Skip to main content
Log in

The Effect of Multi-source Feedback on Core Competencies of Pediatric Residents

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Indian Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Objective

The study was conducted to evaluate impact of multisource feedback in pediatric residency training.

Methods

A crossover study of pediatric residents at Wadia Children’s Hospital was conducted with assessment of core competencies like knowledge, practice-based learning, system-based practice, professionalism, communication skills and interpersonal interaction. After randomization both groups (A and B) were given MSF and traditional feedback, respectively and later the groups were crossed over to other method of feedback. Control faculty assessed both groups at three points — Pre-intervention, after first and after second intervention.

Results

There were 16 residents in each group (13,7,7 in first, second and third year of residency, respectively). Both groups had comparable scores in all six competencies at entry point. Group A after MSF showed significant improvement in all six competencies (all P<0.01). No significant improvement was observed in group B after traditional feedback. After cross-over to MSF, group B showed statistically significant improvement in all core competencies. Traditional feedback to group A after crossover showed statistically significant improvement only in knowledge, professionalism and system based practice.

Outcome

MSF was beneficial in improving competency based performance scores in pediatric residents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shah N, Desai C, Jorwekar G, Badyal D, Singh T. Competency-based medical education: An overview and application in pharmacology. Indian J Pharma. 2016;48:S5–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Miller GE, Miller GE. The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Acad Med. 1990;65:S63–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ramsden P. Learning to Teach in Higher Education. Roulledge Press; 1992.

  4. Adnan S. Journal of surgery team assessment behaviour (TAB): Is it an ideal tool for improving professional behaviour in trainee doctors. J Surg. 2014;2:78–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Berger JS, Pan E, Jason Thomas M. A randomized, controlled crossover study to discern the value of 360-degree versus traditional, faculty-only evaluation for performance improvement of anesthesiology residents. J Educ Perioper Med. 2009;11:E053.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Al Alawi S, Al Ansari A, Raees A, Al Khalifa S. Multisource feedback to assess pediatric practice: A systematic review. Can Med Educ J. 2013;4:e86–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Berger JS, Pan E, Jason Thomas M. A randomized, controlled crossover study to discern the value of 360-degree versus traditional, faculty-only evaluation for performance improvement of anesthesiology residents. J Educ Perioper Med. 2009;11:E053.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Dohrenwend A. Serving up the feedback sandwich. Fam Pract Manag. 2002;9:43–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Brinkman WB, Geraghty SR, Lanphear BP, et al. Effect of multisource feedback on resident communication skills and professionalism: A randomized controlled trial. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007;161:44–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Higgins RSD, Bridges J, Burke JM, et al. Implementing the ACGME general competencies in a cardiothoracic surgery residency program using 360-degree feedback. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;77:12–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Joshi R, Ling FW, Jaeger J. Assessment of a 360-degree instrument to evaluate residents’ competency in interpersonal and communication skills. Acad Med. 2004;79:458–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Archer JC, Norcini J DH, Archer JC, Davies HA. Use of SPRAT for peer review of paediatricians in training. BMJ. 2005;330:1251–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Boulet J, Sajjad N, Ali S, et al. A 360-degree evaluation of the communication and interpersonal skills of medicine resident physicians in Pakistan. Educ Health. 2016;27:269.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Liu C. An introduction to workplace-based assessments. Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2012;5:24–28.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Weigelt JA Bragg D, Simpson D. BKJ. The 360-degree evaluation: Increased work with little return? Curr Surg.2004;61:616–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Sumitra Venkatesh, Lakshmi Shobhavat, Vaidehi Dande, Sonam Kothari — Resource faculty, Bodhanwala Minnie (CEO), Dr Sudha Rao (Head of the Department), Dr Rajesh Joshi (Head of the Unit) Mrs Sneha Desai (Data Entry).

Funding

Funding: None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Contributors: SK: conceptualized the study, completed the data collection, analysed and drafted the paper; SP: feedback process and also did proof reading; TL: statistical analysis. All authors approved the final version of manuscript, and are accountable for all aspects related to the study.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shilpa Kulkarni.

Ethics declarations

Ethics clearance: Institutional Ethics Committee, Bai Jerbai Wadia Hospital for Children; No. IEC- BJWHC/97/2018, dated August 30, 2018.

Competing interest:: None stated.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kulkarni, S., Prabhu, S. & Lakhan, T. The Effect of Multi-source Feedback on Core Competencies of Pediatric Residents. Indian Pediatr 59, 125–128 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-022-2443-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-022-2443-3

Keywords

Navigation