Advertisement

Autoimmunity Highlights

, Volume 3, Issue 3, pp 119–125 | Cite as

Asialoglycoprotein receptor (ASGPR): a peculiar target of liver-specific autoimmunity

  • Dirk RoggenbuckEmail author
  • Maria G. Mytilinaiou
  • Sergey V. Lapin
  • Dirk Reinhold
  • Karsten Conrad
Review Article

Abstract

Asialoglycoprotein receptor (ASGPR) autoantibodies have been considered specific markers of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). The exact mechanisms responsible for the development of these autoantibodies and leading to autoimmunity to this peculiar liver receptor remain elusive. Furthermore, loss of T cell tolerance to ASGPR has been demonstrated in patients with AIH, but it is poorly understood whether such liver-specific T cell responses bear a pathogenic potential and/or participate in the precipitation of AIH. Newly developed enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays have led to the investigation of the sensitivity and specificity of anti-ASGPR antibodies for AIH. The present review provides an overview of the diagnostic and clinical relevance of anti-ASGPR antibodies. A thorough investigation of the autoreactivity against ASGPR may assist efforts to understand liver autoimmunity in susceptible individuals.

Keywords

Autoantibody Autoimmune hepatitis Autoimmunity Liver disease Primary biliary cirrhosis 

Abbreviations

ANA

Anti-nuclear antibody

ASGPR

Asialoglycoprotein receptor

ASMA

Anti-smooth muscle antibody

ELISA

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

LSP

Liver-specific membrane lipoproteins

LKM

Liver kidney microsomal

SLA

Soluble liver antigen

ASGPR: an introduction to the molecule

Asialoglycoprotein receptor (ASGPR) [1] is a C-type lectin, primary expressed on the sinusoidal surface of the hepatocyte [2, 3, 4]. ASGPR was discovered as early as 1965 by Gilbert Ashwell and Anatol Morell in USA [3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]. These investigators isolated ASGPR from rabbit liver by affinity chromatography employing asialo-orosomucoid sepharose [10].

ASGPR is formed by a major 48 kDa (ASGPR-1) and a minor 40 kDa subunits (ASGPR-2) [11, 12, 13]. The major role of ASGPR is the binding, internalization, and subsequent clearance from the circulation of glycoproteins that contain terminal galactose or N-acetylgalactosamine residues (asialoglycoproteins) [11, 12, 14]. The binding of ligands to ASGPR depends on Ca2+ [15], the position of terminal galactose residues [16, 17, 18], and a pH optimum above 6.5 [19]. Mice lacking ASGPR are characterized by an impaired clearance of injected asialoglycoproteins, but do not accumulate glycoproteins in the serum suggesting that ASGPR is not the only regulator of glycoprotein levels in the blood.

ASGPR has been shown also to be involved in the clearance of IgA from circulation [10, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25], in the removal of apoptotic cells, in the clearance of low density lipoprotein (LDL) and chylomicron remnants [26, 27] and in the disposal of cellular fibronectin [28]. Recent data support the assumption that ASGPR is utilized by hepatotropic viruses for hepatocyte entry [29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35]. Furthermore, there is evidence that ASGPR participates in the elimination of activated lymphocytes [36, 37, 38, 39].

From a pathophysiological point of view, ASGPR appears to be involved in the clearance of coagulation factors from circulation and to be involved in the establishment of lethal thrombocytopenia seen in sepsis caused by S. pneumonia infection [40]. In this disease setting, ASGPR-dependent clearance of platelets, which have been desialylated by the NanA sialidase of S. pneumonia, seems to play a pivotal role in sepsis precipitation. This may explain why ASGPR-knockout mice cannot survive inoculation with small doses of S. pneumonia [40, 41, 42, 43].

ASGPR and liver inflammation

Liver inflammatory diseases irrespectively of the cause alter the expression levels of ASGPR, its synthesis, and binding activity. In normal hepatocytes, ASGPR is expressed in a polar manner on the sinusoidal and basolateral surface of the plasma hepatocyte membrane [11, 12, 44]. However, during liver inflammation, ASGPR’s expression shifts towards the canalicular membrane [45]. In end-stage liver disease (cirrhosis), ASGPR is over-expressed and serum levels of asialoglycoproteins are increased [46]. Cytokines appear to have a profound effect on the expression, synthesis, and functionality of the receptor [47, 48].

In immune-mediated liver diseases, ASGPR becomes the target of autoimmune responses, both at the B- and T cell level [49]. Thus, this review will mainly discuss the role of ASGPR as a liver autoantigen.

ASGPR as an autoantigen

In the 1970s, liver-specific membrane lipoproteins (LSP) have been found by Roger Williams’ group to bear antigenic epitopes for circulating autoantibodies in patients with acute and chronic active hepatitis [50]. Later on, ASGPR was identified as the major antigenic component of LSP by the same group in London and appears to be the main organ-specific autoantigenic target in autoimmune liver diseases reported so far [51]. Subsequent studies, both in human and animal biomaterial, have highlighted the autoimmunogenicity of ASGPR and its relevance to specific disease phenotypes [49, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68]. Soon after the experimental data provided evidence that ASGPR-specific monoclonal antibodies can induce liver damage, attempts to study the immunological potential of ASGPR have been accelerating [69]. ASGPR-specific T cell clones have been obtained [67] and ASGPR (or LSP) has been used in immunization experiments to induce liver damage in an animal setting [69, 70, 71, 72, 73]. The relevance of anti-ASGPR-specific T cell responses to the pathogenesis of AIH is still elusive [74, 75]. Other liver-specific B and T cell responses against AIH-relevant antigens appear to play an important role in the development of AIH in susceptible individuals, who are characterized by impaired immunoregulatory mechanisms [74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85]. Intriguingly, gastrointestinal receptors, such as the ASGPR with the potential to interact with pathogens appear to play an important role in gastrointestinal autoimmunity as recently demonstrated for the microfold cell-specific glycoprotein 2, the autoantigenic target in Crohn’s disease which has even an immunomodulating capacity [86, 87, 88].

One of the first efforts to elucidate the humoral loss of tolerance to ASGPR was to develop assays that could reliably detect anti-ASGPR antibody levels in patients with AIH. Due to the peculiar biochemical characteristics of ASGPR, this task proved to be rather difficult, but was nevertheless essential to study the diagnostic and clinical relevance of the tolerance loss to ASGPR.

Anti-ASGPR antibody testing

A variety of assays has been developed in order to detect anti-ASGPR antibody reactivity and such assays included solid-phase enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), liquid-phase radioimmunoassays, immunoblotting and dot blot assays. As an antigenic source, ASGPR purified from rabbit, rat or human liver preparations or recombinant ASGPR subunits have been utilized [52, 58, 60, 62, 89]. One of the major challenges in developing a molecular assay remained the access to highly purified ASGPR [90]. ASGPR obtained through affinity chromatography on galactose–sepharose has been considered a credible source of the antigen [68]. Recombinant antigen has been produced, but its immunogenicity appears poor [58]. In summary, data obtained by several studies produced inconsistent results, raising concerns as to whether a reliable immunoassay could ever be developed to assess the epitope structure of the antigenic preparation used for ASGPR-antibody testing [89]. As it was expected, the lack of a reliable, standardized assay for the detection of anti-ASGPR antibodies has led to a series of reports with significant variation in the prevalence of these autoantibodies in AIH, and other autoimmune and non-autoimmune liver diseases.

Nevertheless, anti-ASGPR antibodies have been included in the revised criteria of the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group in 1999, but are missing in recently published diagnostic scores for AIH while other autoantibodies have been incorporated in the routine testing [91, 92, 93]. The assumption that ASGPR autoantibodies should not be part of the autoantibody specificities considered to be important for the serological diagnosis in patients with AIH deserves further discussion.

Diagnostic relevance of anti-ASGPR antibodies

Most studies recently published have tested anti-ASGPR antibodies in serum samples from patients with liver diseases, including autoimmune and non-autoimmune disorders of the liver. Anti-ASGPR autoantibodies have been predominantly found in patients with chronic active hepatitis, the term used in the past for what is currently known as AIH. Another key finding was that the level of these autoantibodies sharply decreases during immunosuppressive treatment [68]. This was an intriguing observation with profound implications regarding the broad range of anti-ASGPR seropositivity in various reports published over the years, as most studies included mixed sera from patients at diagnosis and during treatment. Thus, testing of cohorts that include more samples at diagnosis rather than under immunosuppression will most likely provide prevalence rates much higher than those of cohorts mainly containing samples tested after treatment [60].

The prevalence rates in children [94] and adult patients [59] with AIH-1 appear to be comparable, with anti-ASGPR antibodies being detectable in 75–82 % AIH-1 patients. However, in a recent study by Bulgakova et al. reported as an abstract at the 8th International Congress of Autoimmunity in Granada, a significantly higher prevalence of anti-ASGPR antibodies was found in children investigating 18 children and 28 adults with AIH (Fig. 1). However, only 2 out of the 18 children with AIH suffered from AIH-2 which demonstrate in general less prevalent anti-ASGPR antibodies (around 24–40 %) [94, 95].
Fig. 1

Prevalence of autoantibodies in children (n = 18, median of age 10 years) and adults (n = 28, median of age 46 years) with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). Seropositivity for antinuclear antibodies (ANA), anti-smooth muscle antibodies (ASMA), liver–kidney microsomal type 1 (LKM-1) and anti-mitochondrial (AMA) antibodies were detected by indirect immunofluorescence on respective substrates. Antibodies to asialoglycoprotein receptor (ASGPR) and soluble liver antigen (SLA) were determined by commercial ELISA. 2 of 18 children with AIH suffered from type 2 AIH, whereas 2 of 28 adult patients with AIH demonstrated type 2 disease. All remaining patients had type 1 AIH. *P < 0.05

The diagnostic value of anti-ASGPR antibodies is supported by studies suggesting that up to 80 % of AIH patients, who are seronegative for conventionally tested autoantibodies such as antinuclear antibody (ANA), anti-smooth muscle antibody (ASMA), anti-liver kidney microsomal 1 (LKM1) antibody, and even antibodies to soluble liver antigen (SLA), may have anti-ASGPR antibodies [61, 96]. In practical terms, these findings suggest that the recommended serological profile of patients with this disease may fail, if anti-ASGPR antibodies are not incorporated [97]. This has led some expert reports to underline the importance of anti-ASGPR antibody testing [92, 98]. However, the guidelines of the diagnostic criteria for AIH do not include anti-ASGPR antibodies in the scoring for the probable or definite diagnosis of AIH [93, 99, 100].

Considering the lack of commercially available assays, testing for anti-ASGPR antibodies has been limited to few university laboratories using laborious in house assays for research purposes. The reports so far published have also indicated that the specificity of anti-ASGPR for AIH is not as good as described for other autoantibodies, like anti-LKM1, anti-SLA, and anti-SMA filamentous actin. Anti-ASGPR antibodies have been reported in more than 10 % of patients with chronic hepatitis B or C, patients with PBC, and patients with alcoholic hepatitis [54, 56, 60, 62, 101, 102]. The inconsistent results may be due to the lack of a standardized assay. In recent years, a new commercially available ELISA based on purified rabbit ASGPR has been developed and a study has been published reporting on the sensitivity and the specificity of this assay. Remarkably, 70 % of naïve (untreated) AIH patients were tested positive for anti-ASGPR antibody, whereas only 30 % patients under immunosuppressive treatment demonstrated elevated anti-ASGPR antibody levels [68]. Detectable anti-ASGPR antibodies were found in approximately 10 % patients with chronic hepatitis B or C [68]. Anti-ASGPR antibodies were practically absent in other pathological controls (including patients with PBC and alcoholic hepatitis) [68]. The interesting finding of this study was the striking specificity of anti-ASGPR for AIH (up to 100 %) as compared to PBC excluding PBC AIH overlap syndromes and such findings have not been reported previously.

Clinical utility of anti-ASGPR antibodies

An early study assessing anti-ASGPR antibodies in AIH-1 patients from USA noted more frequent relapses on treatment cessation in anti-ASGPR antibody positive AIH patients compared to anti-ASGPR antibody negative [59]. Serum immunoglobulin levels appeared higher in those with anti-ASGPR antibodies [59]. The association of disease activity indices or response to treatment and the presence of anti-ASGPR antibodies has been reported by others [53, 59, 94, 100, 103].

The recently published study employing the new anti-ASGPR antibody ELISA has found a correlation between anti-ASGPR and the level of liver transaminases in patients followed for long period of time [68]. A further intriguing result was that anti-ASGPR antibodies may precede the onset of elevated transaminases. That finding and the fact that anti-ASGPR antibodies are decreased over the course of immunosuppression indicate that this autoantibody may be a prognostic marker of disease activity [54, 56, 60]. A recent report has also found that anti-ASGPR antibodies decrease during immunosuppression [91, 104].

Conclusion

In the years to come, the relevance of anti-ASGPR antibodies in the diagnosis of AIH will be understood better with the help of robust and user-friendly anti-ASGPR antibody assays used in routine laboratory analysis. At present, several laboratories over the world are testing the applicability of newly available anti-ASGPR antibody ELISA. The results of these tests will shed a light on the long discussed usefulness of this autoantibody in the serology of AIH. We need to remind ourselves that ASGPR is one of the very few autoantigens that is liver specific in AIH (if it is not the only liver-specific one). It is possible that the understanding of the pathogenesis of AIH lies within the understanding of the immunopathophysiology of this hepatic lectin [91]. We anticipate that we will learn more about the role of ASGPR in the near future.

Notes

Conflict of interest

Dirk Roggenbuck has a management role and is a shareholder of GA Generic Assays GmbH and Medipan GmbH. Both companies are diagnostic manufacturers. All other authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

References

  1. 1.
    Ashwell G, Morell AG (1974) The role of surface carbohydrates in the hepatic recognition and transport of circulating glycoproteins. Adv Enzymol Relat Areas Mol Biol 41:99–128PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ashwell G, Harford J (1982) Carbohydrate-specific receptors of the liver. Annu Rev Biochem 51:531–554PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Morell AG, Gregoriadis G, Scheinberg IH et al (1971) The role of sialic acid in determining the survival of glycoproteins in the circulation. J Biol Chem 246:1461–1467PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Morell AG, Irvine RA, Sternlieb I et al (1968) Physical and chemical studies on ceruloplasmin. V. Metabolic studies on sialic acid-free ceruloplasmin in vivo. J Biol Chem 243:155–159PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Drickamer K (1988) Two distinct classes of carbohydrate-recognition domains in animal lectins. J Biol Chem 263:9557–9560PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Drickamer K (1996) Ca(2+)-dependent sugar recognition by animal lectins. Biochem Soc Trans 24:146–150PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Anonymous (2008) Gilbert Ashwell: sweet on science. Nat Med 14:608Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Morell AG, Van den Hamer CJ, Scheinberg IH et al (1966) Physical and chemical studies on ceruloplasmin. IV. Preparation of radioactive, sialic acid-free ceruloplasmin labeled with tritium on terminal d-galactose residues. J Biol Chem 241:3745–3749PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Van Den Hamer CJ, Morell AG, Scheinberg IH et al (1970) Physical and chemical studies on ceruloplasmin. IX. The role of galactosyl residues in the clearance of ceruloplasmin from the circulation. J Biol Chem 245:4397–4402Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Baenziger J, Kornfeld S (1974) Structure of the carbohydrate units of IgA1 immunoglobulin. II. Structure of the O-glycosidically linked oligosaccharide units. J Biol Chem 249:7270–7281PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Spiess M (1990) The asialoglycoprotein receptor: a model for endocytic transport receptors. Biochemistry 29:10009–10018PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stockert RJ (1995) The asialoglycoprotein receptor: relationships between structure, function, and expression. Physiol Rev 75:591–609PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Diao J, Michalak TI (1996) Composition, antigenic properties and hepatocyte surface expression of the woodchuck asialoglycoprotein receptor. J Recept Signal Transduct Res 16:243–271PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pricer WE Jr, Hudgin RL, Ashwell G et al (1974) A membrane receptor protein for asialoglycoproteins. Methods Enzymol 34:688–691PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Weigel PH (1980) Characterization of the asialoglycoprotein receptor on isolated rat hepatocytes. J Biol Chem 255:6111–6120PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lee YC, Townsend RR, Hardy MR et al (1983) Binding of synthetic oligosaccharides to the hepatic Gal/GalNAc lectin. Dependence on fine structural features. J Biol Chem 258:199–202PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hardy MR, Townsend RR, Parkhurst SM et al (1985) Different modes of ligand binding to the hepatic galactose/N-acetylgalactosamine lectin on the surface of rabbit hepatocytes. Biochemistry 24:22–28PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chiu MH, Tamura T, Wadhwa MS et al (1994) In vivo targeting function of N-linked oligosaccharides with terminating galactose and N-acetylgalactosamine residues. J Biol Chem 269:16195–16202PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Breitfeld PP, Rup D, Schwartz AL (1984) Influence of the N-linked oligosaccharides on the biosynthesis, intracellular routing, and function of the human asialoglycoprotein receptor. J Biol Chem 259:10414–10421PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Stockert RJ, Kressner MS, Collins JC et al (1982) IgA interaction with the asialoglycoprotein receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 79:6229–6231PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Daniels CK, Schmucker DL, Jones AL (1989) Hepatic asialoglycoprotein receptor-mediated binding of human polymeric immunoglobulin A. Hepatology 9:229–234PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tomana M, Kulhavy R, Mestecky J (1988) Receptor-mediated binding and uptake of immunoglobulin A by human liver. Gastroenterology 94:762–770PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rifai A, Fadden K, Morrison SL et al (2000) The N-glycans determine the differential blood clearance and hepatic uptake of human immunoglobulin (Ig)A1 and IgA2 isotypes. J Exp Med 191:2171–2182PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Baenziger J, Kornfeld S (1974) Structure of the carbohydrate units of IgA1 immunoglobulin. I. Composition, glycopeptide isolation, and structure of the asparagine-linked oligosaccharide units. J Biol Chem 249:7260–7269PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Inamoto T, Brown WR (1991) IgG is associated with the asialoglycoprotein receptor in the human liver. Hepatology 14:1070–1075PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Windler E, Greeve J, Levkau B et al (1991) The human asialoglycoprotein receptor is a possible binding site for low-density lipoproteins and chylomicron remnants. Biochem J 276(Pt 1):79–87PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ishibashi S, Perrey S, Chen Z et al (1996) Role of the low density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor pathway in the metabolism of chylomicron remnants. A quantitative study in knockout mice lacking the LDL receptor, apolipoprotein E, or both. J Biol Chem 271:22422–22427PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rotundo RF, Vincent PA, McKeown-Longo PJ et al (1999) Hepatic fibronectin matrix turnover in rats: involvement of the asialoglycoprotein receptor. Am J Physiol 277:G1189–G1199PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Yang J, Bo XC, Ding XR et al (2006) Antisense oligonucleotides targeted against asialoglycoprotein receptor 1 block human hepatitis B virus replication. J Viral Hepat 13:158–165PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Yang J, Wang F, Tian L et al (2010) Fibronectin and asialoglyprotein receptor mediate hepatitis B surface antigen binding to the cell surface. Arch Virol 155:881–888PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Treichel U, Meyer zum Buschenfelde KH, Dienes HP (1997) Receptor-mediated entry of hepatitis B virus particles into liver cells. Arch Virol 142:493–498PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Treichel U, Meyer zum Buschenfelde KH, Stockert RJ et al (1994) The asialoglycoprotein receptor mediates hepatic binding and uptake of natural hepatitis B virus particles derived from viraemic carriers. J Gen Virol 75(Pt 11):3021–3029PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Dotzauer A, Gebhardt U, Bieback K et al (2000) Hepatitis A virus-specific immunoglobulin A mediates infection of hepatocytes with hepatitis A virus via the asialoglycoprotein receptor. J Virol 74:10950–10957PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wu GY, Wu CH (1988) Receptor-mediated gene delivery and expression in vivo. J Biol Chem 263:14621–14624PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wu GY, Zhan P, Sze LL et al (1994) Incorporation of adenovirus into a ligand-based DNA carrier system results in retention of original receptor specificity and enhances targeted gene expression. J Biol Chem 269:11542–11546PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Marth JD, Grewal PK (2008) Mammalian glycosylation in immunity. Nat Rev Immunol 8:874–887PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Guy CS, Rankin SL, Michalak TI (2011) Hepatocyte cytotoxicity is facilitated by asialoglycoprotein receptor. Hepatology 54:1043–1050PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Huang L, Soldevila G, Leeker M et al (1994) The liver eliminates T cells undergoing antigen-triggered apoptosis in vivo. Immunity 1:741–749PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Huang L, Sye K, Crispe IN (1994) Proliferation and apoptosis of B220+CD4-CD8-TCR alpha beta intermediate T cells in the liver of normal adult mice: implication for lpr pathogenesis. Int Immunol 6:533–540PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Grewal PK, Uchiyama S, Ditto D et al (2008) The Ashwell receptor mitigates the lethal coagulopathy of sepsis. Nat Med 14:648–655PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Rumjantseva V, Grewal PK, Wandall HH et al (2009) Dual roles for hepatic lectin receptors in the clearance of chilled platelets. Nat Med 15:1273–1280PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Grewal PK (2010) The Ashwell–Morell receptor. Methods Enzymol 479:223–241PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Sorensen AL, Rumjantseva V, Nayeb-Hashemi S et al (2009) Role of sialic acid for platelet life span: exposure of beta-galactose results in the rapid clearance of platelets from the circulation by asialoglycoprotein receptor-expressing liver macrophages and hepatocytes. Blood 114:1645–1654PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Becker S, Spiess M, Klenk HD (1995) The asialoglycoprotein receptor is a potential liver-specific receptor for Marburg virus. J Gen Virol 76(Pt 2):393–399PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Burgess JB, Baenziger JU, Brown WR (1992) Abnormal surface distribution of the human asialoglycoprotein receptor in cirrhosis. Hepatology 15:702–706PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Nakaya R, Kohgo Y, Mogi Y et al (1994) Regulation of asialoglycoprotein receptor synthesis by inflammation-related cytokines in HepG2 cells. J Gastroenterol 29:24–30PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Treichel U, Paietta E, Poralla T et al (1994) Effects of cytokines on synthesis and function of the hepatic asialoglycoprotein receptor. J Cell Physiol 158:527–534PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Marshall JS, Green AM, Pensky J et al (1974) Measurement of circulating desialylated glycoproteins and correlation with hepatocellular damage. J Clin Invest 54:555–562PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Poralla T, Treichel U, Lohr H et al (1991) The asialoglycoprotein receptor as target structure in autoimmune liver diseases. Semin Liver Dis 11:215–222PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Jensen DM, McFarlane IG, Portmann BS et al (1978) Detection of antibodies directed against a liver-specific membrane lipoprotein in patients with acute and chronic active hepatitis. N Engl J Med 299:1–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    McFarlane IG, McFarlane BM, Major GN et al (1984) Identification of the hepatic asialo-glycoprotein receptor (hepatic lectin) as a component of liver specific membrane lipoprotein (LSP). Clin Exp Immunol 55:347–354PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    McFarlane BM, McSorley CG, McFarlane IG et al (1985) A radioimmunoassay for detection of circulating antibodies reacting with the hepatic asialoglycoprotein receptor protein. J Immunol Methods 77:219–228PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    McFarlane IG, Hegarty JE, McSorley CG et al (1984) Antibodies to liver-specific protein predict outcome of treatment withdrawal in autoimmune chronic active hepatitis. Lancet 2:954–956PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    McFarlane BM, McSorley CG, Vergani D et al (1986) Serum autoantibodies reacting with the hepatic asialoglycoprotein receptor protein (hepatic lectin) in acute and chronic liver disorders. J Hepatol 3:196–205PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    McFarlane BM, Sipos J, Gove CD et al (1990) Antibodies against the hepatic asialoglycoprotein receptor perfused in situ preferentially attach to periportal liver cells in the rat. Hepatology 11:408–415PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Treichel U, Gerken G, Rossol S et al (1993) Autoantibodies against the human asialoglycoprotein receptor: effects of therapy in autoimmune and virus-induced chronic active hepatitis. J Hepatol 19:55–63PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Treichel U, McFarlane BM, Seki T et al (1994) Demographics of anti-asialoglycoprotein receptor autoantibodies in autoimmune hepatitis. Gastroenterology 107:799–804PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Treichel U, Poralla T, Hess G et al (1990) Autoantibodies to human asialoglycoprotein receptor in autoimmune-type chronic hepatitis. Hepatology 11:606–612PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Czaja AJ, Pfeifer KD, Decker RH et al (1996) Frequency and significance of antibodies to asialoglycoprotein receptor in type 1 autoimmune hepatitis. Dig Dis Sci 41:1733–1740PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Dejica D, Treichel U, Par A et al (1997) Anti asialoglycoprotein receptor antibodies and soluble interleukin-2 receptor levels as marker for inflammation in autoimmune hepatitis. Z Gastroenterol 35:15–21PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Lohse AW, Gerken G, Mohr H et al (1995) Relation between autoimmune liver diseases and viral hepatitis: clinical and serological characteristics in 859 patients. Z Gastroenterol 33:527–533PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Yoshioka M, Mizuno M, Morisue Y et al (2002) Anti-asialoglycoprotein receptor autoantibodies, detected by a capture-immunoassay, are associated with autoimmune liver diseases. Acta Med Okayama 56:99–105PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Bedlow AJ, Donaldson PT, McFarlane BM et al (1989) Autoreactivity to hepatocellular antigens in primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis. J Clin Lab Immunol 30:103–109PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Vento S, McFarlane BM, Vento TG et al (1988) Serial study of liver-directed autoantibodies and autoreactive T-lymphocytes in acute viral hepatitis B. J Autoimmun 1:299–307PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    McFarlane BM, Bridger CB, Smith HM et al (1995) Autoimmune mechanisms in chronic hepatitis B and delta virus infections. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 7:615–621PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Lohr H, Treichel U, Poralla T et al (1992) Liver-infiltrating T helper cells in autoimmune chronic active hepatitis stimulate the production of autoantibodies against the human asialoglycoprotein receptor in vitro. Clin Exp Immunol 88:45–49PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Lohr H, Treichel U, Poralla T et al (1990) The human hepatic asialoglycoprotein receptor is a target antigen for liver-infiltrating T cells in autoimmune chronic active hepatitis and primary biliary cirrhosis. Hepatology 12:1314–1320PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Hausdorf G, Roggenbuck D, Feist E et al (2009) Autoantibodies to asialoglycoprotein receptor (ASGPR) measured by a novel ELISA—revival of a disease-activity marker in autoimmune hepatitis. Clin Chim Acta 408:19–24PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Poralla T, Ramadori G, Dienes HP et al (1987) Liver cell damage caused by monoclonal antibody against an organ-specific membrane antigen in vivo and in vitro. J Hepatol 4:373–380PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Gonzales C, Cochrane AM, Eddleston AL et al (1979) Mechanisms responsible for antibody-dependent, cell-mediated cytotoxicity to isolated hepatocytes in chronic active hepatitis. Gut 20:385–388PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Cochrane AM, Moussouros A, Thomsom AD et al (1976) Antibody-dependent cell-mediated (K cell) cytotoxicity against isolated hepatocytes in chronic active hepatitis. Lancet 1:441–444PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Hopf U, Meyer zum Buschenfelde KH, Arnold W (1976) Detection of a liver-membrane autoantibody in HBsAg-negative chronic active hepatitis. N Engl J Med 294:578–582PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Meyer zum Buschenfelde KH, Treichel U, Lohr H et al (1991) Human asialoglycoprotein receptor as an autoantigen in chronic hepatitis. Immunol Res 10:497–502PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Vergani D, Longhi MS, Bogdanos DP et al (2009) Autoimmune hepatitis. Semin Immunopathol 31:421–435PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Wen L, Ma Y, Bogdanos DP et al (2001) Pediatric autoimmune liver diseases: the molecular basis of humoral and cellular immunity. Curr Mol Med 1:379–389PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Longhi MS, Hussain MJ, Bogdanos DP et al (2007) Cytochrome P450IID6-specific CD8 T cell immune responses mirror disease activity in autoimmune hepatitis type 2. Hepatology 46:472–484PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Longhi MS, Ma Y, Bogdanos DP et al (2004) Impairment of CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory T-cells in autoimmune liver disease. J Hepatol 41:31–37PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Longhi MS, Ma Y, Mitry RR et al (2005) Effect of CD4+CD25+regulatory T-cells on CD8 T-cell function in patients with autoimmune hepatitis. J Autoimmun 25:63–71PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Ma Y, Bogdanos DP, Hussain MJ et al (2006) Polyclonal T-cell responses to cytochrome P450IID6 are associated with disease activity in autoimmune hepatitis type 2. Gastroenterology 130:868–882PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Ma Y, Okamoto M, Thomas MG et al (2002) Antibodies to conformational epitopes of soluble liver antigen define a severe form of autoimmune liver disease. Hepatology 35:658–664PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Ma Y, Thomas MG, Okamoto M et al (2002) Key residues of a major cytochrome P4502D6 epitope are located on the surface of the molecule. J Immunol 169:277–285PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Mullighan CG, Bogdanos DP, Vergani D et al (2006) Cytochrome P450 1A2 is a target antigen in hepatitic graft-versus-host disease. Bone Marrow Transplant 38:703–705PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Vergani D, Choudhuri K, Bogdanos DP et al (2002) Pathogenesis of autoimmune hepatitis. Clin Liver Dis 6:727–737PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Hintermann E, Holdener M, Bayer M et al (2011) Epitope spreading of the anti-CYP2D6 antibody response in patients with autoimmune hepatitis and in the CYP2D6 mouse model. J Autoimmun 37:242–253PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Christen U, Hintermann E, Jaeckel E (2009) New animal models for autoimmune hepatitis. Semin Liver Dis 29:262–272PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Werner L, Paclik D, Fritz C et al (2012) Identification of pancreatic glycoprotein 2 as an endogenous immunomodulator of innate and adaptive immune responses. J Immunol 189:2774–2783PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Roggenbuck D, Hausdorf G, Martinez-Gamboa L et al (2009) Identification of GP2, the major zymogen granule membrane glycoprotein, as the autoantigen of pancreatic antibodies in Crohn’s disease. Gut 58:1620–1628PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Bogdanos DP, Rigopoulou EI, Smyk DS et al (2011) Diagnostic value, clinical utility and pathogenic significance of reactivity to the molecular targets of Crohn’s disease specific-pancreatic autoantibodies. Autoimmun Rev 11:143–148PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Hajoui O, Martin S, Alvarez F (1998) Study of antigenic sites on the asialoglycoprotein receptor recognized by autoantibodies. Clin Exp Immunol 113:339–345PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Treichel U, Schreiter T, Meyer zum Buschenfelde KH et al (1995) High-yield purification and characterization of human asialoglycoprotein receptor. Protein Expr Purif 6:251–255PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Rigopoulou EI, Roggenbuck D, Smyk DS et al (2012) Asialoglycoprotein receptor (ASGPR) as target autoantigen in liver autoimmunity: lost and found. Autoimmun RevGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Alvarez F, Berg PA, Bianchi FB et al (1999) International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group Report: review of criteria for diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis. J Hepatol 31:929–938PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Hennes EM, Zeniya M, Czaja AJ et al (2008) Simplified criteria for the diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis. Hepatology 48:169–176PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Hajoui O, Debray D, Martin S et al (2000) Auto-antibodies to the asialoglycoprotein receptor in sera of children with auto-immune hepatitis. Eur J Pediatr 159:310–313PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Gregorio GV, Portmann B, Reid F et al (1997) Autoimmune hepatitis in childhood: a 20-year experience. Hepatology 25:541–547PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Johnson PJ, McFarlane IG, McFarlane BM et al (1990) Auto-immune features in patients with idiopathic chronic active hepatitis who are seronegative for conventional auto-antibodies. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 5:244–251PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Bogdanos DP, Mieli-Vergani G, Vergani D (2009) Autoantibodies and their antigens in autoimmune hepatitis. Semin Liver Dis 29:241–253PubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Johnson PJ, McFarlane IG (1993) Meeting report: International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group. Hepatology 18:998–1005PubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Vergani D, Alvarez F, Bianchi FB et al (2004) Liver autoimmune serology: a consensus statement from the committee for autoimmune serology of the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group. J Hepatol 41:677–683PubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Chantran Y, Ballot E, Johanet C (2012) Autoantibodies in autoimmune hepatitis: anti-asialoglycoprotein receptor (anti-ASGPR) antibodies. Clin Res Hepatol GastroenterolGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Hilgard P, Schreiter T, Stockert RJ et al (2004) Asialoglycoprotein receptor facilitates hemolysis in patients with alcoholic liver cirrhosis. Hepatology 39:1398–1407PubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Husa P, Chalupa P, Stroblova H et al (2001) Autoantibodies to asialoglycoprotein receptor in chronic hepatitis C patients. Acta Virol 45:7–11PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Sasaki M, Yamauchi K, Tokushige K et al (2001) Clinical significance of autoantibody to hepatocyte membrane antigen in type 1 autoimmune hepatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 96:846–851PubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Mytilinaiou MG, Roggenbuck D, Grammatikopoulos A et al (2011) Anti-asialoglycoprotein receptor antibody measured by ELISA is a specific marker of liver autoimmunity and mirrors disease activity in patients with autoimmune hepatitis. Hepatology 54:919AGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dirk Roggenbuck
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Maria G. Mytilinaiou
    • 3
  • Sergey V. Lapin
    • 4
  • Dirk Reinhold
    • 5
  • Karsten Conrad
    • 6
  1. 1.Faculty of Natural SciencesUniversity of Applied SciencesSenftenbergGermany
  2. 2.GA Generic Assays GmbHDahlewitz/BerlinGermany
  3. 3.Division of Transplantation Immunology and Mucosal Biology, Institute of Liver StudiesKing’s College London School of Medicine at King’s College HospitalLondonUK
  4. 4.Laboratory of Autoimmune DiagnosticsSt. Petersburg Pavlov State Medical UniversitySt.PetersburgRussia
  5. 5.Institute of Molecular and Clinical ImmunologyOtto-von-Guericke UniversityMagdeburgGermany
  6. 6.Institute of ImmunologyTechnical University DresdenDresdenGermany

Personalised recommendations