Skip to main content
Log in

A novel patient-centered protocol to reduce hospital readmissions for dehydration after ileostomy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Updates in Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Early hospital readmission for dehydration represents a relevant problem among patients with diverting or terminal ileostomy. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of a new multidisciplinary individualized multistep protocol in terms of reduction of hospital readmission for dehydration. Since January 2016, our institution adopted a new protocol for patients with ileostomy. Protocol key points were: preoperative personalized education in stoma management; early recognition of dehydration symptoms; multidisciplinary counseling; patient autonomy in stoma management through post-operative recall schedule. The study compared a series of consecutive patients treated before (2014–2015) and after (2016–2017) the protocol application. The primary endpoint was hospital readmission rate after protocol use. The secondary endpoint was the identification of possible risk factors for readmission. The entire cohort was composed of 296 patients, 129 in the protocol group and 167 in the control one. The two groups were homogeneous for baseline characteristics. Hospital readmission rate within 30 days post-discharge for dehydration dropped from 9 to 3.9% after protocol application. Specifically, the number of avoided potential readmissions was 29/129 (22.4%). The number needed to treat (NNT) was 20. Univariate analysis identified three relevant variables: patient comorbidities, diuretics use as risk factors and protocol application as the protective one. The multivariate analysis confirmed patient comorbidity as the risk factor. Dehydration related to ileostomy is a potentially avoidable problem, by employing preventive strategies, especially in high-risk patients. Our new protocol could be a simple and cost-saving method, effective in preventing hospital readmissions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shabbir J, Britton DC (2010) Stoma complications: a literature review. Colorectal Dis 12(10):958–964

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Parma KL, Zammit M, Smith A et al (2011) A prospective audit of early stoma complications in colorectal cancer treatment throughout the greater Manchester and Cheshire colorectal cancer network. Colorectal Dis 13(8):935–938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hill GL, Mair WS, Goligher JC (1975) Cause and management of high volume output salt-depleting ileostomy. Br J Surg 62:720–726

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gallagher ND, Harrison DD, Skyring AP (1962) Fluid and electrolyte disturbances in patients with long-established ileostomies. Gut 3:219–223

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Clarke AM, Chirnside A, Hill GL, Pope G, Stewart MK (1967) Chronic dehydration and sodium depletion in patients with established ileostomies. Lancet 2:740–743

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Messaris E, Sehgal R, Deiling S et al (2012) Dehydration is the most common indication for readmission after diverting ileostomy creation. Dis Colon Rectum 55:175–180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Paquette IM, Solan P, Rafferty JF, Ferguson MA, Davis BR (2013) Readmission for dehydration or renal failure after ileostomy creation. Dis Colon Rectum 56:974–979

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hayden DM, Pinzon MC, Francescatti AB et al (2013) Hospital readmission for fluid and electrolyte abnormalities following ileostomy construction: preventable or unpredictable? J Gastrointest Surg 17:298–303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fish DR, Mancuso CA, Garcia-Aguilar JE, Lee SW, Nash GM, Sonoda T, Carlson ME, Temple LK (2017) Readmission after ileostomy creation: retrospective review of a common and significant event. Ann Surg 265(2):379–387

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Nagle D, Pare T, Keenan E, Marcet K, Tizio S, Poylin V (2012) Ileostomy pathway virtually eliminates readmissions for dehydration in new ostomates. Dis Colon Rectum 55:1266–1272

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hardiman KM, Reames CD, McLeod MC (2016) Patients autonomy-centered self are checklist reduces hospital readmissions after ileostomy creation. Surgery 160:1302–1308

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Shaffer VO, Owi T, Kumarusamy MA, Sullivan PS, Srinivasan JK, Maithel SK, Staley CA, Sweeney JF, Esper G (2017) Decreasing hospital readmission in ileostomy patients: results of Novel Pilot Program. J Am Coll Surg 224(4):425–430

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Florida CV (2001) Dietary choices of peoples with ostomies. Wound, ostomies and continence nurses society 28(1):28–31

    Google Scholar 

  14. Iqbal A, Raza A, Huang E, Goldstein L, Hughes SJ, Tan SA (2017) Cost effectiveness of a novel attempt to reduce readmission after ileostomy creation. JSLS 21(1):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Laganà AS, Vitale SG, Trovato MA, Triolo O et al (2016) Full-thickness excision versus shaving by laparoscopy for intestinal deep infiltrating endometriosis: rationale and potential treatment options. Biomed Res Int 2016:3617179

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Dong C, Ngu WS, Wakefield SE (2015) Endometriosis masquerading as Crohn’s disease in a patient with acute small bowel obstruction. BMJ Case Rep. https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2014-207229

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Vitale SG, Capriglione S, Zito G, Laganà AS et al (2019) Management of endometrial, ovarian and cervical cancer in the elderly: current approach to a challenging condition. Arch Gynecol Obstet 299(2):299–315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Shuurman MS, Kruitwagen RFPM, Portielje JEA, van der Aa MA et al (2018) Treatment and outcome of elderly patients with advanced stage ovarian cancer: a nationwide analysis. Gynecol Oncol 149(2):270–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Federica Gonella.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained by all patients who participated to the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gonella, F., Valenti, A., Massucco, P. et al. A novel patient-centered protocol to reduce hospital readmissions for dehydration after ileostomy. Updates Surg 71, 515–521 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-019-00643-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-019-00643-2

Keywords

Navigation