Abstract
Objective
We reviewed the available literature on patients with MPM undergoing either extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) or pleurectomy/decortication (P/D).
Methods
Original research studies that evaluated long-term outcomes of P/D versus EPP were identified, from January 1980 to February 2022. The 30-days and 90-day mortality, along with the 1-, 2-, 3-, 5-year survival, the median overall survival, the macroscopic complete resection (MCR) rate, and the complications were calculated according to both a fixed and a random effect model. The Q and I2 statistic were used to test for heterogeneity among the studies. Sensitivity analysis was performed including only studies that incorporated the MCR concept.
Results
Eighteen studies were included, incorporating a total of 4,852 patients treated with EPP and P/D. The 30-day mortality was significantly higher in the EPP group (OR: 2.79 [95% CI 1.30, 6.01]; p = 0.009). The median overall survival was higher in the P/D group (WMD:-4.55 [-6.05, -3.04]; p < 0.001). No differences were found regarding the 90-day mortality, MCR rate, and the 1-, 2-,3-, 5-year survival between the EPP and P/D groups. These findings were validated by the sensitivity analysis. The incidence of atrial fibrillation, hemorrhage, pulmonary embolism, air leak, and reoperation was significantly increased in the EPP group (p < 0.05).
Conclusions
The present meta-analysis indicates that P/D is associated with enhanced outcomes regarding 30-day mortality, median overall survival, and complications. The P/D approach should be preferred when technically feasible. However, the procedure of choice should be decided based on the goal of MCR in the safest approach for the patient.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of material
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.
References
TuralOnur S, Sokucu SN, Dalar L, Iliaz S, Kara K, Buyukkale S et al (2016) Are neutrophil/ lymphocyte ratio and platelet/lymphocyte ratio reliable parameters as prognostic indicators in malignant mesothelioma? Ther Clin Risk Manag 12:651–656
Sugarbaker DJ, Wolf AS, Chirieac LR, Godleski JJ, Tilleman TR, Jaklitsch MT et al (2011) Clinical and pathological features of three-year survivors of malignant pleural mesothelioma following extrapleural pneumonectomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 40:298–303
Treasure T, Lang-Lazdunski L, Waller D, Bliss JM, Tan C, Entwisle J et al (2011) Extra-pleural pneumonectomy versus no extra-pleural pneumonectomy for patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma: clinical outcomes of the Mesothelioma and Radical Surgery (MARS) randomised feasibility study. Lancet Oncol 12:763–772
Rusch V, Baldini EH, Bueno R et al (2013) The role of surgical cytoreduction in the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma: meeting summary of the International Mesothelioma Interest Group Congress, September 11–14, 2012, Boston. Mass J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 145:909–910
Rice D, Rusch V, Pass H, Asamura H, Nakano T, Edwards J et al (2011) Recommendations for uniform definitions of surgical techniques for malignant pleural mesothelioma: a consensus report of the international association for the study of lung cancer international staging committee and the international mesothelioma interest group. J Thorac Oncol 6(8):1304–1312. https://doi.org/10.1097/JTO.0b013e3182208e3f
Taioli E, Wolf AS, Flores RM (2015) Meta-analysis of survival after pleurectomy decortication versus extrapleural pneumonectomy in mesothelioma. Ann Thorac Surg 99:472–480
Magouliotis DE, Tasiopoulou VS, Athanassiadi K (2019) Updated meta-analysis of survival after extrapleural pneumonectomy versus pleurectomy/decortication in mesothelioma. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 67(3):312–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-018-1027-6 (Epub 2018 Oct 29)
Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000100. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100. Epub 2009 Jul 21. PMID: 19621070; PMCID: PMC2707010.
Higgins JPT, Green S (2011) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration. Accessed on 8 jan 2022. www.cochrane-handbook.org
Stang A (2010) Critical evaluation of the Newcastle–Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol 25:603–605
Aziz T, Jilaihawi A, Prakash D (2002) The management of malignant pleural mesothelioma; single centre experience in 10 years. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 22(2):298–305
Bovolato P, Casadio C, Billè A, Ardissone F, Santambrogio L, Ratto GB et al (2014) Does surgery improve survival of patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma?: a multicenter retrospective analysis of 1365 consecutive patients. J Thorac Oncol 9(3):390–396. https://doi.org/10.1097/JTO.0000000000000064
Branscheid D, Krysa S, Bauer E, Bülzebruck H, Schirren J (1991) Diagnostic and therapeutic strategy in malignant pleural mesothelioma. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 5(9):466–472 (discussion 473).
de Vries WJ1, Long MA (2003) Treatment of mesothelioma in Bloemfontein, South Africa. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 24(3):434–440
Flores RM, Pass HI, Seshan VE, Dycoco J, Zakowski M, Carbone M, et al (2008) Extrapleural pneumonectomy versus pleurectomy/decortication in the surgical management of malignant pleural mesothelioma: results in 663 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 135(3):620–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.10.054(626.e1–3)
Hashimoto M, Yamamoto H, Endo S, Okada M, Miyata H, Hasegawa S, Chida M (2021) Japanese current status of curative-intent surgery for malignant pleural mesothelioma. Ann Thorac Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.04.042
Kanayama M, Mori M, Matsumiya H, Taira A, Shinohara S, Takenaka M, Kuroda K, Tanaka F (2022) Surgical strategy for malignant pleural mesothelioma: the superiority of pleurectomy/decortication. Surg Today. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-021-02437-9
Kostron A, Friess M, Inci I, Hillinger S, Schneiter D, Gelpke H et al (2017) Propensity matched comparison of extrapleural pneumonectomy and pleurectomy/decortication for mesothelioma patients. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 24(5):740–746. https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivw422
Lang-Lazdunski L, Bille A, Lal R, Cane P, McLean E, Landau D et al (2012) Pleurectomy/decortication is superior to extrapleural pneumonectomy in the multimodality management of patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. J Thorac Oncol 7(4):737–743. https://doi.org/10.1097/JTO.0b013e31824ab6c5
Luckraz H, Rahman M, Patel N, Szafranek A, Gibbs AR, Butchart EG (2010) Three decades of experience in the surgical multi-modality management of pleural mesothelioma. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 37(3):552–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.07.032 (Epub 2009 Aug 29)
Miyazaki T, Yamasaki N, Tsuchiya T, Matsumoto K, Kamohara R, Hatachi G et al (2018) Is pleurectomy/decortication superior to extrapleural pneumonectomy for patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma? A single-institutional experience. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 24(2):81–88. https://doi.org/10.5761/atcs.oa.17-00192 (Epub 2018 Jan 23)
Okada M, Mimura T, Ohbayashi C, Sakuma T, Soejima T, Tsubota N (2008) Radical surgery for malignant pleural mesothelioma: results and prognosis. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 7(1):102–106
Pass HI, Kranda K, Temeck BK, Feuerstein I, Steinberg SM (1997) Surgically debulked malignant pleural mesothelioma: results and prognostic factors. Ann Surg Oncol 4(3):215–222
Rena O, Casadio C (2012) Extrapleural pneumonectomy for early stage malignant pleural mesothelioma: a harmful procedure. Lung Cancer 77(1):151–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2011.12.009
Schipper PH, Nichols FC, Thomse KM, Deschamps C, Cassivi SD, Allen MS, et al (2008) Malignant pleural mesothelioma: surgical management in 285 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 85(1):257–64 (discussion 264)
Sharkey AJ, Tenconi S, Nakas A, Waller DA (2016) The effects of an intentional transition from extrapleural pneumonectomy to extended pleurectomy/decortication. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 49(6):1632–1641. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezv403
Verma V, Ahern CA, Berlind CG, Lindsay WD, Sharma S, Shabason J et al (2017) National cancer database report on pneumonectomy versus lung-sparing surgery for malignant pleural mesothelioma. J Thorac Oncol 12(11):1704–1714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2017.08.012
Zhou N, Rice DC, Tsao AS, Lee PP, Haymaker CL, Corsini EM, Antonoff MB, Hofstetter WL, Rajaram R, Roth JA, Swisher SG, Vaporciyan AA, Walsh GL, Mehran RJ, Sepesi B (2022) Extrapleural pneumonectomy versus pleurectomy/decortication for malignant pleural mesothelioma. Ann Thorac Surg 113(1):200–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.04.078
Rusch V, Baldini EH, Bueno R, De Perrot M, Flores R, Hasegawa SJ (2013) The role of surgical cytoreduction in the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma: meeting summary of the International Mesothelioma Interest Group Congress, September 11–14, 2012, Boston. Mass Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 145(4):909–910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.01.039
Funding
The participating authors declare no sources of financial reports that require acknowledgement.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
DEM contributed to the conception/design of the work, the acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data, drafting, revising, and final approval of the manuscript. PAZ contributed to the design, acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data, revising, and final approval of the manuscript. AAR contributed to the acquisition/analysis of data, drafting, revising, and final approval of the manuscript. DK contributed to the acquisition/analysis of data, drafting, revising, and final approval of the manuscript. VV and IP contributed to the design, the acquisition/analysis of data, drafting, revising, and final approval of the manuscript. KS contributed to the analysis of data, revising, and final approval of the manuscript. TA contributed to the conception/design of the work, the interpretation of data, drafting, revising, and final approval of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Ethical approval
Does not apply.
human and animals statement
Not applicable.
Informed consent
Does not apply.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Magouliotis, D.E., Zotos, PA., Rad, A.A. et al. Meta-analysis of survival after extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) versus pleurectomy/decortication (P/D) for malignant pleural mesothelioma in the context of macroscopic complete resection (MCR). Updates Surg 74, 1827–1837 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-022-01369-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-022-01369-4