Skip to main content
Log in

Pediatric Appendicitis Score for Identifying Acute Appendicitis in Children Presenting With Acute Abdominal Pain to the Emergency Department

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Indian Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To determine the diagnostic accuracy of Pediatric Appendicitis Score (PAS) in predicting appendicitis in children presenting with acute abdominal pain to the Emergency Department (ED) of a private hospital in Pakistan.

Methods

This validation study was through retrospective chart review of children between 4–18 years of age with clinical suspicion of acute appendicitis, presenting to the pediatric ED. Diagnostic accuracy was determined using sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and area under the curve (AUC).

Results

104 children (76% boys) with mean (SD) age of 10.9 (3.5) years met the eligibility criteria. 91% (n=95) patients had moderate to high PAS (score ≥4), and 95% (n=99) had biopsy-proven appendicitis. The likelihood ratio calculated for low, equivocal and high-risk PAS was 0.10, 2.17 and 2.53, respectively. An equivocal PAS (score 4–6) showed a sensitivity of 96.8%, specificity of 80%, positive predictive value of 98.9% and AUC of 0.84 for predicting acute appendicitis.

Conclusion

PAS showed good diagnostic accuracy in predicting acute appendicitis in children presenting to the ED.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pogorelic Z, Rak S, Mrklic I, Juric I. Prospective validation of Alvarado score and Pediatric appendicitis score for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2015;31:164–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rothrock SG, Pagane J. Acute appendicitis in children: emergency department diagnosis and management. Ann Emerg Med. 2000;36:39–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Alvarado A. A practical score for the early diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Pediatr Emerg Care. 1986;2:206–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brenner D, Elliston C, Hall E, Berdon W. Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176:289–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Shah NB, Platt SL. ALARA: is there a cause for alarm? Reducing radiation risks from computed tomography scanning in children. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2008;20:243–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Doria AS, Moineddin R, Kellenberger CJ, et al. US or CT for diagnosis of appendicitis in children and adults? A meta-analysis. Radiology. 2006;241:83–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Samuel M. Pediatric appendicitis score. J Pediatr Surg. 2002;37:877–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kulik DM, Uleryk EM, Maguire JL. Does this child have appendicitis? A systematic review of clinical prediction rules for children with acute abdominal pain. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66:95–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Goldman RD, Carter S, Stephens D, et al. Prospective validation of the pediatric appendicitis score. J Pediatr. 2008;153:278–82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rehman S, Afzal M, Butt MQ. Validity of Samuel’s paediatric appedicitis score (PAS) in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children. Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal. 2014; 64:172–77.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bhatt M, Joseph L, Ducharme FM, et al. Prospective validation of the pediatric appendicitis score in a Canadian pediatric emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2009; 16:591–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim DY, Shim DH, Cho KY. Use of the pediatric appendicitis score in a community hospital. Indian Pediatr. 2016;53:217–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sayed A, Zeidan N, Fahmy D, Ibrahim H. Diagnostic reliability of pediatric appendicitis score, ultrasound and low-dose computed tomography scan in children with suspected acute appendicitis. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2017; 13:847–54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Ebell MH, Shinholser J. What are the most clinically useful cutoffs for the Alvarado and Pediatric appendicitis scores? A systematic review. Ann Emerg Med. 2014;64:365–372.e2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Funding: None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Contributors: MS, AIM: helped in conceptualization of the study, devised methodology, developed tool for the study, contributed in training the research assistant for data collection, gave supervision in data collection, input in data analysis, manuscript writing and critically reviewed the manuscript as submitted. OA: data collection and manuscript writing; MJ: data collection; RN: arranging data collection logistics, maintained data folders, manuscript reviewed by all co-authors, drafting the manuscript; SST: cleaned and performed statistical analysis of the data and provided technical input in the data interpretation. All authors have contributed, designed and approved the study.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Syed Maaz Salahuddin.

Ethics declarations

Ethics clearance IEC, Aga Khan University; No.: 4433-EM ERC-16 dated Sept 9, 2016.

Competing interests: None stated.

Additional information

Note: Additional matter related to this article is available with the web version at "https://www.indianpediatrics.net

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Salahuddin, S.M., Ayaz, O., Jaffer, M. et al. Pediatric Appendicitis Score for Identifying Acute Appendicitis in Children Presenting With Acute Abdominal Pain to the Emergency Department. Indian Pediatr 59, 774–777 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-022-2620-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-022-2620-4

Keywords

Navigation