Skip to main content
Log in

The extent of colorectal resection and short-term outcomes in patients with ulcerative colitis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Updates in Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

There is limited literature on the impact of the extent of resection on short-term outcomes in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) in an elective setting. The aim of this study was to better understand the impact of approach and extent of resection on short-term outcomes for patients undergoing total proctocolectomy (TPC) and subtotal colectomy (STC) for UC.

Methods

Patients with UC who underwent elective TPC or STC were captured from the ACS-NSQIP® 2011–2018 database and divided into four cohorts: Open TPC (O-TPC), Laparoscopic TPC (L-STC), Open STC (O-STC), and Laparoscopic STC (L-STC). Baseline and perioperative variables were compared between the four groups alongside 30-day mortality and 30-day complication rates.

Results

Of 3387 patients, 368 (10.9%) underwent O-STC, 406 (12%) underwent O-TPC, 1958 (58%) underwent L-STC, and 655 (19%) underwent L-TPC. Overall rate of prolonged length of stay (LOS) was 27% and 9% needed a blood transfusion. There was no difference in the risk of complications between open TPC and open STC. Those who had open surgery had a higher risk of complications and prolonged LOS. Patients who had L-TPC had prolonged LOS compared to patients who had L-STC, but less compared to those who had O-STC.

Conclusion

Elective surgery for UC is associated with high rates of prolonged LOS and blood transfusion despite MIS approaches. Short-term outcomes and LOS are more impacted by the operative approach than the extent of resection. Despite this laparoscopic TPC has higher rates of prolonged LOS when compared to laparoscopic STC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abou Khalil M, Boutros M, Nedjar H, Morin N, Ghitulescu G, Vasilevsky CA, Gordon P, Rahme E (2018) Incidence rates and predictors of colectomy for ulcerative colitis in the era of biologics: results from a Provincial database. J Gastrointest Surg 22(1):124–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-017-3530-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Murphy B, Kavanagh DO, Winter DC (2020) Modern surgery for ulcerative colitis. Updates Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-020-00719-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Causey MW, Stoddard D, Johnson EK, Maykel JA, Martin MJ, Rivadeneira D, Steele SR (2013) Laparoscopy impacts outcomes favorably following colectomy for ulcerative colitis: a critical analysis of the ACS-NSQIP database. Surg Endosc 27(2):603–609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2498-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ingraham AM, Richards KE, Hall BL, Ko CY (2010) Quality improvement in surgery: the American College of surgeons national surgical quality improvement program approach. Adv Surg 44:251–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yasu.2010.05.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Shiloach M, Frencher SK Jr, Steeger JE, Rowell KS, Bartzokis K, Tomeh MG, Richards KE, Ko CY, Hall BL (2010) Toward robust information: data quality and inter-rater reliability in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg 210(1):6–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.09.031

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Loftus EV Jr, Delgado DJ, Friedman HS, Sandborn WJ (2008) Colectomy and the incidence of postsurgical complications among ulcerative colitis patients with private health insurance in the United States. Am J Gastroenterol 103(7):1737–1745. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.01867.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pędziwiatr M, Mavrikis J, Witowski J, Adamos A, Major P, Nowakowski M, Budzyński A (2018) Current status of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in gastrointestinal surgery. Med Oncol (Northwood, London, England) 35(6):95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-018-1153-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Baker DM, Folan AM, Lee MJ, Jones GL, Brown SR, Lobo AJ (2020) A systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes after elective surgery for ulcerative colitis. Colorectal Dis. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.15301

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Buchs NC, Bloemendaal ALA, Wood CPJ, Travis S, Mortensen NJ, Guy RJ, George BD (2017) Subtotal colectomy for ulcerative colitis: lessons learned from a tertiary centre. Colorectal Dis 19(5):O153–O161. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.13658

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chung TP, Fleshman JW, Birnbaum EH, Hunt SR, Dietz DW, Read TE, Mutch MG (2009) Laparoscopic vs. open total abdominal colectomy for severe colitis: impact on recovery and subsequent completion restorative proctectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 52 (1):4–10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181975701

  11. Waljee A, Waljee J, Morris AM, Higgins PD (2006) Threefold increased risk of infertility: a meta-analysis of infertility after ileal pouch anal anastomosis in ulcerative colitis. Gut 55(11):1575–1580. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2005.090316

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Gorgun E, Remzi FH, Goldberg JM, Thornton J, Bast J, Hull TL, Loparo B, Fazio VW (2004) Fertility is reduced after restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis: a study of 300 patients. Surgery 136(4):795–803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2004.06.018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lepisto A, Sarna S, Tiitinen A, Jarvinen HJ (2007) Female fertility and childbirth after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. Br J Surg 94(4):478–482. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.5509

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bartels SA, Gardenbroek TJ, Ubbink DT, Buskens CJ, Tanis PJ, Bemelman WA (2013) Systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open colectomy with end ileostomy for non-toxic colitis. Br J Surg 100(6):726–733. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9061

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Abd El Aziz MA, Grass F, Behm KT, Shawki S, D’Angelo A-L, Mathis KL, Larson DW (2020) Trends of complications and innovative techniques’ utilization for colectomies in the United States. Updat Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-020-00862-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Abd El Aziz MA, Grass F, Perry W, Behm KT, Shawki SF, Larson DW, Mathis KL (2020) Colectomy for patients with super obesity: current practice and surgical morbidity in the United States. Surg Obesity Relat Dis. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2020.06.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin T. Behm.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

This article does not contain any experimental studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

For this type of study formal consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abd El Aziz, M.A., Perry, W.R.G., Grass, F. et al. The extent of colorectal resection and short-term outcomes in patients with ulcerative colitis. Updates Surg 73, 1429–1434 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-021-01040-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-021-01040-4

Keywords

Navigation