Skip to main content
Log in

Predicting regional-scale spread of ascospores of Didymella pinodes causing ascochyta blight disease on field pea

  • Published:
Australasian Plant Pathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ascochyta blight is the most destructive foliar pathogen of field peas. The amount of yield loss resulting from the disease in Australia is mainly driven by primary infection from wind-borne ascospores of Didymella pinodes. In this study, a model was developed to predict the spread of ascospores from the ascochyta blight infected field pea stubble of previous season’s crops. The model was adapted from a previously developed spatiotemporal model and calibrated with field experimental data consisting of release events of ascospores of D. pinodes from known source for 21 consecutive weeks, under natural environmental conditions, in a 400 m by 400 m area. The model was then applied in a 30.9 km by 36.8 km area in a major field pea growing region of Western Australia to show the magnitude and spatial diversity of the dispersal of ascospores, generated in previous season’s field pea stubble, could differ between growing seasons. This simulation was only tested subjectively. It is concluded that a properly validated simulation of this type has potential for understanding the value of physical separation of the current season field pea crop from previous season’s stubble, visualising the scale and diversity of ascospore dispersal as an educational tool for growers and consultants, and deriving the “magic figure” of the intensity of field pea area that could result in the presence of ascospores everywhere in a region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aubertot JN, West JS, Bousset-Vaslin L, Salam MU, Barbetti MJ, Diggle AJ (2006) Improved resistance management for durable disease control: A case study of phoma stem canker of oilseed rape (Brassica napus). Eur J Plant Pathol 114:91–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bretag TW (1991) Epidemiology and control of ascochyta blight of field peas. PhD Thesis. La Trobe University, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Bretag TW, Keane PJ, Price TV (1995) Effect of ascochyta blight on grain yield of field peas (Pisum sativum L.) grown in southern Australia. Aust J Exp Agric 35:531–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bretag TW, Keane PJ, Price TV (2006) The epidemiology and control of ascochyta blight in field peas: a review. Aust J Agric Res 57:883–902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson JA, Hartley D, Priest M, Herdina MK-K, McKay A, Scott ES (2009) A new species of Phoma causes achochyta blight symptoms of field peas (Pisum sativum) in South Australia. Mycologica 101:120–128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Diggle AJ, Salam MU, Thomas GJ, Yang HA, O’Connell M, Sweetingham MW (2002) AnthracnoseTracer: A spatiotemporal model for simulating the spread of anthracnose in an lupin field. Phytopathology 92:1110–1121

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • French B, Pritchard I, Seymour M, Riethmuller G (2005) Crop management: Growing field pea. In: Producing Pulses in the Southern Agricultural Region, pp. 19–32. Department of Agriculture, Western Australia

  • Galloway J, MacLeod WJ (2003) Didymella rabiei, the teleomorph of Ascochyta rabiei, found on chickpea stubble in Western Australia. Australas Plant Pathol 32:127–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madden LV, Hughes G (1995) Plant disease incidence: Distributions, heterogeneity, and temporal analysis. Annu Rev Phytopathol 33:529–564

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McMurray LS, Davidson JA, Lines MD, Leonforte AL, Salam MU (2011) Combining pathological, agronomic and breeding advances to maximise Pisum sativum yields under changing climatic conditions in south-eastern Australia. Euphytica. doi:10.1007/s10681-011-0362-9

    Google Scholar 

  • Peever TL, Barve MT, Stone LJ, Kaiser WJ (2007) Evolutionary relationships among Ascochyta species infecting wild and cultivated hosts in legume tribes Cicereae and Vicieae. Mycologia 99:59–77

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Salam MU, Khangura RK, Diggle AJ, Barbetti MJ (2003) Blackleg Sporacle: A model for predicting onset of pseudothecia maturity and seasonal ascospore showers in relation to blackleg of canola. Phytopathology 93:1073–1081

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Salam MU, Galloway J, MacLeod WJ, Davidson JA, Seymour PI, Salam KP, Diggle AJ, Maling M (2011) G1 Blackspot Manager model predicts the maturity and release of ascospores in relation to ascochyta blight of field pea. Australas Plant Pathol. doi:10.1007/s13313-011-0035-0

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoeny A, Jumel S, Rouault F, Le May C, Tivoli B (2007) Assessment of airborne primary inoculum availability and modelling of disease onset of ascochyta blight in field peas. Eur J Plant Pathol 119:87–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu XM, Ridout MS (1998) Effects of initial epidemic conditions, sporulation rate, and ascospore dispersal gradient on the spatio-temporal dynamics of plant disease epidemics. Phytopathology 88:1000–1012

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zadoks JC, van den Bosch F (1994) On the spread of plant disease: A theory on foci. Annu Rev Phytopathol 32:503–521

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Grains Research and Development Corporation (GRDC) of Australia for financial assistance in this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Moin U. Salam.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Salam, M.U., Galloway, J., Diggle, A.J. et al. Predicting regional-scale spread of ascospores of Didymella pinodes causing ascochyta blight disease on field pea. Australasian Plant Pathol. 40, 640–647 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13313-011-0064-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13313-011-0064-8

Keywords

Navigation