Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach vs. transoral robotic thyroidectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Updates in Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the surgical outcomes of the transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach (TOETVA) and transoral robotic thyroidectomy (TORT). We carried out a systematic literature search of PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar on studies comparing TOETVA and TORT until January 2023. A total of five articles published between 2018 and 2023 that matched the inclusion criteria were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The studies included 641 patients (394 TOETVA patients and 247 TORT patients). TOETVA group was associated with a significantly shorter operative time with a mean difference of 60.08 min [95% confidence interval (CI) − 83.95 to − 36.20; P < 0.001). Transient recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy was more common in the TOETVA group than the TORT group (OR 3.00; 95% CI 1.14–7.88; P = 0.03). There were no significant differences in the other outcomes, including the length of hospital stay, postoperative pain scores, number of central lymph nodes retrieved, permanent recurrent laryngeal nerve injuries, and transient and permanent hypoparathyroidism. The TOETVA group was associated with shorter operative time and more transient recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy than the TORT group. Each procedure has its benefits and limitations. The surgical approach should be determined by considering the patient’s characteristics and preferences, as well as the surgeon’s preference and area of expertise.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Choi Y, Lee JH, Kim YH, Lee YS, Chang HS, Park CS, Roh MR (2014) Impact of postthyroidectomy scar on the quality of life of thyroid cancer patients. Ann Dermatol 26:693–699

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Juarez MC, Ishii L, Nellis JC, Bater K, Huynh PP, Fung N, Darrach H, Russell JO, Ishii M (2019) Objectively measuring social attention of thyroid neck scars and transoral surgery using eye tracking. Laryngoscope 129:2789–2794

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Choe JH, Kim SW, Chung KW, Park KS, Han W, Noh DY, Oh SK, Youn YK (2007) Endoscopic thyroidectomy using a new bilateral axillo-breast approach. World J Surg 31:601–606

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kwak J, Yu HW, Ahn JH, Kim SJ, Chai YJ, Choi JY, Lee KE (2023) A time trend analysis of 5,000 robotic thyroidectomies via bilateral axillo-breast approach. World J Surg 47:403–411

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Han S, Kwon TK, Chai YJ, Park J, Lee DY, Lee KE, Kim HY, Hwang KT, Yi KH (2020) Functional voice and swallowing outcome analysis after thyroid lobectomy: transoral endoscopic vestibular versus open approach. World J Surg 44:4127–4135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dionigi G, Chai YJ, Tufano RP, Anuwong A, Kim HY (2018) Transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy via a vestibular approach: why and how? Endocrine 59:275–279

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Anuwong A, Sasanakietkul T, Jitpratoom P, Ketwong K, Kim HY, Dionigi G, Richmon JD (2018) Transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach (TOETVA): indications, techniques and results. Surg Endosc 32:456–465

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Song CM, Bang HS, Kim HG, Park HJ, Tae K (2021) Health-related quality of life after transoral robotic thyroidectomy in papillary thyroid carcinoma. Surgery 170:99–105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sun H, Wang X, Zheng G, Wu G, Zeng Q, Zheng H (2022) Comparison between transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach (TOETVA) and conventional open thyroidectomy for patients undergoing total thyroidectomy and central neck dissection: a propensity score-matching analysis. Front Oncol 12:856021

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Xuan Nguyen H, Nguyen HX, Thi Hoang H, Van Le Q (2022) Quality of Life and surgical outcome of transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach (TOETVA) versus open thyroid surgery: experience from a single center in Vietnam. J Thyroid Res 2022:2381063

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. You JY, Kim HY, Park DW, Yang HW, Kim HK, Dionigi G, Tufano RP (2021) Transoral robotic thyroidectomy versus conventional open thyroidectomy: comparative analysis of surgical outcomes using propensity score matching. Surg Endosc 35:124–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chai YJ, Lee KE, Youn YK (2014) Can robotic thyroidectomy be performed safely in thyroid carcinoma patients? Endocrinol Metab (Seoul) 29:226–232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim HY, Park D, Bertelli AAT (2020) The pros and cons of additional axillary arm for transoral robotic thyroidectomy. World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 6:161–164

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Razavi CR, Khadem MGA, Fondong A, Clark JH, Richmon JD, Tufano RP, Russell JO (2018) Early outcomes in transoral vestibular thyroidectomy: Robotic versus endoscopic techniques. Head Neck 40:2246–2253

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Tae K, Lee DW, Song CM, Ji YB, Park JH, Kim DS, Tufano RP (2019) Early experience of transoral thyroidectomy: comparison of robotic and endoscopic procedures. Head Neck 41:730–738

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen YH, Kim HY, Anuwong A, Huang TS, Duh QY (2021) Transoral robotic thyroidectomy versus transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy: a propensity-score-matched analysis of surgical outcomes. Surg Endosc 35:6179–6189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee MJ, Oh MY, Lee JM, Sun J, Chai YJ (2022) Comparative surgical outcomes of transoral endoscopic and robotic thyroidectomy for thyroid carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09636-6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee JH, Choi HJ, Woo JW, Jung EJ (2023) Robotic versus endoscopic transoral thyroidectomy in papillary thyroid cancer: a comparative analysis of surgical outcomes in 240 consecutive patients. Head Neck. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.27295,January6,2023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews. Ann Intern Med 151(4):264–269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wells GA, Shea B, O’Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, Tugwell P (2021) The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp. Accessed 20 Jan 2023

  21. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, Schunemann HJ (2008) Rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations: GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 336(7650):924

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Wan X, Wang W, Liu J, Tong T (2014) Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Med Res Methodol 14:135

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Anuwong A, Ketwong K, Jitpratoom P, Sasanakietkul T, Duh QY (2018) Safety and outcomes of the transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach. JAMA Surg 153:21–27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kang YJ, Cho JH, Stybayeva G, Hwang SH (2022) Safety and efficacy of transoral robotic thyroidectomy for thyroid tumor: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancers (Basel) 14:4230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang Y, Zhou S, Liu X, Rui S, Li Z, Zhu J, Wei T (2021) Transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach vs conventional open thyroidectomy: meta-analysis. Head Neck 43:345–353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Song CM, Jang YI, Ji YB, Park JS, Kim DS, Tae K (2018) Factors affecting operative time in robotic thyroidectomy. Head Neck 40:893–903

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Xing Z, Qiu Y, Abuduwaili M, Xia B, Fei Y, Zhu J, Su A (2021) Surgical outcomes of different approaches in robotic assisted thyroidectomy for thyroid cancer: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis. Int J Surg 89:105941

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kandil E, Attia AS, Hadedeya D, Shihabi A, Elnahla A (2020) Robotic thyroidectomy: past, future, and current perspectives. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 53:1031–1039

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lee J, Yun JH, Choi UJ, Kang SW, Jeong JJ, Chung WY (2012) Robotic versus endoscopic thyroidectomy for thyroid cancers: a multi-institutional analysis of early postoperative outcomes and surgical learning curves. J Oncol 2012:734541

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Kim KH, Ji YB, Song CM, Kim E, Kim KN, Tae K (2023) Learning curve of transoral robotic thyroidectomy. Surg Endosc 37:535–543

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kim HK, Park D, Kim HY (2019) Robotic transoral thyroidectomy for papillary thyroid carcinoma. Ann Surg Treat Res 96:266–268

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Tae K, Ji YB, Song CM, Ryu J (2019) Robotic and endoscopic thyroid surgery: evolution and advances. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 12:1–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Choi JY, Bae IE, Kim HS, Yoon SG, Yi JW, Yu HW, Kim SJ, Chai YJ, Lee KE, Youn YK (2020) Comparative study of bilateral axillo-breast approach endoscopic and robotic thyroidectomy: propensity score matching analysis of large multi-institutional data. Ann Surg Treat Res 98:307–314

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Chang YW, Lee HY, Ji WB, Kim HY, Kim WY, Lee JB, Son GS (2020) Detailed comparison of robotic and endoscopic transaxillary thyroidectomy. Asian J Surg 43:234–239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Paek SH, Kang KH (2016) Robotic thyroidectomy and cervical neck dissection for thyroid cancer. Gland surg 5:342–351

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Choo JM, You JY, Kim HY (2019) Transoral robotic thyroidectomy: the overview and suggestions for future research in new minimally invasive thyroid surgery. J Minim Invasive Surg 22:5–10

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Dionigi G, Lavazza M, Wu CW, Sun H, Liu X, Tufano RP, Kim HY, Richmon JD, Anuwong A (2017) Transoral thyroidectomy: why is it needed? Gland Surg 6:272–276

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Lee DW, Bang HS, Jeong JH, Kwak SG, Choi YY, Tae K (2021) Cosmetic outcomes after transoral robotic thyroidectomy: comparison with transaxillary, postauricular, and conventional approaches. Oral Oncol 114:105139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Chai YJ, Song J, Kang J, Woo JW, Song RY, Kwon H, Kim SJ, Choi JY, Lee KE (2016) A comparative study of postoperative pain for open thyroidectomy versus bilateral axillo-breast approach robotic thyroidectomy using a self-reporting application for iPad. Ann Surg Treat Res 90:239–245

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Ha TK, Kim DW, Park HK, Shin GW, Heo YJ, Baek JW, Lee YJ, Choo HJ, Kim DH, Jung SJ, Park JS, Moon SH, Ahn KJ, Baek HJ, Kang T (2018) Comparison of postoperative neck pain and discomfort, swallowing difficulty, and voice change after conventional open, endoscopic, and robotic thyroidectomy: a single-center cohort study. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 9:416

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Ryu HR, Lee J, Park JH, Kang SW, Jeong JJ, Hong JY, Chung WY (2013) A comparison of postoperative pain after conventional open thyroidectomy and transaxillary single-incision robotic thyroidectomy: a prospective study. Ann Surg Oncol 20:2279–2284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Dionigi G (2013) Robotic thyroidectomy: Seoul is not Varese. Otolaryngol-Head Neck Surg 148:178–178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Young Jun Chai.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Moon Young Oh, Young Jun Chai, Hyeong Won Yu, Su-Jin Kim, June Young Choi, Kyu Eun Lee have no conflict of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Ethical approval

This is a review study which has been conducted in accordance with the ethical standards as laid in the 1964 Helsinki Declaration.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

For this type of study, formal consent is not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oh, M.Y., Chai, Y.J., Yu, H.W. et al. Transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach vs. transoral robotic thyroidectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Updates Surg 75, 1773–1781 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-023-01623-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-023-01623-3

Keywords

Navigation