Nucleic Acid–Based Therapeutics for Parkinson’s Disease

Abstract

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder that is diagnosed largely on clinical grounds due to characteristic motor manifestations that result from the loss of nigrostriatal dopaminergic neurons. While traditional pharmacological approaches to enhance dopamine levels, such as with l-dopa, can be very effective initially, the chronic use of this dopamine precursor is commonly plagued with motor response complications. Additionally, with advancing disease, non-motor manifestations emerge, including psychosis and dementia that compound patient disability. The pathology includes hallmark intraneuronal inclusions known as Lewy bodies and Lewy neurites that contain fibrillar α-synuclein aggregates. Evidence has also accumulated that these aggregates can propagate across synaptically connected brain regions, a phenomenon that can explain the progressive nature of the disease and the emergence of additional symptoms over time. The level of α-synuclein is believed to play a critical role in its fibrillization and aggregation. Accordingly, nucleic acid–based therapeutics for PD include strategies to deliver dopamine biosynthetic enzymes to boost dopamine production or modulate the basal ganglia circuitry in order to improve motor symptoms. Delivery of trophic factors that might enhance the survival of dopamine neurons is another strategy that has been attempted. These gene therapy approaches utilize viral vectors and are delivered stereotaxically in the brain. Alternative disease-modifying strategies focus on downregulating the expression of the α-synuclein gene using various techniques, including modified antisense oligonucleotides, short hairpin RNA, short interfering RNA, and microRNA. The latter approaches also have implications for dementia with Lewy bodies. Other PD genes can also be targeted using nucleic acids. In this review, we detail these various strategies that are still experimental, and discuss the challenges and opportunities of nucleic acid–based therapeutics for PD.

Introduction

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disease after Alzheimer’s disease, affecting 1% of the population over the age of 60. In addition to classic motor symptoms of resting tremor, rigidity, bradykinesia, gait disturbances, and postural instability, PD patients often present with non-motor symptoms, including autonomic nervous system disorders such as constipation, bladder dysfunction, and orthostatic hypotension; REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD); and olfactory impairment [1]. The abnormal accumulation of the protein α-synuclein in fibrillar form is associated with neuronal damage, particularly degeneration of dopaminergic neurons projecting from the substantia nigra pars compacta to the striatum, leading to dopamine deficiency and motor symptoms. In early-stage disease, the motor symptoms can be relieved by oral intake of l-dopa, the precursor of dopamine, or dopamine receptor agonists. However, as neurodegeneration progresses, the effects of the drugs become short lived as in l-dopa, or less effective as in dopamine agonists, and wearing-off and on-off phenomena as well as adverse motor and psychiatric effects appear. All these complicate the pharmacological management of patients as the disease advances. Braak’s hypothesis supports the emergence of various symptoms of PD at different stages of the disease, with premotor symptoms such as RBD, hyposmia, and constipation early on, and cognitive and psychiatric manifestations in later stages of the disease. This hypothesis suggests that abnormal or excessive accumulation/aggregation of α-synuclein—which is an abundant component of the hallmark pathologic lesions (Lewy bodies and Lewy neurites), and its mutations and multiplication are linked to dominantly inherited PD—spreads from the dorsal nucleus of the vagus nerve and olfactory bulb and perhaps even the periphery from the myenteric plexus to the lower brainstem [2]. As the disease progresses, α-synuclein spreads further to the diencephalon and cerebrum via cell-to-cell transmission. Therefore, a strategy that targets α-synuclein is believed to be a fundamental treatment for blocking the progression of neurodegeneration. In the present article, we discuss the potential of treating PD by regulating α-synuclein expression with a focus on nucleic acid medicine, a strategy that is being incorporated into clinical practice for the treatment of other neurodegenerative diseases. In addition to targeting α-synuclein, we discuss nucleic acid–based therapeutics aimed at controlling motor symptoms or improving the response to l-dopa using gene therapy to deliver dopamine biosynthetic enzymes.

Treatment of PD with Nucleic Acid Medicine Using Antisense Oligonucleotides and RNA Interference

Strategies to Downregulate α-Synuclein Expression

Neurodegeneration in PD can be induced by abnormal or excessive levels of α-synuclein protein, suggesting that suppressing the expression of its gene SNCA may prevent further neurodegeneration, thereby slowing disease progression. And in particular, nucleic acid medicine aimed at reducing α-synuclein protein levels is theoretically an ideal treatment for PARK4, a type of autosomal dominantly inherited PD caused by SNCA gene multiplication with clinical features that include cognitive impairment [3]. In healthy individuals, there is one copy of the SNCA gene on each chromosome, while in PARK4 patients, three (1 + 2) or four (1 + 3) copies are expressed as a result of duplication or triplication (Fig. 1). This results in excessive levels of α-synuclein protein, and its accumulation/aggregation is believed to have an adverse effect on neurons in these patients. Therefore, a strategy to reduce SNCA messenger RNA (mRNA) expression to normal levels by degrading excessive SNCA mRNA in these individuals may lead to suppression of α-synuclein protein levels and prevention of neurodegeneration (Figs. 1 and 2C).

Fig. 1
figure1

SNCA duplication/triplication in PARK4. PARK4 is a dominantly inherited Parkinson’s disease due to multiplication of the SNCA gene locus. In PARK4 patients, α-synuclein protein is produced in excess, leading to its accumulation/aggregation and neurodegeneration

Fig. 2
figure2

Treatment strategy for PARK4 by Gapmer-ASOs. (A) Structure of Gapmer-ASOs. The Gapmer design includes two chemically modified nucleotide sequences at the two ends, flanking a central stretch of DNA sequence. The central gap can activate RNase H, whereas the flanking sequence provides high stability and affinity. (B) Mechanism of action of Gapmer-ASOs. When Gapmer-ASOs bind to the target mRNA, RNase H recognizes the DNA:RNA heteroduplex and cleaves the RNA strand. (C) Gapmer-type antisense nucleic acid degrades α-synuclein mRNA, thereby preventing the pathological accumulation of α-synuclein in PARK4

Repression of SNCA expression by reducing its mRNA level through the use of nucleic acid medicine has been tested experimentally using various approaches in preclinical models with the aim of developing a disease-modifying treatment for PD (Table 1). For example, a therapeutic approach using ribozyme expressed by adeno-associated virus (AAV) has been attempted to degrade SNCA mRNA and allowed the survival of tyrosine hydroxylase (TH)–positive neurons in the substantia nigra of rats challenged with the dopaminergic toxin 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium (MPP+) [4]. In addition, other methods that use short hairpin RNA (shRNA) and short interfering RNA (siRNA) to suppress SNCA expression have been tested [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. For example, partial silencing of α-synuclein expression in striatal neurons can be achieved using a lentiviral vector expressing SNCA-targeting shRNA [5]. In addition, AAV-mediated expression of shRNA targeting SNCA in the substantia nigra in rats with ectopically expressed α-synuclein also ameliorated behavioral deficits [7, 8]. And, infusion of AAV-shRNA targeting SNCA into the substantia nigra of wild-type rats can knockdown α-synuclein protein levels by about 35% and protect against the mitochondrial toxin rotenone [9]. Direct injection of siRNA targeting SNCA into the mouse hippocampus can also result in moderate reduction of SNCA expression [10]. Infusion of siRNA targeting SNCA into the substantia nigra of non-human primates achieved a 40 to 50% reduction of α-synuclein expression [13]. Additionally, new techniques of drug delivery have been attempted to downregulate α-synuclein expression in the brain. Systemic injection of modified exosomes expressing Rabies virus glycoprotein loaded with siRNA targeting SNCA into the mouse tail vein resulted in widespread distribution of siRNA in the brain and around 50% reduction of SNCA mRNA and protein expression in the midbrain and striatum [11]. More recently using α-synuclein transgenic mice, intracerebroventricular infusion of polyethylenimine (PEI)/siRNA complex against α-synuclein resulted in 65% suppression of SNCA mRNA expression accompanied by a 50% reduction of α-synuclein protein in the striatum [12].

Table 1 Preclinical experimental studies to knock down SNCA expression using nucleic acid medicine

However, none of these approaches has produced ideal outcomes, and achieving long-term effects has proven challenging due to intracellular instability of these RNA-based nucleic acid compounds. Additionally, AAV-mediated expression of shRNA-SNCA can have negative effects such as increased inflammatory response, reduced TH expression, and nigrostriatal degeneration [6,7,8]. Thus, AAV-mediated shRNA-SNCA expression requires further optimization before it can be exploited for potential therapeutic use. Certain AAV serotypes appear to contribute to this inflammatory response.

With recent advances in nucleic acid modification technology, dramatic improvements have been made to develop nucleic acid medicines with enhanced binding affinity, increased in vivo stability, and reduced toxicity [14]. In particular, specifically designed antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) that lead to target mRNA degradation are drawing increasing attention. These ASOs have unique configurations, such as the Gapmer structure, with modified nucleic acids at both ends of a linear single-stranded oligonucleotide and normal DNA located in the center (gap) (Fig. 2A). When a Gapmer-type antisense nucleic acid with this structure binds to its target mRNA, the RNA-degrading enzyme RNase H recognizes the DNA:RNA hybrid structure formed by the DNA portion of the ASOs and the mRNA target (Fig. 2B). Additionally, the target binding affinity of the ASOs is enhanced by the modified nucleic acids placed at both ends, while also improving resistance to DNA-degrading enzymes present in the cell. After degrading the initial target mRNA, these Gapmer-type ASOs can continue to degrade other target mRNA molecules, further increasing their potency. Furthermore, because of their high resistance to nucleolytic enzymes, Gapmers can theoretically produce long-term effects at a low dose once they reach the nucleus of target cells. Notably, the effects of Gapmer-type ASOs with target degradation properties have been shown to last for a year following systemic administration in an animal model of myotonic dystrophy type 1 [15]. Clinical trials are underway for the use of Gapmer-type ASOs for the treatment of myotonic dystrophy type 1 (clinicaltrial.gov; NCT02312011), Huntington’s disease (clinicaltrial.gov; NCT02519036), as well as various other disorders.

As another strategy to overcome the obstacles is associated with the stability of nucleic acid medicines in vivo and their delivery into the brain, we introduced a novel technology of nucleotide modification called amido-bridged nucleic acid (AmNA), a locked nucleic acid (LNA/BNA) analog, with increased target binding affinity and reduced toxicity [16] (Fig. 3). We have completed the optimization of the nucleic acid sequence and Gapmer-ASO structure for effective degradation of SNCA mRNA. We are currently conducting translational research to reveal the efficacy and safety in animal models for future clinical trials.

Fig. 3
figure3

Antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) chemical structures. Schematic of locked nucleic acid (LNA/BNA, left) and amido-bridged nucleic acid (AmNA, right)

In addition to ASOs, advances in CRISPR-based technology allow a novel therapeutic approach for fine-tuned downregulation of α-synuclein levels by inducing DNA methylation at the SNCA gene. A recent publication demonstrated that CRISPR-deactivated Cas9 (dCas9) fused with the catalytic domain of DNA-methyltransferase 3A (DNMT3A) reduces expression levels of SNCA mRNA and protein mediated by targeted DNA methylation at intron 1 in human-induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)–derived dopaminergic neurons from a PD patient with SNCA triplication [17].

Because PARK4 is a hereditary condition, it is possible to identify patients in these families with early and mild disease. It is hypothesized that preventing progression with early treatment using nucleic acid medicine for mild PARK4 will allow these patients to maintain a good level of activities of daily living (ADLs) as well as cognitive function throughout life. Additionally, establishing the efficacy of treatment using nucleic acid medicine in PARK4 patients may allow us to apply this treatment to sporadic PD as well, which is associated with abnormal accumulation of α-synuclein. This strategy may also be applied to dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), which is characterized clinically by cognitive decline and hallucinations, and pathologically by diffuse Lewy bodies and Lewy neurites containing abundant α-synuclein fibrils across various brain regions. If abnormal accumulation of α-synuclein and the spread of the proteinopathy are key in the progression of PD, as proposed in Braak’s hypothesis, this treatment strategy may be able to prevent the onset of motor symptoms if initiated early when pre-motor symptoms appear, by preventing abnormal α-synuclein propagation to substantia nigra dopaminergic neurons. Thus, treatment with ASOs that reduce α-synuclein may possibly be extended to all α-synucleinopathies even when α-synuclein mutation is not the cause of the disease.

Since a near-complete loss of SNCA may have adverse effects on neuronal function or integrity, the extent of downregulating SNCA should be carefully controlled. This is because α-synuclein is abundantly expressed in the normal central nervous system, especially at presynaptic terminals. Although its exact physiologic function remains to be fully understood, previous reports have suggested that α-synuclein is involved in synaptic vesicle pool maintenance, neuronal plasticity, dopamine metabolism, and insoluble N-ethylmaleimide–sensitive factor attachment protein receptor (SNARE) complex assembly critical for neurotransmitter release, vesicle recycling, and synaptic integrity [18].

Targeting Other PD Genes with Nucleic Acids

Target knockdown by nucleic acid medicine can also be applied to other gain-of-function genetic mutations that cause dominantly inherited PD. Mutations in leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) are linked to the most common familial form of PD (PARK8) [19, 20]. shRNAs specifically targeting mutations in LRRK2 were shown to lead to mutant allele-specific knockdown in human embryonic kidney (HEK)–derived 293FT or 293 cells [21, 22]. In addition, an artificial mirtron, a short hairpin intron that serves as a Drosha-independent Dicer substrate for microRNA biogenesis, targeting LRRK2 reduced endogenous LRRK2 transcripts in human dopaminergic SH-SY5Y cell line [23]. Furthermore, intracerebroventricular injection in mice of ASOs targeting LRRK2 reduced mRNA and protein levels of LRRK2 as well as decreased α-synuclein inclusions in the substantia nigra induced by intrastriatal injection of preformed α-synuclein fibrils [24].

The clinical application of ASOs to various diseases is advancing rapidly due to the high target specificity and long-lasting therapeutic effects of this strategy. Research and clinical trials are underway to investigate their use in treating neurodegenerative diseases as intrathecal administration shows favorable entry to the central nervous system. Routes of administration other than intrathecal administration, such as oral, intravenous, and transdermal, are desirable when considering their use as therapeutic drugs for chronic progressive diseases such as PD, as repeated administration of nucleic acid medicines is required. With recent advances in modified nucleic acid technology and improvements in delivery systems to enhance drug delivery to target organs [25], it is hoped that a fundamental treatment for PD and DLB using nucleic acid medicine will become available in the near future.

Pathogenetic Role of MicroRNAs and Their Therapeutic Potential for PD

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small (20–25-nt) noncoding RNAs in the eukaryotic transcriptome that can regulate gene expression post-transcriptionally by binding to the 3′-untranslated region (UTR) of their target mRNAs [26]. miRNAs regulate the expression of their mRNA targets either by cleavage/degradation of mRNA or inhibition of translation. Altered expression of certain miRNAs in the brains of patients with neurodegenerative diseases including PD suggests that miRNAs could have a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of these diseases [27, 28]. The pathogenetic role of miRNAs in PD and their therapeutic potential are the subject of increasing interest in recent years.

Genetic Models with Dicer Mutants

miRNAs are derived from long primary transcripts through sequential processing by the Drosha ribonuclease and the Dicer enzyme. Dicer expression is reduced in the ventral midbrain of aged mice [29]. In addition, targeted deletion of the Dicer gene in the dopaminergic (DA) neurons of mice reportedly led to a progressive loss of DA neurons with severe locomotor deficits [30]. The latter finding suggests that Dicer is essential for DA neuron survival, and that loss of mature miRNAs due to deletion of the Dicer gene may be involved in the development and/or progression of PD.

miRNA Profiling Studies

Identifying miRNAs that are differentially expressed in postmortem brain tissue from PD brains and nonaffected controls helps in understanding the role of miRNAs in the pathogenesis of PD and may lead to recognizing potential therapeutic opportunities. Several studies of this nature have been carried out, and dysregulated miRNAs identified from these studies are listed in Table 2 [30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37]. Initially, profiling miRNAs obtained from the midbrains of PD and control subjects showed that miR-133b is highly enriched in the midbrain but found to be low in PD brains [30]. However, this finding was later challenged by another report showing that miR-133b levels were unaltered in midbrain tissue from PD brains [38]. Another miRNA profiling study identified miR-34b and miR-34c to be decreased in PD brains [37], but this finding too was not replicated in another report [34]. Subsequent studies revealed multiple miRNAs are dysregulated in PD, but few are common among the list of dysregulated miRNAs in PD across all the studies (Table 2). Discrepancies among such studies may result from a number of biological as well as technical differences. For example, differences in the analyzed brain region (e.g., midbrain vs frontal cortex) can yield disparate results. Even when the substantia nigra is analyzed, the relative numbers of DA neurons in the nigra differ significantly among individual PD brains as well as between PD brains and controls. Another factor that can critically affect outcomes using human postmortem material is variation in RNA quality/integrity due to end-of-life conditions, autolysis time, and tissue harvesting and preservation [39,40,41].

Table 2 MicroRNA profiling studies in PD patients

PD-Causing Genes and miRNAs

Considering the critical role of α-synuclein in PD, understanding the mechanism(s) regulating its expression is helpful in efforts to control it for therapeutic intent. Initially, we identified miRNA-7 to bind to the 3′-UTRs of α-synuclein mRNA and downregulate its expression [42]. Since then, five additional miRNAs, miR-153, miR-34b, miR-34c, miR-214, and miR-1643, were also found to bind to the 3′-UTR of α-synuclein mRNA and inhibit its expression [43,44,45,46]. Among these, miR-7, miR-34b, and miR-34c were shown to be decreased in PD brains [31, 37], suggesting that decreased expression of these particular miRNAs in PD brains can result in elevated α-synuclein levels and contribute to PD pathogenesis. Furthermore, we recently found that miR-7 also accelerates the clearance of α-synuclein and its aggregates by promoting autophagy and expedites the degradation of preformed fibrils of α-synuclein endocytosed from outside the cells [47]. This additional mechanism for reducing α-synuclein levels reinforces the notion that miR-7 is an important molecular target for PD therapeutics.

LRRK2 is the commonest genetic cause of the disease and is inherited in an autosomal dominant manner with reduced penetrance [19, 20]. miRNA-205 has been reported to bind to the 3′-UTR of LRRK2 mRNA and repress its expression [48]. The levels of miR-205 were found to be decreased in the frontal cortex and striatum from PD patients, and the expression of LRRK2 was significantly upregulated in these brains [48]. This observation suggests that downregulation of miR-205 might contribute to the pathogenic increase of LRRK2 in PD brains.

Genetic Variation of miRNAs and miRNA Target Sites

Variations in miRNAs and their binding sites on target mRNAs can contribute to PD. For example, a significant association has been reported in PD with SNP (rs12720208 [C/T]) located in the 3′-UTR of FGF20 mRNA. This genetic variation lies within a predicted binding region for miR-433 [49]. The risk allele inhibits the binding of the mRNA with miR-433 and enhances FGF20 expression. This variation appears to augment the vulnerability to PD through increasing α-synuclein expression, which is mediated by FGF20. However, other reports have failed to reproduce an association between SNPs of FGF20 and PD risk, or the relationship between the variation at rs12720208 and α-synuclein protein levels [50, 51].

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have also identified variations in miR-4519 (rs897984) and miR-548at-5p (rs11651671), which are associated with PD [52]. Mutant alleles of both miRNAs change the secondary structure and result in a decrease in the level of each miRNA. Therefore, it is predicted that increased expression of certain target mRNAs resulting from decreased expression of these mutant microRNA alleles somehow contributes to PD pathogenesis. It remains to be discovered which proteins or cellular pathways regulated by these miRNAs could contribute to PD. In addition, a number of PD-associated SNPs located in the 3′-UTR of 13 genes such as α-synuclein, tau, diacylglycerol kinase theta, and transmembrane protein 175, have been identified [52]. These SNPs are predicted to influence miRNA-mediated regulation of their target genes by disrupting, generating, or modifying miRNA binding sites. Future studies are needed to determine the relationship between identified SNPs and miRNA-mediated gene regulation in the context of PD pathogenesis.

miRNA-Based Therapeutics

With the emergence of miRNAs as crucial regulators of gene expression involved in several diseases including PD, targeting miRNAs provides a potential therapeutic opportunity for PD. Two miRNA-based therapeutic approaches are currently being explored in other diseases [53]: microRNA mimics and anti-microRNAs. miRNA mimics, which are small RNA molecules that resemble miRNA precursors, are used to inhibit the expression of target proteins. The target protein can be from any gene involved in disease pathogenesis, or the disease gene itself that harbors a gain-of-function pathogenic mutation or multiplication of the gene locus. The goal of this approach is based on the hypothesis that downregulating the level of the specific protein itself is a protective therapeutic strategy. The second strategy of miRNA-based therapeutics is to utilize anti-miRNA molecules to generate a loss of function in the miRNA of interest [54]. In particular circumstances in which miRNAs are overexpressed, the intent would be to block these miRNAs by injecting a complementary RNA sequence that binds to and inactivates the target miRNAs.

Although there is no established therapy or ongoing clinical trials using miRNAs, targeting miRNAs seems to be a potential therapeutic intervention for PD. Since elevated levels of α-synuclein are toxic [55, 56], miRNAs that target and repress α-synuclein expression can be exploited to develop therapeutics for PD. Among α-synuclein targeting miRNAs, miRNA-7 is unique in several respects. In addition to targeting the 3′-UTR of α-synuclein mRNA [42], miRNA-7 facilitates the clearance of preformed α-synuclein aggregates by promoting autophagy [47]. Further, miRNA-7 displays protective effects against MPP+/1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP)-induced toxicity through α-synuclein-independent mechanisms including targeting RelA, which stimulates glycolysis, the Nrf2 pathway, and mitochondrial health [57,58,59,60]. In addition, miRNA-124 has been reported to be decreased in the MPTP-challenged mouse model, and the delivery of miR-124 to the right lateral ventricle protected TH-positive neurons from this toxin [61].

Considering that neuroinflammation plays a key role in the pathogenesis of PD [62], strategies to inhibit neuroinflammation can be exploited to impact PD as well. In this regard, miRNA-155, a well-known modulator of inflammatory response, is reportedly upregulated in the substantia nigra of mice injected with AAV2-α-synuclein. On the other hand, deletion of the miR-155 gene prevented microglial activation and mitigated the loss of TH-positive nigral neurons in AAV2-α-synuclein–injected mice [63]. Interestingly, in addition to modulating α-synuclein levels and processing, miR-7 plays a role in neuroinflammation as well. Stereotactic injection of miR-7 mimics into the mouse striatum has been shown to reduce the neuroinflammation and exert neuroprotective effects in MPTP-lesioned mice by targeting the 3′-UTR of NOD-like receptor protein 3 (NLRP3) mRNA. The latter encodes a protein that is a key constituent of inflammasomes that are highly expressed in microglial cells and are important in neuroinflammation [64]. This finding suggests that miRNA-7 ameliorates NLRP3 inflammasome-mediated neuroinflammation and highlights the various neuroprotective mechanisms of miRNA-7 and, therefore, its therapeutic potential for PD.

Gene Therapy for PD

Delivery of Neurotransmitter Biosynthetic Enzymes

Gene therapy is a method to treat a disease by exogenously delivering genetic material into cells with genetic abnormalities or other biochemical deficiencies in order to recover normal function [65]. Viral vectors are primarily used as a means of introducing genes to cells. Clinical research with viral vectors made great headway in the early 1990s, and gene therapy was tested in various disease targets. Unfortunately, a series of some 2000 reports describing adverse effects, some of which were serious including death, led to a stagnation period in the field [66]. However, because of steady progress in basic research resulting in increased safety and reliability, gene therapy is once again drawing attention. With the development of viral vectors that effectively introduce therapeutic genes into target neurons and myocytes, in vivo gene therapy, a technique in which genes are directly introduced into the body using vectors containing the therapeutic genes, is being tested in neurodegenerative diseases and myopathies. AAV vectors are primarily used in gene therapy in these conditions. This is because AAV vectors are safe, as they are derived from AAV, which is a nonpathogenic virus. These vectors can deliver genes to terminally differentiated nondividing cells such as neurons and myocytes, and they are expected to enable long-term expression of the introduced genes [65]. In addition, one of the advantages of AAV vectors is that integration into chromosomal DNA occurs rarely, thus minimizing the risk of inactivating tumor suppressor genes or activating protooncogenes. Furthermore, numerous AAV serotypes are available with different tissue tropisms, and serotypes 1, 2, 5, 8, and 9 show affinity for the nervous system.

The classic motor symptoms of PD are due to dopamine deficiency in the striatum caused by degeneration of nigrostriatal neurons. TH, the rate-limiting enzyme in dopamine biosynthesis, converts the amino acid tyrosine to l-dopa in axon terminals projecting from the substantia nigra pars compacta to the striatum. Aromatic l-amino acid decarboxylase (AADC) further converts l-dopa into dopamine (Fig. 4). In addition, guanosine triphosphate cyclohydrolase I (GCH) plays an important role in the synthesis of tetrahydrobiopterin, a coenzyme of TH. Therefore, strategies for enhancing dopamine synthesis by delivering its synthetic enzymes using viral vectors have been examined (Table 3). In an open-label phase 1 trial in PD patients conducted in the USA, delivery of AADC-expressing AAV type 2 vector (AAV2-AADC) into the putamen bilaterally resulted in a 36% improvement in the motor score of the unified Parkinson’s disease rating scale (UPDRS) in the off l-dopa state [67]. In another open-label phase 1 trial conducted in Japan, the AAV2-AADC vector delivered bilaterally into the putamen resulted in 46% improvement in the UPDRS score in the off state and increased uptake of the AADC tracer 6-[18F]fluoro-l-m-tyrosine on positron emission tomography (PET) imaging [68]. Notably, long-term follow-up of subjects in another phase 1 trial of AAV2-AADC reported stable transgene expression for 4 years or longer [69]. In addition, an open-label phase 1/2 trial, in which not only AADC but also TH and GCH genes were expressed simultaneously using equine infectious anemia virus, a putative lentivirus, and delivered into the putamen bilaterally, was attempted in Europe [70]. Motor function, as measured by UPDRS part III scores off l-dopa, improved in all patients at 6 months and 1 year after the administration of this gene therapy drug named ProSavin®, and daily l-dopa equivalent dose was reduced or remained stable [70]. PET imaging with [11C]-raclopride as a tracer was consistent with increased dopamine production in the putamen.

Fig. 4
figure4

Dopamine biosynthesis in the striatum, and gene therapy approaches to increase dopamine production in PD. In axonal terminals in the striatum, tyrosine is converted to l-dopa by tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) and further converted into dopamine by aromatic l-amino acid decarboxylase (AADC). In advanced stages of PD, the activity of these enzymes decreases dramatically due to a loss of neuronal terminals. Gene therapy for PD introduces these enzymes into the striatum using viral vectors

Table 3 Clinical trials with gene therapy approaches in PD

Decreased dopamine levels in the putamen are suggested to lead to disinhibition of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) in PD [65]. The increased excitatory drive of the STN to the internal portion of globus pallidus and substantia nigra pars reticulate exerts inhibitory effects on the thalamocortical projection and brainstem nuclei and exacerbates motor symptoms in PD. Treatments are currently being tested in which the glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) gene, required for the synthesis of the inhibitory neurotransmitter GABA, is introduced using AAV vectors with the goal of modulating STN activity in PD patients. In an open-label phase 1 trial conducted in the USA involving gene introduction to the subthalamic nucleus unilaterally, improvement in the UPDRS motor score was observed on the contralateral side 3 to 12 months following AAV-GAD administration [71]. A double-blind, sham surgery–controlled, randomized phase 2 trial with bilateral subthalamic nucleus injections in 66 patients with advanced PD also showed a modest but significant improvement from baseline in UPDRS scores (8.1 points) compared with the sham group (4.7 points) over the 6-month course of the study [72].

Delivery of Trophic Factor Genes

Neurotrophic factor delivery using viral vectors has also been attempted in order to protect dopaminergic neurons in PD. In a phase 2, double-blind, sham surgery–controlled, randomized trial where neurturin, a neurotrophic factor for dopaminergic neurons, was expressed bilaterally in the putamen using AAV2, there was no significant difference in the degree of improvement in motor symptoms 12 months later compared to the control group [73]. A follow-up double-blind trial delivering neurturin bilaterally in both the putamen and substantia nigra in patients with advanced PD also failed to show a benefit [74]. An open-label phase 1 trial of AAV2-glial cell line–derived neurotrophic factor delivered bilaterally into both putamina of advanced PD patients using convection-enhanced delivery is ongoing (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01621581). In addition to viral vector–mediated delivery of neurotrophic factors, nucleic acid–based therapy with activatory RNA–based molecules may be applied for PD treatment by increasing the expression of neurotrophic factors, as well as compensatory factors in cases of loss-of-function mutations in PD. This state-of-the-art nucleic acid–based technology contains small activating RNAs (saRNAs), artificial transactivators NMHVs (an acronym for nuclear localization signal-MS2 coat protein RNA–interacting domain-HA epitope-(3x)VP16–transactivating domain), AntagoNATs that inhibit natural antisense lncRNA transcripts (NATs), and SINEUPs that stimulate translation of target mRNA (details are provided in a review by Gustincich et al. [75]).

In conclusion, the potential for nucleic acid–based therapies in PD is varied and diverse with multiple approaches and targets. While none is available to patients at this time, the prospects are clear and encouraged by recent advances in other neurologic conditions.

References

  1. 1.

    Titova N, Qamar MA, Chaudhuri KR. The Nonmotor Features of Parkinson’s Disease. Int Rev Neurobiol 2017; 132: 33–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Braak H, Del Tredici K, Rub U, de Vos RA, Jansen Steur EN, Braak E. Staging of brain pathology related to sporadic Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol Aging 2003; 24: 197–211.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Yasuda T, Mochizuki H. The regulatory role of alpha-synuclein and parkin in neuronal cell apoptosis; possible implications for the pathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease. Apoptosis 2010; 15: 1312–1321.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Hayashita-Kinoh H, Yamada M, Yokota T, Mizuno Y, Mochizuki H. Down-regulation of alpha-synuclein expression can rescue dopaminergic cells from cell death in the substantia nigra of Parkinson’s disease rat model. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2006; 341: 1088–1095.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Sapru MK, Yates JW, Hogan S, Jiang L, Halter J, Bohn MC. Silencing of human alpha-synuclein in vitro and in rat brain using lentiviral-mediated RNAi. Exp Neurol 2006; 198: 382–390.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Gorbatyuk OS, Li S, Nash K et al. In vivo RNAi-mediated alpha-synuclein silencing induces nigrostriatal degeneration. Mol Ther 2010; 18: 1450–1457.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Khodr CE, Sapru MK, Pedapati J et al. An alpha-synuclein AAV gene silencing vector ameliorates a behavioral deficit in a rat model of Parkinson’s disease, but displays toxicity in dopamine neurons. Brain Res 2011; 1395: 94–107.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Khodr CE, Becerra A, Han Y, Bohn MC. Targeting alpha-synuclein with a microRNA-embedded silencing vector in the rat substantia nigra: positive and negative effects. Brain Res 2014; 1550: 47–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Zharikov AD, Cannon JR, Tapias V et al. shRNA targeting alpha-synuclein prevents neurodegeneration in a Parkinson’s disease model. J Clin Invest 2015; 125: 2721–2735.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Lewis J, Melrose H, Bumcrot D et al. In vivo silencing of alpha-synuclein using naked siRNA. Mol Neurodegener 2008; 3: 19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Cooper JM, Wiklander PB, Nordin JZ et al. Systemic exosomal siRNA delivery reduced alpha-synuclein aggregates in brains of transgenic mice. Mov Disord 2014; 29: 1476–1485.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Helmschrodt C, Hobel S, Schoniger S et al. Polyethylenimine Nanoparticle-Mediated siRNA Delivery to Reduce alpha-Synuclein Expression in a Model of Parkinson’s Disease. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids 2017; 9: 57–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    McCormack AL, Mak SK, Henderson JM, Bumcrot D, Farrer MJ, Di Monte DA. Alpha-synuclein suppression by targeted small interfering RNA in the primate substantia nigra. PLoS One 2010; 5: e12122.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Evers MM, Toonen LJ, van Roon-Mom WM. Antisense oligonucleotides in therapy for neurodegenerative disorders. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2015; 87: 90–103.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Wheeler TM, Leger AJ, Pandey SK et al. Targeting nuclear RNA for in vivo correction of myotonic dystrophy. Nature 2012; 488: 111–115.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Yamamoto T, Yahara A, Waki R et al. Amido-bridged nucleic acids with small hydrophobic residues enhance hepatic tropism of antisense oligonucleotides in vivo. Org Biomol Chem 2015; 13: 3757–3765.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Kantor B, Tagliafierro L, Gu J et al. Downregulation of SNCA Expression by Targeted Editing of DNA Methylation: A Potential Strategy for Precision Therapy in PD. Mol Ther 2018; 26: 2638–2649.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Mochizuki H, Choong CJ, Masliah E. A refined concept: alpha-synuclein dysregulation disease. Neurochem Int 2018; 119: 84–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Paisan-Ruiz C, Jain S, Evans EW et al. Cloning of the gene containing mutations that cause PARK8-linked Parkinson’s disease. Neuron 2004; 44: 595–600.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Zimprich A, Biskup S, Leitner P et al. Mutations in LRRK2 cause autosomal-dominant parkinsonism with pleomorphic pathology. Neuron 2004; 44: 601–607.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    de Ynigo-Mojado L, Martin-Ruiz I, Sutherland JD. Efficient allele-specific targeting of LRRK2 R1441 mutations mediated by RNAi. PLoS One 2011; 6: e21352.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Sibley CR, Wood MJ. Identification of allele-specific RNAi effectors targeting genetic forms of Parkinson’s disease. PLoS One 2011; 6: e26194.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Sibley CR, Seow Y, Curtis H, Weinberg MS, Wood MJ. Silencing of Parkinson’s disease-associated genes with artificial mirtron mimics of miR-1224. Nucleic Acids Res 2012; 40: 9863–9875.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Zhao HT, John N, Delic V et al. LRRK2 Antisense Oligonucleotides Ameliorate alpha-Synuclein Inclusion Formation in a Parkinson’s Disease Mouse Model. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids 2017; 8: 508–519.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Nishina K, Piao W, Yoshida-Tanaka K et al. DNA/RNA heteroduplex oligonucleotide for highly efficient gene silencing. Nat Commun 2015; 6: 7969.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    He L, Hannon GJ. MicroRNAs: small RNAs with a big role in gene regulation. Nat Rev Genet 2004; 5: 522–531.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Junn E, Mouradian MM. MicroRNAs in neurodegenerative disorders. Cell Cycle 2010; 9: 1717–1721.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Junn E, Mouradian MM. MicroRNAs in neurodegenerative diseases and their therapeutic potential. Pharmacol Ther 2012; 133: 142–150.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Chmielarz P, Konovalova J, Najam SS et al. Dicer and microRNAs protect adult dopamine neurons. Cell Death Dis 2017; 8: e2813.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Kim J, Inoue K, Ishii J et al. A MicroRNA feedback circuit in midbrain dopamine neurons. Science 2007; 317: 1220–1224.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Tatura R, Kraus T, Giese A et al. Parkinson’s disease: SNCA-, PARK2-, and LRRK2- targeting microRNAs elevated in cingulate gyrus. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2016; 33: 115–121.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Nair VD, Ge Y. Alterations of miRNAs reveal a dysregulated molecular regulatory network in Parkinson’s disease striatum. Neurosci Lett 2016; 629: 99–104.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Hoss AG, Labadorf A, Beach TG, Latourelle JC, Myers RH. microRNA Profiles in Parkinson’s Disease Prefrontal Cortex. Front Aging Neurosci 2016; 8: 36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Briggs CE, Wang Y, Kong B, Woo TU, Iyer LK, Sonntag KC. Midbrain dopamine neurons in Parkinson’s disease exhibit a dysregulated miRNA and target-gene network. Brain Res 2015; 1618: 111–121.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Cardo LF, Coto E, Ribacoba R et al. MiRNA profile in the substantia nigra of Parkinson’s disease and healthy subjects. J Mol Neurosci 2014; 54: 830–836.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Thomas RR, Keeney PM, Bennett JP. Impaired complex-I mitochondrial biogenesis in Parkinson disease frontal cortex. J Parkinsons Dis 2012; 2: 67–76.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Minones-Moyano E, Porta S, Escaramis G et al. MicroRNA profiling of Parkinson’s disease brains identifies early downregulation of miR-34b/c which modulate mitochondrial function. Hum Mol Genet 2011; 20: 3067–3078.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Schlaudraff F, Grundemann J, Fauler M, Dragicevic E, Hardy J, Liss B. Orchestrated increase of dopamine and PARK mRNAs but not miR-133b in dopamine neurons in Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol Aging 2014; 35: 2302–2315.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Kingsbury AE, Daniel SE, Sangha H, Eisen S, Lees AJ, Foster OJ. Alteration in alpha-synuclein mRNA expression in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 2004; 19: 162–170.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Dachsel JC, Lincoln SJ, Gonzalez J, Ross OA, Dickson DW, Farrer MJ. The ups and downs of alpha-synuclein mRNA expression. Mov Disord 2007; 22: 293–295.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Grundemann J, Schlaudraff F, Haeckel O, Liss B. Elevated alpha-synuclein mRNA levels in individual UV-laser-microdissected dopaminergic substantia nigra neurons in idiopathic Parkinson’s disease. Nucleic Acids Res 2008; 36: e38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Junn E, Lee KW, Jeong BS, Chan TW, Im JY, Mouradian MM. Repression of alpha-synuclein expression and toxicity by microRNA-7. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009; 106: 13052–13057.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Doxakis E. Post-transcriptional regulation of alpha-synuclein expression by mir-7 and mir-153. J Biol Chem 2010; 285: 12726–12734.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Kabaria S, Choi DC, Chaudhuri AD, Mouradian MM, Junn E. Inhibition of miR-34b and miR-34c enhances alpha-synuclein expression in Parkinson’s disease. FEBS Lett 2015; 589: 319–325.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Wang ZH, Zhang JL, Duan YL, Zhang QS, Li GF, Zheng DL. MicroRNA-214 participates in the neuroprotective effect of Resveratrol via inhibiting alpha-synuclein expression in MPTP-induced Parkinson’s disease mouse. Biomed Pharmacother 2015; 74: 252–256.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Lim W, Song G. Identification of novel regulatory genes in development of the avian reproductive tracts. PLoS One 2014; 9: e96175.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Choi DC, Yoo M, Kabaria S, Junn E. MicroRNA-7 facilitates the degradation of alpha-synuclein and its aggregates by promoting autophagy. Neurosci Lett 2018; 678: 118–123.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Cho HJ, Liu G, Jin SM et al. MicroRNA-205 regulates the expression of Parkinson’s disease-related leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 protein. Hum Mol Genet 2013; 22: 608–620.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Wang G, van der Walt JM, Mayhew G et al. Variation in the miRNA-433 binding site of FGF20 confers risk for Parkinson disease by overexpression of alpha-synuclein. Am J Hum Genet 2008; 82: 283–289.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    de Mena L, Cardo LF, Coto E et al. FGF20 rs12720208 SNP and microRNA-433 variation: no association with Parkinson’s disease in Spanish patients. Neurosci Lett 2010; 479: 22–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Wider C, Dachsel JC, Soto AI et al. FGF20 and Parkinson’s disease: no evidence of association or pathogenicity via alpha-synuclein expression. Mov Disord 2009; 24: 455–459.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Ghanbari M, Darweesh SK, de Looper HW et al. Genetic Variants in MicroRNAs and Their Binding Sites Are Associated with the Risk of Parkinson Disease. Hum Mutat 2016; 37: 292–300.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Wen MM. Getting miRNA Therapeutics into the Target Cells for Neurodegenerative Diseases: A Mini-Review. Front Mol Neurosci 2016; 9: 129.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Meister G, Landthaler M, Dorsett Y, Tuschl T. Sequence-specific inhibition of microRNA- and siRNA-induced RNA silencing. RNA 2004; 10: 544–550.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Maraganore DM, de Andrade M, Elbaz A et al. Collaborative analysis of alpha-synuclein gene promoter variability and Parkinson disease. JAMA 2006; 296: 661–670.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Cookson MR. alpha-Synuclein and neuronal cell death. Mol Neurodegener 2009; 4: 9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Choi DC, Chae YJ, Kabaria S et al. MicroRNA-7 protects against 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium-induced cell death by targeting RelA. J Neurosci 2014; 34: 12725–12737.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Chaudhuri AD, Kabaria S, Choi DC, Mouradian MM, Junn E. MicroRNA-7 Promotes Glycolysis to Protect against 1-Methyl-4-phenylpyridinium-induced Cell Death. J Biol Chem 2015; 290: 12425–12434.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Kabaria S, Choi DC, Chaudhuri AD, Jain MR, Li H, Junn E. MicroRNA-7 activates Nrf2 pathway by targeting Keap1 expression. Free Radic Biol Med 2015; 89: 548–556.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Chaudhuri AD, Choi DC, Kabaria S, Tran A, Junn E. MicroRNA-7 Regulates the Function of Mitochondrial Permeability Transition Pore by Targeting VDAC1 Expression. J Biol Chem 2016; 291: 6483–6493.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Kanagaraj N, Beiping H, Dheen ST, Tay SS. Downregulation of miR-124 in MPTP-treated mouse model of Parkinson’s disease and MPP iodide-treated MN9D cells modulates the expression of the calpain/cdk5 pathway proteins. Neuroscience 2014; 272: 167–179.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Hirsch EC, Vyas S, Hunot S. Neuroinflammation in Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2012; 18 Suppl 1: S210–212.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Thome AD, Harms AS, Volpicelli-Daley LA, Standaert DG. microRNA-155 Regulates Alpha-Synuclein-Induced Inflammatory Responses in Models of Parkinson Disease. J Neurosci 2016; 36: 2383–2390.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Zhou Y, Lu M, Du RH et al. MicroRNA-7 targets Nod-like receptor protein 3 inflammasome to modulate neuroinflammation in the pathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease. Mol Neurodegener 2016; 11: 28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Choong CJ, Baba K, Mochizuki H. Gene therapy for neurological disorders. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2016; 16: 143–159.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Naldini L. Gene therapy returns to centre stage. Nature 2015; 526: 351–360.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Christine CW, Starr PA, Larson PS et al. Safety and tolerability of putaminal AADC gene therapy for Parkinson disease. Neurology 2009; 73: 1662–1669.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Muramatsu S, Fujimoto K, Kato S et al. A phase I study of aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase gene therapy for Parkinson’s disease. Mol Ther 2010; 18: 1731–1735.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Mittermeyer G, Christine CW, Rosenbluth KH et al. Long-term evaluation of a phase 1 study of AADC gene therapy for Parkinson’s disease. Hum Gene Ther 2012; 23: 377–381.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Palfi S, Gurruchaga JM, Ralph GS et al. Long-term safety and tolerability of ProSavin, a lentiviral vector-based gene therapy for Parkinson’s disease: a dose escalation, open-label, phase 1/2 trial. Lancet 2014; 383: 1138–1146.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Kaplitt MG, Feigin A, Tang C et al. Safety and tolerability of gene therapy with an adeno-associated virus (AAV) borne GAD gene for Parkinson’s disease: an open label, phase I trial. Lancet 2007; 369: 2097–2105.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    LeWitt PA, Rezai AR, Leehey MA et al. AAV2-GAD gene therapy for advanced Parkinson’s disease: a double-blind, sham-surgery controlled, randomised trial. Lancet Neurol 2011; 10: 309–319.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Marks WJ, Jr., Bartus RT, Siffert J et al. Gene delivery of AAV2-neurturin for Parkinson’s disease: a double-blind, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Neurol 2010; 9: 1164–1172.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Warren Olanow C, Bartus RT, Baumann TL et al. Gene delivery of neurturin to putamen and substantia nigra in Parkinson disease: A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Ann Neurol 2015; 78: 248–257.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Gustincich S, Zucchelli S, Mallamaci A. The Yin and Yang of nucleic acid-based therapy in the brain. Prog Neurobiol 2017; 155: 194–211.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by AMED under Grant Number JP17ek0109195. E.J. is supported by the NIH (NS070898 and NS095003) and the State of New Jersey. M.M.M. is the William Dow Lovett Professor of Neurology and is supported by the Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson’s Research, the American Parkinson Disease Association, and the New Jersey Health Foundation/Nicholson Foundation, and by grants from the US National Institutes of Health (AT006868, NS073994, NS096032, and NS101134).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Maral Mouradian.

Ethics declarations

Required Author Forms

Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the online version of this article.

Disclosures

M.N. and H.M. have a pending patent (WO2017119463A1) relevant to this work. E.J. and M.M.M. hold patents on RNA targeting in alpha-synucleinopathies.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(PDF 1.19 mb)

ESM 2

(PDF 1.19 mb)

ESM 3

(PDF 1.19 mb)

ESM 4

(PDF 1.19 mb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nakamori, M., Junn, E., Mochizuki, H. et al. Nucleic Acid–Based Therapeutics for Parkinson’s Disease. Neurotherapeutics 16, 287–298 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13311-019-00714-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • α-Synuclein
  • Antisense oligonucleotides
  • MicroRNA
  • Gene therapy
  • Neurodegeneration