Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Validating the MUAC (Mid-upper arm circumference) Cut-off for Detection of Severe Acute Malnutrition in Children Aged 6–59 Months in Rural Maharashtra

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Indian Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To review the Mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) cut-off currently being used to identify Severe Acute Malnutrition (SAM) as currently defined using Weight-for-Height.

Methods

Cross-sectional study conducted in 24 villages of a Primary Health Centre in Wardha district of Maharashtra among 2650 children between the ages of 6 to 59 months.

Results

For identifying SAM, sensitivity of MUAC was 23.5% and specificity was 99.7% for cut-off <11.5 cm. Using Youden index, best Mid-upper arm circumference cut-off point to identify SAM was <13 cm with sensitivity of 74.5% and specificity of 92.7%. Using Receiver operating characteristics curve, best MUAC cut-off point was 12.8 cm with 74.5% sensitivity and 92.7% specificity. Area under curve was 0.88 (95%CI: 0.85-0.91).

Conclusion

The current MUAC cut-off of <11.5 cm for detecting SAM needs to be increased to ensure that children, who need referral for management of malnutrition, are not missed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. International Institute for Population Sciences. India National Family Health Survey (NFHS–3), 2005–06. International Institute for Population Sciences; 2007.

  2. Kapil U, Sachdev HP. Management of children with severe acute malnutrition: A national priority. Indian Pediatr. 2010;47:651–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Myatt M, Duffield A. Weight–for–height and MUAC for estimating the prevalence of acute undernutrition. Report for IASC, UNICEF. 2007:104–10.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Myatt M, Khara T, Collins S. A review of methods to detect cases of severely malnourished children in the community for their admission into community–based theraputic care programs. Food Nutr Bull. 2006;27:S7–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Berkley J, Mwangi I, Griffiths K, Ahmed I, Mithwani S, English M, et al. Assessment of severe malnutrition among hospitalized children in rural Kenya. JAMA. 2005;294:591–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Vella V, Tomkins A, Ndiku J, Marshal T, Cortinovis I. Anthropometry as a predictor for mortality among Ugandan children, allowing for socio–economic variables. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1994;48:189–97.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen LC, Chowdhury A, Huffman SL. Anthropometric assessment of energy–protein malnutrition and subsequent risk of mortality among preschool aged children. Am J Clin Nutr. 1980;33:1836–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Trowbridge FL, Sommer A. Nutritional anthropometry and mortality risk. Am J Clin Nutr. 1981;34:2591–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. World Health Organization. WHO Child Growth Standards and the Identification of Severe Acute Malnutrition in Infants and Children: A Joint Statement by the World Health Organization and the United Nations Children’s Fund: World Health Organization (WHO); 2009.

  10. Fernandez MA, Delchevalerie P, Van Herp M. Accuracy of MUAC in the detection of severe wasting with the new WHO growth standards. Pediatrics. 2010;126:195–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dasgupta R, Sinha D, Jain SK, Prasad V. Screening for SAM in the community: Is MUAC a ‘simple tool’? Indian Pediatr. 2013;50:154–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shekhar S, Shah D. Validation of mid–upper–arm circumference cut–offs to diagnose severe wasting in Indian children. Indian Pediatr. 2012;49:496–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kumar R, Aggarwal AK, Iyengar SD. Nutritional status of children: Validity of mid–upper arm circumference for screening undernutrition. Indian Pediatr. 1996;33: 189–96.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kapil U, Pandey RM, Bansal R, Pant B, Varshney AM, Yadav CP, et al. Mid–upper arm circumference in detection of weight–for–height Z–score below–3 in children aged 6–59 months. Public Health Nutr. 2018;21:1794–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Grijalva–Eternod CS, Wells JCK, Girma T, Kæstel P, Admassu B, Henrik Friis H, et al. Mid upper arm circumference and weight–for–length Z–scores have different associations with body composition: evidence from a cohort of Ethiopian infants. Am J Clin Nutr. 2015;102:593.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Shaw NJ, Crabtree NJ, Kibirige MS, Fordham JN. Ethnic and gender differences in body fat in British schoolchildren as measured by DXA. Arch Dis Child. 2007;92:872–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reshma Sougaijam.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sougaijam, R., Gupta, S., Raut, A. et al. Validating the MUAC (Mid-upper arm circumference) Cut-off for Detection of Severe Acute Malnutrition in Children Aged 6–59 Months in Rural Maharashtra. Indian Pediatr 56, 209–212 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-019-1502-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-019-1502-x

Keywords

Navigation