Abstract
Publications in the field of medical literature are a matter of prestige and fame for doctors. While genuine research contributes to the existing scientific knowledge, fraudulent data make publication unreliable, demeans the credibility of the author and reduces faith in science. Research misconduct includes the three cardinal sins fabrication, falsification and plagiarism. To promote highest standards in publication ethics, Committee on Publication Ethics provides advice and guidance to journals and publishers. Investigators should abide by ethical norms during the conduct of the research. Journals also maintain editorial standards and have well-defined policies for responding to misconduct. With an increase in medical publications over the years, it is important for all stakeholders to abide by publication ethics, in order to uphold the sanctity of research and credence in science.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Wager E, Kleinert S. Cooperation Between Research Institutions and Journals on Research Integrity Cases: Guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics. Saudi J Anaesth. 2012;6:155–60.
Wager E. The Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE): Objectives and achievements 1997–2012. Presse Med. 2012;41:861–6.
Wiley. Best Practice Guidelines on Publishing Ethics. [Online]. Accessed August 1, 2020. Available from: http://www.exchanges.wiley.com/ethicsguidelines
Council of Science Editors. White Paper on Promoting Integrity in Scientific Journal Publications, 2012 Update [Online]. Available from: http://www.councilscienceeditors.org. Accessed August 1, 2020.
Fanelli D. How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data. PLoS One. 2009;29:e5738.
Resnik DB, Neal T, Raymond A, et al. Research misconduct definitions adopted by US research institutions. Account Res. 2015;22:14–21.
Helgesson G, Eriksson E. Plagiarism in research. Med Health Care and Philos. 2015;18:91–101.
COPE. Promoting integrity in scholarly research and its publication. [Online]. Accessed August 1, 2020. Available from: http://www.publicationethics.org
Graf C, Wager E, Bowman A, et al. Best practice guidelines on publication ethics: A publisher’s perspective. Int J Clin Pract Suppl. 2007;61:1–26.
Indian Council of Medical Research. National Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical and Health Research Involving Human Participants. 2017. Accessed March 7, 2020. Available from: https://www.icmr.nic.in/sites/default/files/guidelines/ICMR_Ethical_Guidelines_2017.pdf
World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki — Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Accessed March 7, 2020. Available from: https://www.wmadeclaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects.pdf
Riley DS, Barber MS, Kienle GS, et al. CARE guidelines for case reports: explanation and elaboration document. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017;89:218–35.
ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals. [Online]. Accessed August 1, 2020. Available from: http://www.icmje.org/journals-following-the-icmje-recommendations/
Callaway E. Deal done over HeLa cell line. Nature. 2013;500:132–3.
McLeroy KR, Garney W, Mayo-Wilson E, et al. Scientific reporting: Raising the standards. Health Educ Behav. 2016;43:501–8.
Vasilevsky NA, Hosseini M, Teplitzky S, et al. Is authorship sufficient for today’s collaborative research? A call for contributor roles. Account Res. 2021;28:23–43.
Street JM, Rogers WA, Israel M, et al. Credit where credit is due? Regulation, research integrity and the attribution of authorship in the health Sc. Soc Sci Med. 2010;70:1458–65.
Juyal D, Thawani V, Thaledi S, et al. The fruits of authorship. Educ Health: Change Learn Pract. 2014;27:217–20.
Kovacs J. Honorary authorship and symbolic violence. Med Health Care and Philos. 2017;20:51–9.
Gureev VN, Lakizo IG, Mazov NA. Unethical authorship in scientific publications (A Review of the Problem). Sci Tech Inf Proc. 2019;46:219–32.
Al-Herz W, Haider H, Al-Bahhar M, et al. Honorary authorship in biomedical journals: How common is it and why does it exist? J Med Ethics. 2014;40:346–8.
Woolley KL, Gertel A, Hamilton CW, et al. Time to finger point or fix? An invitation to join ongoing efforts to promote ethical authorship and other good publication practices. Ann Pharmacother. 2013;47:1084–7.
Brand A, Allen L, Altman M, et al. Beyond authorship: Attribution, contribution, collaboration, and credit. Learned Publish. 2015;28:151–5.
Allen L, O’ Connell A, Kiermer V. How can we ensure visibility and diversity in research contributions? How the Contributor Role Taxonomy (CRediT) is helping the shift from authorship to Contributor ship. Learned Publishing. 2019;32:71–4.
Indian Pediatrics. Instructions to authors. Accessed August 9, 2020. Available from: https://www.indianpediatrics.net/author1.htm
Springer. Publishing ethics for journals. Accessed August 01, 2020. Available from: https://www.springer.com/gp/authors-editors/editors/publishing-ethics-for-journals/4176
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Contributors
KSM: conceptualization; KSM, AD: draft preparation, review and editing. Both authors approved the final version of the manuscript.
Funding
None
Competing interests
None stated.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mishra, K., Dabas, A. Publication Ethics. Indian Pediatr 58, 781–785 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-021-2291-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-021-2291-6