Skip to main content
Log in

First report of robotic retromuscular incisional hernia repair with Hugo Ras™ surgical system

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Updates in Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Treatment of incisional hernia is a rapidly evolving field of surgery, with actual trends being oriented toward retromuscular/preperitoneal mesh placement. The diffusion of robotic surgery is constantly growing in different surgical specialties and is gaining widespread acceptance for abdominal wall reconstruction. Recently, novel robotic platforms have entered into the market. In this study, we present the first transabdominal retromuscular incisional hernia repair performed with the new Hugo RAS™ system (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA). The surgical team had previous robotic experience and completed an official 2-day session running incisional hernia repair on human cadaver lab. Operating room setting and trocar layout were planned. The patient presented a 4 × 4 cm midline incisional hernia and was scheduled for transabdominal retromuscular incisional hernia repair at our Institution. A description of the operative room setup, robotic arm configuration and docking/tilt angles is provided. Docking time, operative time, and console time were 15, 95, and 75 min, respectively. All the surgical steps were completed without critical surgical errors or high-priority alarms. Neither intraoperative complications nor conversion to open surgery was recorded. Postoperative course was uneventful and the patient was discharged on postoperative day 2. The safety and the feasibility of these procedures will require further analysis and larger patients’ sample sizes for procedural standardization and potential integration into minimally invasive abdominal wall reconstruction programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Kohler A, Lavanchy JL, Lenoir U et al (2019) Effectiveness of prophylactic intraperitoneal mesh implantation for prevention of incisional hernia in patients undergoing open abdominal surgery: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg 154(2):109–115. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2018.4221. (PMID: 30476940; PMCID: PMC6439658)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Muysoms F, Van Cleven S, Pletinckx P et al (2018) Robotic transabdominal retromuscular umbilical prosthetic hernia repair (TARUP): observational study on the operative time during the learning curve. Hernia 22(6):1101–1111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-018-1825-x. (Epub 2018 Sep 22. PMID: 30244344)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dixit R, Prajapati OP, Krishna A et al (2023) Patient-reported outcomes of laparoscopic versus robotic primary ventral and incisional hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hernia 27(2):245–257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-022-02733-4. (Epub 2023 Jan 6. PMID: 36607459)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sheetz KH, Claflin J, Dimick JB (2020) Trends in the adoption of robotic surgery for common surgical procedures. JAMA Netw Open 3(1):e1918911. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18911. (PMID: 31922557; PMCID: PMC6991252)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Rocco B, Sighinolfi MC, Sarchi L et al (2023) First case of robot-assisted radical cystectomy and intracorporeal neobladder reconstruction with the Hugo RAS system: step-by-step surgical setup and technique. J Robot Surg 17(5):2247–2251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-023-01629-4. (Epub 2023 Jun 9. PMID: 37294418)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bianchi PP, Salaj A, Rocco B et al (2023) First worldwide report on Hugo RAS™ surgical platform in right and left colectomy. Updates Surg 75(3):775–780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-023-01489-5. (Epub 2023 Mar 10. PMID: 36897505)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ferraro L, Formisano G, Salaj A et al (2023) Preliminary robotic abdominal wall reconstruction experience: single-centre outcomes of the first 150 cases. Langenb Arch Surg 408(1):276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-023-03004-1. (PMID: 37450034)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kudsi OY, Chang K, Bou-Ayash N et al (2021) Hybrid robotic hernia repair for incisional hernias: perioperative and patient-reported outcomes. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 31(5):570–578. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2020.0657. (Epub 2020 Nov 4. PMID: 33147098)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jensen KK, Helgstrand F, Henriksen NA (2024) Short-term outcomes after laparoscopic IPOM versus robot-assisted retromuscular repair of small to medium ventral hernias: a nationwide database study. Ann Surg 279(1):154–159. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000005915. (Epub 2023 May 22. PMID: 37212128)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sighinolfi MC, Terzoni S, Scanferla E et al (2023) Prior robotic console expertise may improve basic skills at the New Hugo RAS simulator: results from a cohort trial and implications for skill transference across platforms. Eur Urol Open Sci 53:83–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2023.04.008. (PMID: 37441345; PMCID: PMC10334229)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giampaolo Formisano.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interests or financial ties to disclose.

Research involving human participants and/or animals and Informed consent

The procedure with robotic approach is not an experimental one, since it has been already performed (and approved) with conventional laparoscopic approach and different robotic platform. HugoRAS robotic system is cleared for use in abdominal surgery (CE mark).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Formisano, G., Ferraro, L., Salaj, A. et al. First report of robotic retromuscular incisional hernia repair with Hugo Ras™ surgical system. Updates Surg (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-024-01873-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-024-01873-9

Keywords

Navigation