Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy: how we have standardized the technique (with video)

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Updates in Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Minimally invasive pancreatectomy has increased worldwide over the last decade. Despite refinement in the technique, laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy (LPD) is still technically challenging and the standardization of the technique might increase its implementation and oncological outcomes and decrease postoperative complications, as well. Giving our experience, which was shown in the PADULAP trial and after refinement of the technique, we present here a standardized technique of LPD including technical steps, tips and videos for pancreatic head adenocarcinoma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Schwarz JL, Hogg ME (2021) Current state of minimally invasive pancreatic surgery. J Surg Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.26412

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Oguro S, Yoshimoto J, Imamura H, Ishizaki Y, Kawasaki S (2017) Three hundred and sixty-eight consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies with zero mortality. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 24:226–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Otsubo T, Kobayashi S, Sano K, Misawsa T, Ota T, Katagiri S, Yanaga K, Yamaue H, Kokudo N, Unno M, Fujimoto J, Miura F, Miyazaki M, Yamamoto M (2017) Safety-related outcomes of the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery board certification system for expert surgeons. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 24:252–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Satoi S, Yamamoto T, Yoshitomi H, Motoi F, Kawai M, Fujii T, Wada K, Arimitsu H, Sho M, Matsumoto I, Hirano S, Yanagimoto H, Ohtsuka M, Unno M, Yamaue H, Kon M (2017) Developing better practices at the institutional level leads to better outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy in 3378 patients: domestic audit of the Japanese Society of Pancreatic Surgery. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 24:501–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Poves I, Burdío F, Morató O, Iglesias M, Radosevic A, Ilzarbe L, Visa L, Grande L (2018) Comparison of perioperative outcomes between laparoscopic and open approach for pancreatoduodenectomy: the PADULAP randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 268(5):731–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors would like to thank also Ignasi Poves for his effort and dedication to the developement of this technique. Without him this approach couldn’t have been standardized at our center.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Study conception and design: BI, FB, PS, LG. Acquisition of data: BI, FB. Analysis and interpretation of data: LG. FB. Drafting of manuscript: BI, FB, PS.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benedetto Ielpo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All the authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

This article does not contain any experimental studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent is not required for this type of study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file 1 (MP4 85753 KB)

Supplementary file 2 (MOV 42199 KB)

Supplementary file 3 (MP4 108093 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ielpo, B., Sanchez, P., Grande, L. et al. Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy: how we have standardized the technique (with video). Updates Surg 74, 1479–1481 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-021-01235-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-021-01235-9

Keywords

Navigation