Tuberculosis control in India: Why are we failing?


In spite of being the pioneer-leader of research into epidemiology and prevention of tuberculosis among low-income countries, India has the highest population-based burden of tuberculosis among all nations. Children with latent tuberculosis are the pool from which adult pulmonary tuberculosis emerges many years later. In the absence of primary prevention of infection by BCG, sociologic/behavioral interventions must be applied to reduce air-borne transmission. In addition to maximizing passive surveillance of adult disease, pediatric tuberculosis must also be brought under surveillance. Those with latent tuberculosis must be detected and treated to remove them from the pool. Epidemiologically, the realistic monitoring method of tuberculosis control trajectory is documenting progressive reduction of the short incubation period pediatric disease through surveillance, and not the reduction of long incubation period adult pulmonary tuberculosis. Application of scientific tools for the detection and management of pediatric tuberculosis infection — latent and active — holds the key to effective tuberculosis control.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.


  1. 1.

    World Health Organization. Global Tuberculosis Report 2013, Available from: Accessed May 3, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Tuberculosis prevention trial, Madras. Trial of BCG vaccines for prevention of tuberculosis in South India. Bull WHO. 1979;57:819–27.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Tuberculosis prevention trial, Madras. Trial of BCG vaccines in south India for tuberculosis prevention. Indian J Med Res. 1980;72:1–74.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    John TJ, Babu PG, Jayakumari HM, Simoes EAF. Prevalence of HIV infection in risk groups in Tamilnadu, India. Lancet. 1987;1:160–1.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Jain NK. Drug resistance in India. A tragedy in the making. Indian J Tubercul. 1992;92:145–8.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Khatri GR. National Tuberculosis Control Program. J Indian Med Assoc. 1996;94:370–5.

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    John TJ. Tuberculosis control, without protection from BCG. Indian Pediatr. 2000;37:9–18.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Dowdle WR. The principles of disease elimination and eradication. Bull WHO: 1998;76: 23–5.

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    John TJ, John SM. Paradigm shift for tuberculosis control in high prevalence countries. Trop Med Internat Health. 2009;14:1428–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Kamat SR, Dawson SJY, Devadatta S. A controlled study of the influence of segregation of tuberculosis patients for one year on the attack rate of tuberculosis in close family contacts in south India. Bull WHO. 1966;34:577–632.

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Directorate General of Health Services, Government of India, New Delhi. World TB day 2013. Available from: Accessed March 29, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Dasgupta PR, Jain MK, John TJ. Government response to HIV/AIDS in India. AIDS. 1994;8:S83–90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Jacob John.

Additional information

This write-up is based on a lecture delivered by Prof. T Jacob John for the IAP Golden Jubilee CME in November 2013 at New Delhi, India.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

John, T.J. Tuberculosis control in India: Why are we failing?. Indian Pediatr 51, 523–527 (2014).

Download citation


  • Child
  • Control
  • India
  • Tuberculosis
  • Strategy