Advertisement

Australasian Plant Disease Notes

, Volume 7, Issue 1, pp 107–110 | Cite as

First report of an isolate of Japanese iris necrotic ring virus from Australia

  • Stephen J. WylieEmail author
  • Hua Li
  • Michael G. K. Jones
Article

Abstract

An isolate of Japanese iris necrotic ring virus (JINRV) was detected from a plant of Iris ensata Thunb. growing in Western Australia, and the sequence of its complete genome (4019 nucleotides) was determined. The deduced replicase and coat proteins shared 75 % and 72 % amino acid identities, respectively, with those of the only other sequenced isolate of JINRV, from Japan. This is the first report of JINRV in Australia, and the first beyond Japan.

Keywords

Flower bulb Virus incursion High throughput sequencing Horticulture 

Japanese iris necrotic ring virus (JINRV) (family Tombusviridae, genus Carmovirus) was first described in Japan in 1982 from Japanese iris (Iris kaempferi Sieb.) (Yasukawa et al. 1982). It possessed spherical particles of about 35 nm in diameter with linear, monopartite, single-stranded plus-sense RNA. The virus was transmitted mechanically but not by aphids or through soil. It caused necrotic spindle-shaped streaks or rings in the leaves of Japanese irises and latent local infection in Siberian iris (I. sanquinea Hornem. ex Donn) and rabbit-ear iris (I. laevigata Fisch.) (Yasukawa et al. 1991). The complete genome sequence of the type isolate from Japan (GenBank accession NC_002187) is 4014 nucleotides (nt) long and predicted to encode five or six overlapping open reading frames (ORF). Until now, JINRV was described only from Japan, and only one sequence (Takemoto et al. 2000), that of the type isolate, was available.

Iris plants were analysed as part of a project to determine incidence and sequence diversity of potyviruses and flexiviruses in the Perth region, Western Australia. Total RNA was extracted from leaf samples of five Spanish iris (I. xiphium Desf.) and five Japanese water iris (I. ensata Thunb.) plants using the Qiagen Plant RNeasy kit. RNA samples from each species were pooled. Purification of polyadenylated RNA from total RNA using Oligo-dT labeled beads, nebulization of RNA prior to adaptor ligation, library construction, amplification, and paired-end sequencing using Illumina HiSeq 2000 technology was done by Macrogen Inc (Seoul). De novo assembly of contigs was carried out using CLC Genomics Workbench v4.8 (www.clcbio.com) and Geneious Pro v5.5.6 (Drummond et al. 2011). Parameters for the assembly of contigs were minimum overlap of 50 % of read length (50 nt), 10 % maximum gaps per read, 85 %, 90 % and 95 % minimum overlap identity. Resulting contigs were sorted according to length. Batches of remaining contigs were subjected to Blastn, Blastx and Blastp analysis against appropriate GenBank databases. The JINRV sequences identified were edited manually to remove gaps and aberrant reads. The final virus consensus sequence was constructed using contigs from both assemblers. ORFs and identities of mature peptides, and domains encoded by them were predicted by homology after alignment with available carmovirus genomes. Pairwise identities were calculated after alignment of nt and amino acid (aa) sequences in ClustalW (Thompson et al. 1994). The phylogenetic tree of amino acid sequences was constructed using Neighbor-joining (NJ), Maximum Likelihood (ML), and Maximum Parsimony (MP) methods in MEGA5 (Tamura et al. 2011) after pairwise alignment of sequences with a Gonnet protein weight matrix, a gap open penalty of 10, a gap separation distance of 4, and a gap extension penalty of 0.2. The test of phylogeny was done using 1,000 bootstrap replications.

The genome sequence of the isolate of JINRV was 4019 nt in length, excluding the polyA tail. It was predicted to encode five ORFs. ORF1 and ORF2 encode subunits of the replicase. ORF1 encodes a protein of 27 kDa that terminates with an amber stop codon. Read-through of this amber codon results in the synthesis of ORF2, in this case a protein of 85 kDa. The third and forth overlapping ORFs encode proteins of 8 kDa and 12 kDa, respectively. Both proteins are thought to be involved in cell-to-cell movement (MP) of the virus. The overlapping 3′-proximal ORF5 encodes a 37 kDa capsid protein (CP). The isolate was named Marijiniup10 after the suburb in which it was found, and its genome sequence was granted GenBank accession JQ807998.

When the genome sequence of JINRV-Marijiniup10 was aligned with those of other carmoviruses for which a complete genome was available, it shared greatest nt identity (69 %) with the type isolate of JINRV from Japan. It shared lower nt identities (53–57 %) with the genome sequences of other carmoviruses. The deduced aa sequence of the large read-through protein subunit of the replicase shared 75 % pairwise identity with that of JINRV-Japan and only 32–47 % identity with other carmoviruses (Table 1a). Similarly, the CP sequence had greatest aa identity (72 %) with JINRV-Japan, and shared much lower identities (22–37 %) with other carmoviruses (Table 1b). Although aa identity between the two JINRV isolates is low, the sequence identity criteria determined by the International Committee on the Taxonomy of Viruses for species demarcation for the replicase and coat proteins are <57 % and <52 % respectively (King et al. 2012). Therefore, the sequence identities between replicase and CP sequences of isolate Marijiniup10 and JINRV-Japan, and shared features of their genomic architecture, confirm them as members of the same taxon. When the replicase sequences (aa) of carmoviruses were aligned to deduce their phylogeny using NJ, ML, and MP methods, essentially the same evolutionary relationships between them were revealed with each algorithm. The NJ tree is shown (Fig. 1).
Table 1

Comparison of replicase and coat protein genes of carmovirus isolates

Virusa

JINRV-Marijiniup10

JINRV-Japan

AnFBV

CbMV

CCFV

CarMV

CpMoV

GMV

HCRSV

HnRSV

MNSV

NLVCV

PSNV

PFBV

SCV

SYMMV

TPGV1

a. Distance matrix of amino acid sequence identities of the large read-through proteins (putative replicase) of 17 carmovirus isolates for which complete genome sequences are available.

JINRV-Japan

75

                

AnFBV

39

39

               

CbMV

39

39

48

              

CCFV

45

45

40

38

             

CarMV

40

39

51

48

41

            

CpMoV

37

37

39

37

40

38

           

GMV

32

31

33

34

33

36

34

          

HCRSV

47

47

41

41

49

40

42

34

         

HnRSV

41

41

52

53

40

56

39

34

43

        

MNSV

39

37

40

39

42

38

41

35

41

39

       

NLVCV

38

39

47

51

38

49

36

34

40

51

39

      

PSNV

42

39

40

40

41

38

40

36

43

39

57

38

     

PFBV

38

38

51

54

39

57

39

33

42

65

40

48

40

    

SCV

39

39

49

51

38

52

38

32

42

54

39

47

39

54

   

SYMMV

40

39

37

38

39

38

66

35

42

38

41

37

41

40

37

  

TGPV1

33

34

39

37

35

38

34

30

37

38

35

36

35

38

38

34

 

TuCV

46

47

41

41

67

41

43

34

52

41

41

40

42

41

40

42

37

b. Distance matrix of amino acid sequence identities of the coat proteins of 17 carmovirus isolates for which complete genome sequences are available

JINRV-Japan

72

                

AnFBV

28

28

               

CbMV

26

26

27

              

CCFV

37

37

24

30

             

CarMV

28

29

34

34

27

            

CpMoV

26

24

17

19

22

16

           

GMV

25

25

19

23

21

22

22

          

HCRSV

30

33

25

28

33

31

24

26

         

HnRSV

28

29

33

37

28

39

21

22

27

        

MNSV

24

22

18

19

22

18

19

28

24

20

       

NLVCV

25

27

29

31

27

35

17

19

26

34

20

      

PSNV

22

22

19

18

20

19

20

25

20

19

30

18

     

PFBV

30

30

35

38

28

38

20

22

31

55

22

37

19

    

SCV

29

30

30

43

32

41

20

24

31

42

23

33

19

43

   

SYMMV

26

24

18

20

22

19

61

24

24

22

20

19

19

23

20

  

TGPV1

27

28

33

28

25

30

17

19

28

31

18

31

18

35

28

18

 

TuCV

37

36

25

28

52

25

23

24

30

24

23

25

21

26

28

24

23

a AnFBV angelonia flower break virus (NC_007733); CbMV calibrachoa mottle virus (GQ244431); CCFV, cardamine chlorotic fleck virus (NC_001600); CarMV, carnation mottle virus (NC_001265); CpMoV cowpea mottle virus (NC_003535); GMV galinsoga mosaic virus (NC_001818); HCRSV hibiscus chlorotic ringspot virus (NC_003608); HnRSV honeysuckle ringspot virus (NC_014967); JINRV Japanese iris necrotic ring virus (isolate Japan NC_002187, isolate Marijiniup10 JQ807998); MNSV melon necrotic spot virus (AB232925); NLVCV nootka lupine vein-clearing virus (NC_009017); PSNV pea stem necrosis virus (NC_004995); PFBV pelargonium flower break virus (NC_005286); SCV saguaro cactus virus (NC_001780); SYMMV soybean yellow mottle mosaic virus (NC_011643); TGPV1 TGP Carmovirus 1 (NC_015227); TuCV, turnip crinkle virus (NC_003821)

Fig. 1

Neighbor-joining tree of amino acid sequences of the large read-through protein (putative replicase) of an isolate of each species of carmovirus for which this sequence was available. Isolate names (where available) and GenBank accessions are shown. JINRV isolate Marijiniup10 is boxed. 1,000 bootstrap replicates were done and values >60 % are shown. The tree was drawn to scale, with evolutionary distance used to infer the branch length in nucleotide substitutions per site

All the iris plants tested were screened individually using primers JINRVF1 (5′-CAGGGG CGCTCAGGCGACTA-3′) and JINRVR1 (5′-CAACCCCCGACGCTGCCAAT-3′) in an RT-PCR assay as described previously (Wylie et al. 2012). Primer JINRVF1 annealed to the 3′ end of the MP and primer JINRVR1 annealed to the 5′ end of the CP to yield a product of 376 bp. The product was sequenced directly by the Sanger method to confirm that it was derived from JINRV. The virus was detected in a single I. ensata plant. As others have noted for other iris host species (Yasukawa et al. 1991), the virus did not induce visible symptoms in I. ensata typical of virus infection.

Of interest is that the reads that mapped perfectly to the 3′ terminal 30–80 nucleotides of the JINRV genome had contiguous 3′ tracts of adenines of up to 43 nucleotides. Carmoviruses, including the type isolate of JINRV, are not reported to be polyadenylated (Sit and Lommel 2010; Takemoto et al. 2000). The existence of the poly (A) region cannot be explained as a cDNA synthesis or library preparation artifact because neither process involved addition of adenines. In fact, the presence of a poly (A) is required for RNA to be sequenced using this method because poly (T) beads are utilized to capture polyadenylated RNAs while ribosomal RNAs are removed prior to cDNA library construction and sequencing. A possible explanation is that a small number of copies of the genome are, in fact, polyadenylated, but until now these have not been detected using conventional cloning and sequencing techniques. As more plant viruses are sequenced using high throughput technologies, this issue may be clarified.

To our knowledge this is the first report of Japanese iris necrotic ring virus occurring outside of Japan, and within Australia. The virus has a narrow host range and was probably inadvertently introduced to Australia on imported iris propagules, and if they were grown and underwent quarantine inspection, it was passed because no obvious symptoms of infection were evident on the leaves. Plants that are vegetatively propagated, such as irises, accumulate viruses, and when they are traded internationally, viruses infecting them are spread to new locations (Wylie et al. 2010; Wylie et al. 2011; Wylie and Jones 2012; Wylie et al. 2012). The sequencing method used was designed to detect only polyadenylated RNA viruses, so additional viruses may be present in the plant tested. This study highlights the need for more stringent examination of imported plant propagation materials at pre- and post-entry quarantine to prevent new viruses entering Australia, and the requirement for Australian producers to source virus-free stock and to also have their stocks tested for viruses prior to distribution.

Notes

Acknowledgment

This study was funded by Australian Research Council Linkage Grant LP110200180

References

  1. Drummond AJ, Ashton B, Buxton S, Cheung M, Cooper A, Duran C, Field M, Heled J, Kearse M, Markowitz S, Moir R, Stones-Havas S, Sturrock S, Thierer T, Wilson A (2011) Geneious Pro v5.5.6. http://www.geneious.com
  2. King AMQ, Lefkowitz E, Adams MJ, Carstens EB (2012) Virus taxonomy: IXth report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. Academic, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Sit TL, Lommel SA (2010) Tombusviridae. In: Encyclopedia of Life Sciences. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. DOI: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0000756.pub2
  4. Takemoto Y, Kanehira T, Shinohara M, Yamashita S, Hibi T (2000) The nucleotide sequence and genome organization of Japanese iris necrotic ring virus, a new species in the genus Carmovirus. Arch Virol 145:651–657PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S (2011) MEGA5: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr121
  6. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ (1994) CLUSTALW: improving sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nuc Acid Res 22:4673–4680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Wylie SJ, Jones MGK (2012) Complete genome sequences of seven carlavirus and potyvirus isolates on Narcissus and Hippeastrum plants in Australia, and proposals to clarify their naming. Arch Virol (in press 21 Mar 2012 AVIROL-D-12-00014)Google Scholar
  8. Wylie SJ, Nouri S, Coutts BA, Jones MGK (2010) Narcissus late season yellows virus and Vallota speciosa virus found infecting domestic and wild populations of Narcissus species in Australia. Arch Virol 155:1171–1174PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Wylie SJ, Li H, Jones MGK (2011) Phylogenetic analysis of allexiviruses identified on garlic from Australia. APDN. doi: 10.1007/s13314-011-0038-2
  10. Wylie SJ, Luo H, Li H, Jones MGK (2012) Multiple polyadenylated RNA viruses detected in pooled cultivated and wild plant samples. Arch Virol 157:271–284PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Yasukawa K, Ohki ST, Osaki T, Inouye T (1982) Japanese iris necrotic ring disease, a newly recognized disease caused by Japanese iris necrotic ring virus. Ann Phytopathol Soc Jpn 48:113–114Google Scholar
  12. Yasukawa K, Osaki T, Inouye T (1991) Necrotic Ring Disease of Japanese Iris (Iris kaempferi Sieb.), A new disease caused by Japanese iris necrotic ring virus. Bull U Osaka Pref Ser B Agric Biol 43:21–28Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Australasian Plant Pathology Society Inc. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephen J. Wylie
    • 1
    Email author
  • Hua Li
    • 1
  • Michael G. K. Jones
    • 1
  1. 1.Plant Virology Group, Western Australian State Agricultural Biotechnology Centre, School of Biological Sciences and BiotechnologyMurdoch UniversityPerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations