Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Pune low birth weight study — Growth from birth to adulthood

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Indian Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To assess the growth, adiposity and blood pressure of non-handicapped low birthweight children at 18 years.

Design

Prospective cohort study.

Setting

Infants born between 1987-1989 with birthweight less than 2000g, discharged from a neonatal special care unit of a referral hospital and followed up till the age of 18 years.

Methods

The height, weight, and head circumference were measured. Measurements for adiposity, blood pressure, parental height and weight were recorded.

Results

The cohort of 161 low birth weight (LBW) infants was divided into three groups according to their gestation — preterm SGA (n=61), full term SGA (n=30) and preterm AGA (n=70). 71 full term AGA infants served as controls. Preterm SGA males had height of 164.5 cms (162–166.9, 95% CI) which was significantly less (mean deficit = 5.7 cms) than that of controls (P=0.02). However, PTSGA children were short inspite of normal midparental height. Preterm SGA and AGA children had smaller head circumference. There was no evidence of adiposity and no child had hypertension. Mid-parental height was an important determinant of height in LBW children. Both parentss’ weight and BMI were important determinants of weight and BMI, respectively in all LBW children.

Conclusion

Preterm SGA males were short, but there was no difference in the weight of the LBW group and controls. Preterms had smaller head circumference. There was no evidence of adiposity or hypertension.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. National Neonatal-Perinatal Database NNPD Network. Indian Council of Medical Research. 2002;2003:25.

  2. Leger J, Marchal CL, Bloch J, Pinet A, Porquet D, Czernichow P. Reduced final height and indications for insulin resistance in 20 years olds born small for gestational age: regional cohort study. BMJ. 1997;315:341–347.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Paz I, Seidman DS, Danon YL, Laor A, Stevenson DK, Gale R. Are children born small for gestational age at increased risk of short stature? Am J Dis Child Pediatr Res. 1993;147:337–339.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Barker DJP, Hales CN, Fall CHD, Osmond C, Phipps K, Clark PMC. Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus, hypertension and hyperlipidemia (syndrome X): relation to reduced foetal growth. Diabetologia. 1993;36:62–67.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Frankel S, Elwood P, Swertham P, Yarnell J, Davey Smith E. Birthweight, body mass index and incident coronary heart disease. Lancet. 1996;348:1478–1480.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hack M, Schluchter M, Cartar L, Mabhoob R, Cutter L, Borawski E. Growth of very low birth weight infants to age 20 year. Pediatrics. 2003;112:e30–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Saigal S, Stoskopf B, StreIner D, Paneth N, Pinneli J, Boyle M. Growth trajectories of extremely low birth weight infants from birth to young adulthood: a longitudinal population based study. Pediatr Res. 2006;60:751–758.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chaudhari S, Otiv M, Hoge M, Pandit A, Mote A. Growth and sexual maturation of low birth weight infants at early adolescence. Indian Pediatr. 2008;45:191–198.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chaudhari S, Kulkarni S, Pandit A, Deshmukh S. Mortality and morbidity in high risk infants during a six year follow up. Indian Pediatr. 2000;37;1314–1320.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chaudhari S, Otiv M, Chitale A, Hoge M, Pandit A, Mote A. Biology versus environment in low birth weight children. Indian Pediatr. 2005;42:763–770.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chaudhari S, Otiv M, Chitale A, Pandit A, Hoge M. Pune low birth weight study — cognitive abilities and educational performance at twelve years. Indian Pediatr. 2004;41:121–128.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Singh M. Care of the Newborn. 4thedn. New Delhi, Sagar Publications. 1979:2.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tanner JM. Normal growth and techniques of growth assessment. Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1986;3:411–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Agarwal DK, Agarwal KN. Physical growth in Indian affluent children (Birth - 6 years) Indian Pediatr. 1994;31:377–413.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Agarwal DK, Agarwal KN, Upadhyay SK, Mittal R, Prakash R, Rai S. Physical and sexual growth pattern of affluent Indian children from 6 to 18 years of age. Indian Pediatr. 1992;29:1203–1283.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Tanner JM, Whitehouse RH, Marshall WA, Healey MJR, Goldstein H. Assessment of skeletal maturity and prediction of adult height (TW II) method. London, Academic Press. 1975.

  17. Tanner JM. Growth at adolescence 2nd. edn. Oxford Blackwell Scientific Publication. 1962.

  18. Cole TJ, Bellizzi MC, Flegal KM, Deitz WH. Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide. International survey. BMJ. 2000;320:1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  19. McCarthy HD, Jarrett KV, Crawley HF. The development of waist circumference percentiles in British children aged 5–16.9 years. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2001;55:902–907.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Taylor RW, Jones JE, Williams SM, Goulding A. Evaluation of waist circumference, waist to hip ratio and the tonicity index as screening tools for high trunk mass, as measured by dual energy. X ray absorptiometry in children aged 3–19 years. Am J Clin Nutr. 1989;69:308–317.

    Google Scholar 

  21. McCarthy HD, Ashwell M. A study of central fatness using waist to height ratios in UK children and adolescents over two decades supports the simple ménage “ keep your waist circumference to less than half of your height.” Int J Obes. 2006;30:988–992.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Durnin JYGA, Womersley J. Body fat assessed from total body density and its estimation from skinfold thickness: measurements on 481 men and women aged 16–72 years. Br J Nutr. 1974;32:77–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Odberg MD, Sommerfelt K, Markestad T, Elgen IB. Growth and somatic health until adulthood of low birthweight children. Arch Dis Child Foetal Neonatal Ed. 2010;95:F201–F205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kuppuswamy B. Manual of socio-economic status (Revised) Manasayan, New Delhi, 1991.

  25. Ranke MB, Vollmer B, Traunecker R, Wollman HA, Goelz RR, Seibolweiger K. Growth and development are similar in VLBW children born appropriate and small for gestational age: an interim report of 97 preschool children. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 1997;20:1017–1026.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Doyle LW, Faber B, Callanan C, Morley R. Blood pressure in late adolescence and very low birth weight. Pediatrics. 2003;111:252–257.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hack M, Schluchter M, Cartar L. Blood pressure among very low birth weight (<1.5kg) young adults. Pediatr Res. 2005;58:677–684.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sudha Chaudhari.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chaudhari, S., Otiv, M., Khairnar, B. et al. Pune low birth weight study — Growth from birth to adulthood. Indian Pediatr 49, 727–732 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-012-0165-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-012-0165-7

Key words

Navigation