Skip to main content
Log in

A writer’s dilemma: Where to publish and where not to?

  • The Art and Science of Writing a Paper
  • Published:
Indian Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. U.S. National Library of Medicine. List of all journal cited in Pubmed®. Available from: https://www.nlm.nih.gov/bsd/serfile_addedinfo.html. Accessed January 9, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sachdev HPS, Ramji S. Why do we write? Indian Pediatr. 2016;1:45–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ng KH, Peh WC. Getting to know journal bibliographic databases. Singapore Med J. 2010;51:757–60; quiz761.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Aggarwal R, Gogtay N, Kumar R, Sahni P, for the Indian Association of Medical Journal Editors. The revised guidelines of the Medical Council of India for academic promotions: Need for a rethink. Indian Pediatr. 2016;53:23–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Garfield E. The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. JAMA. 2006;295:90–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lippi G, Favalor EJ, Simundic AM. Biomedical research platforms and their influence on article submissions and journal rankings: an update. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012;22:7–14.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Elsaie ML, Kammer J. Impactitis: The impact factor myth syndrome. Indian J Dermatol. 2009;54:83–5.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Brown T. Journal quality metrics: Options to consider other than impact factors. Am J Occup Ther. 2011;65:346–50.

  9. Hojat M, Gonnella JS, Caelleigh AS. Impartial judgment by the “gatekeepers” of science: fallibility and accountability in the peer review process. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2003;8:75–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Albert KM. Open access: implications for scholarly publishing and medical libraries. J Med Libr Assoc. 2006;94:253–62.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bowman JD. Predatory publishing, questionable peer review, and fraudulent conferences. Am J Pharm Educ. 2014;78:176.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Beall J. Predatory publishers are corrupting open access. Nature. 2012;489:179.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Beall J. Medical publishing triage-chronicling predatory open access pmublishers. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2013;2:47–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gasparyan AY, Yessirkepov M, Diyanova SN, Kitas GD. Publishing ethics and predatory practices: A dilemma for all stakeholders of science communication. J Korean Med Sci. 2015;30:1010–6.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Butler D. Investigating journals: The dark side of publishing. Nature. 2013;495:433–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Beall J. Beall’s List of Predatory Publishers 2016. Available from: http://scholarlyoa.com/2016/01/05/bealls-list-ofpredatory-publishers-2016/. Accessed January 9, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dheeraj Shah.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dewan, P., Shah, D. A writer’s dilemma: Where to publish and where not to?. Indian Pediatr 53, 141–145 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-016-0809-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-016-0809-0

Keywords

Navigation