Skip to main content
Log in

En-bloc excision of sacral squamous cell carcinoma with immediate reconstruction

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Updates in Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sacral squamous cell carcinoma is an uncommon condition that may arise in scars following burns or in chronic wounds, such as an untreated pilonidal cyst. The aim of the present technical note is to describe a surgical technique aimed at minimizing local recurrence rates by en-bloc resection as well as providing immediate plastic reconstruction: 1. right-sided extended vertical rectus abdominis myo-cutaneous (VRAM) flap; 2. abdomino-perineal excision of the rectum with end colostomy; 3. en-bloc excision of the mass inclusive of gluteus maximus muscles and distal sacrectomy; 4. sacrectomy defect covered with VRAM flap; 5. bilateral gluteal defects covered with single-layer dermal substitute of bovine collagen and elastin hydrolysate followed by immediate split-thickness skin grafting from bilateral thigh donor sites, and negative pressure wound therapy dressings. This approach resulted in a favorable outcome at 2-year follow-up in a male patient presenting with a large locally advanced sacral squamous cell carcinoma involving the external anal sphincter muscle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Data availability

Data are available upon request from qualified entity.

References

  1. Sharma RK (2009) Is Marjolin’s ulcer always a squamous cell carcinoma? Shedding some light on the old problem. Plast Reconstr Surg 124(3):1005

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Trent JT, Kirsner RS (2003) Wounds and malignancy. Adv Skin Wound Care 16(1):31–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kerr-Valentic MA, Samimi K, Rohlen BH, Agarwal JP, Rockwell WB (2009) Marjolin’s ulcer: modern analysis of an ancient problem. Plast Reconstr Surg 123(1):184–191

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Choa R, Rayatt S, Mahtani K (2015) Marjolin’s ulcer. Br Med J 351:h3997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pekarek B, Buck S, Osher L (2011) A comprehensive review on marjolin’s ulcers: diagnosis and treatment. J Am Col Certif Wound Spec 3(3):60–64

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Meaume S, Fromantin I, Teot L (2013) Neoplastic wounds and degenerescence. J Tissue Viability 22(4):122–130

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Khan K, Schafer C, Wood J (2020) Marjolin ulcer: a comprehensive review. Adv Skin Wound Care 33(12):629–634

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cocchetto V, Magrin P, de Paula RA, Aide M, Monte Razo L, Pantaleao L (2013) Squamous cell carcinoma in chronic wound: marjolin ulcer. Dermatol Online J 19(2):7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Simman R, Abbas F, Singh SP (2021) Malignant transformation in chronic stage IV sacral pressure ulcer: a case of marjolin ulcer. Wounds 33(7):E53–E57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chou CY, Huang ZY, Chiao HY, Wang CY, Sun YS, Chen SG et al (2015) Squamous cell carcinoma arising from a recurrent ischial pressure ulcer: a case report. Ostomy Wound Manage 61(2):48–50

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dvorak HF (1986) Tumors wounds that do not heal similarities between tumor stroma generation and wound healing. New Engl J Med. 315(26):1650–1659

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Novick M, Gard DA, Hardy SB, Spira M (1977) Burn scar carcinoma: a review and analysis of 46 cases. J Trauma 17(10):809–817

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mayol Oltra A, Boldo Roda E, Lozoya Albacar R, Morillo Macias V, Nobleja Quiles N (2020) Squamous cell carcinoma over pilonidal chronic disease. A new therapeutic approach. Int J Surg Case Rep 70:172–177

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Safadi MF, Degiannis K, Doll D (2023) Pilonidal sinus disease carcinoma: survival and recurrence analysis. J Surg Oncol 128(4):569–575

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

No funding was acquired for this article.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conception and design: RB. Administrative support: MG, RB, ER. Provision of study material or patients: MG, AK. Collection and assembly of data: DMF, MG. Data analysis and interpretation: DMF, ER, RB. Manuscript writing: DMF, MG. Final approval of manuscript: DMF, AK, MG, ER, RB.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roberto Bergamaschi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None of the authors have any conflict of interest to declare.

Ethical statement

The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee(s) and with the Helsinki Declaration (as revised in 2013). Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and accompanying images.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Felsenreich, D.M., Gachabayov, M., Ritter, E. et al. En-bloc excision of sacral squamous cell carcinoma with immediate reconstruction. Updates Surg (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-024-01861-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-024-01861-z

Keywords

Navigation