Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Early outcomes of three new robotic surgical systems in patients undergoing hysterectomy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Updates in Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

New robot models, such as hinotori, da Vinci SP, and Hugo, have been introduced in Japan. This study examined the surgical outcomes of these models in patients from the initial stages of their introduction to the present day.

We retrospectively reviewed 36 patients with endometrial cancer or benign gynecologic disease, who underwent robotic hysterectomy using da Vinci SP, hinotori, or Hugo between March 2023 and March 2024.

Robotic hysterectomy was performed using hinotori™ in 10 patients, da Vinci SP in 16 patients, and Hugo in 10 patients. No significant differences were observed in the characteristics of the patients subjected to surgery using these models. The total operative time was 123.0 min (93–144 min) for hinotori, 95.0 min (79–165 min) for da Vinci SP, and 98.5 min (74–177 min) for Hugo. The total operative time of hinotori™ was significantly longer than that of the other two models (p = 0.031). No differences were observed among the robot systems with respect to complications during or after surgery and the intensity of postoperative pain.

Differences in the surgical time were noted depending on the model used. It has been proven that surgeons who are already proficient in performing robotic surgery with da Vinci Xi can safely perform surgeries with the new models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Wu JM, Wechter ME, Geller EJ et al (2007) Hysterectomy rates in the United States, 2003. Obstet Gynecol 110:1091–1095. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000285997.38553.4b

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Minelli L, Franciolini G, Franchini MA et al (1990) Laparoscopic hysterectomy. Minerva Ginecol 42:515–518

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Diaz-Arrastia C, Jurnalov C, Gomez G et al (2002) Laparoscopic hysterectomy using a computer-enhanced surgical robot. Surg Endosc 16:1271–1273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-002-8523-5. (Epub 2002 Jun 27)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira MLD et al (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250:187–196. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Intuitive Surgical Inc. https://isrg.intuitive.com/news-releases/news-release-details/intuitive-reaches-10-million-procedures-performed-using-da-vinci?utm_medium=email&utm_source=transaction. Accessed 9 Apr 2024.

  6. Isoyama K, Matsuura M, Hayasaka M et al (2023) Nationwide trends in and regional factors associated with minimally invasive hysterectomy for benign indications in Japan. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 289:129–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.08.388

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Health, labour and welfare. https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/seisakunitsuite/bunya/0000177182.html. Accessed 9 Apr 2024.

  8. Park SY, Cho EH, Jeong K et al (2023) Robotic single-port hysterectomy versus robotic multisite hysterectomy in benign gynecologic diseases: a retrospective comparison of clinical and surgical outcomes. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 49:2746–2752. https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.15778. (Epub 2023 Aug 27)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kwak YH, Lee H, Seon K et al (2022) DaVinci SP single-port robotic surgery in gynecologic tumors: single surgeon’s initial experience with 100 cases. Yonsei Med J 63:179–186. https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2022.63.2.179

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Panico G, Mastrovito S, Campagna G et al (2023) Robotic docking time with the Hugo RAS system in gynecologic surgery: a procedure independent learning curve using the cumulative summation analysis (CUSUM). J Robot Surg 17:2547–2554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-023-01693-w

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Gioe A, Monterossi G, Alletti SG et al (2024) The new robotic system HUGO RAS for gynecologic surgery: first european experience from Gemelli hospital. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.15396

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Monterossi G, Anchora LP, Oliva R et al (2023) The new surgical robot Hugo RAS for total hysterectomy: a pilot study. Facts views Vis Obgyn 15:331–337. https://doi.org/10.52054/FVVO.15.4.11

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Komatsu H, Wada I, Harada T et al (2024) First report of robotic-assisted total hysterectomy using the Hugo RAS system. Update Surg 76:315–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-023-01710-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Togami S, Higashi T, Tokudome A et al (2023) The first report of surgery for gynecological diseases using the hinotori surgical robot system. Jpn J Clin Oncol 53:1034–1037. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyad105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the staff of Sapporo Medical University Hospital operating room for their support.

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design of this study. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by Motoki Matsuura, Sachiko Nagao, Shoko Kurokawa, Masato Tamate, Taishi Akimoto, and Tsuyoshi Saito. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Motoki Matsuura, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Motoki Matsuura.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Ethics approval

This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Institutional Review Board of Sapporo Medical University (No 352–224).

Consent to participate/Publish

Since patient data was collected anonymously, informed consent for this retrospective study was waived in accordance with the Institutional Review Board policy of Sapporo Medical University.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Matsuura, M., Nagao, S., Kurokawa, S. et al. Early outcomes of three new robotic surgical systems in patients undergoing hysterectomy. Updates Surg (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-024-01891-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-024-01891-7

Keywords

Navigation