Skip to main content
Log in

Correspondence

  • Published:
Indian Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. San Martino A, Perramon X. Phishing secrets: History, effects, and countermeasures. International Journal of Network Security. 2010;11:163–71.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Huang H, Tan J, Liu L. Countermeasure techniques for deceptive phishing attack. In: New Trends in Information and Service Science; 2009: 636–641. doi: 10.1109/NISS.2009.80

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jalalian M, Mahboobi H. Hijacked journals and predatory publishers: Is there a need to re-Think how to assess the quality of academic research? Walailak J Science and Technol. 2014;11:389–94.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dadkhah M, Sutikno T, Jazi, Stiawan D. An introduction to journal phishings and their detection approach. TELKOMNIKA Telecommunication, Computing, Electronics and Control. 2015;13:373–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

References

  1. Sundel RP. Kawasaki disease. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2015;41:63–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Turnier JL, Anderson MS, Heizer HR, Jone PN, Glodé MP, Dominguez SR. Concurrent respiratory viruses and Kawasaki disease. Pediatrics. 2015;136:e609–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jagadeesh A, Krishnamurthy S, Mahadevan S. Kawasaki disease in a 2-year-old child with dengue fever. Indian J Pediatr. 2016;83:602–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Principi N, Rigante D, Esposito S. The role of infection in Kawasaki syndrome. J Infect. 2013;67:1–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Abrams JY, Weintraub ES, Baggs JM, Mccarthy NL, Schonberger LB, Lee GM, et al. Childhood vaccines and Kawasaki disease, vaccine safety datalink, 1996-2006. Vaccine. 2015;33:382–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

References

  1. Polman CH, Reingold SC, Banwell B, Clanet M, Cohen JA, Filippi M, et al. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann Neurol. 2011;69:292–302.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Dale RC, Brilot F, Banwell B. Pediatric central nervous system inflammatory demyelination: acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, clinically isolated syndromes, neuromyelitis optica and multiple sclerosis. Curr Opin Neurol. 2009;22:233–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ghezzi A, Deplano V, Faroni J, Grasso MG, Liguori M, Marrosu G, et al. Multiple sclerosis in childhood: Clinical features of 149 cases. Mult Scler. 1997;3:43–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

References

  1. Aggarwal R, Gogtay N, Kumar R, Sahni P. The Revised Guidelines of the Medical Council of India for Academic promotions: Need for a rethink. Indian Pediatr. 2016;53:23–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Zbar A, Frank E. Significance of authorship position: An open-ended international assessment. Am J Med Sci. 2011;341:106–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hundley V, Teijlingen EV, Simkhada P. Academic authorship: who, why and in what order? Health Renaissance. 2013;11:98–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Malicki M, Jeroncic A, Marusic M, Marusic A. Why do you think you should be the author on this manuscript? Analysis of open-ended responses of authors in a general medical journal. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12:189.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Ray S, Shah I, Nundy S. The research output from Indian medical institutions between 2005 and 2014. Curr Med Res Pract. 2016;6:49–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Shen C, Bjork BC. ‘Predatory’ open access: A longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics. BMC Med. 2015;13:230.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

References

  1. Aggarwal R, Gogtay N, Kumar R, Sahni P. The revised guidelines of the Medical Council of India for academic promotions: need for a rethink. Indian Pediatr. 2016;53:23–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing. http://publicationethics.org/files/Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing.pdf. Accessed June 10, 2016.

  3. Fleming VM, Schindler N, Martin GJ, Da Rosa DA. Separate and equitable promotion tracks for clinicianeducators. JAMA. 2005;294:1101–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

References

  1. Directorate General of Health Services. Office of the Drugs Controller General of India (DCGI). Notice. F No. 12-52/2004-DC (Part I). Available from: http://www.dfda.goa.gov.in/images/uploads/ale_not.pdf. Accessed May 16, 2016.

  2. Directorate General of Health Services. Office of the Drugs Controller General of India (DCGI). Notice. F No. 12-52/2004-DC (Part I). Available from: http://www.cdsco.nic.in/writereaddata/AVASTIN.pdf. Accessed May 15, 2016.

  3. World Health Organization. WHO Model List of Essential Medicines. 19th list (April 2015) (Amended June 2015). Available from: http://www.who.int/selection_medicines/committees/expert/20/EML_2015_FINAL_amended_JUN2015.pdf?ua=1. Accessed May 15, 2016.

  4. Jain S, Saini SS, Chawla D, Kumar P, Dhir S. Off-label use of drugs in neonatal intensive care units. Indian Pediatr. 2014;51:644–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jobanputra N, Save SU, Bavdekar SB. Off-label and unlicensed drug use in children admitted to Pediatric Intensive Care Units (PICU). Int J Risk Saf Med. 2015;27:113–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

References

  1. Yewale VN. IAP-ICMR call to action to tackle the antimicrobial resistance. Indian Pediatr. 2014;51:437–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Leung E, Weil DE, Raviglione M, Nakatani H. The WHO policy package to combat antimicrobial resistance. Bull World Health Organ. 2011;89:390–2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Bedi N, Gupta P. Antimicrobial stewardship in pediatrics: An Indian perspective. Indian Pediatr. 2016;53:293–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Indian Network for Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance (INSAR) group, India. Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in India: Prevalence and susceptibility pattern. Indian J Med Res. 2013;137:363–9.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Senthilkumar K, Biswal N, Sistla S. Risk factors associated with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in children. Indian Pediatr. 2015;52:31–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. McConeghy KW, Bleasdale SC, Rodvold KA. The empirical combination of vancomycin and a â-lactam for Staphylococcal bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis Off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am. 2013;57:1760–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lodise TP, McKinnon PS, Swiderski L, Rybak MJ. Outcomes analysis of delayed antibiotic treatment for hospital-acquired Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis Off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am. 2003;36:1418–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wong D, Wong T, Romney M, Leung V. Comparative effectiveneßs of ß-lactam versus vancomycin empiric therapy in patients with methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) bacteremia. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2016;15:27.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Mehdi Dadkhah, Gowda Parameshwara Prashanth, Ajay Kumar, Rajesh Garg, Sandeep B. Bavdekar or Rangan Srinivasaraghavan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dadkhah, M., Bianciardi, G., Prashanth, G.P. et al. Correspondence. Indian Pediatr 53, 1027–1033 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-016-0983-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-016-0983-0

Navigation