Skip to main content
Log in

Short course versus 7-day course of intravenous antibiotics for probable neonatal septicemia: A pilot, open-label, randomized controlled trial

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Indian Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To compare a short course of antibiotics (48 to 96 hours) and a standard course of antibiotics (7 days) for probable neonatal sepsis.

Design

Randomized, controlled, open-labeled trial with blocking and stratification according to birth weight.

Setting

Tertiary care, referral, teaching hospital in Northern India.

Participants

Neonates >30 wks gestation and >1000 g at birth, with probable sepsis (clinical signs of sepsis, raised C-reactive protein) were enrolled. Babies with major malformations, severe birth asphyxia, meningitis, bone or joint or deep-seated infection, those who were already on antibiotics, and those undergoing surgery were excluded. Neonates, who had clinically remitted on antibiotic therapy — by the time a sterile blood culture report was received — were randomized.

Intervention

In the intervention arm, antibiotics were stopped after the 48-hour culture was reported sterile. In the control arm, antibiotics were continued to a total of 7 days.

Main outcome measure

“Treatment failure” defined as reappearance of signs suggestive of sepsis within 15 days of stopping antibiotics, supported by laboratory evidence and adjudicated by a blinded expert committee.

Results

52 neonates were randomized to receive a short course or 7-day course (n=26 each). Baseline variables were balanced in the 2 groups. There was no significant difference in the treatment failures between the 2 groups (3 babies in the 7-day group vs none in short course group, P=0.23).

Conclusion

No difference in the treatment failure rates could be identified between short course and 7-day groups among neonates >30 weeks and >1000 grams with probable sepsis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schelonka RL, Freij BJ, McCrecken GH Jr. Bacterial and fungal infections. In: MacDonald MG, Seshia MMK, Mullett MD, editors. Avery’s Neonatology. Pathophysiology and management of the newborn. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott William Wilkins. 1999. p. 1235–1275.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Klein JO. Bacterial sepsis and meningitis. In: Remington JS, Klein JO, editors. Infectious Diseases of Fetus and Newborn Infant. 5th Ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders & Co. 2001.p.943–999.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dear P. Neonatal infections: Infections in the newborn. In: Rinnie JM editor. Roberton’s Textbook of Neonatology. 4th ed. Elsevier Churchill Livingstone; 2005. p. 1011–1093.

  4. Hammerschlag MR, Klein JO, Herschel M, Chen FC, Fermin R. Patterns of use of antibiotics in two newborn nurseries. N Engl J Med. 1977;296:1268–1269.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Philip AG, Hewitt JR. Early diagnosis of neonatal sepsis. Pediatrics. 1980;65:1036–1041.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Goldmann DA, Leclair J, Macone A. Bacterial colonization of neonates admitted to an intensive care environment. J Pediatr. 1978;93:288–293.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lacey RW. Evolution of microorganisms and antibiotic resistance. Lancet. 1984;2:1022–1025.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Low DE, Scheld WM. Strategies for stemming the tide of antimicrobial resistance. JAMA. 1998;279:394–395.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gray JE, Ringer SA. Common neonatal procedures. Cloherty JP, Eichenwald EC, Stark AR editors. In: Manual of Neonatal Care. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott William Wilkins. 2004.p.687–702.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ehl S, Gering B, Bartmann P, Hagel J, Pohlandt F. Creactive protein is a useful marker for guiding duration of antibiotic therapy in suspected neonatal bacterial infection. Pediatrics. 1997;99:216–221.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bomela HN, Ballot DE, Cory BJ, Cooper PA. Use of Creactive protein to guide duration of empiric antibiotic therapy in suspected early neonatal sepsis. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2000;19:531–535.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Khashabi J, Karamiyar M, Taghinejhad H, Shirazi M. Use of serial C-reactive protein measurements for determination of the length of empiric antibiotic therapy in suspected neonatal sepsis. Iran J Med Sci. 2004;29: 31–35.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lee WE, Chan ML, Young BWY. Reducing hospitalization and antibiotic use in suspected early neonatal sepsis through serial measurements of C-reactive proteins. HK J Pediatr. 2005;10:3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Engle WD, Jackson GL, Sendalbach D, Ford D, Oleson B, Burton KM, et al. Neonatal pneumonia: comparison of 4 Vs 7 days antibiotic therapy in term and near-term infants. J Perinatol. 2000;20:421–426.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sourabh Dutta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Saini, S.S., Dutta, S., Ray, P. et al. Short course versus 7-day course of intravenous antibiotics for probable neonatal septicemia: A pilot, open-label, randomized controlled trial . Indian Pediatr 48, 19–24 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-011-0019-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-011-0019-8

Key words

Navigation