Abstract
Gravity-fed infusion (GFI) systems are acknowledged as being unable to keep their flow-rate constant. This may affect drug plasma levels such as aminoglycosides. Numerous factors have previously been cited, but their relative importance has never been quantified so far. The objective of this work is to identify the main factors that influence GFI in vitro outflow and to propose a mathematical model of flow-rate evolution as a function of time. In this model, pressure loss and infusion device creep have been considered as the main variation factors. Concomitantly, two experiments were undertaken. Firstly, the flow-rate evolution of an in vitro infusion of 250 mL of dextrose 5% was assessed. Secondly, the creep occurring on an infusion device was measured through a stress relaxation experiment. The experimental infusion flow-rate decreased by as much as 28.5% over 1 h. Simulated and experimental data are well correlated (r = 0.987; P < 0.0001). The maximum creep effect happens during the first 15 min of infusion. In this work, height of the liquid in the bag and tube creep were found to be the main variation factors in GFI flow-rate. This new mathematical model should help to explain the differences observed in drug plasma levels with gravity-fed devices.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Crass RE, Vance JR (1985) In vivo accuracy of gravity-flow i.v. infusion systems. Am J Hosp Pharm 42:328–331
Demoruelle JL, Harrison WL, Flora LE (1975) Flow rate maintenance and output of intravenous fluid administration. Am J Hosp Pharm 32:177–185
Ebewele R (2000) Polymer science and technology. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Elad D, Zaretsky U, Heller O (1994) Hydrodynamic evaluation of intravenous infusion systems. Ann Emerg Med 23(3):457–463
Flack FC, Whyte TD (1974) Behaviour of standard gravity-fed administration sets used for intravenous infusion. Br Med J 3:439–443
Fonkalsrud EW, Carpenter K, Adelberg M (1971) A new even-flow intravenous infusion clamp. Arch Surg 102(5):530–531
Hook II (1978) Administration sets for intravenous fluid used in the Republic of Ireland. Int J Pharm 1:105–120
International Organization for Standardization (1998) EN ISO 8536-4 standards: Infusion equipment for medical use—part 4: infusion sets for single use, gravity feed
Nahata MC, Durrell DE, Miller MA (1986) Accuracy of tobramycin delivery with a controller and a volumetric chamber or syringe. Am J Hosp Pharm 43:2239–2241
NF S 90-250 standard. Pompes à perfusion, [in French]
Philip BK, Philip JH (1983) Characterization of flow in intravenous infusion systems. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng BME-30(11):702–707
Philip BK, Philip JH (1986) Characterization of flow in intravenous catheters. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng BME-33(5):529–531
Pleasants RA, Sawyer WT, Williams DM, McKenna WR, Brown JM, Powell JR (1988a) Accuracy of tobramycin delivery by four i.v. infusion methods. Clin Pharm 7:367–373
Pleasants RA, Sawyer WT, Williams DM, McKenna WR, Brown JM, Powell JR (1988b) Effect of four intravenous infusion methods on tobramycin pharmacokinetics. Clin Pharm 7:374–379
Simon N, Décaudin B, Lannoy D, Odou MF, De Broucker M, Barthélémy C, Poret E, Dubreuil L, Odou P (2010) Impact of infusion method on amikacin serum levels in humans. Pulm Pharmacol Ther 23(4):324–326
Stoneham MD (1995) An evaluation of methods increasing the flow rate of i.v. fluid administration. Br J Anesth 75:361–365
Ziser M, Feezor M, Skolaut MW (1979) Regulating intravenous fluid flow: controller versus clamps. Am J Hosp Pharm 36:1090–1094
Acknowledgments
The authors thank M. Philippe BUISSON, Doran International, Toussieu, France, for his help in performing the stress relaxation test.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Simon, N., Décaudin, B., Lannoy, D. et al. Mathematical and physical model of gravity-fed infusion outflow: application to soft-bag-packed solutions. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 36, 197–203 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13318-011-0062-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13318-011-0062-9