References
Ciria R, Cherqui D, Geller DA, Briceno J, Wakabayashi G (2016) Comparative short-term 244 benefits of laparoscopic liver resection: 9000 cases and climbing. Ann Surg 263(4):761–777
Schiffman SC, Kim KH, Tsung A, Marsh JW, Geller DA (2015) Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: a metaanalysis of 610 patients. Surgery 157(2):211–222
Zhou Y, Xiao Y, Wu L, Li B, Li H (2013) Laparoscopic liver resection as a safe and efficacious alternative to open resection for colorectal liver metastasis: a meta-analysis. BMC Surg 13:44
Goh BKP (2020) Letter regarding ‘benchmark performance of laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy and right hepatectomy in expert centers.’ J Hepatol 73:1576
Kwon Y, Cho JY, Han H-S, Yoon Y-S, Lee HW, Lee JS, Lee B, Kim M (2021) Improved outcomes of laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma located in posterosuperior segments of the liver. World J Surg 45:1178–1185
Tsung A, Geller DA, Sukato DC, Sabbaghian S, Tohme S, Steel J, Marsh W, Reddy SK, Bartlett DL (2014) Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy: a matched comparison. Ann Surg 259:549–555
Di Benedetto F, Petrowsky H, Magistri P, Halazun KJ (2020) Robotic liver resection: hurdles and beyond. Int J Surg 82S:155–162
Huang JW, Su WL, Wang SN (2018) Alternative laparoscopic intracorporeal pringle maneuver by huang’s loop. World J Surg 42(10):3312–3315
Gotohda N, Cherqui D, Geller DA, Abu Hilal M, Berardi G, Ciria R et al (2022) Expert consensus guidelines: How to safely perform minimally invasive anatomic liver resection. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 29(1):16–32
Brustia R, Mariani P, Sommacale D, Slim K (2021) GRACE Group. The impact of enhanced recovery program compliance after elective liver surgery: results from a multicenter prospective national registry. Surgery 170(5):1457–1466
Funding
No funding was received for conducting this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. The first draft of the manuscript was written by FM. and JG and reviewed and edited by DS and RB. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.
Ethics approval
This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The participant has consented to the submission of the information presented during the description of the case.
Human and animal rights
The study was compliant with the local standard of current care, and was the ethical committee approval was not required. The article does not contain any study with neither humans nor animal participants.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from the patient.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplementary file1 (MP4 496352 KB)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Milana, F., Galvanin, J., Sommacale, D. et al. Left hepatectomy and microwave ablation for bilobar colorectal metastases: video description of a “complicated” robotic approach. Updates Surg 74, 2019–2021 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-022-01398-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-022-01398-z