Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The role of endocervicoscopy in women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a systematic review of the literature

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Updates in Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Endocervicoscopy is an alternative diagnostic tool to endocervical curettage for the diagnostic workup of repeatedly positive cervicovaginal cytology suggestive of a high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) and negative or unsatisfactory colposcopy. The aim of this review is to summarize the current evidence on the diagnostic accuracy of endocervicoscopy in women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in the presence of nonvisible squamocolumnar junction with unsatisfactory colposcopy. A systematic review of literature was performed by searching in the main electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, ClinicalTrial.gov, OVID and Cochrane Library), from their inception to January 2021 for studies testing endocervicoscopy. Risk of Bias Assessment was performed. Four articles were included: three prospective and one retrospective cohort studies. Data on the endocervicoscopy accuracy, the accuracy and reliability correlation with definitive histology, the cone biopsy dimension after endocervicoscopy, the comparison between endocervicoscopy and curettage and the lesion missed were analyzed. Based on our results, the limit of this technique is the low predictive value that does not allow it to replace the colposcopy. Nevertheless, it could help to define the characteristics and localization of cervical-suspected lesions. However, further studies are needed to clarify its use and indication.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cervical Cancer (2012) Estimated incidence, mortality and prevalence worldwide in 2012. International Agency for Research on Cancer and World Health Organization

  2. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P (2005) Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 55:74–7108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kamangar F, Dores GM, Anderson WF (2006) Patterns of cancer incidence, mortality, and prevalence across five continents: defining priorities to reduce cancer disparities in different geographic regions of the world. J Clin Oncol 24:2137–2150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D (2011) Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 61(2):69–90. Erratum in: CA Cancer J Clin. 2011 Mar–Apr 61(2):134

  5. Bray F, Loos AH, McCarron P, Weiderpass E, Arbyn M, Møller H et al (2005) Trends in cervical squamous cell carcinoma incidence in 13 European countries: changing risk and the effects of screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 14(3):677–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. De Rosa N, Lavitola G, Della Corte L, Bifulco G (2020) Diagnostic accuracy of endocervicoscopy in identifying and grading cervical intraepithelial neoplasia lesion. Gynecol Obstet Invest 85(2):196–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rahimi S, Marani C, Gardner F, Yeoh CC, Akaev I, Votano S (2018) Endocervicoscopy and biopsy to detect cervical intraepithelial squamous neoplasia in nonvisible squamocolumnar junction with unsatisfactory colposcopy: a pilot study. Technol Cancer Res Treat 1(17):1533034617753811

    Google Scholar 

  8. Di Spiezio SA, De Rosa N, Bifulco G, Piccoli R, Nappi C (2012) Endocervicoscopy: an important diagnostic tool in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia undergoing LLETZ. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 91(6):760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lavitola G, Della Corte L, De Rosa N, Nappi C, Bifulco G (2020) Effects on vaginal microbiota restoration and cervical epithelialization in positive HPV patients undergoing vaginal treatment with Carboxy-Methyl-Beta-Glucan. Biomed Res Int 27(2020):5476389

    Google Scholar 

  10. Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D, Kwiatkowski F, Panis Y, Chipponi J (2003) Methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS). Development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg 73:712–716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. De Franciscis P, La Manna V, Schiattarella A, Ambrosio D, Labriola D, Procaccianti R et al (2018) Diagnostic accuracy of endocervicoscopy as preoperative tool to improve the excisional treatment of cervical preneoplastic lesions. Minerva Ginecol 70(4):364–370

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bifulco G, Piccoli R, Lavitola G, Di Spiezio SA, Spinelli M, Cavallaro A et al (2010) Endocervicoscopy: a new technique for the diagnostic work-up of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia allowing a tailored excisional therapy in young fertile women. Fertil Steril 94(7):2726–2731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fontham ETH, Wolf AMD, Church TR, Etzioni R, Flowers CR, Herzig A et al (2020) Cervical cancer screening for individuals at average risk: 2020 guideline update from the American Cancer Society. CA Cancer J Clin 70(5):321–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Marth C, Landoni F, Mahner S, McCormack M, Gonzalez-Martin A, Colombo N, ESMO Guidelines Committee (2017) Cervical cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 28:iv72

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (2016) Reproductive Outcomes after Local Treatment for Preinvasive Cervical Disease. Scientific Impact Paper No. 21 July 2016

  16. Sasieni P, Castanon A, Landy R, Kyrgiou M, Kitchener H, Quigley M et al (2016) Risk of preterm birth following surgical treatment for cervical disease: executive summary of a recent symposium. BJOG 123(9):1426–1429

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Noehr B, Jensen A, Frederiksen K, Tabor A, Kjaer SK (2009) Depth of cervical cone removed by loop electrosurgical excision procedure and subsequent risk of spontaneous preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol 114(6):1232–1238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jheng YC, Wang YP, Lin HE, Sung KY, Chu YC, Wang HS et al (2021) A novel machine learning-based algorithm to identify and classify lesions and anatomical landmarks in colonoscopy images. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08331-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No financial support was received for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luigi Della Corte.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Dr. Della Corte, Dr. Mercorio, Dr. Giampaolino, Dr. Vitale, Dr. Vizzielli, Professor Bifulco and Dr. Lavitola, have no conflicts of interest or financial conflicts to disclose.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

For this type of study, no informed consent is required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Della Corte, L., Mercorio, A., Giampaolino, P. et al. The role of endocervicoscopy in women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a systematic review of the literature. Updates Surg 74, 1239–1245 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-021-01193-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-021-01193-2

Keywords

Navigation