Skip to main content

Endotracheal aspirate microscopy, cultures and endotracheal tube tip cultures for early prediction of ventilator associated pneumonia in neonates

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the utility of endotracheal aspirate microscopy, culture and endotracheal tube tip culture for early diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia in neonates.

Methods

Inborn ventilated neonates were followed-up for ventilator-associated pneumonia using Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) criteria. Endotracheal aspirate microscopy, culture and endotracheal tube tip cultures were performed.

Results

Ventilator-associated pneumonia occurred in 28/68 (41%) neonates as per CDC criteria. Endotracheal aspirate microscopy (≥5 polymorphonuclear cells per high power field) and endotracheal aspirate culture had 78.6% and 75% sensitivity, 87.5% and 90% specificity, positive predictive value of 81.5% and 84%, and negative predictive value of 85.4% and 83.72%, respectively. Mean (SD) time of result of microscopy and endotracheal aspirate culture was 55.7 (4.3) h and 108.3 (19.7) h, respectively in comparison to diagnosis made at 143.5 (23.3) h, as per CDC criteria.

Conclusion

Endotracheal aspirate microscopic examination and culture can be supportive in objective diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia with an added advantage of earlier prediction.

References

  1. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System Report: Data summary. Am J Infect Control. 2004;32:470–85.

  2. Foglia E, Meier M, El-ward A. Ventilator-associated pneumonia in neonatal and pediatric intensive care units. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2007;20:409–25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Tripathi S, Malik GK, Jain A. Study of ventilator associated pneumonia in neonatal intensive care unit: characteristics, risk factors and outcome. Internet J Med Update. 2010;5:12–9.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Garner JS, Jarvis WR, Emori TG, Horan TC, Hughes JM. CDC definitions for nosocomial infections, 1988. Am J Infect Control. 1988;16:128–40.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Luna CM, Vujacich P, Niederman M. Impact of BAL data on the therapy and outcome of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Chest. 1997;111:676–85.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Labenne M, Poyart C, Rambaud C, Goldfarb B, Pron B, Jouvet P, et al. Blind protected specimen brush and bronchoalveolar lavage in ventilated children. Crit Care Med. 1999;27:2537–43.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gauvin F, Dassa C, Chaibou M, Proulx F, Farrell CA, Lacroix J. Ventilator-associated pneumonia in intubated children: comparison of different diagnostic methods. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2003;4:437–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hagedorn MI, Gardner SL, Abman SH: Respiratory diseases; Handbook of Neonatal Intensive Care. St. Louis: Mosby 1989. 381.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bartlett JG, Ryan KJ, Smith TF. Laboratory Diagnosis of Lower Respiratory Tract Infection. In: Washington JA ed, Cumitech 7A, Washington DC: American Society for Microbiology. 1987. p. 1–18.

  10. Marquette CH, Georges H, Wallet F, Ramon P, Saulnier F, Neviere R, et al. Diagnostic efficiency of endotracheal aspirates with quantitative bacteria cultures in intubated patients with suspected pneumonia. Comparison with the protected specimen brush. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1993;148:138–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahendra Kumar Gupta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gupta, M.K., Mondkar, J., Swami, A. et al. Endotracheal aspirate microscopy, cultures and endotracheal tube tip cultures for early prediction of ventilator associated pneumonia in neonates. Indian Pediatr 54, 211–214 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-017-1033-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-017-1033-2

Keywords

  • Complications
  • Diagnosis
  • Intensive care
  • Nosocomial sepsis