Skip to main content
Log in

The influence of growth stage of different cereal species on host susceptibility to Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici and on Pseudomonas populations in the rhizosphere

  • Published:
Australasian Plant Pathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The dynamics of infection by Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici (Ggt), the soil-borne fungus causing the disease take-all, in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), rye (Secale cereale L.), barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and triticale (x Triticosecale Wittmack) was investigated at different growth stages of the cereal hosts. In the field, Ggt spreads along rows of plants from the inoculum sources. At harvest, Ggt DNA was detected up to 60 cm away from inoculum sources in all species except rye, although most of the take-all lesions occurred in roots less than 30 cm away in all species, with rye being the least affected. The greatest populations of fluorescent Pseudomonas sp-species were extracted from the rhizosphere of cereal roots sampled near the points of Ggt inoculation; were found prior to the booting growth stage in triticale and rye; and were not related to the concentration of Ggt in the roots. In pots in a glasshouse experiment, Ggt colonised seedling wheat roots to a concentration of 103 ng DNA/mg dried roots and caused 14 % take-all severity in roots during plant development. In rye, seedling roots contained Ggt DNA at 15 ng/mg dried root, which decreased to negligible concentrations until heading, then increased rapidly to 280 ng DNA/mg dried root at kernel development. Take-all root severity in rye increased from 1 to 50 % over that period. In a second glasshouse experiment, inoculation of roots of host plants at various growth stages with actively growing hyphae of Ggt showed that the pathogen was able to overcome resistance in rye plants after an establishment phase.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asher MJC, Shipton PJ (1981) Biology and control of take-all. Academic, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey DJ, Gilligan CA (1999) Dynamics of primary and secondary infection in take-all epidemics. Phytopathology 89:84–91

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bithell SL, McLachlan ARG, Hide CCL, McKay A, Cromey MG (2009) Changes in post-harvest levels of Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici inoculum in wheat fieldsx. Australas Plant Pathol 38:277–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bithell SL, Butler RC, Harrow S, McKay A, Cromey MG (2011) Susceptibility to take-all of cereal and grass species, and their effects on pathogen inoculum. Ann Appl Biol 159:252–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bithell SL, McKay A, Butler RC, Herdina, Ophel-Keller K, Hartley D, Cromey MG (2012) Predicting take-all severity in second-year wheat using soil DNA concentrations of Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici determined with qPCR. Plant Dis 96:443–451

  • Cook RJ (2003) Take-all of wheat. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 62:73–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook RJ (2007) Management of resident plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria with the cropping system: a review of experience in the US Pacific Northwest. Eur J Plant Pathol 119:255–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cromey, M.G., 2010. Diseases and disease resistance in New Zealand cereal crops: 2009–10

  • Deacon JW, Henry CM (1980) Age of wheat and barley roots and infection by Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici. Soil Biol Biochem 12:113–118

  • GenStat Committee (2011) The guide to GenStat release 14 - parts 1–3. VSN International, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • GenStat Committee (2013) GenStat reference manual release 15 - part 3, procedures. VSN International, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan CA (1980) Zone of potential infection between host roots and inoculum units of Gaeumannomyces graminis. Soil Biol Biochem 12:513–514

  • Gilligan CA, Simons SA (1987) Inoculum efficiency and pathozone width for 2 host-parasite systems. New Phytol 107:549–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gosme M, Lucas P (2009) Combining experimentation and modelling to estimate primary and secondary infections of take-all disease of wheat. Soil Biol Biochem 41:1523–1530

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gosme M, Lucas P (2011) Effect of host and inoculum patterns on take-all disease of wheat incidence, severity and disease gradient. Eur J Plant Pathol 129:119–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gosme M, Willocquet L, Lucas P (2007) Size, shape and intensity of aggregation of take-all disease during natural epidemics in second wheat crops. Plant Pathol 56:87–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutteridge RJ, Hornby D, Hollins TW, Prew RD (1993) Take-all in autumn-sown wheat, barley, triticale and rye grown with high and Low inputs. Plant Pathol 42:425–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollins TW, Scott PR, Gregory RS (1986) The relative resistance of wheat, rye and triticale to take-all caused by Gaeumannomyces-graminis. Plant Pathol 35:93–100

  • Hornby D (1981) Inoculum. In: Asher MJC, Shipton PJ (eds) Biology and control of take-all. Academic, London, pp 271–293, C272, C275, C276

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornby D, Bateman GL, Gutteridge RJ, Ward E, Yarham D (1998) Take-all disease of cereals: a regional perspective. CAB International, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, S., Cromey, M.G., Harrow, S.A., Bithell, S.L., Butler, R.C., Beard, S.S., Pitman, A.R., 2014. Quantitative PCR detects Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici in non-symptomatic wheat roots and shows proliferation of the pathogen is associated with take-all progression. Plant Dis. Submitted.

  • King EO, Ward MK, Raney DE (1954) Two simple media for the demonstration of pyocyanin and fluorescein. J Lab Clin Med 44:301–307

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kwak Y-S, Weller DM (2013) Take-all of wheat and natural disease suppression: a review. Plant Pathol J 29:125–135

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee Y, Nelder JA, Pawitan Y (2006) Generalized linear models with random effects: unified analysis via H-likelihood. Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • MacNish GC, Dodman RL (1973) Survival of Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici in the field. Aust J Biol Sci 26:1309–1317

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazzola M, Funnell DL, Raaijmakers JM (2004) Wheat cultivar-specific selection of 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol-producing fluorescent Pseudomonas species from resident soil populations. Microb Ecol 48:338–348

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCullagh P, Nelder JA (1989) Generalized linear models, 2nd edn. Chapman & Hall, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Okubara PA, Bonsall RF (2008) Accumulation of Pseudomonas-derived 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol on wheat seedling roots is influenced by host cultivar. Biol Control 46:322–331

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Okubara PA, Call DR, Kwak Y-S, Skinner DZ (2010) Induction of defense gene homologues in wheat roots during interactions with Pseudomonas fluorescens. Biol Control 55:118–125

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ophel-Keller K, McKay A, Hartley D, Herdina, Curran J (2008) Development of a routine DNA-based testing service for soilborne diseases in Australia. Australas Plant Pathol 37:243–253

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prew RD (1980) Studies on the spread of Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici in wheat. I. Autonomous spread. Ann Appl Biol 94:391–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothrock CS (1988) Relative susceptibility of small grains to take-all. Plant Dis 72:883–886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoeny A, Lucas P (1999) Modeling of take-all epidemics to evaluate the efficacy of a new Seed-treatment fungicide on wheat. Phytopathology 89:954–961

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sheng Q, Hunt LA (1991) Shoot and root dry-weight and soil-water in wheat, triticale and rye. Can J Plant Sci 71:41–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skou, J.P., 1975. Studies on the take-all fungus Gaeumannomyces graminis. 5. Development and regeneration of roots in cereal species during the attack. Arskrift Kongelige Veterinaer- og Landbohoejskole, 142–160.

  • Solel Z, Benzeev IS, Dori S (1990) Features of resistance to take-all disease in cereal species evaluated by laboratory assays. J Phytopathol-Phytopathol Z 130:219–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weller DM, Cook RJ (1983) Suppression of take-all of wheat by seed treatments with fluorescent Pseudomonads. Phytopathology 73:463–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willocquet L, Lebreton L, Sarniguet A, Lucas P (2008) Quantification of within-season focal spread of wheat take-all in relation to pathogen genotype and host spatial distribution. Plant Pathol 57:906–915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadoks JC, Chang TT, Konzak CF (1974) A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Res 14:415–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Plant & Food Research staff Steve Griffiths, Julian Hodgkinson and Ross Hanson for management of the field experiment, and Megan Gee for assistance in collecting samples; Stan Ebdon for maintenance of plants in the glasshouses; Sandi Keenan for advice on molecular diagnostics of Ggt, and, along with Prof. Richard Falloon and Dr Bob Fullerton, for review of the manuscript. This research was funded by a Ministry of Science and Innovation contract (LINX0804 – Ecosystems Bioprotection).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. F. van Toor.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

van Toor, R.F., Chng, S.F., Warren, R.M. et al. The influence of growth stage of different cereal species on host susceptibility to Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici and on Pseudomonas populations in the rhizosphere. Australasian Plant Pathol. 44, 57–70 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13313-014-0324-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13313-014-0324-5

Keywords

Navigation