Skip to main content

Neonatal hearing screening — Experience from a tertiary care hospital in Southern India

Abstract

Objective

To implement a neonatal hearing screening program using automated auditory brainstem response audiometry in a tertiary care set-up and assess the prevalence of neonatal hearing loss.

Design

Descriptive study.

Setting

Tertiary care hospital in Southern India.

Participants

9448 babies born in the hospital over a period of 11 months.

Intervention

The neonates were subjected to a two stage sequential screening using the BERAphone. Neonates suspected of hearing loss underwent confirmatory testing using auditory steady state response audiometry. In addition, serological testing for TORCH infections, and connexin 26 gene was done.

Main outcome measures

Feasibility of the screening program, prevalence of neonatal hearing loss and risk factors found in association with neonatal hearing loss.

Results

164 babies were identified as suspected for hearing loss, but of which, only 58 visited the audiovestibular clinic. Among 45 babies who had confirmatory testing, 39 were confirmed to have hearing loss and were rehabilitated appropriately. 30 babies had one or more risk factors; 6 had evidence of TORCH infection and 1 had connexin 26 gene mutation.

Conclusion

Neonatal hearing screening using BERA phone is a feasible service. The estimated prevalence of confirmed hearing loss was comparable to that in literature. Overcoming the large numbers of loss to follow-up proves to be a challenge in the implementation of such a program.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Fisher DA, Dussault JH, Foley TP, Klein AH, LaFranchi S, Larsen PR, et al. Screening for congenital hypothyroidism: results of screening one million North American infants. J Pediatr. 1979;94:700–705.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bickel H, Bachmann C, Beckers R, Brandt NJ, Clayton BE, Corrado G, et al. Neonatal mass screening for metabolic disorders: summary of recent sessions of the committee of experts to study inborn metabolic diseases. Eur J Pediatr. 1981;137:133–139.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mehra S, Eavey RD, Keamy DG Jr. The epidemiology of hearing impairment in the United States: newborns, children, and adolescents. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;140:461–472.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Stach BA, Ramachandran VS. Hearing disorders in children. In: Madell JR, Flexer C eds. Pediatric Audiology: Diagnosis, Technology, and Management. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers Inc; 2008. P. 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Judith A, Mason MS, Kenneth R, Herrmann MD. Universal infant hearing screening by automated auditory brainstem response measurement. Pediatrics. 1998;101:221–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nagapoornima P, Ramesh A, Srilakshmi, Rao S, Patricia PL, Gore M, et al. Universal hearing screening. Indian J Pediatr. 2007;74:545–549.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Paul AK. Early identification of hearing loss and centralized newborn hearing screening facility-The Cochin experience. Indian Pediatr. 2011;48:355–359.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rai N, Thakur N. Universal screening of newborns to detect hearing impairment — Is it necessary?. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;77:1036–1041.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sanders R, Durieux-Smith A, Hyde M, Jacobson J, Kileny P, Murnane O. Incidence of hearing loss in high risk and intensive care nursery infants. J Otolaryngol Suppl. 1985;14:28–33.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Joint Committee on Infant Hearing. Joint Committee on Infant Hearing (JICH) 1994 Position Statement. Pediatrics. 1994;95:152–156.

    Google Scholar 

  11. De Capua B, De Felice C, Costantini D, Bagnoli F, Passali D. Newborn hearing screening by transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: analysis of response as a function of risk factors. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2003;23:16–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Maxon AB, White KR, Vohr BR, Behrens TR. Using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions for neonatal hearing screening. Br J Audiol. 1993;27:149–153.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Maxon AB, White KR, Behrens TR, Vohr BR. Referral rates and cost efficiency in a universal newborn hearing screening program using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. J Am Acad Audiol. 1995;6:271–277.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Iwasaki S, Hayashi Y, Seki A, Nagura M, Hashimoto Y, Oshima G, et al. A model of two-stage newborn hearing screening with automated auditory brainstem response. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2003;67:1099–1104.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. van Straaten HL, Hille ET, Kok JH, Verkerk PH. Dutch NICU Neonatal Hearing Screening Working Group. Implementation of a nation-wide automated auditory brainstem response hearing screening program in neonatal intensive care units. Acta Paediatr. 2003;92:332–338.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shehata-Dieler WE, Dieler R, Wenzel G, Keim R, Singer D, von Deuster Ch. Universal newborn hearing screening program in Wurzburg. Experience with more than 4000 newborns and the influence of non-pathological factors on the test results. Laryngorhinootologie. 2002;81:204–210 [German].

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cebulla M, Shehata-Dieler W. ABR-based newborn hearing screening with MB11 BERAphone®using an optimized chirp for acoustical stimulation. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2012;76:536–543.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Joint Committee on Infant Hearing. Year 2007 Position Statement: Principles and Guidelines for Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Programs. Pediatrics. 2007;120:898–921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shulman S, Besculides M, Saltzman A, Ireys H, White KR, Forsman I. Evaluation of the universal newborn hearing screening and intervention program. Pediatrics. 2010;126:S19–S27.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Achamma Balraj.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Augustine, A.M., Jana, A.K., Kuruvilla, K.A. et al. Neonatal hearing screening — Experience from a tertiary care hospital in Southern India. Indian Pediatr 51, 179–183 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-014-0380-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-014-0380-5

Keywords

  • BERA phone
  • Neonate
  • Screening
  • Outcome