Glutamate and Its Receptors as Therapeutic Targets for Migraine

There is substantial evidence indicating a role for glutamate in migraine. Levels of glutamate are higher in the brain and possibly also in the peripheral circulation in migraine patients, particularly during attacks. Altered blood levels of kynurenines, endogenous modulators of glutamate receptors, have been reported in migraine patients. Population genetic studies implicate genes that are involved with glutamate signaling in migraine, and gene mutations responsible for familial hemiplegic migraine and other familial migraine syndromes may influence glutamate signaling. Animal studies indicate that glutamate plays a key role in pain transmission, central sensitization, and cortical spreading depression. Multiple therapies that target glutamate receptors including magnesium, topiramate, memantine, and ketamine have been reported to have efficacy in the treatment of migraine, although with the exception of topiramate, the evidence for the efficacy of these therapies is not strong. Also, because all of these therapies have other mechanisms of action, it is not possible to conclude that the efficacy of these drugs is entirely due to their effects on glutamate receptors. Further studies are needed to more clearly delineate the possible roles of glutamate and its specific receptor subtypes in migraine and to identify new ways of targeting glutamate for migraine therapy.

Introduction

Migraine involves alteration in the excitability of multiple regions of the central nervous system (CNS). Glutamate is the most important and widely distributed excitatory neurotransmitter in the CNS, and therefore likely plays a crucial role in migraine pathophysiology [1]. Glutamate exerts diverse and complex effects in the CNS by binding to a large range of receptors with distinct structural and functional properties. Glutamate receptors are broadly divided into two groups, the cation-permeable ionotropic glutamate receptors (iGluR) and the G protein-coupled metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluR). The iGluRs are subdivided into N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA), α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-proprionate (AMPA), and 2-carboxy-3-carboxymethyl-4-isopropenylpyrrolidine (kainate) receptors and each of these comprises several receptors that are permeable to sodium (Na+) or calcium (Ca2+) The mGluRs are subdivided into three groups (groups I–III) [2, 3]. Receptors belonging to group I are predominantly located postsynaptically, activate phospholipase C and thereby increase excitability. However, they are also found presynaptically where they induce the activation of protein kinase C enhancing the exocytotic release of glutamate [4]. In contrast, the mGluRs belonging to groups II and III, which are predominantly located presynaptically, activate adenylyl cyclase and thereby reduce the release of glutamate. Based on these functions of mGluR, they possess distinct effects on neuronal activity with receptors belonging to group I being predominantly pronociceptive and those belonging to groups II and III being predominantly antinociceptive. In addition, the different groups may interact with each other, as for example mGluR belonging to group I may prime NMDA receptors to enhance their excitability. This mechanism may be relevant for the induction of central sensitization, a neuronal phenomenon that may affect peripheral and central neurons and is characterized by a reduction in the activation threshold of nociceptive neurons so that usually non-nociceptive stimuli induce a nociceptive neuronal response. This phenomenon is the pathophysiological correlate of the cutaneous allodynia that is frequently observed in migraine [5].

Evidence for a Role for Glutamate in Migraine

A large body of preclinical and clinical evidence suggests that glutamate and its receptors are involved in migraine pathophysiology [1].

Elevated Levels of Glutamate in Migraine Patients

Elevated blood levels of glutamate have been recorded both interictally and ictally in migraine patients [6,7,8], although the results of these measurements have not been consistent across all studies. Effective migraine preventive therapies with distinct mechanisms of action have been reported to reduce plasma glutamate levels [9]. Increased levels of glutamate have also been reported in the cerebrospinal fluid in migraine patients during the ictal and interictal periods [8, 10, 11], as well as in saliva in episodic and chronic migraine patients [12, 13]. A proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy study has found that glutamate in the occipital cortex was increased in patients with migraine without aura compared with controls [14].

Studies demonstrating increased levels of glutamate in migraine patients are supported by the effects of orally administered monosodium glutamate. Although the reported effects of monosodium glutamate vary considerably, multiple studies have found that administration of monosodium glutamate can evoke headache [15, 16]. This observation that glutamate may act as a headache trigger in some individuals is consistent with elevated levels of glutamate playing a causative role in migraine.

Endogenous Glutamate Receptor Modulators in Migraine

Kynurenines are products of the major metabolic pathway of the amino acid tryptophan. Kynurenines have direct effects on both iGluRs and mGluRs, as well as influencing synaptic glutamate release. It has been hypothesized that kynurenines could play a role in migraine by modulating glutamatergic activity [17]. In animal models of migraine, nitroglycerine downregulates the kynurenine pathway [18] while kynurenines have been shown to reduce nitroglycerin-evoked hyperalgesia [19] and cortical spreading depression [20]. Altered levels of kynurenines have been reported in chronic migraine patients [21]. An intriguing aspect of kynurenines is that they could represent a link between systemic metabolism and glutamatergic signaling. Fluctuating levels of kynurenines could lead to episodic changes in glutamate signaling that could be involved in episodic neurological disorders such as migraine. The kynurenine pathway therefore represents an interesting potential therapeutic target.

Migraine-Associated Genes and Glutamate Signaling

Population genetic studies have identified multiple migraine-associated polymorphisms in genes that could be involved in glutamate signaling. Polymorphisms of genes encoding AMPA receptors have been associated with migraine in multiple population studies, although the results of these studies have not been consistent in different populations [22,23,24,25,26]. Population studies have also identified other migraine-associated polymorphisms of genes encoding potential regulators of glutamate receptor trafficking or glutamate release including LRP1, IGSF89, CARF, REST, JPH3, PHACTR1, and PRDM16 [27, 28]. A polymorphism of the glutamate transporter EAAT2 has been reported to be associated with progression of migraine from episodic to chronic [29]. Familial hemiplegic migraine (FHM) genes and other familial migraine genes may also influence glutamatergic signaling. Mutations in the genes encoding the P/Q type calcium channel in FHM1 and the voltage-gated sodium channel in FHM3 have been hypothesized to increase neuronal glutamate release [30], whereas mutations in the ATP1A2 sodium-potassium ATPase in mice have been hypothesized to reduce glutamate uptake by astrocytes [31]. Mutations in the genes encoding PRRT2, which are associated with hemiplegic migraine in some families, have also been reported to result in altered glutamatergic signaling [32]. Mutations in casein kinase 1 delta that are associated with migraine and advanced sleep phase syndrome [33, 34] could result in increased glutamatergic signaling via alterations in the phosphorylation and processing of glutamate receptors [35].

The Role of Glutamate in Pain Transmission and Central Sensitization

Given its excitatory action on nociceptive neurons along the trigeminovascular pathway glutamate has long been discussed as a crucial neurotransmitter in the pathophysiology of migraine headache and migraine-related central sensitization. All three classes of iGluR as well as the mGluR are located in the superficial laminae I and II of the trigeminocervical complex (TCC) [36] forming the basis for a complex interaction and modulation of neuronal pain signals. The TCC is of crucial importance in migraine pathophysiology as it represents the key relay center that integrates the peripheral and central elements of the trigeminovascular pathway and activates during the pain phase of a migraine attack [37]. In addition to the TCC and to the trigeminal ganglion, glutamate receptors are found on other pain-modulating structures including the thalamus and hypothalamus as well as the periaqueductal gray [38, 39]. Beyond this neuroanatomical distribution, a functional role in these nociceptive pathways has been proven as noxious; painful stimulation leads to an increase in glutamate concentration in these structures including the TCC [40, 41]. In line with these observations, the microiontophoretic administration of glutamate into the Sp5C of the TCC induced a facilitation of neuronal activity in this region [42]. Stimulation of intracranial structures such as the middle meningeal artery or superior sagittal sinus in the dura mater as well as stimulation of other areas with afferent trigeminal innervation such as the cornea and the temporomandibular joint induce a neuronal facilitation of nociceptive fibers in the TCC [41, 43,44,45] emphasizing the potential importance of glutamate in the central transmission of nociceptive trigeminal signals. Triptans, which are serotonin agonists at the 5-HT1B/D/F receptors, may act, at least in part, through a modulation of glutamate release [46]. Based on this strategic receptor distribution and the described functional properties in key centers along the trigeminovascular pain pathway, targeting glutamate receptors is an attractive pharmacological approach for the treatment of migraine.

The Role of Glutamate in Cortical Spreading Depolarization

There is strong evidence that glutamate plays a primary role in cortical spreading depolarization (CSD, classically referred to as cortical spreading depression), which is believed to be the physiological substrate of the migraine aura. CSD is associated with the release of glutamate into the extracellular space. Glutamate release in CSD has been reported to be a regenerative process, whereby released glutamate acts on presynaptic NMDA receptors to elicit further release of glutamate [47]. Multiple inhibitors of glutamate receptors, particularly NMDA receptor antagonists including the MK801, APH [48], ifenprodil [49], memantine [50], ketamine [51], and others have been reported to inhibit the initiation and propagation of CSD, indicating that activation of NMDA receptors play a key role in generating CSD. Topiramate, a kainate receptor antagonist, has also been reported to inhibit CSD [52]. Conversely, “unblocking” NMDA receptors by lowering extracellular magnesium can evoke CSD [53]. In contrast to NMDA receptors, activation of AMPA receptors has been reported to suppress CSD [54]. CSD can also be inhibited by systemic administration of the endogenous glutamate receptor modulator L-kynurenine [20], supporting a potential role for kynurenines in migraine as discussed above.

Glutamate Receptor Subtypes as Therapeutic Targets in Migraine

NMDA Receptors

NMDA receptors are widely distributed in the CNS. Under resting conditions, the channel pore is blocked by magnesium (Mg2+) preventing the flow of ions through the receptor channel. During neuronal depolarization, Mg2+ leaves the pore allowing the influx of Ca2+ [55].

A number of preclinical studies indicate a potential role for the action of Mg2+ on NMDA receptors as a migraine mechanism. These studies revealed that large groups of glutamate receptors are located on the superficial laminae of the trigeminal nucleus caudalis (TNC) [36]. Local stimulation of these receptors with microiontophoretically administered glutamate induces a postsynaptic facilitation of neuronal activity within the TNC [42]. In rats, chemical activation of corneal nociceptors with mustard oil induced a significant increase in Fos protein immunoreactivity, a marker for neuronal activation, in the TNC (Sp5C) [43]. This effect was attenuated by intravenous pretreatment with the NMDA receptor antagonist dizolcipine maleate (MK-801) [43] indicating the importance of NMDA receptors in the transmission of trigeminal nociceptive information in the centrally located TNC. These observations were reproduced in electrophysiological experiments in cats in which nociceptive electrical stimulation of the superior sagittal sinus also had a facilitating effect in the TCC which could be inhibited by the intravenous administration of MK-801 [44]. A similar effect is observed in the TCC when electrical stimulation is performed on the occipital nerve as it converges with trigeminal input into the same nuclei in the brainstem [56]. In contrast to the inhibitory effects observed when the antagonists or channel blockers are administered microiontophoretically, the attenuation of a stimulus-evoked response in the TCC is not observed after intravenous administration of the NMDA channel pore blockers magnesium and memantine suggesting that the permissible doses given through this route of administration do no achieve a sufficient channel blocking effect at NMDA receptors located in the TCC [45].

In contrast to what is seen in the TCC, MK-801, may also increase neuronal activity in certain regions of the midbrain involved in the descending inhibitory modulation of the trigeminal pain processing pathway, such as the periaqueductal gray and the nucleus raphe magnus [57].

Beyond its role in mediating neuronal activation, NMDA receptors play a significant role in peripheral and central neuronal sensitization, the pathophysiological correlate of allodynia. Cutaneous allodynia is a common symptom during an acute migraine attack and describes a nociceptive response under normal conditions non-nociceptive stimulus [5, 58]. This phenomenon can be reproduced in preclinical studies. For example, intense, repetitive, and sustained neuronal stimuli may induce central sensitization and there is a large body of evidence indicating a substantial role of NMDA receptors in the establishment of this condition [59,60,61,62]. The same phenomenon can be induced in animal models of peripheral inflammation, in which allodynia and hyperalgesia are induced by the local injection of carrageenan or glutamate and, as observed in electrically induced sensitization, treatment with the NMDA channel blocker MK-801 or the NMDA receptor antagonist AP7 ((±)-2-amino-7-phosphonoheptanoic acid) effectively reverses these neuronal phenomena [63, 64].

In the context of migraine, even more important than the establishment of allodynia, is the possibility that central sensitization may play a major role in the chronification of this disorder [65,66,67]. More research is needed in this area to elucidate the role of central sensitization and NMDA receptors in the chronification of migraine but if this assumption should become well accepted, it could represent a promising target to treat this disabling condition. In this case, one may even speculate of a therapeutic potential of similar or associated conditions involving neuronal sensitization such as medication overuse headache [68].

AMPA Receptors

As described above, AMPA receptors are located in the superficial laminae of the TCC [36]. Given the known interaction between NMDA and AMPA receptors and the fundamental importance of the TCC in migraine pathophysiology, it seems likely that these receptors play a role in the pathophysiology of migraine. Through a specific arrangement of their subunits as well as a significant membrane trafficking, AMPA receptors are dynamically regulated adjusting their synaptic strength [3]. These properties of AMPA receptors and their functional interaction with NMDA receptors form the molecular basis for their role in normal nociception as well as in injury-induced synaptic plasticity, hyperalgesia, and allodynia. Their functional relevance in nociceptive trigeminovascular neurotransmission and therefore possibly in migraine pathophysiology was demonstrated in preclinical studies conducted by Storer et al. in which stimulus-evoked nociceptive neuronal activity in the TCC could be inhibited by the specific AMPA receptor antagonist GYKI52466 [44]. These electrophysiological studies are in line with the observations made in an animal model of capsaicin-induced neuronal activation which revealed that in the TCC (Sp5C) capsaicin-induced increase in c-fos expression, which reflects an increase in neuronal activation, is reduced by the AMPA/kainate receptor antagonists 1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-6-nitro-2,3-dioxo-benzol[f]quinoxaline-7-sulphonamide and 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione [69]. As this antinociceptive effect was not observed with the selective kainate receptor antagonists gamma-(R-)glutamylaminomethanesulphonic acid and 6,7,8,9-tetrahydro-5-nitro-1H-benz[g]indole-2,3-dione-3-oxime, it may be assumed that the capsaicin-induced facilitation in the TCC is mediated through AMPA receptors [69]. In this context, the AMPA/kainate receptor antagonist LY293558, which effectively inhibits c-fos expression in the TCC in a preclinical model of migraine [70], is effective in the acute treatment of migraine [71]. However, the design of these preclinical experiments does not allow any conclusion if the clinical efficacy relies on an action at AMPA or kainate receptors.

Taken together, the results suggest a therapeutic potential in targeting AMPA receptors. Given the lack of more AMPA-selective agonists and antagonists, it is still challenging to dissect further the distinct effects at AMPA receptors and their clinical significance compared to other iGluRs, in particular kainate receptors.

Kainate Receptors

Kainate receptors consist of several subunits named iGluR5, 6, and 7 and KA1 and KA2. Homo- and heteromeric assemblies of these subunits create the functional receptor [72,73,74]. Within the peripheral part of the trigeminovascular system, functional kainate receptors have been detected within the trigeminal ganglion [75, 76] whereas in central regions that modulate and process trigeminal nociceptive signals, kainate receptors are found in laminae I and II of the TNC (Sp5C) [36, 76] as well as in the sensory thalamus [39]. Given that kainate receptors are localized pre- [77, 78] and postsynaptically [79,80,81], they may exert their functional actions through a presynaptic regulation of neuropeptide and neurotransmitter release [77, 78, 82, 83] as well as through a postsynaptic regulation of neuronal currents [82].

In regard to their functional role in pain, activation of kainate receptors at both locations, pre- and postsynaptic, has been shown to influence nociceptive neurotransmission [81, 83]. In animal models investigating peripheral pain, activation of the kainate receptor induced mechanical [84] and thermal [63] hyperalgesia and allodynia as well as pain behavior [84]. Studies investigating plasma protein extravasation (PPE) in rodents, a mechanism that in the past had been thought to be predictive for clinical efficacy, showed that the receptor antagonists LY293558, LY382884, and LY435735, which have varying degrees of selectivity and affinity to the kainate receptors, effectively inhibit PPE [70]. As the selective AMPA receptor antagonist LY300168 did not block PPE [70], it may be assumed that the PPE-inhibiting effect of the combined AMPA/kainate receptor antagonists relies mainly on an antagonism at the kainate receptor. However, given that the NK-1 receptor antagonist lanepitant, which effectively blocks PPE, failed to show clinical efficacy in migraine treatment [85, 86], the value of PPE as a predictive marker for clinical efficacy in migraine has been dismissed.

Beyond its effect on PPE, the AMPA/kainate receptor antagonist LY293558 has been shown to inhibit c-fos expression in the TCC elicited by electrical stimulation of the trigeminal ganglion [70]. Based on this observation, a randomized placebo-controlled trial was conducted in migraineurs which proved this compound to be effective in the acute treatment of migraine [71, 87] but, as described above, whether the relevant effect is mediated through AMPA or kainate receptors remains unclear. However, even if it remains to be clarified if AMPA or kainate receptors play the prominent role in these mechanisms, it seems likely that the responsible receptor is located within the CNS as antagonizing kainate receptors in the peripheral part of the trigeminal pain pathway does not affect vessel diameter after electrical [83] or CGRP-induced [88] stimulation. This is supported by the observation that the GluK1 receptor antagonist LY466195 inhibits nociceptive neuronal activity in the TCC, possibly at the postsynaptic GluK1 receptor [76]. In line with these results, topiramate, which is effective and widely used for the preventive treatment of migraine [89,90,91], acts at least partially on kainate receptors in the TCC and the ventroposteromedial nucleus (VPM) of the thalamus [92].

In summary, the results suggest that targeting kainate receptors may offer an effective strategy for the treatment of migraine. Further studies with kainate-selective agonists and antagonists are required to further elucidate the underlying mechanisms and confirm the clinical utility of kainate receptor antagonists in migraine.

Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors as a Pharmacological Target in Migraine

The role of the mGluRs in migraine is largely unknown. In general, it is well established, that the mGluRs belonging to group I are predominantly pronociceptive as they are located postsynaptically and, if activated, increase excitability, while those belonging to groups II and III are located presynaptically reducing glutamate release thereby mainly creating an antinociceptive effect [2]. While, in the context of migraine, the functional relevance of mGluRs belonging to group I is beginning to be understood, the role of mGluRs belonging to groups II and III remains largely unknown.

Group I mGluR

In relationship to migraine and trigeminal pain, mGluRs belonging to group I, in particular mGluR5, are the most investigated. The mGluR5 are located in trigeminal sensory afferents [93, 94], the trigeminal ganglion [95], and in the TCC [96,97,98,99]. From a functional perspective, the receptor has been shown to be involved in several types of pain including inflammatory and neuropathic pain [100, 101]. In this context beyond enhancing neuronal activation, the receptor is involved in creating neuronal sensitization causing allodynia and hyperalgesia [100,101,102]. It may also interact with other receptor systems involved in the modulation of pain signals including opioid [47, 103] and TRPV1 [100, 101] channels and in this way even play a significant role in the chronification of pain. In the context of migraine, targeting these receptors in an in vivo rodent model with the negative allosteric modulator ADX10059 has revealed that the compound attenuates neurogenic dural vasodilation induced by electrical stimulation of the middle meningeal artery as well as stimulus-evoked and spontaneous central nociceptive transmission through the TCC [96] indicating an action at peripheral and central receptors. As these results suggested a therapeutic potential in migraine, a randomized controlled trial has been conducted which demonstrated clinical efficacy [96].

In contrast to the mGluR5, the mGluR1 is much less explored in the context of migraine. In the periphery, mGluR1 receptors are found in peripheral sensory afferents [93], the meningeal vasculature [94], and in the trigeminal ganglion [104]. Within the CNS, the receptor has been identified in the TCC as well as in the thalamus, hypothalamus, and in inhibitory structures belonging to the descending modulating network such as the periaqueductal gray [105]. As observed in mGluR5 receptors, stimulation of mGluR1 receptors on peripheral nociceptive trigeminal neurons induces a facilitation within the TCC [97]. In addition, the mGluR1 may be involved in the establishment of central sensitization [102]. These two observations demonstrate the functional influence of mGluR1 on central structures modulating and processing trigeminally mediated pain signals [97]. Interestingly, this connection may be influenced by estrogens [97]. In contrast to the mGluR5, the mGluR1 is much less expressed in the TCC compared to the other central areas, in particular, the thalamus [105]. Thalamic mGluR1 interact functionally with NMDA receptors creating synergistic effects enhancing neuronal activity [106]. This anatomical distribution and functional interaction suggests, that centrally located mGluR1s are particularly involved in the modulation of neuronal traffic in higher pain processing areas.

Group II mGluR

The group II mGluRs comprise the mGluR2 and mGluR3 and have been identified in the meningeal vasculature [94], trigeminal ganglion [104], as well as in the TCC and the thalamus [98, 106,107,108,109,110]. Functionally, group II mGluRs are located presynaptically and reduce the release of glutamate upon activation. It is therefore assumed that this group exerts mainly antinociceptive effects [2]. In addition to its direct effect on glutamate release, the mGluRs belonging to group II interact and modulate gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) mediated inhibitory transmission in the thalamus causing a functional disinhibition [108,109,110].

Their role in migraine pathophysiology is largely unknown, in part owned to the lack of highly selective agonists and antagonists for their subtypes. However, their anatomical distribution suggests an involvement in the modulation of trigeminal nociceptive signals. Therefore, a potential relevance in the pathophysiology of migraine seems likely.

Group III mGluR

The mGluRs belonging to group III comprise the mGluR4–6. Group III mGluRs have been identified in the meningeal vasculature and trigeminal ganglion as well as in the trigeminocervical complex (in particular in laminae I and II), thalamus, hypothalamus, and inhibitory structures including the periquaeductal gray [94, 104, 111,112,113,114]. This particular anatomical distribution suggests that group III mGluRs may play a role in migraine pathophysiology. As is the case in group II mGluRs, group III mGluRs are located mainly presynaptically, reducing the exocytotic release of glutamate and are therefore characterized by a predominantly antinociceptive effect [2]. However, as described for group II mGluRs, group III mGluRs may also induce a neuronal disinhibition in the thalamus as they modulate GABA-mediated inhibition. These findings highlight the complexity of the actions and interactions of some of the mGluRs in neuronal communication. Unfortunately, preclinical research in this area is still hampered by the lack of highly selective agonists and antagonists to each of the single receptor subtypes that would allow to further elucidate these complex mechanisms.

Glutamate Receptor Modulators in the Treatment of Migraine

Magnesium

As discussed above, magnesium is an activity-dependent blocker of NMDA receptors that has been shown to be involved in both pain transmission and cortical spreading depression. There is also human evidence that Mg2+ may play a role in migraine. Reduced Mg2+ levels have been reported in cerebrospinal fluid [115] serum [116] and saliva [116] during the ictal and interictal phases in migraine patients. An MR spectroscopy study also suggested Mg2+ concentration within the brain may be reduced in patients with migraine [117].

Oral magnesium is commonly used as a non-prescription preventive therapy in migraine, and both oral and intravenous migraine are used as acute therapies, although the evidence for these approaches is not strong [118, 119]. The use of magnesium is driven in large part by its reasonable tolerability. It is important to consider that magnesium has numerous effects on the nervous system apart from its effects on NMDA receptors, including inhibition of voltage-gated calcium channels, connexin channels, and other ion channels. These other mechanisms could also be involved in any role that magnesium may play in migraine.

Topiramate

Topiramate has been shown in large clinical trials to be effective in the prevention of both episodic and chronic migraine [120, 121]. It has been shown to inhibit cortical spreading depression and nitroglycerin-evoked hyperalgesia in animal models. Topiramate has multiple potential mechanisms of action as a therapeutic agent for epilepsy and migraine. One of these is the inhibition of iGluR receptors, specifically kainate receptors [122]. Other potential mechanisms of action of topiramate include inhibition of voltage-gated sodium and calcium channels, activation of GABA receptors, and inhibition of carbonic anhydrase [123, 124].

Memantine

Memantine is an activity-dependent blocker of NMDA receptors that is approved for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease [125]. Memantine has also been reported to block other ligand-gated ion channels including the 5HT3 receptor [126] and a subtype of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor [127]. Memantine inhibits cortical spreading depolarization in animal models [50]. Two observational studies [128, 129] and one randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study [130] have reported efficacy of memantine as a migraine preventive therapy. It is not approved for migraine prevention. However, given its tolerability, possibly due to the fact that it is an activity-dependent blocker of NMDA receptors that could inhibit hyper-excitability without affecting normal function, it may be worth considering in migraine patients in whom standard therapies have been ineffective or poorly tolerated.

Ketamine

Ketamine is a selective antagonist of the NMDA receptor, which is believed to be a primary mechanism of action. It has numerous other complex pharmacological actions, however, including effects on extracellular glutamate and dopamine and opioid receptors [131, 132]. It has been reported to inhibit cortical spreading depression [51]. Two case series have reported transient improvement in headache severity with infusion of ketamine, but neither reported statistically significant sustained improvement [133, 134]. Ketamine has also been reported to stop or reduce the severity of prolonged migraine aura in some patients [135, 136]. At this stage, there is insufficient evidence to endorse the use of ketamine for migraine, particularly because of the challenges associated with its administration and the potential for adverse effects.

Summary

There is strong indirect evidence for a role for glutamate in migraine based on anatomical and physiological studies in animal models and genetic, biochemical, and imaging studies in humans. Thus far, however, there is no definitive pharmacological evidence that specifically targets glutamate or its receptors as an effective strategy for acute or preventive migraine therapy. This may be in part due to the lack of the appropriate pharmacological agents. In addition to different glutamate receptor modulators, treatments that target glutamate release or uptake, or endogenous modulators of glutamate signaling such as kynurenines may be more effective therapeutic strategies for migraine. Another factor may be that because of its crucial role in normal function of the nervous system, it may be difficult to therapeutically target glutamate or its receptors without causing unacceptable adverse effects. Future therapies may need to be refined to more specifically target abnormal migraine-related glutamatergic signaling without altering normal neurological function.

References

  1. 1.

    Goadsby PJ, Holland PR, Martins-Oliveira M, Hoffmann J, Schankin C, Akerman S. Pathophysiology of migraine: a disorder of sensory processing. Physiological Reviews. 2017;97:553–622.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Kew JN, Kemp JA. Ionotropic and metabotropic glutamate receptor structure and pharmacology. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2005;179:4–29.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Traynelis SF, Wollmuth LP, McBain CJ, et al. Glutamate receptor ion channels: structure, regulation, and function. Pharmacological reviews. 2010;62:405–96.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Herrero I, Miras-Portugal MT, Sanchez-Prieto J. Positive feedback of glutamate exocytosis by metabotropic presynaptic receptor stimulation. Nature. 1992;360:163–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Burstein R, Yarnitsky D, Goor-Aryeh I, Ransil BJ, Bajwa ZH. An association between migraine and cutaneous allodynia. Ann Neurol. 2000;47:614–24.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Ferrari MD, Odink J, Bos KD, Malessy MJ, Bruyn GW. Neuroexcitatory plasma amino acids are elevated in migraine. Neurology. 1990;40:1582–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Campos F, Sobrino T, Perez-Mato M, et al. Glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase: a new key in the dysregulation of glutamate in migraine patients. Cephalalgia. 2013;33:1148–54.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Martinez F, Castillo J, Rodriguez JR, Leira R, Noya M. Neuroexcitatory amino acid levels in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid during migraine attacks. Cephalalgia. 1993;13:89–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Ferrari A, Spaccalopelo L, Pinetti D, Tacchi R, Bertolini A. Effective prophylactic treatments of migraine lower plasma glutamate levels. Cephalalgia. 2009;29:423–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Vieira DS, Naffah-Mazzacoratti Mda G, Zukerman E, et al. Glutamate levels in cerebrospinal fluid and triptans overuse in chronic migraine. Headache. 2007;47:842–7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Peres MF, Zukerman E, Senne Soares CA, Alonso EO, Santos BF, Faulhaber MH. Cerebrospinal fluid glutamate levels in chronic migraine. Cephalalgia. 2004;24:735–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Nam JH, Lee HS, Kim J, Kim J, Chu MK. Salivary glutamate is elevated in individuals with chronic migraine. Cephalalgia. 2017;0333102417742366.

  13. 13.

    Rajda C, Tajti J, Komoróczy R, Seres E, Klivényi P, Vécsei L. Amino acids in the saliva of patients with migraine. Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain. 1999;39:644–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Zielman R, Wijnen JP, Webb A, et al. Cortical glutamate in migraine. Brain. 2017;140:1859–71.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Baad-Hansen L, Cairns B, Ernberg M, Svensson P. Effect of systemic monosodium glutamate (MSG) on headache and pericranial muscle sensitivity. Cephalalgia. 2010;30:68–76.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Yang WH, Drouin MA, Herbert M, Mao Y, Karsh J. The monosodium glutamate symptom complex: assessment in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1997;99:757–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Vecsei L, Szalardy L, Fulop F, Toldi J. Kynurenines in the CNS: recent advances and new questions. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2013;12:64–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Nagy-Grocz G, Laborc KF, Veres G, et al. The effect of systemic nitroglycerin administration on the kynurenine pathway in the rat. Front Neurol. 2017;8:278.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Greco R, Demartini C, Zanaboni AM, et al. Effects of kynurenic acid analogue 1 (KYNA-A1) in nitroglycerin-induced hyperalgesia: targets and anti-migraine mechanisms. Cephalalgia. 2017;37:1272–84.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Chauvel V, Vamos E, Pardutz A, Vecsei L, Schoenen J, Multon S. Effect of systemic kynurenine on cortical spreading depression and its modulation by sex hormones in rat. Exp Neurol. 2012;236:207–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Curto M, Lionetto L, Negro A, et al. Altered kynurenine pathway metabolites in serum of chronic migraine patients. J Headache Pain. 2015;17:47.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Formicola D, Aloia A, Sampaolo S, et al. Common variants in the regulative regions of GRIA1 and GRIA3 receptor genes are associated with migraine susceptibility. BMC Med Genet. 2010;11:103.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Maher BH, Lea RA, Follett J, et al. Association of a GRIA3 gene polymorphism with migraine in an Australian case-control cohort. Headache. 2013;53:1245–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Gasparini CF, Sutherland HG, Haupt LM, Griffiths LR. Genetic analysis of GRIA2 and GRIA4 genes in migraine. Headache. 2014;54:303–12.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Cargnin S, Viana M, Mittino D, et al. Lack of association between GRIA1 polymorphisms and haplotypes with migraine without aura or response to triptans. Neurol Sci. 2014;35:421–7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Fang J, An X, Chen S, Yu Z, Ma Q, Qu H. Case-control study of GRIA1 and GRIA3 gene variants in migraine. J Headache Pain. 2015;17:2.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Gormley P, Anttila V, Winsvold BS, et al. Meta-analysis of 375,000 individuals identifies 38 susceptibility loci for migraine. Nat Genet. 2016;48:856–66.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Sutherland HG, Griffiths LR. Genetics of migraine: insights into the molecular basis of migraine disorders. Headache. 2017;57:537–69.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Shin HE, Han SJ, Lee KS, Park JW. Polymorphism of the glutamate transporter protein EAAT2 and migraine transformation into chronic daily headache. J Clin Neurol. 2011;7:143–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Ayata C, Shimizu-Sasamata M, Lo EH, Noebels JL, Moskowitz MA. Impaired neurotransmitter release and elevated threshold for cortical spreading depression in mice with mutations in the alpha1A subunit of P/Q type calcium channels. Neuroscience. 2000;95:639–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Capuani C, Melone M, Tottene A, et al. Defective glutamate and K+ clearance by cortical astrocytes in familial hemiplegic migraine type 2. EMBO Mol Med. 2016;8:967–86.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Riant F, Roze E, Barbance C, et al. PRRT2 mutations cause hemiplegic migraine. Neurology. 2012;79:2122–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Brennan KC, Bates EA, Shapiro RE, et al. Casein kinase idelta mutations in familial migraine and advanced sleep phase. Science translational medicine. 2013;5:183ra56, 1-11.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Hoffmann J, Martins-Oliveira M, Supronsinchai W, et al. The CK1δ T44A mutation affects nociceptive activation of the trigeminocervical complex in an in vivo model of migraine (P1.258). Neurology. 2014;82:P1.258.

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Chergui K, Svenningsson P, Greengard P. Physiological role for casein kinase 1 in glutamatergic synaptic transmission. J Neurosci. 2005;25:6601–9. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1082-05.2005

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Tallaksen-Greene SJ, Young AB, Penney JB, Beitz AJ. Excitatory amino acid binding sites in the trigeminal principal sensory and spinal trigeminal nuclei of the rat. Neuroscience Letters. 1992;141:79–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Akerman S, Holland PR, Goadsby PJ. Diencephalic and brainstem mechanisms in migraine. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011;12:570–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Greenamyre J, Young A, Penney J. Quantitative autoradiographic distribution of L-[3H]glutamate-binding sites in rat central nervous system. The Journal of Neuroscience. 1984;4:2133–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Halpain S, Wieczorek C, Rainbow T. Localization of L-glutamate receptors in rat brain by quantitative autoradiography. The Journal of Neuroscience. 1984;4:2247–58.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Silva E, Quiñones B, Freund N, Gonzalez LE, Hernandez L. Extracellular glutamate, aspartate and arginine increase in the ventral posterolateral thalamic nucleus during nociceptive stimulation. Brain Research. 2001;923:45–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Bereiter DA, Benetti AP. Excitatory amino release within spinal trigeminal nucleus after mustard oil injection into the temporomandibular joint region of the rat. Pain. 1996;67:451–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Hill RG, Salt TE. An ionophoretic study of the responses of rat caudal trigeminal nucleus neurones to non-noxious mechanical sensory stimuli. The Journal of Physiology. 1982;327:65–78.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Bereiter DA, Bereiter DF, Hathaway CB. The NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801 reduces Fos-like immunoreactivity in central trigeminal neurons and blocks select endocrine and autonomic responses to corneal stimulation in the rat. Pain. 1996;64:179–89.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Storer RJ, Goadsby PJ. Trigeminovascular nociceptive transmission involves N-methyl-D-aspartate and non-N-methyl-D-aspartate glutamate receptors. Neuroscience. 1999;90:1371–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Hoffmann J, Park JW, Storer RJ, Goadsby PJ. Magnesium and memantine do not inhibit nociceptive neuronal activity in the trigeminocervical complex of the rat. J Headache Pain. 2013;1 (Suppl 1):71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Ma Q-P. Co-localization of 5-HT1B/1D/1F receptors and glutamate in trigeminal ganglia in rats. Neuroreport. 2001;12:1589–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Zhou Q, Wang J, Zhang X, Zeng L, Wang L, Jiang W. Effect of metabotropic glutamate 5 receptor antagonists on morphine efficacy and tolerance in rats with neuropathic pain. European Journal of Pharmacology. 2013;718:17–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Lauritzen M, Hansen AJ. The effect of glutamate receptor blockade on anoxic depolarization and cortical spreading depression. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1992;12:223–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Faria LC, Mody I. Protective effect of ifenprodil against spreading depression in the mouse entorhinal cortex. J Neurophysiol. 2004;92:2610–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Peeters M, Gunthorpe MJ, Strijbos PJ, Goldsmith P, Upton N, James MF. Effects of pan- and subtype-selective N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists on cortical spreading depression in the rat: therapeutic potential for migraine. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2007;321:564–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Sanchez-Porras R, Santos E, Scholl M, et al. The effect of ketamine on optical and electrical characteristics of spreading depolarizations in gyrencephalic swine cortex. Neuropharmacology. 2014;84:52–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Akerman S, Goadsby PJ. Topiramate inhibits cortical spreading depression in rat and cat: impact in migraine aura. Neuroreport. 2005;16:1383–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Mody I, Lambert JD, Heinemann U. Low extracellular magnesium induces epileptiform activity and spreading depression in rat hippocampal slices. Journal of Neurophysiology. 1987;57:869–88.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Addae JI, Ali N, Stone TW. Effects of AMPA and clomethiazole on spreading depression cycles in the rat neocortex in vivo. Eur J Pharmacol. 2011;653:41–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Parsons CG, Danysz W, Quack G. Memantine is a clinically well tolerated N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist—a review of preclinical data. Neuropharmacology. 1999;38:735–67.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Le Doaré K, Akerman S, Holland PR, et al. Occipital afferent activation of second order neurons in the trigeminocervical complex in rat. Neuroscience Letters. 2006;403:73–7.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Hattori Y, Watanabe M, Iwabe T, et al. Administration of MK-801 decreases c-Fos expression in the trigeminal sensory nuclear complex but increases it in the midbrain during experimental movement of rat molars. Brain Research. 2004;1021:183–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Burstein R, Cutrer MF, Yarnitsky D. The development of cutaneous allodynia during a migraine attack clinical evidence for the sequential recruitment of spinal and supraspinal nociceptive neurons in migraine. Brain. 2000;123 ( Pt 8):1703–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Latremoliere A, Woolf CJ. Central sensitization: a generator of pain hypersensitivity by central neural plasticity. The Journal of Pain. 2009;10:895–926.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Woolf CJ. Central sensitization: implications for the diagnosis and treatment of pain. Pain. 2011;152:S2–15.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Woolf CJ, Thompson SW. The induction and maintenance of central sensitization is dependent on N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptor activation; implications for the treatment of post-injury pain hypersensitivity states. Pain. 1991;44:293–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Haley JE, Dickenson AH. Evidence for spinal N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor involvement in prolonged chemical nociception in the rat. Brain Research. 2016;1645:58–60.

    Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Jackson DL, Graff CB, Richardson JD, Hargreaves KM. Glutamate participates in the peripheral modulation of thermal hyperalgesia in rats. European Journal of Pharmacology. 1995;284:321–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Lawand NB, Willis WD, Westlund KN. Excitatory amino acid receptor involvement in peripheral nociceptive transmission in rats. European Journal of Pharmacology. 1997;324:169–77.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Filatova E, Latysheva N, Kurenkov A. Evidence of persistent central sensitization in chronic headaches: a multi-method study. The Journal of Headache and Pain. 2008;9:295–300.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Buchgreitz L, Lyngberg AC, Bendtsen L, Jensen R. Frequency of headache is related to sensitization: a population study. Pain. 2006;123:19–27.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Buchgreitz L, Lyngberg AC, Bendtsen L, Jensen R. Increased prevalence of tension-type headache over a 12-year period is related to increased pain sensitivity. A population study. Cephalalgia. 2007;27:145–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Srikiatkhachorn A, Grand SM, Supornsilpchai W, Storer RJ. Pathophysiology of medication overuse headache—an update. Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain. 2014;54:204–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Mitsikostas DD, Sanchez del Rio M, Waeber C, Huang Z, Cutrer FM, Moskowitz MA. Non-NMDA glutamate receptors modulate capsaicin induced c-fos expression within trigeminal nucleus caudalis. Brit J Pharmacol. 1999;127:623–30.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Johnson KW, Dieckman DK, Phebus LA, et al. GLUR5 antagonists as novel migraine therapies. Cephalagia. 2001;21:268.

    Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Ramadan N, Sang C, Chappell A, et al. IV LY293558, an AMPA/KA receptor antagonist, is effective in migraine. Cephalagia. 2001;21:267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Jane DE, Lodge D, Collingridge GL. Kainate receptors: pharmacology, function and therapeutic potential. Neuropharmacology. 2009;56:90–113.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Collingridge GL, Olsen RW, Peters J, Spedding M. A nomenclature for ligand-gated ion channels. Neuropharmacology. 2009;56:2–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Chittajallu R, Braithwaite SP, Clarke VRJ, Henley JM. Kainate receptors: subunits, synaptic localization and function. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences. 1999;20:26–35.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Sahara Y, Noro N, Iida Y, Soma K, Nakamura Y. Glutamate receptor subunits GluR5 and KA-2 are coexpressed in rat trigeminal ganglion neurons. The Journal of Neuroscience. 1997;17:6611–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Andreou AP, Holland PR, Lasalandra MP, Goadsby PJ. Modulation of nociceptive dural input to the trigeminocervical complex through GluK1 kainate receptors. Pain. 2015;156:439–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Kerchner GA, Wang G-D, Qiu C-S, Huettner JE, Zhuo M. Direct presynaptic regulation of GABA/glycine release by kainate receptors in the dorsal horn: an ionotropic mechanism. Neuron. 2001;32:477–88.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Kerchner GA, Wilding TJ, Huettner JE, Zhuo M. Kainate receptor subunits underlying presynaptic regulation of transmitter release in the dorsal horn. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2002;22:8010–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Bortolotto ZA, Clarke VRJ, Delany CM, et al. Kainate receptors are involved in synaptic plasticity. Nature. 1999;402:297–301.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Castillo PE, Malenka RC, Nicoll RA. Kainate receptors mediate a slow postsynaptic current in hippocampal CA3 neurons. Nature. 1997;388:182–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Li P, Wilding TJ, Kim SJ, Calejesan AA, Huettner JE, Zhuo M. Kainate-receptor-mediated sensory synaptic transmission in mammalian spinal cord. Nature. 1999;397:161–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Huettner JE. Kainate receptors and synaptic transmission. Progress in Neurobiology. 2003;70:387–407.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Andreou AP, Holland PR, Goadsby PJ. Activation of iGluR5 kainate receptors inhibits neurogenic dural vasodilatation in an animal model of trigeminovascular activation. Brit J Pharmacol. 2009;157:464–73.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Zhou S, Bonasera L, Carlton SM. Peripheral administration of NMDA, AMPA or KA results in pain behaviors in rats. Neuroreport. 1996;7:895–900.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Goldstein DJ, Wang O, Saper JR, Stoltz R, Silberstein SD, Mathew NT. Ineffectiveness of neurokinin-1 antagonist in acute migraine: a crossover study. Cephalalgia. 1997;17:785–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Goldstein DJ, Offen WW, Klein EG, et al. Lanepitant, an NK-1 antagonist, in migraine prevention. Cephalalgia. 2001;21:102–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Sang CN, Ramadan NM, Wallihan RG, et al. LY293558, a novel AMPA/GluR5 antagonist, is efficacious and well-tolerated in acute migraine. Cephalalgia. 2004;24:596–602.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Chan KY, Edvinsson L, Eftekhari S, et al. Characterization of the calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist telcagepant (MK-0974) in human isolated coronary arteries. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2010;334:746–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Brandes JL, Saper JR, Diamond M, et al. Topiramate for migraine prevention: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2004;291:965–73.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Silberstein SD, Neto W, Schmitt J, Jacobs D. Topiramate in migraine prevention: results of a large controlled trial. Arch Neurol. 2004;61:490–5.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Bussone G, Diener HC, Pfeil J, Schwalen S. Topiramate 100 mg/day in migraine prevention: a pooled analysis of double-blinded randomised controlled trials. Int J Clin Pract. 2005;59:961–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Andreou AP, Goadsby PJ. Topiramate in the treatment of migraine: a kainate (glutamate) receptor antagonist within the trigeminothalamic pathway. Cephalalgia. 2011;31:1343–58.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Bhave G, Karim F, Carlton SM, Gereau IV RW. Peripheral group I metabotropic glutamate receptors modulate nociception in mice. Nat Neurosci. 2001;4:417–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Gillard SE, Tzaferis J, Tsui H-CT, Kingston AE. Expression of metabotropic glutamate receptors in rat meningeal and brain microvasculature and choroid plexus. The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 2003;461:317–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Li B, Lu L, Tan X, Zhong M, Guo Y, Yi X. Peripheral metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 5 contributes to inflammation-induced hypersensitivity of the rat temporomandibular joint. Journal of Molecular Neuroscience. 2013;51:710–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Waung MW, Akerman S, Wakefield M, Keywood C, Goadsby PJ. Metabotropic glutamate receptor 5: a target for migraine therapy. Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology. 2016;3:560–71.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Tashiro A, Nishida Y, Bereiter DA. Local group I mGluR antagonists reduce TMJ-evoked activity of trigeminal subnucleus caudalis neurons in female rats. Neuroscience. 2015;299:125–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Muñoz A, Liu XB, Jones EG. Development of metabotropic glutamate receptors from trigeminal nuclei to barrel cortex in postnatal mouse. Journal of Comparative Neurology. 1999;409:549–66.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Shigemoto R, Nomura S, Ohishi H, Sugihara H, Nakanishi S, Mizuno N. Immunohistochemical localization of a metabotropic glutamate receptor, mGluR5, in the rat brain. Neuroscience Letters. 1993;163:53–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Walker K, Bowes M, Panesar M, et al. Metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 5 (mGlu5) and nociceptive function: I. Selective blockade of mGlu5 receptors in models of acute, persistent and chronic pain. Neuropharmacology. 2001;40:1–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Walker K, Reeve A, Bowes M, et al. mGlu5 receptors and nociceptive function II. mGlu5 receptors functionally expressed on peripheral sensory neurones mediate inflammatory hyperalgesia. Neuropharmacology. 2001;40:10–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Kawasaki Y, Kohno T, Zhuang Z-Y, et al. Ionotropic and metabotropic receptors, protein kinase A, protein kinase C, and Src contribute to C-fiber-induced ERK activation and cAMP response element-binding protein phosphorylation in dorsal horn neurons, leading to central sensitization. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2004;24:8310–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Schröder H, Wu DF, Seifert A, et al. Allosteric modulation of metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 affects phosphorylation, internalization, and desensitization of the μ-opioid receptor. Neuropharmacology. 2009;56:768–78.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Boye Larsen D, Ingemann Kristensen G, et al. Investigating the expression of metabotropic glutamate receptors in trigeminal ganglion neurons and satellite glial cells: implications for craniofacial pain. Journal of Receptors and Signal Transduction. 2014;34:261–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Shigemoto R, Nakanishi S, Mizuno N. Distribution of the mRNA for a metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR1) in the central nervous system: an in situ hybridization study in adult and developing rat. Journal of Comparative Neurology. 1992;322:121–35.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    Salt TE, Binns KE. Contributions of mGlu1 and mGlu5 receptors to interactions with N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor-mediated responses and nociceptive sensory responses of rat thalamic neurons. Neuroscience. 2000;100:375–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  107. 107.

    Salt TE, Eaton SA. Excitatory actions of the metabotropic excitatory amino acid receptor agonist, trans-(±)-1-amino-cyclopentane-1,3-dicarboxylate (t-ACPD), on rat thalamic neurons in vivo. European Journal of Neuroscience. 1991;3:1104–11.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  108. 108.

    Salt TE, Eaton SA. Modulation of sensory neurone excitatory and inhibitory responses in the ventrobasal thalamus by activation of metabotropic excitatory amino acid receptors. Neuropharmacology. 1995;34:1043–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  109. 109.

    Salt TE, Eaton SA, Turner JP. Characterization of the metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) which modulate GABA-mediated inhibition in the ventrobasal thalamus. Neurochemistry International. 1996;29:317–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  110. 110.

    Salt TE, Eaton SA. Functions of ionotropic and metabotropic glutamate receptors in sensory transmission in the mammalian thalamus. Progress in Neurobiology. 1996;48:55–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  111. 111.

    Ohishi H, Akazawa C, Shigemoto R, Nakanishi S, Mizuno N. Distributions of the mRNAs for L-2-amino-4-phosphonobutyrate-sensitive metabotropic glutamate receptors, mGluR4 and mGluR7, in the rat brain. The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 1995;360:555–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  112. 112.

    Ohishi H, Nomura S, Ding YQ, et al. Presynaptic localization of a metabotropic glutamate receptor, mGluR7, in the primary afferent neurons: an immunohistochemical study in the rat. Neurosci Lett. 1995;202:85–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  113. 113.

    Li J-L, Ohishi H, Kaneko T, et al. Immunohistochemical localization of a metabotropic glutamate receptor, mGluR7, in ganglion neurons of the rat; with special reference to the presence in glutamatergic ganglion neurons. Neuroscience Letters. 1996;204:9–12.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  114. 114.

    Kinoshita A, Shigemoto R, Ohishi H, van der Putten H, Mizuno N. Immunohistochemical localization of metabotropic glutamate receptors, mGluR7a and mGluR7b, in the central nervous system of the adult rat and mouse: A light and electron microscopic study. The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 1998;393:332–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  115. 115.

    Jain AC, Sethi NC, Babbar PK. A clinical electroencephalgraphic and trace element study with special reference to zinc, copper and magnesium in serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in cases of migraine. Journal of Neurology. 1985;232, Supplement 1:161.

    Google Scholar 

  116. 116.

    Sarchielli P, Coata G, Firenze C, Morucci P, Abbritti G, Gallai V. Serum and salivary magnesium levels in migraine and tension-type headache. Results in a group of adult patients. Cephalalgia. 1992;12:21–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  117. 117.

    Ramadan NM, Halvorson H, Vande-Linde A, Levine SR, Helpern JA, Welch KM. Low brain magnesium in migraine. Headache. 1989;29:416–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  118. 118.

    Orr SL. Diet and nutraceutical interventions for headache management: a review of the evidence. Cephalalgia. 2016;36:1112–33.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  119. 119.

    Tepper SJ. Nutraceutical and other modalities for the treatment of headache. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2015;21:1018–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. 120.

    Diener HC, Tfelt-Hansen P, Dahlof C, et al. Topiramate in migraine prophylaxis—results from a placebo-controlled trial with propranolol as an active control. J Neurol. 2004;251:943–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  121. 121.

    Diener HC, Bussone G, Van Oene JC, Lahaye M, Schwalen S, Goadsby PJ. Topiramate reduces headache days in chronic migraine: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Cephalalgia. 2007;27:814–23.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  122. 122.

    Poulsen CF, Simeone TA, Maar TE, Smith-Swintosky V, White HS, Schousboe A. Modulation by topiramate of AMPA and kainate mediated calcium influx in cultured cerebral cortical, hippocampal and cerebellar neurons. Neurochem Res. 2004;29:275–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  123. 123.

    Porter RJ, Dhir A, Macdonald RL, Rogawski MA. Mechanisms of action of antiseizure drugs. Handb Clin Neurol. 2012;108:663–81.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  124. 124.

    Hoffmann J, Akerman S, Goadsby PJ. Efficacy and mechanism of anticonvulsant drugs in migraine. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2014;7:191–201.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  125. 125.

    McShane R, Areosa Sastre A, Minakaran N. Memantine for dementia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006:CD003154.

  126. 126.

    Rammes G, Rupprecht R, Ferrari U, Zieglgansberger W, Parsons CG. The N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor channel blockers memantine, MRZ 2/579 and other amino-alkyl-cyclohexanes antagonise 5-HT(3) receptor currents in cultured HEK-293 and N1E-115 cell systems in a non-competitive manner. Neurosci Lett. 2001;306:81–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  127. 127.

    Aracava Y, Pereira EF, Maelicke A, Albuquerque EX. Memantine blocks alpha7* nicotinic acetylcholine receptors more potently than n-methyl-D-aspartate receptors in rat hippocampal neurons. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2005;312:1195–205.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  128. 128.

    Bigal M, Rapoport A, Sheftell F, Tepper D, Tepper S. Memantine in the preventive treatment of refractory migraine. Headache. 2008;48:1337–42.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  129. 129.

    Charles A, Flippen C, Romero Reyes M, Brennan KC. Memantine for prevention of migraine: a retrospective study of 60 cases. J Headache Pain. 2007;8:248–50.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  130. 130.

    Noruzzadeh R, Modabbernia A, Aghamollaii V, et al. Memantine for prophylactic treatment of migraine without aura: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study. Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain. 2016;56:95–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  131. 131.

    Iacobucci GJ, Visnjevac O, Pourafkari L, Nader ND. Ketamine: an update on cellular and subcellular mechanisms with implications for clinical practice. Pain Physician. 2017;20:E285-E301.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  132. 132.

    Wohleb ES, Gerhard D, Thomas A, Duman RS. Molecular and cellular mechanisms of rapid-acting antidepressants ketamine and scopolamine. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2017;15:11–20.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  133. 133.

    Lauritsen C, Mazuera S, Lipton RB, Ashina S. Intravenous ketamine for subacute treatment of refractory chronic migraine: a case series. J Headache Pain. 2016;17:106.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  134. 134.

    Pomeroy JL, Marmura MJ, Nahas SJ, Viscusi ER. Ketamine infusions for treatment refractory headache. Headache. 2017;57:276–82.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  135. 135.

    Afridi SK, Giffin NJ, Kaube H, Goadsby PJ. A randomized controlled trial of intranasal ketamine in migraine with prolonged aura. Neurology. 2013;80:642–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  136. 136.

    Kaube H, Herzog J, Kaufer T, Dichgans M, Diener HC. Aura in some patients with familial hemiplegic migraine can be stopped by intranasal ketamine. Neurology. 2000;55:139–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Hoffmann.

Ethics declarations

Required Author Forms

Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the online version of this article.

Disclosures

Jan Hoffmann has consulted for and/or serves on an advisory board of Allergan, Autonomic Technologies Inc., Chordate Medical AB, Novartis, and Teva. He received honoraria for speaking from Allergan, Chordate Medical AB, Novartis, and Teva. Andrew Charles has served as a consultant for Amgen, Alder, Biohaven, Eli Lilly, and eNeura. He has received grant funding from Takeda Pharmaceuticals.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(PDF 1225 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hoffmann, J., Charles, A. Glutamate and Its Receptors as Therapeutic Targets for Migraine. Neurotherapeutics 15, 361–370 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13311-018-0616-5

Download citation

Key Words

  • Glutamate
  • Migraine
  • Aura
  • Headache
  • Cortical spreading depression