecture (Enama). Engineering, Science & Technology, 14(1), 9–13.
Gohil, R., & Pandya, V. (2015). A comparative study of different video compression. International Journal of Advance Research in Computer Science and Management Studies, 3(6), 39–43.
Rogge, B., Bekaert, J., & Van de Walle, R. (2004). Timing issues in multimedia formats: Review of the principles and comparison of existing formats. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 6(6), 910–924.
Laghari, A. A., He, H., Shafiq, M. & Khan, A., (2016). Assessing effect of Cloud distance on end user’s Quality of Experience (QoE). In 2016 2nd IEEE international conference on computer and communications (ICCC), (pp. 500–505).
Laghari, A. A., He, H., Karim, S., Shah, H. A., & Karn, N. K. (2017). Quality of experience assessment of video quality in social clouds. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2017, 1–10.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fLeJJPxua3E. Accessed on 4/13/2018.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=76f6J4x87hI. Accessed on 4/13/2018.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=27bdrguQxew. Accessed on 4/13/2018.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i9RQX1oGtEs. Accessed on 4/13/2018.
https://en.savefrom.net/1-how-to-download-youtube-video/. Accessed on 4/13/2018.
https://mediasave.online/. Accessed on 4/13/2018.
https://www.genyoutube.net/formats-resolution-youtube-videos.html. Accessed on 4/13/2018.
UIT, U., 500-11 Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures. (2002). International Telecommunication Union.
ITU-T RECOMMENDATION, P. (1999) Subjective video quality assessment methods for multimedia applications.
Youn, S., Baek, S., Jeong, T., & Lee, C. (2018). Perceptual video quality comparison of various 3D video formats and displays. Displays, 52, 21–29.
Laghari, A. A., He, H., & Channa, M. I. (2018). Measuring effect of packet reordering on quality of experience (QoE) in video streaming. 3D Research, 9(3), 30.
Laghari, A. A., He, H., Shafiq, M., & Khan, A. (2018). Assessment of quality of experience (QoE) of image compression in social cloud computing. Multiagent and Grid Systems, 14(2), 125–143.
https://windowsfileviewer.com/. Accessed on 5/13/2018.
Solera, M., Toril, M., Palomo, I., Gomez, G., & Poncela, J. (2018). A testbed for evaluating video streaming services in LTE. Wireless Personal Communications, 98(3), 2753–2773.
https://www.videolan.org/index.html. Accessed on 5/13/2018.
https://www.videohelp.com/software/MediaInfo. Accessed on 5/13/2018.
Hoque, M. A., Siekkinen, M., Nurminen, J. K., Aalto, M., & Tarkoma, S. (2015). Mobile multimedia streaming techniques: QoE and energy saving perspective. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 16, 96–114.
The work is supported by the National Key R&D Program of China under grant No. 2017YB0801801, the National Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under grant No. 61472108. Asif Ali Laghari and Professor Hui He are the corresponding authors.
About this article
Cite this article
Laghari, A.A., He, H., Khan, A. et al. Impact of Video File Format on Quality of Experience (QoE) of Multimedia Content. 3D Res 9, 39 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13319-018-0191-x