Skip to main content
Log in

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: do risk factors for a prolonged length of stay exist?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Updates in Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Gallstones are one of the most common morbidities in the world. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the gold standard for gallbladder stones’ removal. Few studies focus on the existence of predictive factors aimed at facilitating cholecystectomy in a day surgery setting. The aim of this retrospective study was to identify clinical factors that could guide day-surgery laparoscopic cholecystectomy safety. The study included 985 consecutive patients who underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallstone disease between May 2006 and February 2015. Patients were divided into two groups: group A with a length of stay ≤ 2 days (922 patients); group B with a length of stay > 2 days (63 patients). Univariate analysis showed that age, sex and the presence of obesity, cardiological, and nephrological comorbidities had a higher likelihood of a longer hospital stay. The logistic regression model showed that only age was a significant predictor of a longer stay. No complication has reached the statistical significance of extending the length of stay in group B. Conversely, the presence of such comorbidities has influenced the hospitalization. Our results allow the identification of a category of patients at high risk of hospitalization within 1 or 2 days from treatment. Moreover, we reported that there is no complication specifically affecting the length of stay. Our findings support the idea that a prolonged length of stay is not linked to the surgical procedure but to the patient’s comorbidities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shaffer EA (2005) Epidemiology and risk factors for gallstone disease: has the paradigm changed in the 21st century? Curr Gastroenterol Rep 7:132–140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schirmer BD, Winters KL, Edlich RF (2005) Cholelithiasis and cholecystitis. J Long Term Eff Med Implants 15:329–338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Everhart JE, Khare M, Hill M, Maurer KR (1999) Prevalence and ethnic differences in gallbladder disease in the United States. Gastroenterology 117:632–639

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tazuma S (2006) Gallstone disease: epidemiology, pathogenesis, and classification of biliary stones (common bile duct and intrahepatic). Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 20:1075–1083

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Legorreta AP, Silber JH, Costantino GN, Kobylinski RW, Zatz SL (1993) Increased cholecystectomy rate after the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Med Assoc 270(12):1429–1432

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Steiner CA, Bass EB, Talamini MA, Pitt HA, Steinberg EP (1994) Surgical rates and operative mortality for open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Maryland. N Engl J Med 330(6):403–408

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sandler RS, Everhart JE, Donowitz M et al (2002) The burden of selected digestive diseases in the United States. Gastroenterology 122:1500–1511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Everhart JE, Ruhl CE (2009) Burden of digestive diseases in the United States part I: overall and upper gastrointestinal diseases. Gastroenterology 136:376–386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Petelin JB (1993) Laparoscopic approach to common duct pathology. Am J Surg 165(4):487–491

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Crawford DL, Phillips EH (1999) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. World J Surg 23(4):343–349

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dooms GC, Fisher MR, Higgins CB, Hricak H, Goldberg HI, Margulis AR (1986) MR imaging of the dilated biliary tract. Radiology 158(2):337–341

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Glenn F (1971) Biliary tract disease since antiquity. Bull N Y Acad Med 47(4):329–350

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Yamakawa T, Fukuda N (2000) History of surgery for cholelithiasis: from the era of cholecystostomy to laparoscopic surgery. Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 101(12):877–881

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sims JM (1878) Remarks on cholecystotomy in dropsy of the gallbladder. Br Med J 1(910):811–815

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Kocher T (1878) Manskopf empyem der gallenblase, HeilUng durch inzision. Cor-BI f Schweiz Basel Aerzte 6:577

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chauvin KL, O’Leary JP (1995) Carl Langenbuch and the first cholecystectomy. Am Surg 61(8):746–747

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mouret P (1996) How I developed laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Acad Med Singapore 25(5):744–747

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. NIH (1993) NIH consensus development panel on gallstones and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Med Assoc 269(8):1018–1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cervantes J, Rojas G, Anton J (1997) Changes in gallbladder surgery: comparative study 4 years before and 4 years after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg 21(2):201–204

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Deziel DJ, Millikan KW, Economou SG, Doolas A, Ko ST, Airan MC (1993) Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a national survey of 4292 hospitals and an analysis of 77604 cases. Am J Surg 165(1):9–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Shea JA, Healey MJ, Berlin JA, Clarke JR, Malet PF, Staroscik RN et al (1996) Mortality and complications associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A meta-analysis. Ann Surg 224(5):609–620

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Lochman P, Hoffmann P, Kočí J (2012) Elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a 75-year-old woman with situs viscerum inversus totalis. Videosurg Miniinv 7:216–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bitner M, Jaszewski R, Jander S et al (2013) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy delayed by complicated myocardial infarction with papillary muscle rupture, and performed after unique complex mitral repair. Videosurg Miniinv 8:170–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Soper NJ, Stockmann PT, Dunnegan DL, Ashley SW (1992) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The new ‘gold standard’? Arch Surg 127:917–921 (discussion 921–923)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Leeder PC, Matthews T, Krzeminska K, Dehn TC (2004) Routine day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 91:312–316

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tenconi SM, Boni L, Colombo EM, Dionigi G, Rovera F, Cassinotti E (2008) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy as day-surgery procedure: current indications and patients’ selection. Int J Surg 6(Suppl 1):S86–S88

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Fuks D, Cosse C, Sabbagh C, Lignier D, Degraeve C, Regimbeau JM (2014) Can we consider day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis? Identification of potentially eligible patients. J Surg Res 186(1):142–149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Victorzon M, Tolonen P, Vuorialho T (2007) Day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy: treatment of choice for selected patients? Surg Endosc 21(1):70–73

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ammori BJ, Davides D, Vezakis A, Martin IG, Larvin M, Smith S, Gibson JS, McMahon MJ (2003) Day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective evaluation of a 6-year experience. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 10(4):303–308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Stephenson BM, Callander C, Sage M, Vellacott KD (1993) Feasibility of ‘day case’ laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 75(4):249–251

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Prasad A, Foley RJ (1996) Day case laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a safe and cost effective procedure. Eur J Surg 162(1):43–46

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Campanelli G, Cavagnoli R, Cioffi U, De Simone M, Fabbiani M, Pietri P (1998) Can laparoscopic cholecystectomy be a day surgery procedure? Hepatogastroenterology. 45(23):1422–1429

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Al-Omani S, Almodhaiberi H, Ali B, Alballa A, Alsowaina K, Alhasan I, Algarni A, Alharbi H, Degna H, Alarma MR (2015) Feasibility and safety of day-surgery laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a single-institution 5-year experience of 1140 cases. Korean J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 19(3):109–112

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paolo Luffarelli.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

No ethical approval was necessary according to Italian law.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

No informed consent was necessary according to Italian law.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ripetti, V., Luffarelli, P., Santoni, S. et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: do risk factors for a prolonged length of stay exist?. Updates Surg 71, 471–476 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-019-00641-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-019-00641-4

Keywords

Navigation